Hey Kathy-Jo

Ray wrote:
". . . posts that keep harping about everyone’s training methods as being unrealistic and equivalent to dry swimming methods etc. etc. are really of no use to anyone and merely stop most people from getting involved in this forum . . . "

Why not speak for yourself and not everyone else? But I can appreciate why you and others might find this annoying – because it calls into question the foundations of your belief system. Many want to believe the myths that have been perpetrated on us, including that they can become better fighters without fighting. They don’t like wake-up calls; they want to remain in their cozy, “safe” world, removed from the brutality, violence, and intensity of fighting, with their titles and certificates, deferring to their “master”, extolling their “lineage”, patting each other on the back in nurturing ways, basking in the cleverness and the superiority of what they do, teaching others the theory, secrets and richness of their “deadly” martial art. However, if someone’s concern is the same as mine – actually increasing their fighting ability via WCK, in other words, performance results, I think that my comments may be of interest. I believe in a put-up-or-shut-up, test-everything-you-do approach not a believe-what-you’re-told, group-hug approach.

Moreover, IMO this issue is the main underlying source of most of the WCK communites “problems” and most “issues” that pop up can be traced directly back to it. As long as folks aren’t fighting as part of their training, all those “issues” will remain with WCK – it is the fighting that clears up the BS (dry-land swimmers can discuss or argue ad nauseum about swimming; actually swimming renders most of that moot). Hence why you don’t see the same “problems” in boxing or BJJ or muay thai, etc. And, the fact of the matter is that WCK is basically a laughing stock among the fighting arts, and properly so IMO. The people that I know that practice WCK as a GENUINE fighting art are typically embarrassed to tell other fighters they practice WCK because of its negative reputation. As long as WCK is populated primarily by nonfighting theoreticians, our reputation is going to continue to decline.
I guess in your view that shouldn’t concern anyone either.

Terence writes:

>The people that I know that practice WCK as a GENUINE fighting >art are typically embarrassed to tell other fighters they practice >WCK because of its negative reputation.

And that of all the arts that have placed social and cultural issues in front of those of application.

And yeah, very embarrassed.

Andrew

Quote t_neihoff:
"Many want to believe the myths that have been perpetrated on us, including that they can become better fighters without fighting. They don’t like wake-up calls; they want to remain in their cozy, “safe” world, removed from the brutality, violence, and intensity of fighting, with their titles and certificates, deferring to their “master”, extolling their “lineage”, patting each other on the back in nurturing ways, basking in the cleverness and the superiority of what they do, teaching others the theory, secrets and richness of their “deadly” martial art. "

Some of this is true. People in WC cannot live off the arts reputation, or their instructors, and just sign up for a class and expect to be able to fight.

As for these so called issues regarding Wing Chun’s reputation as a fighting art, to what are you referring to? Most Martial Artist’s that I have meet have never even heard of WC. The one’s that have are always curious about it and would love to study it someday. We just had a 2nd degree TKD player join the school, and he said he always wanted to train in WC because he was curious about the training and technique. Dan Inosanto has himself stated that WC is a very good system of MA. A student in the school met up with Tito Ortiz at a function he was putting on in the city. When the student asked him if he fought anyone really good, like a WC fighter, Tito said no he hasn’t fought any WC players yet, he did not laugh in his face and say how bad WC is for fighting. I met Bill Wallace a few years ago and he saw a demo we were in at a kickboxing event, and he commented that he really liked what he saw and that it was very good for self-defense. Now it’s not that I or any of us on this forum need to hear these things, I just use it as examples. So once again, I’m not sure what your talking about t_neihoff regarding WC’s bad rep in the MA.

James

Originally posted by t_niehoff
[B]Ray wrote:
". . . posts that keep harping about everyone’s training methods as being unrealistic and equivalent to dry swimming methods etc. etc. are really of no use to anyone and merely stop most people from getting involved in this forum . . . "

Why not speak for yourself and not everyone else? But I can appreciate why you and others might find this annoying – because it calls into question the foundations of your belief system

some deleted.

The people that I know that practice WCK as a GENUINE fighting art are typically embarrassed to tell other fighters they practice WCK because of its negative reputation. As long as WCK is populated primarily by nonfighting theoreticians, our reputation is going to continue to decline.
I guess in your view that shouldn’t concern anyone either. [/B]

I am not annoyed at all at the dry land swimming comment. I am suggesting that these comments can be put in a more positive constructive manner. For example Bruce Lee made those comments and then wrote about his Jeet Kune Do ideas for being more effective. So his comments had a constructive element.

