Hey Kathy-Jo

When are you going to enter Pride/K1/Ultimate? Do you think weekly training against Thai boxers and BJJ artists will help you progress in Wing Chun? I think that those who strive for the level of mastery we read about and which were displayed by the top in Tai Chi, Aikido, Hsing I, Hung style didn’t do it from doing kickboxing from day 1.

I think most discussion these days have nothing to do with what Ken’s students are striving for which is a high level mastery of the art so that a single skilled opponent can be matched.

To beat someone like Tyson, you are out of luck if you are not built like him and you try to use a similar method. It will be something like the famous Foreman vs Frazer fight.

There have been a lot of intelligent discussions before on the subtle details of high level Wing Chun. It seems we have degenerated into talks that everyone needs to work out in a boxing gym as soon as possible after joining a Wing Chun school. I think for some types of quality Wing Chun, this may be a step backwards. If it was a good thing then I would recommend everyone stops Wing Chun and just take up Thai boxing and BJJ. Why do Wing Chun at all? Does Wing Chun really bring any benefit over training in the gym with the real fighters? Since we have no proof of that, then dispensing with Wing Chun is best.

I think the new reality talks can be made more useful if we start talking about what is needed in the training, what works, what doesn’t work or things that go beyond smashing the bag, doing thousands of situps, running for 20 miles and sparring full contact with full protection against guys who can really hit hard (everyone already knows these things).

simple honest question[rant for rant]

level of mastery we read about and which were displayed by the top in Tai Chi, Aikido, Hsing I, Hung style didn’t do it from doing kickboxing from day 1.

Mastery in respect to what ?

the training system chi sau and drills

or actual non choreographed combat

there are certain levels of honesty that need to be addressed
if you’re talking about combat skill

and application of that skill

if you consider Wing Chun combat training system then we need to look at combat with an honest open eye

look at your self - condition / age / time to train / training goals

look at your opponent - condition / age / time put into to training / and training goals

if your goal is to turn wing Chun into tai chi or some health thing
then you should focus on that

and not confuse it with combative honesty

if you’re not in shape hurt or to old then you must accept that

self honesty

Ray , for me that’s the problem in wing Chun training not enough honesty , allot of stories and what this or that person can do

so people train reaching out for ghost

you say there no more wing chun talk at least not what you like to see but lets be honest wing chun has not generated great people these days ,

methods need to be looked right or wrong

looking into the weakness not just focusing on the strength of the art

Ray[There have been a lot of intelligent discussions before on the subtle details of high level Wing Chun.]

if these details were so prominent and effective then people wouldn’t have as many questions or empty holes in there training

with the Internet people are voicing there results and these results in many cases have been less then

this may not be the fault of the training system , but maybe the training methods have lost their edge

is it so much to as these so called skilled people to simply prove it is that so offensive

I believe there is great skill to be achieved in wing chun because I have tried to go toe to toe with some very skilled teachers and felt it and have seen them do to others no problem

but it seems only the older generation with the more hardcore training methods got these results

perhaps we should stop revisiting all these stories and research there training methods , if you have that information then you should bring it out for analysis

also don’t worry so much about what people do , let them experiment and research and have there views if what you can do is as efficient as all the prominent little high level details should make you then , when you see a young lost multi skilled chap blow him out the water and help him see the light

it’s what I plan to do when I’m older =)

you know I got respect for you , but this time it just seemed a bit whiney there is a reason why people are drifting , they are getting there asses kicked out side of class , we must accept this truth and remedy the situation , not with stories about details but actual results and training methods that produce those results
not with what Ken , or Gary , or who ever says but with what is real and tangible

any discussion you want to start on that subject I’m totally down for , I have been thinking along the same lines , transferring baat jam do footwork and skills back into empty hands , my latest footage of WSL shows much of this , yet I have trained with people from different methods that have many years of knife training and can’t move at all just like a lump of clay with 2 toothpicks sticking out

