Hey Kathy-Jo

i’m not hawkins student ,
but we hang and he told me he learned alot about ‘‘fighting’’ when he would fight/ spar the karate guys back in the days when karate guys really had something , he would also hit the gym with them all the time and at his age he still has a 6 pack

good genitics maybe or the fact he put in the work when he was younger

he has also given me work out tips ha ha

but he has alot of skill that goes beyond the outer shell
the man will just sit there and let you hit him in the chest as hard as you want and smile at you

he is still very fast and hits very hard , can he fight a young skilled fighter and win

probably not , but he can defend himself

he dropped a young man not to long ago over a some road rage

they guy tried to mess with this little old man and found out he could’t

stories i know , but hawkins showed me what happened [ i played the role of the young guy ] and it was wierd like he re lived the moment and bam i was on the floor and he had me in a standing heal hook with his foot in my balls

yep there is something in wing chun for sure , but again how did they train , lets look at that and compare it to how most train now

big difference no matter how many fancy words you want to spin around it :cool:

Hawkins has said in several interviews that he knew that he needed fighting experience but didn’t want to fight on the streets of HK so he joined a Gojo Ryu karate club to get sparring experience (he also mention how Bruce told him the karate guys were really fast, so he wanted to learn how to beat them). He even earned a black belt in gojo while he was at it. He’s “sparred” with quite a few different arts in his time.

when karate guys really had something

What do you mean?..Do you mean before Karate was turned into swim…I mean sport?.. :slight_smile:

Nothing wrong with “sport” – funny how folks that just do chi sao and forms look down at people who do combative “sports” as practicing something “unreal” and something that won’t prepare them form “real fighting” (and in the same breath argue that their forms and chi sao will). Walk into a kyokushikai karate school, or JKA schools, and have a go with them.

Gojo Ryu is where Austin Powers train for his Mojo… :wink: Goju Ryu…Go= hard,Ju=soft. Ryu=school…Hard soft school of Karate.

Was he using Karate to spar Karate?..

Terrence,

Just curious. Do you consider Karate-type sparring to be equivalent to fighting???

Originally posted by t_niehoff
Nothing wrong with “sport” – funny how folks that just do chi sao and forms look down at people who do combative “sports” as practicing something “unreal” and something that won’t prepare them form “real fighting” (and in the same breath argue that their forms and chi sao will). Walk into a kyokushikai karate school, or JKA schools, and have a go with them.

I did better than walk into a kyokushin school.I trained in one of these for some times when I was a bit younger.I know how it feels to hit hard and how it feels to be hit. I also “sparred” hard with Judo brown and black belts untill recently when I was stopped by a shoulder injury.Stop being so condescendant !..
With who do you have a go BTW?..
And BTW (2)…You should know better about Wing Chun if what I read in your profile is true. But I doubt it!..

Originally posted by Ernie
[B]he dropped a young man not to long ago over a some road rage

they guy tried to mess with this little old man and found out he could’t [/B]

It sounds like this person who got his a** beat was an average person and didn’t have much fighting skill. So would it make sense that there are more non skilled martial artists than actual martial artists, and that we train to handle ourselves against someone without professional fighting skill? I agree that we need to be honest with ourselves on how we train and what we are training for. I think that the average martial artist isn’t worried about fighting a professional fighter but rather worried about the thug or punk kid on the street who justs wants to start trouble because he has bottled-up aggession. I could be wrong on this, it just feels like this thread could make people feel like all their hours of training is worthless unless you train to handle yourself against a professinoal fighter (GREAT THREAD THOUGH).

just a thought

Bill,

In my view, “fighting” is an environment – it is where you are facing a genuinely resisting opponent that is trying their best to cream (overwhelm) you. That girlfight clip I put up is that type of environment. Some “sparring” is fighting, some is not; it all depends on whether the environment exists. That’s why I don’t like the word “sparring” but prefer fighting – to many people sparring is “chickenstepping” than anything else.

As a side note: when I hear people talk about “improving” it makes me wonder what they are trying to improve and how they measure it. For me, it is the ability to cope and succeed in that fighting environment (does it matter how “good” you look in drills or chi sao if you get blasted when fighting?). WCK gives us strategies and tools to do that, to cope and succeed. But our “improvement” must be based on being able to cope and succeed in that environment. So, going back to girlfight – a student can see how they perform in such an environment, then using WCK, we can help them improve their performance (fight better) in that environment, which requires regular immersion in that environment. Thus, they can see their actual improvement by fighting, and the fighitng helps them to direct and focus the non-fighting aspects of their training (forms, drills) toward greater performance.