We have people who cross train with kickboxers and other competitive arts. They don’t feel inferior to anyone. We have people who have used Wing Chun a lot on the street, as part of their law enforcement job, another as part of his correctional institute job and one who worked for an Asian drug gang. We have people who have entered the tournaments against other styles and did reasonably well. No one here is embarrassed that they practice Wing Chun. Two people here fought as part of their living using Wing Chun for certain organizations in Vancouver and Hong Kong. They are very fighting effective and have never bothered with BJJ. So don’t assume everyone doesn’t understand about fighting.

If you read my notes, I never disagreed that some people should do reality fighting. But my point is that what you are saying is OK but being more constructive is better. For an example, look at Ernie’s post. It gives some good information while at the same time pushing the reality model. In any martial arts discipline a small percentage are real fighters and a larger percentage just do it for recreation. Without the real fighters the art wouldn’t have existed in the first place.

My idea is that this forum could be more constructive. Other martial arts say Wing Chun is crap and leave it at that. That’s another example of non constructive criticism. In the past we also had comments like WT is no good, William Cheung’s system is no good etc. That type of talk doesn’t help anything.

If someone wrote about their experiences in the ring in a positive way to say what they learned and how it affected their Wing Chun etc. that would be much better. I think politics and pure criticism isn’t that usefull except as a starting point to get discussion going.

The dry land swimming thing was talked about by Bruce Lee and so Jeet Kune Do evolved. Yet those people don’t have anymore success than do wing Chun people. In fact most of the arts one can name don’t have a good showing in the Ultimate fighting competitions. Yet I think most of the arts have people who can fight on the street. How can you prove that? You can’t.

So let’s have some practical ideas that go beyond going to the local gym to get your head pounded in by professional boxers in order to learn that Chi sau doesn’t help in a boxing match. Conversely boxing doesn’t help in a chi sau match too.

Alpha Males and the ash heap of history

And, the fact of the matter is that WCK is basically a laughing stock among the fighting arts, and properly so IMO. The people that I know that practice WCK as a GENUINE fighting art are typically embarrassed to tell other fighters they practice WCK because of its negative reputation. As long as WCK is populated primarily by nonfighting theoreticians, our reputation is going to continue to decline.

Well it is only going to decline if the true alpha male @ss kickers don’t hold up their end of the bargain and start delivering beatdowns to their non WCK friends that laugh at them.:rolleyes:

It shouldn’t be that studying WCK is about self-esteem through the admiration of others. “Gosh, you study Wing Chun? Man, you must be a hard @ss!”

There is always going to be a spectrum of people practicing all arts for a variety of reasons, just as their will be a spectrum of skill level as well.

Boxing has it’s tomato cans and I’d wager BJJ and Muay Thai do as well.

I’m all for theory AND application. But being condescending to those who aren’t doing cage fights isn’t going to improve the state of WC in terms of how it is taught and transmitted.

The funny thing is you are chastising students rather than their instructors. Our collective expectation is that the people who love to fight and who study Wing Chun will continue to enter cage fights and win and improve the “reputation” of Wing Chun, thereby saving it from the ash heap of history.

And that is way cool–it doesn’t do anything for my personal WCK UNLESS I adapt their training approaches to my own development.

If I don’t, well then it’s my loss.

In closing I’d like to propose a new hierarchy of respect and authority for WCK people:

  1. Those who have killed multiple people using WCK.
  2. Those who have killed one person using WCK.
  3. Those who have injured someone in a streetfight using WCK
  4. Those who have won a streetfight using WCK.
  5. Those who have won a major MMA event using WCK.
  6. Those who have won a minor MMA event using WCK.
  7. Those who train for fighting a resisting opponent using WCK.
  8. Those who don’t train for fighting using a resisting opponent.
  9. Those who don’t train at all, but simply talk about WCK

:smiley:

Re: Alpha Males and the ash heap of history

Originally posted by planetwc
[B]
In closing I’d like to propose a new hierarchy of respect and authority for WCK people:

  1. Those who have killed multiple people using WCK.
  2. Those who have killed one person using WCK.
  3. Those who have injured someone in a streetfight using WCK
  4. Those who have won a streetfight using WCK.
  5. Those who have won a major MMA event using WCK.
  6. Those who have won a minor MMA event using WCK.
  7. Those who train for fighting a resisting opponent using WCK.
  8. Those who don’t train for fighting using a resisting opponent.
  9. Those who don’t train at all, but simply talk about WCK

