Your own path
Victor sez: He defends someone’s rants who admittedly (James) doesn’t do ANY hard sparring by saying that unless you’ve fought a Thai or Boxing or BJJ CHAMPION on the street - who’s trying to KILL you…
Not at all. I wasn’t defending James as much as our freedom to speak on this forum – with or withour sparring expereince. Ernie cited that only people with sparring or real fighting experience (personal experience) should post on this forum…I simply pointed out that if that were the criteria, then nobody is qulaified to post here, since nobody here has beaten anybody of repute, and the attributes aquired from so-called sparring sessions is questionable in a REAL fight.
Victor sez: unless you’ve done that - you’ve no right to take someone to task who thinks he knows everything but doesn’t even spar…much less fight for real on the street.
That’s my point. Who on this forum has actually fought for real on the street with a highly skillful fighter with full intent? Have you, Victor? If so, what was his name and style?
Victor sez: BUT THERE ARE AT LEAST A MILLION SHADES OF GRAY in-between the two extremes - and chisauking tries to make believe they don’t exist!
Again, not at all. With me, I’m not interested in in-betweens; I’m only interested in whether it works or not. Everybody that knows me knows I don’t make excuses. Unlike many, I don’t delude myself that the results I obtain from so-called sparring with boxing gloves, padding and a bird cage on my head would be replicated in a real fight with no rules, bare knuckles, real INTENT, and my hard Dr. Martin boots. The results would never be the same.
My main point I’m trying to get across is, this forum is only for a bit of fun for fellow wing chun people. If we start to impose conditions of only experienced fighters with actual personal fight experience should post here, then most – if not all – wouldn’t qualify.
In my 20 years’ plus in wing chun, this journey has taught me, if nothing else, that there are many paths leading to the same destination. Just because James haven’t followed your path doesn’t mean he will never reach the destination. Indeed, he may even get there before you.
besides, if you don’t even read Jame’s post any more, how can you argue any points he has stated?
Don’t tell me – you have been secretly reading his post even though you don’t find them interesting and informative
