The Wing Chun Mystery

Joy, Hunt1,

It is my believe that we need to work to integrate all our solution. instead of either or type of deal.

Fit is good enough, I dont care about “true”. my bottom line is can we leave the next generation something make sense for thier training and they can continous on. IMHO, this is OUR project in our generation. Now Jim did a great job contributing. Next everyone has the equal opportunity to contribute. If we all contribute something which is fit. then that will be wonderfull. IMHO, we need to grow and expand and dig deeper…etc

Joy,
we sure need to get the terminology define. IE: Orbiting, I purposely not use Chinese Term. because I am avoiding ten people might come up with ten different chinese intepretation , because a Chinese study instead of what is Orbiting which at the end lost the meaning of what I mean.

Keep contribute guys and gals, this is a democratic world and we all are equal and have opportunity to contribute.

we need to sort out the process of shock power generation without mystify with clear steps…

… … …

Jim,

add these from the white crane side,

1, centre line principle

2, water shape hand — Tan Sau

3, Fire Shape hand – PAk Sau

4, Chao Yang hand – Mun Sau/ Jong Sau…

and the list go on…

Tony,

You forgot to misquote and misrepresent the part where I said Roger Rabbit taught Leung Jan. Maybe next time :slight_smile:

Love up!

Rene

Superman and spiderman taught Yim Wing Chun! :smiley:

Hey Tony,

> We know Wong Wah-Bo was his teacher.

Do we?

> Secondly suggesting that Yik Kam being the Junior to both Wong Wah-Bo and Leung Yee Tai as trivial means your study of Chinese history is very inadequate an in need of much assistance from a new source.

“Trivial” is your word, and I’m curious as to what you’re suggesting about people like Yip Man and Wong Shun-Leung, both of whom had many sihing? Do you consider them somehow “trivial” or inferior soley by virtue of a “date stamp”? Do you not think any 3rd or 4th sidai could have profound knowledge of their system?

> For those of us that do not only do we truly understand how implausible hendrik’s theory really is we also see things in the systems themselves a little differently than most.

Out of curiosity, what discrepensies do you see in the Jee Shim theory? In the Cheung Ng theory? We know no model, absent a time machine, is 100% perfect, so what holes in those do you still think need to be explored in those theories?

Hunt1 sez:

You have an advantage I have never met hendrick or seen his wing chun but from what he has written his wing chun seems to share much in common with what i was taught. However all wing chun I have personally seen has much in common.

As an aside if you talk to my good friend Phil Romero and see his wing chun you will find a great deal that is in common with hendrick even though his wing chun is from Hawkins Cheung.

Hunt 1: I have met Hendrik and hada good visit with him over a two day period.
He does not talk negatively about individuals- but he speaks to topics and is generous in sharing what he knows.
I have seen his form- unlike many of us who break down the form into 3 parts-
his slt has biu jee motions in it… and his form is recognizably wing chun-though he is not from the Ip man or Sum Nun line. He is quite deeply read in Chinese and Asian history. His fast key board work in English creates problems at times for readers.
While Jim has focused on the health aspects of Emei- Hendrik has extensive materials from Emei showing martial stance, hand positions, line control etc. I am not in the Yik Kam or Cho lines and have no vested interest in promoting that line.

Broken arrow, orbiting are his terms… many of us but probably not all know those concepts operationally without using those terms.

Many folks on this forum overgeneralize- saying wing chun doesnt have this or that- often they are commenting on their own wing chun and not necessarily on all others.

I am glad that you have met Phil Romero- please convey a hello for me if/when you see him again. Regards,

joy chaudhuri

Hello Jim,
When you find time enough to get up off the floor and take your foot out your mouth let us closely examine your post.

originally posted by Jim Roselando
We do? Prove it! Show us the “We Know” evidence so we can discuss it.

Jim, even though you haven’t proven word one of what you post, is that what you said to Rene.

In some stories, Wong Wah-Bo reportedly taught Weng Chun Kuen to Dai Fa Ming Kam and Wing Chun Kuen to Leung Yee-Tai (in exchange for Weng Chun Kuen pole methods) and other Opera performers.
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Hq4PHIXIzrcJ:www.wingchunkuen.com/who/ancestors/wongwahbo.html+Wingchunkuen+Wong+WahBo&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
His word on this particular matter should be good enough for even you.

originally posted by Jim Roselando
Known Fact so far:

Yip Man

Yuen Kay San

Yuen Chai Wan

Sum Nung

Leung Jan

Cho’s

Fung’s

Etc.
All state the original set was one long set that was later broken into three sets and all say the art is Snake and Crane. This would be a union of Military and Monk systems. See, if the two camps work together you can actually find common ground in theory.

Really Jim that is very interesting because as Curator of the Ving Tsun Museum and Student of Moy Yat, Student of Ip Ching and Ip Chun and visitor and seminar participant of Grandmaster William Cheung my Sigung Master Meng has Never heard of Yip Man Ever making mention of this to anyone. For the record what is your position in not only the Yip Man family but the Leung Jan lineage as well that you can now make such a claim for them.

Siu Nim Tao (Xiao Nian Tou, Little Idea), the first boxing set of the Yip Man Wing Chun Kuen system, is also sometimes pronounced closer to Siu Lim Tao in certain Hong Kong dialects. Although not to the extent of the Wooden Dummy or weapons sets, there is some variation in the details of the routine from descendant to descendant. While at least three of these variations can be traced back to modifications by Yip Man himself (see below), many others may be the result of later personalizations by different students.

