[QUOTE=David Jamieson;789880]As wars of words go, this board has fallen into a state of contrition.
mma proponents can’t seem to get enough of telling kungfu people how wrong they are in everything they do which has left a lot of kungfu proponents feeling slighted and some bewildered.
Much of the argument is moot and people have a tendency to throw hypotheticals around as if they were reality.
then the harping about “how many kungfu” guys won mma tournaments come up, to which there is no answer really. There are plenty of guys in mma who have done or have drawn from the well of traditional martial arts. But apparently, it’s not en vogue to admit that.
Anyway, I get your frustration Adam, so does the management as they have even made way for a forum all their own. They (they being the. mma proponents) seem to still be unable to come away from it.Probably has a lot to do with misplaced aggression or something.
Kungfu will always be kungfu despite how people want to put it into a box and look at it and feel like they have defined something as (a) or (b). THeir loss really isn’t it? :)[/QUOTE]
I have out a few threads into the MMA forum, they all died a chi ridden death…
I don’t view myself as a CMA or a JMA, simply a MA.
I have found and continue to find, many things of value in TMA, be them CMA, JMA, FMA or whatever.
There can be no MMA without TMA.
That said, EVERY MA is open to critique and rightly so, indeed, as MA it is our duty to question and “find out for ourselves” the validity of any and all MA claims.
Why wouldn’t we? we would we simply take things at face value ?
As for TCMA, they have so much to offer people beyond merely “fighting skills”, BUT, that said, this is a public and open forum, when some one rips a sheet of white paper and says its black silk, they should be prepared to have their view challenged.