[QUOTE=TenTigers;1091746]If you’re going to lose all the structure, methodology and technique of Kung-Fu and end up with basic kickboxing, then why bother doing Kung-Fu at all?
Just do kickboxing and be done with it.
After all, that is what you’re doing anyway.
You’re just wearing the t-shirt.
Some people maintain the mindsets..but it’s still kickboxing.
Some people “flavor” their kickboxing..well, it’s an attempt…
makes me ponder; if you aknowledge that your system contains jabs, cross, uppercut, hook, overhand, frontkick, roundhouse, knees and elbows, and in addition add key signatures of your style, are you doing Chinese-flavored kickboxing?
or, if you simply omit the signature techniques and elements, the “flavoring,” are you doing Kung-Fu?
Or, if you add them into your system just so you can compete with the kickboxers, then what?[/QUOTE]
This is the “pondering” I was talking about. People like to say that when Kung Fu players fight, they end up looking like kickboxers. Techniques should be simple to perform, fast, and cause damage. If they don’t, what’s the point? Jab, Cross, Hook is a great combination, but what about throwing in a Dragon’s head instead of a hook, how about instead of using a front thrust or teep, you use an iron broom.
My point of view is this, Kung Fu in and of itself is more a philosophy or intangible than anything. Sure you have your systems and they have their flavor, but what two individuals have you ever seen use the same techniques, in the same manner, in the exact same way? You never have, and you never will.