Chum Kiu (Xun Qiao, Seeking Bridge) is the second boxing set of the Yip Man Wing Chun Kuen system. Although not to the extent of the Wooden Dummy or weapons sets, there is some variation in the details of the routine from descendant to descendant. While at least some of these variations can be traced back to modifications by Yip Man himself (see below), many others may be the result of later personalizations by different students. Terminology for the individual moves can also vary greatly.

Biu Jee (Biao Zhi, Darting Fingers) is the third and final boxing set of the Yip Man Wing Chun Kuen system. Although not to the extent of the Wooden Dummy or weapons sets, there is some variation in the details of the routine from descendant to descendant. While at least some of these variations can be traced back to modifications by Yip Man himself (see below), many others may be the result of later personalizations by different students. Terminology for the individual moves can also vary greatly.
Taken from wingchunkuen.com
http://www.wingchunkuen.com/modules.php?name=Encyclopedia&op=content&tid=44
Again nothing here in the Yip Man section mentions that the three sets were at one time considered to be done as one long set.

It seems unsual to see Leung Jan on your list because he was taught by Wong Wah-Bo and Leung Yee Tai so if he had ever said this where would it have come from if not Wong Wah-Bo or Leung Yee Tai and if Leung Jan said this and it is attributed to one of his teachers then why is it that he is missing from your list.

originally posted by Jim Roselando
Leung Yee Tai was supposed to have done the One Set. Leung Jan had Two Sifu’s. This is the birth of the Koo Lo story of the Woman’s style and Man’s style Wing Chun arts. Hinting that there is more than one version with diffferent DNA. Arts evolve.
So here you begin to speculate like wildfire and you bring Leung Yee Tai into your story of one long SNT but neglected to put his name on your list interesting.
originally posted by Jim Roselando
The troup senior Wong Wah Bo was “rumored” to have had White Crane training already!!
Rene and his sources must have left that part out of the bio. But then again you said rumored so its ok in your mind.

originally posted by Jim Roselando
Pao Fa Lin is a known modern expressions of Wing Chun. We can count them out. Many state its a fusion with Taiji and Hung Kuen blended.

As for Hung Gun Biu and Pao Fa Lein you obviously are unaware of their history not sure why you even bring them into your story. Hung Gun Biu and Dai Dung Fong were both Secret Society members representing 2 different branches of Wing Chun Kuen that until recently the public had very little knowledge of. Jim again it is clear by your statements you are one of the people with very little knowledge on this topic.
http://www.hfy108.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=1557&perpage=15&pagenumber=1

http://www.wingchunkuen.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=97

originally posted by Jim Roselando
Dai Fa Min Kam did not do Wing Chun but rather Weng Chun so we can count him out. Yet, this is important as it shows there was “TWO” arts on the Junks associating with each other and developing.
Again your choice of words is interesting you just said that white crane plus weng chun plus wing chun equals “TWO”.
originally posted by Jim Roselando
All I took was the different stories common theme and try to locate a couple of possiblities. Its just more to think about. This article also gave us all more time to chat again.
Jim, what you took would be known as liberties to say the least talking about lots of things you know little of but where brainwashed by hendrik with. You have a lot of issues with either rene or rene’s sources but one thing is clear if hendrik says he sees a snake you’ll be the first one in the grass on your knees.
Originally posted by Hendrik
When Jim meet me last year, he asked me if he need to learn my SLT. I told him I will try to help him so that he can turn his enginee on via some simple move, and when his engine is on, he can develop or invent different type of moves or even no moves at all to help others. The point is not about Wearing William Hung T-shirt to become a fan. But to empower and set others free.

Hello everyone,

Replies to various comments below:

I’m not saying anything different. Wing Chun has everything to strengthen the body of the practitioner for the purpose of using wing chun and its techniques in a fight. The legs, the arms , the abdomen, the back, the bones, tendons etc. are worked out and strengthened doing the wing chun forms. You, and Hendrik, seem to believe that some mysterious qigong exercises from emei are absolutely necessary for that. I simply disagree. Simply letting your “chi/Qi” flow is not going to build your body and/or win you a fight. You need go through lots and lots of repetitions with the forms to build your body…more about that below. That’s why I keep stressing that wing chun is a fighting art.

You’re putting words in my mouth. The purpose of learning wing chun is to defeat possible opponents in a FIGHT. Of course wing chun prepares your body in a way that you can actually use wing chun techniques. Repeating forms ad nauseum and working out in the dummy and with partners do that. Your health will get improved as a side effect of moving your ass instead of sitting on a couch, drinking beer and eating potato chips. :smiley: I don’t see how hard that is to understand. If I want to learn a system specifically for health, I’d go do things that were optimized/developed for that…like Yoga (which I absolutely LOVE by the way), yang taijiquan or even qigong…OR…just any sport or activity there is that gets your heart rate going and your sweat glands flowing. :smiley:

Forms are not needed per se to develop a fighting art, but forms are ingenious tools superior to formless practice for many reasons. A few of these reasons are: 1. learn the alphabet of the system in easily remembered sequences 2. develop the body in the specific ways your system requires it 3. through repetition train your body to remember the techniques of your system so the required “shape/technique” is utilized “automatically” when it’s required. Learning happens through repetition after all. 4. as a quasi “side effect” or result of No. 2 and 3 develop the types of power transmissions (“jings”) required by your system

You have any empricial proof for that? Anything you do wrong can cause health problems…this applies to most sports and activities. How about just using logic and not doing things that cause you pain, make you feel uncomfortable and similar issues? You’re getting sidetracked anyway. Let’s get back to the real issue here. As a developer/founder of wing chun you would not be concerned with long term “qi” blockages and real or perceived/imagined health issues resulting from that. What you would be concerned with are things like not losing your life or bodily functions the next time you have to fight for your life and/or freedom. Otherwise, there won’t be any “long term” for you to be worried about. Back in those times, those issues were more pressing for a great majority of people who were actively involved in the martial arts world.