Hi Ernie,

Don’t disagree with anything. I think Gay Lam. Wong Shun Leung and a few people that I have met show that there is still some quality Wing Chun around. We don’t know how people of old trained. I asked a few people about what training was like under Yip Man but I never got any good answers to that. So I conclude maybe it was just trial and error in combat. Along Terrences line of thought the old Hong Kong fighters mostly had less than two years of training and then went out and fought. I doubt if any could handle todays fighters. So I agree that something is needed to beef the art up again and maybe you and Terrences approaches will produce some fighters of note. Then again there is really no money in it so why should anyone train their heads off to achieve a reputation in the fighting circuit? I think it would be hard to get enough people motivated. The best person I met along the reality lines that anyone has heard of was Emin Boztepe but I don’t like his Wing Chun method the best and didn’t want to start again at the bottom of the ladder for another 20 years nor did I have enough money to support a guy like that. I think at least he put out his methods in tape for people to take or leave as Gary Lam is now doing. I have heard Gary Lam did OK against the Thai boxers but again there is no record of this on film. So in a way all these things the reality people say are just stories too. Your website is good because you are starting to show what you do. Jessie Glover was also pretty good. I think his Wing Chun (he doesn’t call it that) is a bit ugly looking but his students are pretty effective and can cut through a lot of Wing Chun.

I don’t think we can just call all Kung Fu training crap and disbelieve all stories we have heard regarding Kung Fu fighters. certainly the famous Tai Chi vs Crane style match looked like a big joke. The famous tournament before (1924 or 1935? I forget now) that in which Hsing I fighters cleaned up and which also had a few fatalities can’t be a joke for the guys that got killed off. Hsing I also has this reputation in Japan. In the South of China this Edmonton Chen style master said someone just came to test out this useless Tai Chi and got his arm broken in six places and later died in hospital. I don’t doubt that some of these stories are true.

Nevertheless stories don’t help anyone but hard training does. I think the good of these discussions can come from training ideas and ideas from actual experience. Reading stories is still good too. For example a couple of Wing Chun people got their arms broken by using the Gan sau in a tournaments against the Japanese fighters. That kind of information is useful to know so that the same mistakes aren’t repeated. Of course we can choose to discount all stories or advice from senior people and fighters and just try to find out ourselves the painful way what works and what doesn’t. These discussions we are having are at least less painful than to learn in real by losing an eye or sufferring a few broken bones.

Ray

Ray

I am really tired of seeing a line drawn in the sand by the so called traditional camp and the so called fighting camp
I wish we could erase those lines compare notes and training , but people get caught up on money and lineage

That’s why it’s just easier to got spar with people and just find out for yourself , there are so many wing chun prophets that are just full of it and can spin a web to entangle you for years and years , by the time you figure out it sucks your to caught up .

I know Hawkins has footage of the old training and Gary has access to it , I have sat with them when they reminisce on the old days [ stories ] I will further investigate this , I have a good relationship with both men and they wont fill me with BS , cause I always make them get up and prove it to me and they love kicking my butt

I also compare these methods with all the other stuff I have been exposed to and seek out things that develop similar attributes

This is how I am trying to give back , though I am a baby in this group , I hate taking and not giving back .

It will be 1 year or so testing these idea’s with people and I will report my findings , could be I’m full of it don’t know have to try

I think we all should who care if there is no money in it , I didn’t learn wing Chun for the money I have a job

As for Gary and the Thai thing he got his butt kicked as much as he one he is very open about it . loves telling the stories about his getting dropped

And I respect that about him

But he gained a lot of insight into fight conditioning and application from his experience

But like he tells us he did his part it’s up to us to do our part , or wing Chun will get lazy and die
more later of to teach a bit:D

Re: Hey Kathy-Jo

Originally posted by YongChun
When are you going to enter Pride/K1/Ultimate?

Not this week. My knee hurts and is giving out too much.

Do you think weekly training against Thai boxers and BJJ artists will help you progress in Wing Chun?

No. I do think that working with other martial artists in these or other styles can help inform my work and identify areas where I presently need the most improvement or focus. Nonetheless, the majority of my time and effort needs to be focused and expended on Wing Chun, given that is what I am intent to improve in.

Everything has an opportunity cost - at least in this life. Not everyone has enough time and money to play every game at the carnival, let alone win a prize for each.

I think most discussion these days have nothing to do with what Ken’s students are striving for which is a high level mastery of the art so that a single skilled opponent can be matched.

I agree. I think it’s fair to say that many of us are focused on an entirely different level of detail than what is the norm in discussions here. I am certain this is true of many others too, it is not only people who learn from Ken. No doubt that is one reason some people don’t play in this sandbox much, or anymore. “Go fight” and “cross train” become little more than boring mantras after awhile.