Originally posted by t_niehoff
That’s why I don’t like the word “sparring” but prefer fighting – to many people sparring is “chickenstepping” than anything else.
Terrence,
Thanks for the concise response and clarification.

WCK gives us strategies and tools to do that, to cope and succeed. But our “improvement” must be based on being able to cope and succeed in that environment.
Seems very reasonable to me.

Thanks,

Good notes Terrence and Ernie.

Most of the Wing Chun training methods used today came from the old timers some of which went out and battled it out. Some teachers we respect such as Tsui Shan Ting were not known as fighters at all yet they have generated some very good fighters. The same in my opinion might be said of Yip Chun and Moy Yat I respect these people and think they have something of use to say that a modern fighter can use as part of his knowledge base as he goes out to the real world to test himself.

All learning combines theory with practice. The teacher points the way, gives the theory and provides some training ideas. That teacher need not be a great fighter himself but needs a good understanding and good eye. He needs to be a good teacher. Not all coaches can play their sport or slug it out in the ring with the people they are training. In professional boxing I doubt any coach can handle his world-class professional fighter. I don’t really know actually what kind of background the top boxing coaches really have. Maybe someone can enlighten me? Certainly their names are not known as are the fighter’s names.

So Tsui Shan Ting let’s say didn’t fight but Wong Shun Leung did. Other names can be substituted so don’t get hung up on the names. Yet I think both can turn out good fighters because most of the work is that of the student and not that of the teacher. The teacher is a guide. A good fighter does not necessarily make a good teacher. A world class Chess player doesn’t make the best Chess analyst. A good analyst can come up with lines of play that will turn out the next world champion. The same may be true of a good boxing coach. Of course both in boxing and Chess you have to have done something in the arts to know something of substance.

I think there are attributes in Wing Chun that cannot always be developed by rushing through the system and then slugging it out in the gym. I have met some people like that. Their attributes where that they were stiff and tense, edgy and jumpy and really weren’t any harder to handle than anyone else. One person was even a SanDa champ with ten years experience (a good fighter mind you but had a lot of trouble against bigger opponents). I think it’s a matter of degree. There are other attributes for real fighting that are developed in the ring by slugging it out with larger opponents.

Anyone who has seen Chen style master Chen XiaoWang move will know that his kind of body coordination, his sensitivity, his depth of understanding doesn’t come from quickly rushing through the Tai Chi system and then training day in and day our with professional boxers. Perhaps at some point that’s useful but to develop his Tai Chi attributes first would take a considerable amount of time. Hitting the ring early is another way to learn but maybe the school of hard knocks way to learn. That method is not for everyone. Some martial arts are just very difficult to master. It takes years and years to get somewhere in Aikido and a top guy like Tohei had trouble to throw an out of shape fat newspaper guy. But there is no doubt he was a master of Aikido that could turn out people better than himself.

Regarding Kenneth Chung, I don’t know his ring ability nor do I care. He has trained Wing Chun intensively for the equivalent time of ten years times 7 hours a day so he has developed something of depth that goes way beyond what I have achieved or what I have seen many others have achieved. When people who know him experience his skills they see some quality there. Whether he can beat up Emin the reality fighter or not is not relevant to me. Both men have put in the time and developed along different lines. Something can be learned from both but they are on different tracks. I would say either is effective on the street. I would say Emin’s might be better in the ring. All of this is speculation. Those who talk about reality should also meet people like Chen XiaoWang and give them a try to see something about the depth of classical Chinese Kung Fu. It also has it’s merits. I think you could be good in the ring but then still miss a lot that martial arts have to offer. It’s not easy to be good against all the kinds of fighters.

From our experience we have had people who work as bouncers and fought a lot and their training was just the usual Wing Chun stuff consisting of forms, Chi sau and light sparring, punching the bag, and wooden dummy work. Some also trained with some boxers and kickboxers (there is a world class kickboxer here) and they did all right. I have seen one case where a so called “dry land swimmer” totally demolished a very experienced ring type by picking him apart. Both of these guys were big boys with similar attitudes so already the chance is 50/50 of who will prevail. Maybe the ring guy got sucked into fighting the other guys fight. But the dry land swimmer later became a bouncer and then a correctional officer and has been in many fights. That realistic experience of course has made him an even better fighter than before but he already had something from his “useless” training. Just not everyone is interested to go the distance nor does everyone feel like killing their fellow human being or beating them to a pulp.