Two things: 1. Thai boxing and expecially western boxing are sports and have been sports/entertainment since their inception. Boxing has been a sport from the beginning and Thai boxing became a sport after it developed from the military art called “krabi krabong.”

  1. You have causes and effect totally wrong here. Yes, martial arts are pretty much dead (most of them) or dying(some of them, including wing chun), not because they are practicing “worthless forms” (which is nonsense Jim), but because martial arts are not needed in our society anymore. Plain and simple. “Martial” implies “war” or “fight”. Do you want to go to war bare handed or with a long pole? Do you want to fight a mugger, who’s pointing a gun at you with a lan sao/chung choi? Exactly. You don’t. That’s why martial arts are dead for the most part. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with the forms.

But you touched an interesting point here…as martial arts have lost their real purpose (effective fighting systems), people start seeing all kinds of things in them and changing/interpreting them for other things. All of a sudden they are seen as “health systems” for promoting some mystical Qi in people’s bodies. People stop training like they used to, develop 40 lbs bellies and gather in forums to talk about Qi, meridians, health effects, “orbiting” and all kinds of things that have absolutely nothing to do with the original purpose of the martial art in question. Another sign that martial arts are dead. That’s why we need to preserve any and all knowledge that is still left about the original purpose of wing chun and other martial arts: effective fighting.

Your body won’t become weak if you actually practice enough…yes, forms, forms forms, dummy, dummy, dummy, sparring, sparring sparring, chi sao, chi sao, chi sao…etc. etc. etc.. Plus, it won’t hurt to go running, swimming or other sports that get your hear pumping and give you a good cardiovascular workout. And voila: there’s your healthy body. In contrast, most martial artists nowadays, especially in wing chun, are overweight and out of shape. Sorry guys, but that’s reality. Especially people that tend to talk a lot about Qi, health, meridians, qigong etc., etc. as certain wing chun factions and especially your average taiji/qigong practitioners, tend to be the most unhealthy and overweight (=very unhealthy) people out there. Anyway? What’s your point? As you can see I am a proponent of a healthy and strong body and see it as an absolutely necessity. Are you saying that our founders absolutely needed some kind of qigong system to stay healthy and strong? Maybe they actually practiced a lot more than your average “martial artists” nowadays since they had a lot more motivation (i.e. their life was on the line).

No, because Hendrik says that wing chun has the emei “engine” and not just some snake style engine. So let’s call the beast by its name.

So do the Taiji classics and some kuen kuits. So? If i don’t see any similarities in motion and function, then other “verbal” similarities are just that…similarities..not proof that emei was used to created wing chun.

Why not? So, where did you and Hendrik actually see the 12 Zhuang? I assume you did since you are talking about it. Are the 12 zhuang not a health system? Is it safe to assume that the 12 zhuang are stills similar to what he teaches now?

What’s there to explain? It’s a story. Plus, I don’t know of any story where Miao Shun fused crane and snake. The story my sifu told me is the “regular” one where Ng Mui observed a fight between a crane and a snake and used that to develop wing chun. You want to use all these stories as “proof” that your/hendrik’s theory is right?

[part 2 below]

Wing Chun is soft and hard to me, keeping in mind that “soft” and “hard” are relative. Ying/Yang, black/white…etc. Why declare wing chun just soft? Why is Taiji considered “soft?” Xingyi? Do they have the emai “engine” too? Obviously not. You guys are giving the creators of wing chun too little credit. It’s not like they could not have refined what they knew before into what became wing chun later, with all its bells and whistles…WITHOUT having to go include some non-martial qigong system into their new art.

And who is this “pupil?” Maybe he misheard. :smiley: :wink: Joking aside, whatever Sum Nung said, just because he might have speculated about the possible origins of wing chun does not make his speculation any more valid than yours or Hendrik’s or anybody else’s. We all have the same sources and same “evidence” to go by.

Yes, and we have the wing chun “engine.” Works great! :slight_smile: Again, give the wing chun creators some more credit. After all, they seem to have been experienced fighters to be able to create such a system. It’s absolutely feasible that they would be capable with coming up with an ingenious “engine”, too…a revolutionary one, instead of an “evolutionary” one from some other art.

No they don’t. Trust me that I know my wing chun , including it’s theories, maxims, concepts very well. After all I have an excellent teacher. :slight_smile: The kidney breathing exercises that sum nung introduced into his wing chun have nothing to do with increasing your ability to fight. It’s for health. My sifu, who is, as far as I know, the only one who learned medicine from sum nung and thus knows a thing or two about health, does not even teach this exercise. Obviously, he does not think it’s necessary to transmit the fighting art of wing chun. Most other wing chun families did not think it was necessary to have qigong either.

Waaaaiiiiiitttt a minute! :smiley: If wing chun already has the emei qigong sysem “built in”, then why would someone like sum nung feel he needed to include some health exercises into his wing chun? Hmmm…maybe, just maybe, wing chun was really developed as an effective fighting art…pure and simple.

Were you there or do you have any written sources to make such claims? How do you know that they were “close?” How do you know there were white crane practitioners on the red junks? I think we’re, once again, the realm of wild speculation.