There are many “silent voices” on forums such as these, and no doubt a great many of them with something useful or interesting to say. Fortunately, a number of folks have been aiming for some more varied and thoughtful discussions of late, and I hope the trend continues.

Regards,

  • kj

The idea of my post was that I think Wing Chun is a very interesting art with many facets and a lot of depth. The reality talk drowns out everyone else who has something interesting to say. To the realists no one else has something of value to say because they don’t spend time in the ring slugging it out.

Randy Williams has 6 big fat volumes on Wing Chun yet he just scratches the surface and doesn’t begin to cover what some of the Tai Chi literature or Aikido literature or Musashi or even Jack Ling does which are scholarly expositions on martial art. THere is value in this because we have brains that can think. With too much hitting on our heads, our brains will no longer function that well.

I think there is a lifetime of exploration that can be done and book after book can be written the same as is true of Chess and Go. Even Western Fencing and some boxing books have very good analysis.

There are those who cannot be ring boxers or who do not care for that kind of thing but who nevertheless can enjoy Wing Chun for a lifetime. My goal is to enjoy this art for a lifetime.

In our own club we have gone through various phases just because of the student mix. Sometimes we had a few who wanted to fight in tournaments so we let them do that. Then we had people into reality mode because they were police, worked for correctional facilities or had jobs as bouncers. Then we had the cross trainers who came from other arts, never cared to learn any forms but just wanted to fight. Then we had pure academics who really couldn’t care less about who could beat up who but who enjoyed to play and analyze the art and strive for perfection on the very fine details of all sorts. So I have heard all these reality discussions before. Nevertheless we all just trained together no matter how we thought.

I find with the ring boxing approach those people eventually fizzle out and give up martial arts all together. After awhile their bodies just can’t take it anymore and they don’t enjoy risking their face night after night. You see this with Thai boxers. In Tai Chi you will find a lot of people can keep that up all of their life. The stories of successful use are no less than those in the Wing Chun world but perhaps there are a lot less peole who care about real fighting. One of the Gacies is old and still does BJJ but to me it’s the same as Chi sau because no one is trying to really break his arms or punch his face in.

With the real approach there is really nothing much to talk about. What can a kickboxer say that gives real food for thought for an intellect over a long period of time? The guy who is more conditioned, hits harder, fights a smarter fight wins.

I watched a boxing fight today and the guy who was more conditioned and threw harder faster punches won. Their mentality was “I am literally going in the ring to murder my opponent.” I guess you need that kind of brain in these situations. In Wing Chun you also have people like that but you also have people without this aggressive mentality who nevertheless like a certain type of Wing Chun.

So different strokes for different folks. But I think the reality guys who talk about Thai fighting and BJJ should really spend their time in the ring with professional boxers. I think you can’t say we want more reality but not too much reality. Either accept the general Wing Chun population or just hang out with the big boys in boxing and don’t say we want reality but not too much as in real Thai ring fighting, real weapons fighting or full army combat.

If I was younger with no injuries, had an aggressive mind and no family of job and thought only in terms of reality then I probably would forget about Wing Chun and just fight with the Thais , with good Western boxers and with hulks like in WWF. Why do Wing Chun? Since it hasn’t proven itself of late , just join those arts that really fight. What really would be the difference anyway between real fighters?

For me Kathy-Jo I really enjoy your expositions on Wing Chun even though I know you will never fight in K1. I know most of teachers I met in Wing Chun love to talk all day about Wing Chun. However maybe none cared for reality fighting themselves at least not on a prolonged basis. Even now Gary Lam no longer fights the Thais and Emin Boztepe no longer makes a reputation of winning hundreds of real fights. Eventually there must be something else that keep people going in the art.

Eventually the real fighters who stick around have a much more toned down approach. There was talk that unless you keep training realistically then you will lose your skill. If that’s the case then why do we listen to people like Gary Lam, Kenneth Chung , Emin Boztepe and the like?

I think sharing ideas between different arts is a great thing if egos aren’t involved. But mostly egos are and then people get hurt. We had one lady who loved to go to different clubs to workout. Then she went to Japan and someone punched her very hard in the stomach and then when she doubled over in pain he elbowed her in the nose leaving her with a broken nose bleeding on the floor. Everyone laughed. It was great that a 6’ 2 " American could beat up a 5’2" lady. After meeting more and more people like that she eventually concluded that most martial artists are idiots and gave up the art forever.