:smiley: [/B]

That’s a great idea for a new decent ranking system for Wing Chun. And that’s just to get to the black belt level. I can’t imagine what goes beyond that but probably enters into the terrorist realm.

d amn now I have to go out and kill multiple attackers with weapons during a hurricane
while standing on one leg and reading the history of wing Chun
just so I can say see you guys have along way to go

oh well better get to work

It’s all simple

It’s all simple:

If you fight boxers then you learn to handle boxers.
If you fight BJJ then you learn to handle BJJ.
If you fight on the street then you learn to handle street fighters.
If you only do chi sau then you learn to fight those who only chi sau.
If you fight against knife fighters then you learn to fight against knife fighters.

There may or may not be some transfer of skills but at the higher levels it is doubtful that a mediocre level in all will help.

In some experiments carried out in the past (1970’s and early 80’s) , people who only did chi sau had some success on the street but failed miserably in tournament competition. Then some clubs who totally dropped Chi sau did a lot better in tournaments but didn’t do well in chi sau competition. I don’t know how comparatively they did on the street.

On the cross training approach, here is an example of what one good fighter in our city does:

http://www.womenkickboxing.com/crothers_int.htm

  1. TOM: You are in awesome shape? Tell me about your typical training routine, who you spar with??

KERI: I train four - six hours a day when I know a fight is coming. I always train cardio and speed; if I’m confident in these aspects I have no worry going into the ring. I also cross train in martial arts by doing kickboxing and Shotokan Karate with Stan Peterec , Yoshukai Karate with Master Hitoshi, submission wrestling classes with Adam Zugec and am doing boxing with Keith McKenzie.

I have also trained at Master Toddy’s Muay Thai camp in Vegas. I try to be a very well rounded fighter so I’m ready for anyone. Wind sprints and hiking are my best forms of cardio. I do a light weight full body work out 3-4 times a week, kickboxing drills using Thai pads, heavy bags and many other drills. I try to double the amount of rounds my fight would be on everything I do.

During work I think about getting my training time in.
My typical workday is busy, I work with mentally challenged people part time, teach Karate and Kickboxing classes and also have my five-year-old son to take care of. I am very intense, close to a
fight. I’m told I can be just a little bit hard to be around, hee hee.

A couple things . . .

Apparently some think that to fight as part of our training requires some super-ordinary effort (the “look at how the pros train”). But you don’t need to train like a pro unless you want to reach that level of performance. But anyone who takes up boxing will need to get in the ring and box, anyone who takes up BJJ will need to get out on the mat and roll, anyone who takes up thai boxing will get in the ring and spar, etc. Anyone who wants WCK to make them a better fighter needs to fight. You don’t want to do that, don’t like the idea, too strenouos for you – well, that’s a necessary part of the training and if you won’t do it, you’re wasting your time. The overwhelming majority of those who box or do BJJ don’t train like a pro, but they still fight. I have a demanding job, a home life, do some regular volunteer work, etc. but even if I only train once a week, it includes fighting. We need to learn and practice the forms/techniques/tools (step 1) in order to prepare us to do the drills (you can’t do chi sao without first learning how to tan or fook or bong); you learn and practice the drills, including chi sao, (step 2) in order to prepare us to fight. And we become a better fighter by fighting (step 3). And step 3 helps us sharpen our understanding and performance of steps 1 and 2, which aids improvement in step 3, and that again better hones our understanding of steps 1 and 2, in an endless spiral of upward performance. That’s the progression. Leave out step 3, no spiral upward, no progression, no increased fighting performance.

And I’m not trying to be condescending. It’s not condescending too talk about how you can’t learn to swim without getting in the water – this is just the way it is. If, and I repeat if someone wants to become a better swimmer there are some things they can’t avoid (sorry, all roads don’t lead to Rome just like all roads don’t make us better swimmers; getting wet is one of those things you can’t avoid). Is it “condescending” to tell people that? Is it “condescending” to say to folks going through the motions on the side of the pool, “That’s great as preparation but you need to get in the water to really grasp what’s going on and to be able to swim?” When folks start theorizing about swimming or swimming-related training is it “condescending” to point out that they’ve never gotten in water, and that if they did, most of their questions would be answered?