We have students now who I think will take a few years before they can start to be a fighter. They don’t have that mentality. To teach them I challenge them just enough but not so much that they get freaked out and quit. That experience has also happened to me. Once a lady with a year’s worth of experience thought she was getting pretty good. But I told her that reality fighting is still very different than having success in Chi sau. So I demonstrated by applying some slightly more vigorous pushing and pulling forces on her. I didn’t hurt her at all but she was very shocked, turned a pale white and never came back. This was a very good student so it was sad to see that happen. I think with a more gradual approach she would have stayed. In another case a lady Wing Chun teacher asked me to take over one of her classes because she had to be away. So I decided to work on some basic techniques like Pak sau. I asked one lady to throw a punch so I could demonstrate a Pak sau drill. I didn’t hit hard but she shrieked, jumped 10 feet away and said in a loud voice “keep you hands off me!” I was quite surprised. After the class the other ladies told me to not worry about it because that lady was always like that. I think she had gone though some sexual abuse experiences and so any physical contact was highly traumatic for her. If I had known that, then I could have taught her in a completely different more gradual way.

So for these people it doesn’t do them any good to send them off to the local kickboxing gym to get their head handed to them on a silver plate. They can get beat up enough by their fellow student if that is what they want to feel. A teacher must tailor the program to the student. I don’t agree with sending everyone out to get hurt. That’s up to the student. Everyone is training for different reasons. Slow or fast depends on the student’s mentality. You can’t teach everyone Wing Chun in 3 months and then send him or her out to fight.

We have had people who spend several years to train and still they are not fighters but they really love the art. We have had one person with 7 months of Wing Chun who entered the Karate Black belt competitions and won against 5 opponents before getting knocked down with a good hook punch.

On this forum there are many kinds of people I think. A small percentage is like professional ring fighters who dominate the discussion and make anyone’s training and discussion seem irrelevant. I think everyone’s journey is useful. Even a beginner can have something useful to say and shouldn’t be afraid to say something that is dumb or to ask a stupid question. There are no stupid questions. I think this forum would be most useful if say 10% of the talk was reality talk and the rest is concerned with other aspects of this art.

Everything is relative. If some professional fighters were on this forum then no one would have anything to say because who has anyone fought? What can you tell Mike Tyson that would be of use to him? Nothing! What can you tell Jon Bluming, Doleman Dekker about fighting that they haven’t hear before? Nothing! The real fighters don’t waste time on these kinds of forums because they are too busy training. I think there are two camps. One camp is the professionals and the other camp is the amateur hobbyists. The two can’t really see eye to eye but the amateur can learn something from the professional.

You know what, dry land swimming is a lot harder than regular swimming. Try doing the Butterfly stroke or crawl for 100 meters across the sand. That’s a real workout. (joke)

Hopefully we are just giving each other’s perspectives in the light of learning from each other. I learn stuff from people much stupider than me too.

old jong,

I train with all kinds of folks – other WCK guys, bjjers, wrestlers, mmaists – anyone that can give me a beating! After all, you don’t get better training with folks that you can whoop. :wink:

And I’m not being condescending – your remarks about karate seemed to belittle it. I replied to go see for yourself. My experience is kyokushikai and JKA folks can and do fight.

Personally, I don’t care how “tough” anyone claims to be – I certainly don’t claim to be “all that”; I’ve encountered too many good, really skilled people to make any personal claims. My comments are directed toward what we need to do to increase our fighting skill. That’s all. Whether my profile is accurate or not doesn’t diminish my arguments. But if you have any questions, several people on this list have met me in person. Rene for one. Ask him about me and my “profile.”

Ray, you made some good points. I agree with you 100% that a WCK teacher doesn’t need to be a good fighter. A good friend of mine (from another lineage) told me once that his teacher, the student of a well-known WCK fighter, told my friend that he (the teacher) could give the student the method but not the application (fighting skill) – that it could only be obtained by the student on his own by actually fighting. I responded that I admired his teacher; not only did he understand the training method, but he was honest about it.

Hawkins once said the same thing – he was asked about “the footwork” and what Yip Man had taught him. Hawkins replied, “YM didn’t teach me the footwork, my opponent’s did.”

Someone can show you the punches of boxing, the footwork, the evasions, the drills, etc. – the method of boxing. That won’t make the student a good boxer. All that is necessary, but they learn to box in the ring, by boxing. No one becomes a good boxer without getting in the ring. They may be able to pass along the method, but not the application. That is individual and comes from the doing.

your remarks about karate seemed to belittle it.