Can’t find a Lee Kiang. I only found a Lee Kiang-Ke, not from Taiwan, but from Malaysia (settled there after leaving China). Can’t find any mention of a long pole in his system. Plus, even if he has the long pole…who says that he did not add it? If eeeeveryone else in the white crane system does not have a long pole but one guy…then what does that mean? He might just have added it…

Again, many others have added dummies to their systems. After all, there are books about it, movies…i.e. it’s not all secretive like it used to be. Even with all the secretiveness in wing chun and weng chun, pretty much everyone knew the system had a dummy and a long pole. Again, if everyone else in white crane does not have a dummy but ONE guy, what does that mean? What’s likely? What’s not likely?

Power transmission (i.e. “geng”) seems to be very similar, if not the same from what I have seen. Now, before someone protests…let’s keep in mind that I have seen material about weng chun that is not publicly available, which is very (and I really mean VERY) different from what is commonly seen on the internet and generally in the “west.” It’s much more wing chun like.

When it comes to empty hand forms. for weng chun it’s clearly weng chun kuen (as the name already implies). For wing chun obviously Siu Nim Tao. However, both forms are worthless without the accompanying concepts, explanations and applications. Those are the real mother. :slight_smile: I personally think that the wooden dummy forms in both arts are also the real mother.

Who is this white crane person? Same as the white crane with the dummy that you mentioned before? How come nobody has heard about the white crane dummy? Don’t tell me the whole “it was secret” story…I don’t buy it.

Jim, I could use Taijiquan to make up “matches” with wing chun, too. Kuen kuit/Taiji classics match. Ying/Yang cirlce match, snake hands match…etc…etc.

By the way, what we do at the beginning of the SLT after the punch has a specific purpose…nothing mystical or related to qigong. Same with the “lap sao” movement. It’s has a specific purpose in the form and in application. Nothing mystical. I believe you are seeing superficial similarities that someone like me for example would not even call “similarities.” As for the “secret 8 leg method”, I have no idea what you are talking about. I know all there kicks in our system and unless you use your imagination and count different heights of the kicks and/or the position of your foot (inward or outward pointing etc) I can’t see how wing chun has 8 different kicks. But anyway…that’s a different story and I don’t want to discuss technicalities/techniques here as I see online forums as inadequate for that purpose.

Bottom line is that you think you see tons of similarities and want us to take your word for it. The only footage of Fu Weizhong performing his art you declare to be not the real thing. Sorry, but proving something and arguing for something AND expecting others to believe you does not work that way. You have to present the material so others can compare. And after seeing all the available material, I just can’t see any similarities whatsoever.

It’s the “common” one. It’s the only way to write that character in common usage. Short line on top, longer line on the bottom. The character never looks like an “equals” sign with both lines the same length.

What yylee posted earlier was only used in markets, math…etc. i.e. in very restricted environments. If you want to give your stance a desriptive name, you use the most commonly recognizable character…not the “odd man out.” Heck, that character is even used directly in the name of the stance, for crying out loud. There is absolutely no doubt at all that the name itself describes the stance as a toes-in stance. Plus, there is the the “formality” of wing chun people actually practicing the stance that way (minus Hendrik). :smiley:

Simple. I don’t know. :slight_smile: Nobody does. If I had something that was plausible I would present it. All I am saying is that what you and hendrik see as “plausible” is wild speculation to me given the evidence presented.

Absolutely nothing beyond information that is commonly available on the internet and things that Hendrik decides to say in the forum. Plus, I’ve seen only one picture of hendrik in his stance. I.e. I don’t know much about it and I don’t like to speculate as I have said before.

Nobody has to mix anything into their wing chun. Plus, Hendrik says that their SLT is pretty much equivalent to other people’s SLT, CK, BJ, so, if true, it wouldn’t matter if you practice one long set or stop in between three parts of the set and call it three sets. Why not leave Yik Kam and Hendrik the person out of this and just concentrate on the actual arguments made here? I think that would be more productive than trying to prove that Yik Kam was somehow inferior to others.

Of course you do! He got the idea from you after all! :smiley:

[part 3 below]

Hendrik, you are totally evading the discussion here. That link does not address the points I have made. You have presented your theories here. You seem to be very convinced that that is exactly the way things happened, constantly saying things like: “soon they will all find out” or similar insinuations. Then you proceed to present speculations as quasi-facts.

I have presented my view and pointed out why your emei theory is highly unlikely and how I just can’t see all the similarities that you seem to see from the material that’s freely available. In scientific circles the presenter of a new theory has the burden of proof, not other scientist the burden of disproving. So, the “proof” that has been presented so far has been picked apart by me one by one. The only thing that you say in return is that you have already said everything there is to say…posting some link to another forum containing already known information.

Plus, you seem to imply I don’t understand what you are saying, especially the whole engine/power generation issue. I understand just fine what you are saying but don’t agree. I have presented my reasons so far, which you have not addressed. I actually think that you do not understand what I am talking about, or don’t want to understand since it goes against what you are saying. More on it below…

Really? Funny that I wasn’t even born in the “west” and have been exposed to many different cultures, including chinese (very extensively). So, you’re trying to tell me that 1.3 billion chinese could not tell the difference between a system meant for fighting and a system meant for health? I understand the whole ying/yang theory, but chinese can still make a conscious decision about the primary purpose of their art. So, our wing chun ancestors were fully capable of making a conscious decision to tailor our art for fighting. Plain and simple…it has nothing to do with cultural differences.

You do not design a car and its engine separately. The car and it’s engine have to “fit.” That’s why different models of cars have slightly different engines, even if they are from the same company. Likewise, a BMW will have a BMW engine, not a Mercedes engine. So, Wing Chun has a (surprise!!) Wing Chun engine, not an emei one. Is it really that hard to give the wing chun founders some creative credit? How can they design a system without designing its engine? Wing Chun power generation is specifically tailored to wing chun body structure/platform…it’s all ONE! No “emei” engine required.