The amazing thing is that if I went to a forum populated by fighters, like a boxing, BJJ, muay thai, etc. forum and posted my same comments, all I would get is a “Duh!” They’d say I was merely stating the blatantly obvious – along the lines of “of course you need to fight – who would think otherwise?” They wouldn’t respond with sarcastic posts about a “heirarchy of authority” based on the level of mayhem you’ve been involved with (is a boxer that killed someone in the ring better than someone who hasn’t?); from experience (fighting) they know the only authority is yourself. And they know what anyone needs to do to become a more skillful fighter, regardless of their method.

Ray asks for “constructive comments.” Well, how much more constructive can I be than to tell you to fight as part of your training, and to understand why it is absolutely essential? Just do it. The irony, Ray, is you don’t get what it means to be “constructive.” Constructive means helpful, not warm-and-fuzzy, not encouraging, not “respectful of diverse opinions” – HELPFUL. A heap of dry-land swimmers offering each other considerate advice on how to swim in the water or train to swim in the water isn’t “constructive” (it’s all just speculative theory, trying to infer from what they do on dry land about how it will be in the water); someone telling you to go get in the pool is “constructive”. The former won’t help you swim, the latter will.

Hi YongChun

I’m just reading threads in no particular order and saw this in your last post

submission wrestling classes with Adam Zugec

I know Adam from way back. He used to be in Ottawa would you know if he’s in Vancouver now?
He’s a pretty solid fighter.

J

Originally posted by t_niehoff
[B]A couple things . . .

Ray asks for “constructive comments.” Well, how much more constructive can I be than to tell you to fight as part of your training, and to understand why it is absolutely essential? Just do it. The irony, Ray, is you don’t get what it means to be “constructive.” Constructive means helpful. A heap of dry-land swimmers offering each other advice on how to swim in the water or train to swim in the water isn’t “constructive” (it’s all just speculative theory, trying to infer from what they do on dry land about how it will be in the water); someone telling you to go get in the pool is “constructive”. The former won’t help you swim, the latter will. [/B]

Ok good enough comments. It depends on what level to fight at. We have people who fight street fights and people who work as bouncers and they do fine. They never stepped into a boxing ring or trained ground fighting and they have been bouncing for years. Maybe it’s their aggressive attitude that makes them succeed. Even with no fighting training these guys would be a handful. I think we are talking about non world class professional fights in all this discussion.

There is a black bouncer here who looks like Mr. T. He never set foot in a boxing gym or has trained grappling but no one in the past 20 years has ever beat this guy and most bouncers on the island have tried. He trained some classical Hung Fut styles, a bit of this and that and now trains in Ba Gua and QiGing out of a book. He is solidly built, can hit like a truck and means business when he fights. He said he has a respect for the art of Wing Chun. One of our students trains Ba Gua with him.

Real fighting to me is the people who do that again and again in real unpredictable situations. Ring training is a different kind of game. Once you put on the gloves then the heavier guy has the advantage. The boxer will have the advantage in most cases. So in that venue it is better to stick to boxing. In wrestling, technique is one thing but hitting the gym to lift weights and just get really fit is maybe a bigger factor. But against professionals, the most current techniques are a must. Yesterday’s Gracie techniques won’t work.

The guy I saw the other night boxing had a killer attitude, was very experienced by his talk but he wasn’t in shape and so he got creamed. If he was attacked on the street then most of the time he would probably come out fine with his level of fitness. But for the prefessional or Olympic ring it won’t cut it.

The levels talk in Wing Chun stuff from David is just a joke. You can’t be serious all day long. Most of us aren’t in a life and death war. Personally I have seen people go from straight pure Wing Chun training into street combat and the results were good. These guys just went in confidently and did their stuff. If the other guy was close enough to hit them then they were close enough to hit also and they certainly didn’t lack in speed or power or hand techniques. A lot of street and bar type start a fight in chi sau range and that’s their undoing.

One talented guy I know had no martial arts background. He trained in the Kenneth Chung system and was a student of one of my students. He did the forms and chi sau and then got himself a job as a bouncer. He had quite a few encounters and did pretty well in all cases. Then he moved to England and became a Bobby or police officer or cop. He said in that part of London it was pretty rough and he had frequent occasion to use his Wing Chun. He sent us a letter to say the stuff really works. Then he had some matches with some martial arts police officers there and defeated them so they asked him to be a self defense instructor. If this guy was a real student of Ken’s he would be much better even.

