Hi Victor,
Originally posted by Ultimatewingchun
[B]Kathy Jo:
Since we’re on the subject of attitudes…how come I never see you complain about the smug “Good Wing Chun doesn’t need anything that I don’t do” attitude that a bunch of the more conservative types around here display?
As if their undocumented and unseen Wing Chun expertise and knowledge is sitting on a mountain top?
That’s a very condescending attitude also…isn’t it? [/B]
Good question. The answer is pretty complex. In part it’s …
a) Because I don’t see most of those people you refer to “pressing” their “attitude” on others as much as defending the right to have a perspective and exchange ideas in a civil and decent way on this forum. Furthermore, in many cases they post as they do in an effort to bring at least some balance to the forum discussions. Much of their “complaining” is at essence more about general tone and and how people on the forum treat each other, as it is about defense of a position on a given subject. And in that much I heartily agree with them; there’s definitely something amiss of late. I am less concerned about extremes of position, than in how people use those extremes like weapons against one another generally or individually.
b) You may have noticed I didn’t come out defending the “all you need is in Wing chun” either. I really didn’t comment on it of late at all, one way or the other.
c) There is a loud enough communal “voice” on the incompleteness and uselessness of Wing Chun to balance out any perceived extremes in the perception about Wing Chun’s completeness. So it didn’t look like you guys were in dire need of my help to balance that one out.
d) Some of what we see people arguing (from both extremes) is more a function of limitations or styles of communication, rather than a full representation of what they may actually believe or are trying to say. What we see on the page may be even ****her [further … darn filter] from what they really “do.” I tend to look for substance and meaning more than the literal words on a page. I try to ask myself “What is this person really trying to say?” I’m not always successful, but I try.
If I were to make a general suggestion, we’d all do better if more people tried asking themselves the same question. And kudos to those who do and have made great efforts to “listen” and “understand” more … there have been a few of you, and it hasn’t all gone unnoticed.
e) Time is also a driving factor in picking my battles and contributions, as it should be for others. Tilting at windmills, pressing my perspective, or insisting to be considered as “right” is not generally a good use of my time, at least when I am able to recognize it as such.
f) I don’t think poor behavior on anyone’s part is appropriate, though being human, we’re all guilty of it at times. I don’t presume to be some perfect and unbiased arbiter either (besides on this forum that’s Sandman’s job, LOL), nor will I perceive everything that others do (though I do catch quite a lot). I confess leanings toward underdogs in discussion (call it a lifelong passion, LOL, and not limited to Wing Chun), and regardless of “position” argued; based on the sheer volume and energy of your postings alone, I would hardly consider some of you fellows as underdogs. Still, two wrongs don’t make a right (I’m talking behavior, not position argued). Neither does one unchallenged or lopsided wrong make a right; so there’s a bit of a catch-22, and pick-your-poison of late. An alternative is just to give up, and abandon the the forum as lost. Sometimes the right solution to a problem isn’t so clear. <sigh>
FWIW, I do in fact believe what we are observing of late is not truly so much an argument over positions or beliefs, but rather a combination of frustrations and hopes for bringing sanity back to the forum. I believe it is also a grassroots refutation of the notion that most of us should just shut up and go away, as has been stated several times in so many words.
g) If you’re actually asking what I think of the complete or incomplete Wing Chun idea, crosstraining, etc, that’s an entirely different suite of matters than the issue of forum behaviors. You may notice, I rarely “push” my ideas on others, though on days where there is a more civil or welcoming tone on the forum, I may offer some of my thoughts, observations, or experiences in good faith, and to be taken or left FWLIW and as seen fit by my fellow readers.
h) Regarding my own thinking about Wing Chun being complete or incomplete, it really doesn’t matter. As Ernie and others have said so many times, the only thing that really counts is what we do, and what we can do. Without greater context of both meaning and application it’s mainly a semantics game. Mostly I’ve left that topic to the “experts” for debate, LOL. Since you asked though, and FWLIW, I’ll take your question in good faith and try over the next few days to offer up a few of my own and varied thoughts on the subject.
i) Because the issue of Wing Chun’s completeness is far from the only one being debated or being lumped together across the “lines in the sand.” We’ve got the completeness vs. incompleteness issue, the what to do about it or do nothing issue, MMA vs. Wing Chun issue, Wing Chun vs. BJJ vs. every other method of groundfighting issue, the fighter vs. non-fighter issue, the sports fighter vs. personal defense vs. do it for fun issue, the you’ve got no right to speak issue, the let’s see your video so we can pick apart your training, your skill, your lineage, and your credibility issue, etc. ad nauseum. So much to choose from, yet so little that actually interests me. Well, other than in seeing what makes other people tick, LOL.
j) I didn’t presume it mattered much to anyone what I might think on the subject. Especially in light of the proliferation of posts already on the topic.
My larger concern on the forum is really not what people believe, how they train, what their capabilities are, their preferences in Wing Chun, interest in other martial arts, who can beat up who, etc. My main concern continues to be how forum members treat each other. It may not be easy, but with some effort it is possible to treat each other with a modicum of decency and human respect even when disagreeing with one another. Building poor relations builds a poor environment for interaction, making positive and constructive interchange increasingly unlikely. Worse, and unfortunately, forum behaviors sometimes lead to real, if really stupid, problems between people in “real” life too.
It boils down to this: If people value forums like this one as a potential means of fruitful exchange (on line) or connection with others (on and off line), then the forum itself and its membership must be treated and maintained with some degree of mutual care and respect. This is “my house” too, and when I see people carelessly or persistently trying to make a mess of it, that tends to get my attention. We can debate how much I know or don’t know about Wing Chun, but I do know a little something about human nature and interactive group cultures.
So that’s in part why I didn’t complain directly to the “smug conservatives.” I could go on, but it would likely max out KFO’s present capacity. 
I’ll get back to you with some of my thoughts on the wholesomeness of Wing Chun thing as time allows.
Regards,