Play is play and fighting is fighting. If people want to train nicely with other arts with protection on, then that’s play. The same as playing with rubber knives. If people want to play real then they should be trying to take each other’s heads off or break their limbs. Not everyone considers the latter that much fun unless they are on the winning end.

The reality people should really just train hard in the gym and then compete for real to show everyone what it’s all about instead of convincing everyone that they should get real and cross train at other clubs at the earliest opportunity. So far we all just talk. I think all of this is just a mental chess game that we play. At least it doesn’t hurt as much to make some wrong statements and get criticized for this as opposed to making a ring mistake which may put you out of commission for your life.

I think most of us are fairly intelligent and could just as easily argue the opposite side of any argument too. So in that light all this is just fodder for discussion. I am not saying who is right or wrong because there isn’t a right or wrong but just different tastes. At different stages of our lives we may have totally different viewpoints too.

We can’t conclude from what anyone says, anything about the effectiveness or lack of effectiveness of their fighting art. Only videos of real matches and competent opponents can show that.

I hope we can also sometimes discuss about some Wing Chun theories and fine points and share different lineage ideas. But to the ring fighters all this talk is a waste of time.

Hopefully all this talk can still mean we respect each other’s viewpoints. We should try to be like one Wing Chun family. In a family some people are more successful than others and rarely do family members agree yet they have a strong family bond. If the reality fighters can give some real insight to the non fighters then that’s great.

With the real approach there is really nothing much to talk about. What can a kick boxer say that gives real food for thought for an intellect over a long period of time? The guy who is more conditioned, hits harder, fights a smarter fight wins.

Ray I have to show the other side of a few points but all in all to each there own

First your dead wrong about kick boxing or boxing , I have trained with pro’s on both levels and every idea you can come up with in wing chun in some way is being applied ‘ the manipulate there opponent with distance timing and sensitivity they set up people with foot work and eye sensitivity
People that are on that level have every attribute you can come up with in any art but normally at a higher level
Just move around with some one on a pro level and you would understand

This is why I feel if you haven’t done it and you [ anybody not just you ] haven’t spent the time inform of these guys you really don’t have the right to say what they do or don’t have , this is why the non reality , technician types don’t have a leg to stand on so they talk about theory of what should work like it was fact , yet they of course cant do it , that really bothers me and the worse part about it is when they recite some one else’s accomplishments as if they were there own or as proof

That just sucks

If you have no personal experience don’t speak on it , that’s all I’m saying if you do then I can not argue with you it is your truth , but to many people offer there views with no experience and argue with no real fighting or hard sparring experience , they argue as if they know some truth they have never experienced
If all you know is chi sau then speak on it , not what some student did or some teacher did but what you can do , or else you just lieing or imagining

I will only speak on what I know for a fact , and can do and pull off with consistency , and I am far from a fighter , because I have experienced what real fighters are like , no BS no lets talk about it just shut up and lets move around and see

As for Gary he will still fight anyone that walk through the door not chi sau but straight up fight , no problem no try my student first , he is no joke and leads by example , if he didn’t I would never have trained there , when I met him he welcomed me to fight him , as he still does with any one and he has easily controlled and shut down everyone except for my friend Robert and they have extreme respect for each other and go at it all the time

A man that is good has nothing to hide even in his mid 50’s and out of shape
I have seen this same behavior from Hawkins , I have sparred him all out and I have felt what a small old man can do
This is what wing Chun is anything less to me will not suffice
I know Emin would have no problem gloving up and going at it , I don’t know ken so I’m not sure what his take is on it , but I would love to have head to head session no ego just for the experience

I have no problem getting dropped and giving the dude a hug after , but if you talk like you got all the answers and can only show them in chi sau then just say so no loss of face when one is honest

So people can say what they want about this or that training , but you will notice those that have really done it seem to agree on the truth that is found there

There is nothing wrong in playing the training game for a life time , just don’t be bummed if people stride for more then your willing to put out , heck I know then I’m out classed or out gunned I don’t make excuses for it , just worry about making myself better and appreciate the skill of some one better then me no big deal , don’t need to try and find reasons to save my ego or view , who cares just train if you happy so be it

we will only start learning from each other when people start being honest about there abilities and experience
:wink:

Originally posted by Ernie
With the real approach there is really nothing much to talk about. What can a kick boxer say that gives real food for thought for an intellect over a long period of time? The guy who is more conditioned, hits harder, fights a smarter fight wins.