His teacher was even more fearless. He had also the standard Wing Chun background, never touched a boxing gym and never set foot in a BJJ school. But he also became a bouncer with quite a few fights. He also tried his hand at a couple of people from the kickboxing school who thought they could take him but he took them out. This guy weighed 220 pounds. He said some of the characters who came in to cause trouble weighed in the neighborhood of 300 pounds. This guy was very smart in that he made friends with both the police and the Hell’s Angels. The Angels are pretty good back up I would say.

Later this guy became a correctional officer. He went on to study Gracie Jujitsu, and a few other things and now does Karate. But he said when the going gets tough, he still relies on his Wing Chun training.

This same guy had a match with this other bouncer who was a student here. The bouncers credentials were impressive in that he competed in Kyokoshin Karate for 5 years, did 9 years of Choy Lee Fut, maybe 5 years of Hung Fut , sparred around with the black bouncer I mentioned above and had a job in another city as a gang enforcer. He was mentally tough. He was also tall but his weight was maybe 200 pounds. He also got beat. Still he was a good fighter. The next day he might have won, who knows?

The only time a student told me he had real problems was in a tournament setting where the fighters did hit and run tactics. The bouncers who work in bars tell me the standard chi sau training (which can include punching, kicking, elbows, take downs , sweeps, head butts etc.) just did fine. They told me they wouldn’t like to go to the ground to get kicked in the head by the guy’s buddies or to roll around on broken glass.

So in our neck of the world that is our experience. Some people enjoy working out with other arts and others don’t. But really from our experience I can’t say that the people who don’t spend time in the boxing gym or on the mat were not realistic and effective fighters because they were successful in the situations we are all supposedly training for. I think this is not a forum for professional fighters.

With a Wing Chun club, you can make the training as aggressive as any two individuals like. One of our members visted Wong Shun Leung’s school and there split lips and bleeding noses in chi sau were just a normal part of the training. This student asked these guys if they liked that kind of training and they said they did because they wanted to make sure it would work on the street for real. We never trained that way for liability reasons but still some of the students were pretty good.

One new police guy we had trained for six months with us. He just did the first form, some drills and chi sau. Then he got assigned to work up North. He said since he was a rookie cop they threw him into six major brawls with lumberjack types throwing hooks, uppercuts and anything else. He said he came out unscratched. He said he was never so scared in all of his life. I asked him what it was that really helped and he said it was mostly the idea of going down the centerline to punch. But he said it was a little frowned upon because they prefer more controlling methods that don’t draw any blood. It doesn’t look good inthe media when the police draw blood (other than by shooting the guy).

So this is just our experience. Maybe hanging out in boxing gyms and BJJ studios would have made these guys even better but they didn’t have the time or interest for that nor did they see any good reason to do that because the stuff they had worked good enough for them.

We also had a guy here who was number 2 in Germany for stickfighting one year and who used to hang around with a gang of 200 guys that fought regularly against the skinheads. He had 8 years of BJJ. He thought the regular Wing Chun training was very good. He knew most of the top in WT in Europe. He also worked as a bouncer here and said he found the Wing Chun very useful in the non weapons type of fighting. Fortunately he was a nice guy.

I have a lot more of these kinds of stories. So I can’t say other people’s ideas are wrong. All I can say is here is our experience. There isn’t just one way to learn how to fight. Some people’s chi sau gets pretty close to reality maybe even closer than BJJ. I am a fan of both boxing and BJJ though so don’t get me wrong.

Maybe other people can state their experiences in these kinds of matters? No one knows the skill levels of anyone on this forum or their students or about their successes and failures, no matter how they train. Maybe some people just run through tires and punch trees all day long. But I wouldn’t put them down for that nor assume I could beat those guys up or suggest they should train in a different way. I would be interested to hear their results in fighting though.

Hey T,

Could you explain that swimming thing one more time? Maybe if you explain it one more time the rest of us dumb asses will finally get your point. :stuck_out_tongue:

Originally posted by t_niehoff
And I’m not trying to be condescending. It’s not condescending too talk about how you can’t learn to swim without getting in the water – this is just the way it is. If, and I repeat if someone wants to become a better swimmer there are some things they can’t avoid (sorry, all roads don’t lead to Rome just like all roads don’t make us better swimmers; getting wet is one of those things you can’t avoid). Is it “condescending” to tell people that? Is it “condescending” to say to folks going through the motions on the side of the pool, “That’s great as preparation but you need to get in the water to really grasp what’s going on and to be able to swim?” When folks start theorizing about swimming or swimming-related training is it “condescending” to point out that they’ve never gotten in water, and that if they did, most of their questions would be answered?