For me wing chun was a “revolutionary” martial art…i.e. it was and is very different from all the other chinese martial arts styles I am familiar with (and I know quite a few). Hence, why not credit the founders with some “revolutionary” thinking also?

I don’t buy that argument. That kuen kuit describes combat concepts, not some mystical philosophy. You engage in a fight, you struggle, you are violent. Simple as that. Yes, of course you want to keep the mind calm and concentrated, but you also want to have the “angry eyes” as many chinese martial arts advocate. If you think that you can subdue an opponent by standing there and thinking about non-violence and similing in his face and letting the “chi” or some higher power take care of the rest, then you’re mistaken. You have to fight. Simple as that. Wing Chun gives you the tools…it’s up to you to use them properly.

I would interpret that as “use efficient/economic methods/techniques to defeat the enemy instead of using excessive muscle strength and large movements.” I don’t see any “do not struggle” philosphy in there. But then, I’m looking at it from a practical perspective, as a fighting art should be looked at, instead of a philosophical one.

Yes, flow…but try flowing without knowing the fighting concepts and applications of your martial art. You’ll get your head knocked off. Just standing there and meditating and letting the chi flow won’t win a fight for you. Knowledge of martial applications don’t just come to you out of the blue. And winning fights was crucial back when people had to bet their lives on it.

Fallacy right there. You can’t drive a BMW like a yugo…remember? Different engine, different acceleration, different aerodynamics…etc…etc. But that’s not the point here. I have already stated that wing chun has its “wing chun engine”…you don’t need to put an emei engine into it. And yes, the wing chun engine did not come out of the blue, but came from the experiences of the wing chun founders. BUT…the point here is that it would not make any sense to stick a qigong engine into a fighting machine. :smiley: The material presented so far does not prove otherwise.

Personal attacks don’t serve any constructive purpose. Such strategies are only used by people who have no arguments to present. They are distracting and totally unnecessary. Discussions can get heated, but attacks on the person should be left out of the discussion.

Good point and exactly one of the points I am trying to make here. The name says it “character TWO”, the people are doing it that way…but Hendrik and now Jim are basically saying it’s “wrong.” So everyone is wrong? Including the founders who built in partial instructions about how to do the stance into the name of the stance?

Exactly my point. That’s why the whole “emei” engine theory makes no sense.

And the fact that some don’t understand how it works does not make it wrong. :wink: Trust me…it’s not just a training method. I could say more about this, but I don’t consider technical explanations of why a technique works or does not work not very fruitful in an online discussion forum. Discussions about history, yes…technical discussions…nope.

Jim, it’s a different thing when you master the stance and stepping to such a degree that you can use it even if the knees happen to be wider apart than one fist during movement/combat/sparring…etc. and deciding that you have to change the stance altogether from toes in and knees together/siking, to toes parallell and knees further out. Plus, sum nung wing chun does have non-one knee distance positions (to Rene: “Jing-jat/jak”), but it still works along with the rest of the wing chun body structure. Having said all this…let’s keep in mind that stances during application (i.e. fight) are dynamically changing and although we should be striving to keep the “ideal” it’s not always possible and you’ll find yourself standing higher or wider apart than you should. The same is the case with sports such as tennis…you don’t always play by the book although you strive to, especially when your oppenent puts you under pressure.

[part 4 below]

Ummm…have you thought about his age? In the video he actually never has a “one fist” distance stance. He already starts out with the legs wide apart and it gets even wider right afterwards. Age can play a role. I have seen a Sum Nung video where he also looks like his knees are wide apart but stresses in the same video how they are supposed to be close together…but that’s due to his age and his inability to bring them closer in. I suspect the same with Fung Chun. People just tend to get less flexible and mobile with age.

It’s trivial if you want to argue that a “junior” necessarily learns less and/or is less skillful. Skill and seniority are rarely corelated. A “junior” can be more skillful and undestand the concepts better than a senior. It’s absolutely plausible. For all we know, Yik Kam might have been “better” at wing chun than wong wah bo and/or leung yee tai. I’m not saying it was the case, but it’s plausible and not at all far fetched.

Do they? I’ve never heard this story come from Sum Nung or Yuen Kay San, nor have I heard it come from Yip man. In fact, my sifu insists that there were all 3 forms on the red boat (true or false…but he insists). If Sum Nung had told him otherwise, I’m sure he would remember. Yuen Chai Wan? Who from that lineage says it was all one set? That leaves Cho family (who obviously say it was one set since theirs is all one set) and Gu Lo. So, the Fung Chun says it was all one set?

Alright…I once again wrote a lot more than I wanted to write. This is taking up waaaay too much time, so I’ll have to severely cut down on the writing again (now I remember why I did not write anything at all for a few years :smiley: ). I have basically said what I wanted to say. So, don’t take it the wrong way if I don’t write anything further…at least for a while. Until I see further material (i.e. maybe meet Hendrik some day and hope he’ll show me further evidence. or meet Fu Weizhong and hope he shows me his “secret” 12 zhuang, and/or meet some white crane lineage holders…etc.) I stand by what I have already written. We just need much more convincing materials before declaring that something “most likely” happened one way or another. Until then it’s really all speculation and should be tagged as such.

Take care and so long,
Mustafa

WCK logo

Check it out:

How many of us had ever worn a Shirt with this on it?