Makes sense. The ironic and curious part is why someone who feels there is little to talk about would spend overt amounts of time on a discussion board.

Regards,

  • kj

Originally posted by YongChun
I know most of teachers I met in Wing Chun love to talk all day about Wing Chun. However maybe none cared for reality fighting themselves at least not on a prolonged basis. Even now Gary Lam no longer fights the Thais and Emin Boztepe no longer makes a reputation of winning hundreds of real fights. Eventually there must be something else that keep people going in the art.

I too can listen to those kinds of guys talk about Wing Chun all day and all night. And there is more to the art than just winning hundreds of fights. It just isn’t cool to talk about those kinds of things here. :stuck_out_tongue:

Regards,

  • kj

cause I always make them get up and prove it to me and they love kicking my butt

It makes me wonder… How is is possible for an “out of shape” (and old!) guy like Gary and a small (and old too!..) guy like Hawkins to" kick the butt" of some young,muscular and well conditioned guy like our friend Ernie?..:wink: Superior strengh?..Superior speed?..fighting tricks?..better conditioning?..bigger six pacs and set of pecs?..:wink: Or what?..:wink:

YongChun wrote:

The idea of my post was that I think Wing Chun is a very interesting art with many facets and a lot of depth. The reality talk drowns out everyone else who has something interesting to say. To the realists no one else has something of value to say because they don’t spend time in the ring slugging it out.

**I agree with you that WCK is a very interesting kuen faat, and has a lot of depth. There is much to talk about. However, look at it from this standpoint – going back to the swimming analogy, if you have a group that never get into the water, how can they ever knowingly talk about swimming or training to be a better swimmer? They can repeat what they’ve been told, tell stories about swimmers in the good old days, speculate about swimming, talk about the dry-land drills they do, etc. but since they never get into the water to test the validity of their views, and since they have no swimming experience from which to draw intelligent inferences, it is not surprising that much of their opinion is not founded on reality but instead is theory. So when I hear folks from the dry-land group talk about the “richness of swimming”, talk about how skilled their dry-land teacher is (someone that never gets into the water), argue about swimming theory and other related topics, I can’t help but laugh and think to myself, “what can they know about swimming?”

**For example, how to do the first form? – with dynamic tension, very relaxed, as fast as you can, as slow as you can, etc. What’s the right answer? Do we ask people who have never fought, never tested their mode of training to see if it worked or not, do we theorize why one method is better than another, do we listen to our teacher who has never tested his training, or do we instead look to personal performance results (has it made me a better swimmer?). Of course, someone can say that “well, doing it my way helps me do the drills (chi sao)” but that begs the question of does the way you’re doing the drills actually help you fight (produce performance results)?

**Ernie makes a great point about motive. It really is all about motive. Why do you train in WCK? If it is primarily for health or social interaction or some such thing, sure you don’t need to fight. But then you are part of the group that doesn’t get into the water – you can’t even begin to talk about the genuine depth of swimming or appreciate swimming as you’ve never done it. What “depth” can you talk about? You can talk about the health benefits of your training or the social benefits of your training because that’s all you’re doing (the only results you are seeing). So don’t kid yourself. WCK isn’t the drills or the forms, it is the fighting with the WCK method (the drills and forms are only the prep work). And if you want to become a better fighter – the true, untimate objective of WCK – we must fight as part of our training.

**This is not some new, modern approach: it is the traditional view. That’s what the old-timers that got good did; it’s what present day folks that get good do. I agree with you again, Ray, that the HK rooftop fighters probably couldn’t beat good fighters but that’s not the point. It was a start; it was training. Beginning boxers don’t get in the ring with a Tyson but they still must get in the ring to learn to box. You don’t need to kill yourself, fight pros fighters or anything like that (unless you want to reach that level) but you do need to regularly fight as part of your training just like a swimmer needs to regularly get in the water as part of their training. Let me repeat: our goal isn’t to be able to do the forms or do the drills, it is to be able to fight with the WCK method.

**You may not like the fact that you need to fight as part of your training, you may not want that to be the case, you may not want to believe it but that is the reality of it. All fighters, regardless of method, do that. Experience has prove it and will prove it to you if you permit yourself the experience.

**old jong asks how old guys like Gary or Hawkins can beat younger guys – for the same reason Helio at 90 can beat younger guys or Jack Dempsey knocked two assailants out when he was 70: because as a young men they did the trainining – fought. WCK has a kuit about if you don’t do the training when you are young, you’ll have nothing when you get old.

Originally posted by kj
[B]Makes sense. The ironic and curious part is why someone who feels there is little to talk about would spend overt amounts of time on a discussion board.

Regards,

  • kj [/B]

mixed up the people Kathy that’s Ray’s quote i was responding to;)

http://www.supraspeed.com/bdrive/pages/grlfight.wmv

One problem I’ve encountered with folks that never get in the water is they begin with a POV of what they think a fight should be (based on movies, stories, etc.) rather than what it really is, and their training follows that “ideal” rather than preparing them for what is. By experiencing for themselves what fighting is, what the reality of it is, they can use it as a guide for their training. The link above is a “streetfight” between two untrained women (no one dies in the end, btw – so I guess it wouldn’t be a “real” fight in some people’s book). :wink: Interesting how it looks like Cheung-Boztepe. What do they have in common? They both reflect what a fight looks like. This is what you need to be able to deal with, the environement you’ll find yourself in. So, KJ, with all your WCK training, could you step in and easily handle with these untrained women? If you think so, then the next step is to go to a gym where some women train and have a go and see if your assessment is correct.

Originally posted by old jong
It makes me wonder… How is is possible for an “out of shape” (and old!) guy like Gary and a small (and old too!..) guy like Hawkins to" kick the butt" of some young,muscular and well conditioned guy like our friend Ernie?..:wink: Superior strengh?..Superior speed?..fighting tricks?..better conditioning?..bigger six pacs and set of pecs?..:wink: Or what?..:wink:

you miss read or I miss wrote , Gary or Hawkins , can’t play with my friend Robert he is just to good , they all have allot of respect , but Robert is as skilled as they are in his own right and he is a highly conditioned fighter , this is what he does for a living

it amazes me that the older wing Chun guys can even keep up!

they love rob because he reminds them of themselves when they were younger

hell Gary has had Robert teach seminars at our school to expose students to that level of fighter

again no egos and I love that

have to remember these men are all fighters and have that in common
there not some Wing Chun guys that just spent a life time doing chi sau and drills

they fought and trained like fighters this conditioning will carry over its experience for the rest of you life

but you see I know why Robert is so good , he trains everyday like he is prepping for a fight , he spars and coaches K-1 people Thai guys , Bjj guys and I have seen him blow out big dude that are ufc types

but then i look at these older out shape wing Chun dudes and they still got game year after year

Gary just started working out again swimming and running

it just after a few weeks he is on fire it’s a sight

so skilled youth with athletic shape still and flight time still edges out old guy with skill
but that is just life

doesn’t mean we can’t get better and if your old and still in condition plus your skill
things get even closer

comes down to what your willing to put in

These are very wet comments.

better wet with honest substance then dry and full of fluff:p

This thread has that wet dog scent!..:wink:
BTW,I think of chasing chickens as part of footwork training!..If it worked for Rocky…:wink: But,would it be better to chase ducks in a pond?..More liquid!..
:wink: :smiley:

Jong
don’t you shadow box under water like all the real pro’s do :wink:

Yes!..The trick is not to slip on the soap but the best underwater training would be in good company in a hot tub!..:wink: It’s more like grappling but who cares?..:wink:

Originally posted by old jong
It makes me wonder… How is is possible for an “out of shape” (and old!) guy like Gary and a small (and old too!..) guy like Hawkins to" kick the butt" of some young,muscular and well conditioned guy like our friend Ernie?..:wink: Superior strengh?..Superior speed?..fighting tricks?..better conditioning?..bigger six pacs and set of pecs?..:wink: Or what?..:wink:

That’s what we should be talking about. I don’t think Hawkins fought any Thais or hangs out in the gym with professional boxers but I could be wrong. I saw some seminar tapes by him and it was just the usual kind of Wing Chun talk. If a guy is rough and tough and big and musculer then I don’t find his talk as interesting as talk from say Hawkins who is small and can do something. I haven’t seen Hawkins do anything in real though so those are just stories too.