I have lots of respect for original Karate. But,what could I say about your remarks on Wing Chun?..Do you only know about forms and immobile chi-sau?..Have you experimented the Chum Kiu level of “chi-sau”?..Many learn the forms and never get the developement going with them in their actual practice. Are you one of them?..Many are still at SLT level of practice even after all the entire system is believe to be learned.They practice Chum Kiu,the dummy and all but only “operate” at SLT level,playing with hands!..This could explain why so many are looking outside of the system for footwork and things to fill the holes!..I guess many “teachers” will not share this with their students also!..

Who knows?..

Quote Ernie:
“yep there is something in wing chun for sure , but again how did they train , lets look at that and compare it to how most train now”
I think that s where the whole problem is. If I understand Ernie and others correctly, you cannot just live off the reputation of the art or the “status”, “popularity” of your instructor. To be good at anything you have to understand it. That’s where the problem lies with most Martial Artist today, especially in WC. The one thing I really like about the Ting organization is that when ever you see one of there instructors demo something they all basically look the same. Yeah, they may be like robots, but to have most of the instructors in a large organization like Ting’s look the same means what? Good quality control, regardless if we agree on what they are doing or not. They have mastered IMO the art of transmitting information on the art of WC to the people that want to learn it. They even offer a university like program over there in Germany at that Castle they own for wanna be instructors, jeez. When I started in WC, I loved it so much that it basically consumed most of my attention for the first 5 or 6 yrs. At that time my Sifu moved from the city I was living in to Calgary, back in 89’. It was hard for me to accept that as I learned early to appreciate him and his wife(she’s my senior in WC) being there and the instruction they provided. But in retrospect in made me start to think on my own and discover things myself, although I had all access to Sifu by phone anytime and he did return home every 4 months. Sooner or later a student has to take on some of the responsibility for their progression through the system. Now this all depends on individual goals and what each person wants out of the system. Me, I wanted it all and to learn it all, and I wanted it all now, lol. Of course we don’t always get what we want, and things did change over time, but eventually I did reach the goal and later I realized the journey of learning is never over.

I also was curious as to what others were up to, especially other WC practitioners.  Since most all the WC back then and now are not really the same as what I practice, it is easy to get information on the different lineages and systems out there today.  Education is the key point, exploration and self discovery of one's self is important too.  If your goal is to become the deadliest fighter, IMO, it is possible to be so in the WC system, but not through some of the WC that is out there, because to me not all WC is equal or the same.  Yes I am very confident in the WC I practice, I teach and what my Sifu still teaches me today. For example, I wish someone would explain to me how can there be so many ways to do the Tan Sao, and all of them be correct?  Are they all correct?  I don't believe so.  Same with the Chi-Sao that is out there today.  So many variations.  This is where some of the problems are.  Some people don't know what to believe because now they know there are other ways to do things, and they fail to analyze what they are learning and preaching.  That old saying” What may work for you may not work for me".  I think that saying is crap.  WC works for everyone, some more so than other because they put the work in and understand it better than they know themselves.

As for fighting, some will naturally be better fighters just because they like to fight. Personally I don’t like to fight, and for me sparring would not be a great training tool as I would not be inclined to perform at the maximum intensity level needed to make it all work. In other words, if I have nothing against you and we spar I will not want to hurt you, and knowing that this situation is not real, my intensity level will not be there. I’ve always been a better match player than practice partner. I would more than likely let you do your thing to me and experience that and be more worried about hitting you too hard than my own safety. Not all are like this I know, so that type of training method doesn’t work for all the same. In my mind Martial Arts in not about fighting, it’s about self development and self discovery through a art form that uses combat as it’s vehicle. If you never use your MA in a fight then to me you have succeeded
James

I think we are all becoming better writers anyway. So I expect to see some good books coming out in the future as well as some realistic modern Wing Chun training DVDs.

LoL, yes your correct Ray. I haven’t written this much since college days. Thank God for Microsoft Word too.

The DVD’s are on there way as well as a book is in the works too, the more information and awareness out there the better, right.

James

good thread

I’d like to thank Ray for starting this thread.

What I like about Ernie’s approach is that he is seeking what is going to be useful in a realistic situation. Working on developing the attributes to prevail against a resisting opponent. This is the same thing Terrence is talking about.

The wakeup call of “reality” or MMA based training is a good one.

It should cause us to examine the training methodolgy we use to see if it will produce effective results. Or the most efficient approach while remaining true to the core concepts of the art.

The perceived “secret” of Wing Chun training was the use of chi sao to develop contact based reactive response. Your hands just feel the opening and “go for it”. Yeah yeah I know there is more, but I’m being overly simplistic here. Couple that with economy of motion and centerline and you have a great little workhorse art.