:slight_smile:

Why the heck do the ancestors and modern teachers continue to use this symbol for WCK?

:slight_smile:

WCK logo

Check it out:

How many of us had ever worn a Shirt with this on it?

:slight_smile:

Why the heck do the ancestors and modern teachers continue to use this symbol for WCK?

:slight_smile:

Part 1

Hello M,

Great Chat.

  1. learn the alphabet of the system in easily remembered sequences

Ok. Whats the Complex Alphabet that Wing Chun needs numerous sets? Bong, Tan, Fook, Sao or (Kai)? All those hands interacting with some posture,positioning and mechanics? What else is there the Sup Jee shape looking hand? (fak or some call lan) Thats pretty much the whole system if you include a punch or palm right.

  1. develop the body in the specific ways your system requires it

Thats the entire discussion! :slight_smile:

  1. through repetition train your body to remember the techniques of your system so the required “shape/technique” is utilized “automatically” when it’s required.

Ok. Take the above and make it natural but still for the 4 or 5 tools we basically use forms would not be needed IMO.

Learning happens through repetition after all.

No argument here.

  1. as a quasi “side effect” or result of No. 2 and 3 develop the types of power transmissions (“jings”) required by your system

So! You have: Cultivate, Manifest the cultivation, Free Flow with specific cultivation.

So, we agree.

You have any empricial proof for that? Anything you do wrong can cause health problems…this applies to most sports and activities.

Sure. Its common knowledge for any athletic sport or physical art to continue to strengthen the body with some balance activity will only make the body more and more brittle. WCK has the long time rep for Bad Knees. Its like driving a Car and not going in for an Oil and Lube. Maybe! For the old timers: Since we have their written notes, some of this stuff was important to them.

Your body won’t become weak if you actually practice enough…yes, forms, forms forms, dummy, dummy, dummy, sparring, sparring sparring, chi sao, chi sao, chi sao…etc. etc. etc..

Thata all good but dont take you car in for a little oil and lube for a the life of the vehicle. We are not disagreeing on the importance of practice to build the art but rather the possible maintainence of the art maybe the old timers had.

Wing Chun is soft and hard to me, keeping in mind that “soft” and “hard” are relative. Ying/Yang, black/white…etc. Why declare wing chun just soft? Why is Taiji considered “soft?” Xingyi? Do they have the emai “engine” too? Obviously not. You guys are giving the creators of wing chun too little credit

We all should really leave the Emei/Shaolin names out of this. Its causing too much wasted energy. We produce and cultivate our art via the Soft. The Hard is a a by product of the Soft Road. So, there is Yin Yang balance thru the training. Taiji is Taiji, Xing Yi is Xing Yi. There is more than one way to become soft you know just like there is more than one way to learn harder gong. I think you also under-estimate the creators or creator. Its ok tho! None of us were there so in the end its just what makes more sense to us.

And who is this “pupil?” Maybe he misheard. Joking aside, whatever Sum Nung said, just because he might have speculated about the possible origins of wing chun does not make his speculation any more valid than yours or Hendrik’s or anybody else’s. We all have the same sources and same “evidence” to go by.

Sure! In case you are curious he was a pupil of Sum Nung’s Uncle and also trained with Sum Nung. I am sure there are lots of people in different schools who hear different stories. Why? Some care to ask and some dont. So, its not un-likely for the same school to think differently about the same topic. Everyone has an equal value. You, Me, Tony, Joy everyone. Its just History for gods sake. hahaha Think of it like Indians Jones. hahaha

No they don’t. Trust me that I know my wing chun , including it’s theories, maxims, concepts very well. After all I have an excellent teacher. The kidney breathing exercises that sum nung introduced into his wing chun have nothing to do with increasing your ability to fight. It’s for health.

Well others say they do? Who do we believe? See what i mean? Sum Nung’s uncle, Sum Nungs son and many other fine pupils of Sum Nung have the Kuit and stories. I am sure you Sifu is excellent. Sum Nung was an amazing Master. Kidney Breath has nothing to DO WITH FIGHTING. Its the Oil and Lube that maybe Sum Nung felt was important to keep his body and pupils bodies from getting Brittle. Maybe, since the SLT and other stuff was not providing this Oil/Lube was why he felt it important to add it in?

Waaaaiiiiiitttt a minute! If wing chun already has the emei qigong sysem “built in”, then why would someone like sum nung feel he needed to include some health exercises into his wing chun? Hmmm…maybe, just maybe, wing chun was really developed as an effective fighting art…pure and simple.

Or! Maybe its the Oil and Lube. :wink: :smiley:

Were you there or do you have any written sources to make such claims? How do you know that they were “close?” How do you know there were white crane practitioners on the red junks? I think we’re, once again, the realm of wild speculation.

Lots of writting on the interaction and the two families are surving today with great stories to sift thru and find the common ground. Its a famous story man. Heck! They even made TV Soap Opera’s about the times. None of us were there but plenty of info on this topic.

When it comes to empty hand forms. for weng chun it’s clearly weng chun kuen (as the name already implies). For wing chun obviously Siu Nim Tao. However, both forms are worthless without the accompanying concepts, explanations and applications. Those are the real mother. I personally think that the wooden dummy forms in both arts are also the real mother.

A Mother gives Birth. What gives Birth to WCK? SLT. Thats the Mother for me.

Who is this white crane person? Same as the white crane with the dummy that you mentioned before? How come nobody has heard about the white crane dummy? Don’t tell me the whole “it was secret” story…I don’t buy it.