In your case it is condesending. You expect every one else to listen and agree with you but you don’t listen or even acknowlege most of what they say.

We’re still waiting for your qualifications too. You talk about how bad everyone else is doing and how they are ruining wing chun but you don’t even know what other people do or why they do what they do. You never talk about how YOU are doing. You just insinuate that you are doing things the right way and other people are doing them the wrong way. You never address the good points that a lot of the other people bring out. Instead you just ignore them and talk around them. Same old evasions and we are all supposed to be impressed by your perfect logic. :rolleyes:

You know what might help though? If you would just explain the swimming thing one more time that might do it. :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:

A lot of people have a lot to say and I wish even more of them would tell about their experiences. The way you treat others I wouldn’t give you the time of day except its people like you who make it so others won’t share and that is what makes you hard to ignore. now you are even trying to shut Ray up. It’s you we don’t need to hear more from especially since you never say anything new. Unless you can explain that swimming thing again cause thats the best. :smiley:

Sorry for my sacrasm people I don’t like being that way. I just think its time for some body to say the emperer has no clothes and time for T to stop harrassing everyone.

The swimming arguement is not valid.

  • getting in a real fight is not as easy as deciding to go swimming. You can go to jail, get harmed, perhaps get killed, or perhaps inflict serious damage to the oponent.

  • If you are referring to getting wet as doing some sparring - well that is a training method and we get back to the whole sparring verses chi sao arguement which we’ve had a billion times before. Best to save that for a specific thread on sparring.

  • Swimmers train in many other ways besides swimming in order to perform well in the pool.

Your training method is your training method. If you want to be the worlds best fighter or represent W.C to the world - you’re right, you better get serious and do the conditioning and what ever it takes to perform well in the environment that you choose to do it in. Be it a kick boxing ring, pride ring, or the octogon.

Others who solely train W.C will also develop high skills. These skills will not plateau at a certain level. Those who want to walk this path also have to follow a disciplined path of faith and patience.
As said above, it all depends on your reasons for training.

  • It may be to develop a skill that is fun, develops into some previously unimagined skill, and while simultaneously giving you some fighting skill.
  • On the other hand you may want to use W.C to prove that you are an awesome fighter or that W.C is a valid martial art. You train like a mad man, condition yourself, and learn other martial arts. You will probably be a better fighter than the type above over all - until you start getting old in which the fitness and conditioning will be of little value.

Neither of the above approaches will guarantee any better street survial than the other in my opinion. If it street survival you are after there are a million bette ways to achieve it than learning a martial art.

Originally posted by Fresh
[B]Hey T,

Could you explain that swimming thing one more time? Maybe if you explain it one more time the rest of us dumb asses will finally get your point. :stuck_out_tongue:

In your case it is condesending. You expect every one else to listen and agree with you but you don’t listen or even acknowlege most of what they say.

We’re still waiting for your qualifications too. You talk about how bad everyone else is doing and how they are ruining wing chun but you don’t even know what other people do or why they do what they do. You never talk about how YOU are doing. You just insinuate that you are doing things the right way and other people are doing them the wrong way. You never address the good points that a lot of the other people bring out. Instead you just ignore them and talk around them. Same old evasions and we are all supposed to be impressed by your perfect logic. :rolleyes:

You know what might help though? If you would just explain the swimming thing one more time that might do it. :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:

A lot of people have a lot to say and I wish even more of them would tell about their experiences. The way you treat others I wouldn’t give you the time of day except its people like you who make it so others won’t share and that is what makes you hard to ignore. now you are even trying to shut Ray up. It’s you we don’t need to hear more from especially since you never say anything new. Unless you can explain that swimming thing again cause thats the best. :smiley:

Sorry for my sacrasm people I don’t like being that way. I just think its time for some body to say the emperer has no clothes and time for T to stop harrassing everyone. [/B]

Merçi,thank you,arigato,spaciba,gratias,she she, You get the idea?..:wink:

Much of this thread is needlessly befudled by semantics.

Fighting doesn’t mean a death-match on the street corner. It’s a bit of a blurred term, but in MA training whether it be boxing, wrestling, judo, bjj, thai, whatever (including WCK), it simply refers to training in a freestyle manner with a resistant opponent.

Chi Sao is a form of fighting, but if anyone constrains themselves to Chi Sao, and their goal is overal skill and not just Chi Sao skill, they’ll be missing out.