Now, back to reality.

Arts like BJJ have developed a methodolgy for training their students which gives them a high degree of success in fighting.
Their record of this is well documented and is consistent to this very day.

Wing Chun does not currently have such a current record.
It is based on legend, urban legend and stories of activities which happened in the 1950’s at best.

So the question is how can we as students find ways to improve the statistical chances of success or at least attribute and demonstrable skill utiizing Wing Chun?

It doesn’t mean every student has to train to K1/Pride/UFC level of conditioning. But it should mean that there is a development approach which COULD lead one to that IF you desired. It should be just a matter of upping the conditioning/intensity level to match what you need to be competitive.

It should mean that even if someone wasn’t planning to enter an NHB match, they were at a minimum being trained to realistically handle a resisting opponent and to be able to prevail.

And it should mean that a student with basic skills in Wing Chun should have MORE than a theoretical plan for handling a junior, intermediate and senior STUDENT of boxing, Muay Thai, or BJJ as a start.

After all, today we aren’t creeping around after Qing officials. Nor are we doing rooftop fights with Choy Lay Fut or Mantis guys. The fighters of today are MT/Boxing/BJJ’ers–people who cross train in those arts.

Bottom line it means teaching someone how to fight if THAT is the last resort they have, and being able to win.

That means being able to take the theory of one’s lineage and put it into reality. That your biu sau CAN handle that tight hook.
That you CAN close on in on someone trying to hammer you with a Muay Thai kick, That you CAN deal with someone who wants to take you down with either a tackle, single or doulbe leg takedown.

If we can do this, then we re-establish the legacy of the art for the present and we improve our own attributes and abilities. We also lay the foundation for passing on the art to future generations with a PATH that will give them desired results in unarmed fighting.

Gentleman
You never cease to amaze me , this thread has brought some very well thought out views , from the scent of a dog [ credit to Jong ] to the scent of a woman , the blind man in us all seeing a little more .

Ray ,
Great post , and yes I have learn just a much from a beginner then and teacher , a Childs eyes are often the most honest , we all have so much to give and we all do share a lot , this makes being here worth it

We are all armatures your right , I know even though I train with and when I’m real nuts at the level of professionals [ no kids , don’t watch TV obsessive personality ]
I am by far not in the league of a professional just don’t have it in me , don’t need to pound people to prove things .
But wing chun can be trained in a professional way , you can glove some one up and have them try and take your head off and use only your wing chun to control the situation , this to me is sparring , I don’t think about scoring points , but feeling when something works and feeling when something doesn’t under pressure , this is just another version of chi sau in my eyes , but now distance and intensity and type of attack have changed . this is the nearest I can get to a beimo situation without going for that ambulance trip

And gentleman wing chun really does shine , once you get past the initial overwhelming wall of intensity , your timing and changing gets quick explosive and clear , not a tag match but quick termination , worked over and over again off many people

I still think street were suddenness makes a difference

Example . I have this totally new guy , ex marine very serious but new , just taught him pak sau a few weeks ago , his black belt BJJ friend was making fun of his choice in training , and tried to surprise him with a attack , this new guy with like no real skill just reacted with a pak but really punched and dropped his BJJ buddy
Now in the ring the guy would lose 10 out of 10 times to the BJJ
But in the street there are different factors

This reminded me how effective something that simple can be in the right situation

So yes we learn from beginners some of the most valuable lessons all the time , some times knowing to much is a bad thing =)

So I propose this simple drill have one of your non wing chun buddies put on some 16oz gloves and a mouth piece and tell him to really go at you with all the awkward and untrained angles that a regular person might throw , and see if you can flow and control him , if you know anyone that is strong and athletic have him do the same , see what the difference is the find a good boxer or kick boxer that is willing to work with you and do the same
Go back to normal chi sau and tell me how it feels

All this is with in the wing chun spectrum just an extension of chi sau nothing more , I promise you will have fun and get frustrated and get excited but most of all learn a lot about yourself and your wing chun .

Give it a shot let me know how it worked out , and those of you that have done something like this , what did you find out

David W sez:

That means being able to take the theory of one’s lineage and put it into reality. That your biu sau CAN handle that tight hook.
That you CAN close on in on someone trying to hammer you with a Muay Thai kick, That you CAN deal with someone who wants to take you down with either a tackle, single or doulbe leg takedown

Good points David. Contemporary Wing Chun has spread too fast and wide and has less quality control than several other styles.

It is not just a matter of lacking realistic experience- it includes
a widespread underdevelopment of fundamentals. Both lack of development and relevant experience are widespread problems.