Not sure. Contact you own family. I was sent the video from a student of Sum Nung and Sum Dek. He was researching Pin Sun Wing Chun and contacted me. I dont believe in the whole secrecy thing. I just believe that some stuff the general public see’s and some stuff is not common to the public. Just like Wing Chun. We all heard the: Biu Jee’s secrets dont leave the Door BS. The Gup Gao Sau emergency secret set. Just becasuse new info comes out it does not mean it was not around already. The more we dig the more we find stuff.

Nobody has to mix anything into their wing chun.

Nobody is saying to. :stuck_out_tongue: Just looking into the History.

Plus, Hendrik says that their SLT is pretty much equivalent to other people’s SLT, CK, BJ, so, if true, it wouldn’t matter if you practice one long set or stop in between three parts of the set and call it three sets.

Bingo.

Why not leave Yik Kam and Hendrik the person out of this and just concentrate on the actual arguments made here? I think that would be more productive than trying to prove that Yik Kam was somehow inferior to others.

Thank you. Nobody is inferior. Its everyones art and everyones info.

Jim, I could use Taijiquan to make up “matches” with wing chun, too. Kuen kuit/Taiji classics match. Ying/Yang cirlce match, snake hands match…etc…etc.

Please do then.

By the way, what we do at the beginning of the SLT after the punch has a specific purpose…nothing mystical or related to qigong. Same with the “lap sao” movement. It’s has a specific purpose in the form and in application. Nothing mystical. I believe you are seeing superficial similarities that someone like me for example would not even call "similarities."As for the “secret 8 leg method”, I have no idea what you are talking about. I know all there kicks in our system and unless you use your imagination and count different heights of the kicks and/or the position of your foot (inward or outward pointing etc) I can’t see how wing chun has 8 different kicks. But anyway…that’s a different story and I don’t want to discuss technicalities/techniques here as I see online forums as inadequate for that purpose.

Ah! here is the beef of the argument that will show how we are both right my friend. There are many layers to an art.

One person may see the hand skill and say: Thats the Lop Sao application and technique.

Someone else may look at it and say: Thats the cultivation of the tendons, sinews, wrist.

And another person may look at it and say: Hey, thats the Lao Gong and Meridian Tip’s development!

Now! Guess what! All three were correct. So, just because you say the above is application or techniques it doesn’t mean the other guys are not also correct.

:cool:

Part 2

Bottom line is that you think you see tons of similarities and want us to take your word for it.

No I do not. I just present some info and you can do or not do anything with it. Its just my hobby.

The only footage of Fu Weizhong performing his art you declare to be not the real thing.

I never said that! I said it was not the 12 Zhuang. Its his Wuji health/healing course he is teaching now. GM Fu is currently training the next lineage holder and looking to retire. He teaches a very simple course with much Emei theory. For example!

GM Fu is in Boston this week. He is teaching his Level 2 course. Whats that? 5 days 10 hours a day (80%) study. Emei Wu Xing theory as taught by GM Ju Zan. Its not the 12 zhaung art.

BUT! He did tell me that After he trains the next Lineage holder he will retire and wants to open a School to Teach 12 Zhuang and Meditation. He is an amazing person. If you or anyone has the chance to check him and his art out then you should. This will be the time to go.

Sorry, but proving something and arguing for something AND expecting others to believe you does not work that way. You have to present the material so others can compare. And after seeing all the available material, I just can’t see any similarities whatsoever.

Oh! I’m sorry. You want me to serve it up on a nice neet plate for you. My friend. I have a family bisuness, spend some time training daily and of course the “Wife” who thinks I am a looney for even doing this stuff. I dont have a make any money from this so its just a hobby. If the info being presenting is something worth looking into for you then you should do just that. and BTW, I Dont Expect Anyone to Believe Anything. This is just my belief based on the compiled info.

Ummm…have you thought about his age? In the video he actually never has a “one fist” distance stance. He already starts out with the legs wide apart and it gets even wider right afterwards. Age can play a role.

His age has nothing to do with it. He is my Sifu’s Si Gung and my sifu spent 7 years with his Nephew. They would visit GM Fung Chun since he was in Hong Kong for 30 years. I know what they do.

I have seen a Sum Nung video where he also looks like his knees are wide apart but stresses in the same video how they are supposed to be close together…but that’s due to his age and his inability to bring them closer in.

The Interview one looks like he was having fun. Most of the time his feet are not like that from the other footage of him. He also had some issues with his knees late in life that could attribute to the not bringing them in closer versus age. Or it could just be he could stand on one toe and still do wing chun. Those guys are not slaves to the day one postures. Their bodies are different. Lots of cultivation.

I suspect the same with Fung Chun. People just tend to get less flexible and mobile with age.

I can tell you that is not the case. These guys just Surf the Wing Chun naturally.

Do they? I’ve never heard this story come from Sum Nung or Yuen Kay San, nor have I heard it come from Yip man.

Numerous have heard these stories from the above and some have not. Once again, some may ask and some dont. The first time I heard this was the first time I took a Wing Chun lesson. It was a Lee Moy Shan school in Cambridge. Lee Shan was an early pupil of Moy Yat and began training with him in Hong Kong and then in the USA. Heard it from numerous students of YKS lineage and others such as Fung Sang. Here is his own research/writing.

As for the three forms: Siu Lin Tau, Chum Kiu, Biu Jee, originally they were all one form. That were subsequenty divided into three.

This research and idea has been going on a long long time. Lots of people have and do look into WCK. I am not a Yik Kam WC practitioner. I dont do any of their sets nor do I train Yuen Kay San WC. So, it doesn’t mean “sh1t” to me if Miao Shun or Joe Smoe created the art from this or that. Its just WC archeology hobby. The story of my family is common. Ng Mui-Yim Yee-Yim-Leung etc.. Same as most but minus Miao as the fuse person and what could he possibly have fused to create the SLT and Chuk Geng.