The solution is to do San Sao alongside Chi Sao. This is nothing new or modern or innovative or whatever. It’s just become uncommon due to the way WCK spread. Chi Sao and slow forms that take hours are a better business model with wider appeal and longer student retention potential.

If you just want to chat or do a little moving around or whatever, it doesn’t matter how you train (or don’t). If you want to be good at application, next time you train, do as much San Sao as Chi Sao.

If you’re not sure how to train San Sao, start a step or so away from your partner. Pick one common distance attack. A swinging punch is a good simple way to start. Have them do it slowly several times while you counter. Increase the speed, power, and intensity until your partner is wailing on you and you’re handling it with some degree of grace. If you mess up, go back down a notch and rebuild.

When you feel okay, add some degree of randomness (switch arms attacking and break the rhythm).

You’ll use strength at first, cheat with increased speed, get sloppy, etc., but figure out what you’re doing wrong (maybe Tan Sao isn’t a good idea for you personally, try something else; maybe you’re not in close enough; maybe your alignment is sub-optimal–whatever–adjust until things click better).

Then add another, different, single attack. Keep going until you’ve covered most common attacks (swing, kick, tackle, grab, etc.) Then do combinations (1+1) of attacks, again starting slow and increasing intensity and decreasing predictability step by step.

Once you can handle that, go freestyle. No preset attacks, you just both try and engage the other. When you make a mistake, stop, analyze, correct, continue.

This is the only real way to build bridging, timing, awareness, and to polish your movements. It’s lab work, just like Chi Sao, but for when you start off at a distance. It’s balance.

If you’re really interested in application, once you can handle your partner(s) in class or home training, go find higher skilled and/or specialists and do the same thing again (relationship building is key :wink: ). Find someone who can box/kickbox well, someone who can wrestle, whatever. Start slow, and build up. Confidence is sometimes the deciding factor, and this can help.

Call it San Sao, fighting, sparring, whatever. It’s just training.

When I was learning, I was always told to go make friends with people from other arts and try out what I knew. If we had problems, we’d bring them back to class, work on them, and try them again. That was 14 years ago with a man in his 50s fresh off the boat from China. Nothing weird, nothing modern, nothing people hadn’t been doing in many, many arts for a long, long time.

Good post Rene..

When I was learning, I was always told to go make friends with people from other arts and try out what I knew. If we had problems, we’d bring them back to class, work on them, and try them again. That was 14 years ago with a man in his 50s fresh off the boat from China. Nothing weird, nothing modern, nothing people hadn’t been doing in many, many arts for a long, long time.

Word up, Rene. My first instructor was like that, when I met him back in 1977. He still hosts multistyle MA camps and seminars today.

You been away or something? Long time no see.

Hi Rene,

That’s pretty well the model we use too. Under one Wing Chun sifu (Dr. Khoe from the Wang Kiu lineage) more than 20 years ago the model was this:

  1. Learn the SLT form and chi sau mechanics right away from day one in order to get the proper feeling right away.

  2. Chi sau involved the single sticking hands, the Lap sau exercise and rolling hands.

  3. Within these three exercises there were various kinds of changes, attacks and defenses. The various techniques found in the SLT were also drilled. The same went for the various techiques in the other forms.

  4. The emphasis was on good form, relaxation, a real stickiness in feeling and an understanding of how the form and Chi sau related or tied together.

  5. Every once in awhile the students would put on protective equipment and go all out with two people in the middle of the floor and the rest watching in order to teach relaxation and performance in a pressure situation.

  6. Then the Chum Kiu was introduced along with various drills that teach how to close the gap against kicks, punches or grabs.
    When Chi sau wasn’t too bad we would start from a short distance away , close and then do whatever. Chi sau sometimes led to a floor fight.

  7. Soon after the Bil Jee form was introduced. The idea was to see Wing Chun as a whole, to learn it relatively quickly and then refine and refine each year after that. When I learned everything was taught in less than a year. Later he taught by spreading it over a period of three years.

  8. The weapons were taught next in order to add extra footwork for freestyle sparring. The knife taught quick advance and also retreating footwork and coming in from different angles. After some standard drills equivalent to sticking hands we went into freestyle knife and pole sparring.

  9. Finally the wooden dummy was taught as the last piece needed for complete freestyle sparring. The techniques of the dummy were used to handle the initial clash or initial entry. The dummy was perfomed on the wooden man and then as partner drills and these would become more and more random.