In fact, my sifu insists that there were all 3 forms on the red boat (true or false…but he insists).

Its possible. Maybe both! Maybe some practice the one long set and some practice the 3. Maybe it was easier to remember 3 shorter sets versus one long set. Who knows. One or three dont mean much.

If Sum Nung had told him otherwise, I’m sure he would remember.

Did he ask?

Yuen Chai Wan? Who from that lineage says it was all one set?

Viet WC do the 1 set but then that leaves the Foshan pupils doing 3 so maybe, like I wrote above, he found it easier to teach it in one to them and 3 to the others?

That leaves Cho family (who obviously say it was one set since theirs is all one set) and Gu Lo. So, the Fung Chun says it was all one set?

Read Fung Sang’s research. We say it was originally one set.

Hey. Weekend is hear. Too much time on the computer. Will “try” to take a break for the weekend. I say try because yes! I am under the Goddess Wing Chun’s mystical spell and she keeps bring me back. hahaha

Thanks for this great chat.

originally posted by Mustafa
Nobody has to mix anything into their wing chun. Plus, Hendrik says that their SLT is pretty much equivalent to other people’s SLT, CK, BJ, so, if true, it wouldn’t matter if you practice one long set or stop in between three parts of the set and call it three sets. Why not leave Yik Kam and Hendrik the person out of this and just concentrate on the actual arguments made here? I think that would be more productive than trying to prove that Yik Kam was somehow inferior to others.

Mustafa,
Very interesting view point the only problem is that it is actually hendrik saying that Yik Kam mixed emei 12 zhuang and white crane into his SLT. So that theory belongs to hendrik your theory of not needing to mix anything might be a sound argument against his but for the record no one used the term inferior until you did.

originally posted by Mustafa
Do they? I’ve never heard this story come from Sum Nung or Yuen Kay San, nor have I heard it come from Yip man. In fact, my sifu insists that there were all 3 forms on the red boat (true or false…but he insists). If Sum Nung had told him otherwise, I’m sure he would remember. Yuen Chai Wan? Who from that lineage says it was all one set? That leaves Cho family (who obviously say it was one set since theirs is all one set) and Gu Lo. So, the Fung Chun says it was all one set?
Now that is a very interesting statement.
Originally Posted by Jim Roselando

Known Fact so far:

Yip Man

Yuen Kay San

Yuen Chai Wan

Sum Nung

Leung Jan

Cho’s

Fung’s

Etc.

All state the original set was one long set that was later broken into three sets

Jim since we have never met nor have I met Mustafa here lets just say either someone got excited at their keyboard or someone has their story wrong but clearly there is a discrepency that needs to be accounted for some way some how for shall we say continuity purposes if nothing else so if you wouldn’t mind being so kind as to do that now so we can continue the discussion the people reading this thread would undoubtedly appreciate it.

My recollection, getting aged as it is, is that Sum Nung felt the sets should be functional. You could do them all together if you wanted, (and it was a training variation we did with my sifu, and a nice little cardio hit), but there was no historical statement within that.

Likewise, you could do 10 reps of the Sam Pai Fut section if you had the need/desire. The set serviced the training, not the other way around.

But, as Mustafa said so well, if the content is the same, it’s a non-starter.

As to 12, this is a common symbolic number, Twelve Stems, etc. Most people are probably familiar with the 12 Animals of Chinese Astrology.

Hey RR,

You know what? I believe your right. You jogged my old memory to. I believe what I was told was Sum said once all three were learned they could be performed all in one long run. Not stating that that was his historical info on it or not we need to adjust him so! Thanks!

I wiped him off the list!

hahaha

Thank to the great tool of Edit & Save!

Have a good weekend!

Peace,

originally posted by reneritchie
My recollection, getting aged as it is, is that Sum Nung felt the sets should be functional. You could do them all together if you wanted, (and it was a training variation we did with my sifu, and a nice little cardio hit), but there was no historical statement within that.

originally posted by Jim Roselando
You know what? I believe your right. You jogged my old memory to. I believe what I was told was Sum said once all three were learned they could be performed all in one long run. Not stating that that was his historical info on it or not we need to adjust him so! Thanks!

I wiped him off the list!
These statements seem hmmm shall we say quite some distance from Jim’s original statements to say the least but anyway it seems we figured out who had the happy fingers at their keyboard.

Jim,
While you are in this edit and correct mode there is this matter of your views on the 40 points of the Gu lao system. According to Robert Chu and his note pad on the subject the 40 points are not known as either 1 set or 3 sets combined into 1 set but simply 40 significant individual points. Also if you can confirm your Yip Man source it would help as well or you can edit and correct that one as well.

4 different lineages compared to 1 and Jim you are suggesting that the one story is more likely than the 4. Jim since you are now speaking on behalf of so many lineages can you answer this. Since Wong Wah-Bo was the senior-most Wing Chun Kuen practitioner of the Red Junk Opera in the mid-1800s. How can Yik Kam invent what Wong Wah-Bo his senior was already known to have not only practiced but passed down through his lineage. When Hung Gun Biu, Dai Dung Fong(Pao Fa Lein) and Jee Shim are all senior to Yik Kam and all trace their lineage back before the time of Yik Kam how is it possible for Yik Kam to invent what they were already reported to have passed down. Please don’t feel so attached to any answer that you feel the need to go out on a limb with your answer if you don’t know just say so as you said earlier its only history.