10 Then we got protective boxing headgear, eye protection and mouth protection and added regular sparring to the class. All of this was within the year time frame. Classes were about 4 hours long several days a week.

  1. Then we would play with the attacks from different arts to see how to counter these. Chi sau was always an important training in order to learn to apply all of the stuff from all of the forms.

  2. Some students would try tournaments but most didn’t care to do that. Whenever a student had problems the teacher would turn the solution into a drill of some sort. Good position, posture, and the right kind of rubbery feeling was always emphasized.

  3. The following years the students would start again from he beginning but each time seeing more levels of detail and making the fighting more realistic. Hitting the bag and kicking the bag was a normal part of the training as well.

  4. Since the instructor taught Taekwondo before and also knew Judo, we got the benefit of this experience as well. Also his teacher Wang Kiu was well versed in Preying Mantis and Lama style so sometimes we played with defence against that or against some of the Hung style attacks that I knew or anything else that someone could bring to the table.

  5. The instructor would frown upon just fighting and wailing away at each other in the name of fighting. He preferred we were always working on something to develop a real skill of applying the right thing at the right time. Our natural tendency was to gravitate to kickboxing as most martial artists do who fight before they know their art.

  6. We always tried to analyze and watch as many kinds of other fighters as we could.

  7. In this model Wing Chun was said to consist of two parts. One part was chi sau which taught what to do when contact had been made and the other part was the art of making contact. So a real fight would consist of trying to make contact using proper distancing and timing and various tactics. Then when contact was made chi sau skills would prevail. We found making contact with very fast kickers was difficult but found Emin Boztepe was pretty good at that. We found out there was no mystery, just hard work.

The Hung style club model in the 60’s was to learn Hung style and two people drills for 10 years and after that go out and fight to get experience with how the art applies. That’s how the teacher also learned. However this didn’t bode too well with the law. So this kind of fighting was stopped. Later people would compete in tournaments as a substitute.

I hear Fedor is good guy to check out for Mixed Martial arts.

Yeah for Rene

Yes, great and sane post, Rene.

We too incorporate the elements you describe. It is an ongoing, endless process.

Our vernacular and venue for what you call san sau, we do in the form of what we call feeding hands. It is typically led by a teacher or a more advanced student, and incorporates both Wing Chun and other movements and attacks.

Like so many others, we also leverage the expertise of classmates who are experienced in other martial arts. Though we do try to be careful not to encourage old habits. :wink:

We further engage with martial artists of other styles to better represent the range of potential and more realistic attacks and movements, which we feel brings more value over our own simulations. In fact there is one person from another style who now routinely comes for an after-class “sparring” (did I say that?) session most weeks.

The pace and energy is agreed upon and varies from mild and controlled to highly aggressive depending on the present skill and needs of the respective participants.

The biggest challenge isn’t figuring out how to train, rather making time for it all and keeping things balanced. For those who can’t train full time or hours every day, patience, persistence and taking the long view helps.

I also agree wholeheartedly that relationship building is extremely important. Our aim (speaking for me and mine) is to learn and advance development, not to kill, maim, or breed misunderstanding, hatred, revenge or lawsuits in case someone should get hurt.

For me it is important to respect not only Wing Chun, but also the often diverse needs of the individuals involved in its practice.

The general approach you describe can accommodate almost any range of needs and limitations, yet offers potential for endless development. As said many times, folks with a penchant for competitive fighting can additional levels of pressure as appropriate to their goals.

And yes, you’ve been pretty invisible of late. Hope all’s well.

Again, nicely done.

Regards,

  • kj

Hey Andrew - Work has been killer as of late.

Ray - I think the model while perhaps not general is not uncommon either. Fedor is a monster. Take a slam on the head, then grab the guy and twist him up. Just unreal. I’m a Minotauro fan, but I think Fedor will be hard for him to stop.

Reading further into the thread:

There’s all different kinds of swimming, from waders to paddlers to floaters to Olympic class racers. I don’t have any problem with the swimming analogy.

What’s problematic is that it’s difficult to act like an arrogant @$$ when there’s San Sao involved regularly and everyone pretty much knows everyone else’s level.

In some arts (unfortunately, WCK included), you can sit on a throne and indoctrinate students and feed your egotism even if you have very, very little application skill. Titles, lineage, and pseudo-cultural trappings still work as obfuscators.

Just imagine if all the “GM”'s had met up fairly regularly on a public tournament circuit :wink: