[QUOTE=bawang;972897]yang luchan had to lift at least 200 ish pounds to join imperial guard, that was the minimum[/QUOTE]
I didn’t know the imperial princess what that fat.
have u seen old photos of the emperess dowager? she looks like jabba the hut
[QUOTE=bawang;972899]have u seen old photos of the emperess dowager? she looks like jabba the hut[/QUOTE]
Some guys are into the fatties, like Mr.Youknowwho, sure the fatties are “hardwork” but for some it just means more to love !
i dont see why u guys argued so much with hardwork about internal kung fu when he doesnt actually train internal kung fu
sure it makes ur ego feel good talking down to a retard but u can spend time doing better things like training the iron fist or dragging a giant millstone with your testicles
[QUOTE=bawang;972902]i dont see why u guys argued so much with hardwork about internal kung fu when he doesnt actually train internal kung fu
sure it makes ur ego feel good talking down to a retard but u can spend time doing better things like training the iron fist or dragging a giant millstone with your testicles[/QUOTE]
How can one argue with such logic ?
[QUOTE=Dragonzbane76;972864]what ever makes you happy. the street goes both ways is all i’m stating.[/quote]
Sorry, but that is not all that you are stating. You are unfamiliar with the methodology that I was discussing and you make the wrong assumptions about it.
Then you went on to make the wrong assumptions about me and even about YOURSELF, by assuming that just because you have been “around the block” a few times, then there was nothing else for you to learn or at least there was nothing that you were not unfamiliar with.
Furthermore, you (and other “wounded” cross trainers) went on to read things into my post that were simply not there: “So you say you are the only one who practices real kung fu”, “your kung fu is good all other kung fu is bad”,“You say that weight training is no good”, etc. etc. All groundless assumptions coming from cross trainers who apparently are not willing to accept that as far as TCMAs are concerned there are a mountain of methodologies they are unaware of.
There we go again. Keep repeating the lie hoping that some people will eventually believe you. In the very post that you are replying to here I stated that if you are happy with what you do then I am happy too.
So again, I don’t look down on other MAs I look down on other MA-ists who make clueless comments regarding TCMAs that they are not familiar with, while they are not man enough to admit their unfamiliarity.
I know it happens and it is acceptable. If no one criticizes us then we may never learn anything new. The problems arise when people criticize you, using clueless assumptions, not to mention their personal insecurities, as a base for their criticisms.
You have to be more specific because the internet is full of MMA meat heads. Luckily there those MMA-ists with whom one can also have an intelligent MA discussion with as they are genuine and honest people. So, they are not all “bad”.
NO, they go into my category of no knowledge when they make clueless comments and give uninformed opinions about TCMA methodologies that they are not familiar with. I don’ know how many times I have to repeat this fact before it sinks in!!!
Yet, they were completely unaware and clueless about the methodology that was being discussed and not a single one was man enough to admit it. Talk about “warrior spirit”. LOL.
So you can “hazard” all the guesses you want but I would say that your guesses have not worked for you, nor your cross training colleagues, regarding the subject matter being discussed. So perhaps instead of going through life guessing about the “unknown” you can instead research and study them!
That way you won’t end up taking sides with people who have “forgot” more about the TCMAs than they themselves have learned! LOL
What you have failed to notice is the fact that conditions for a healthy discussion are not limited to discussing with people who agree with each other, as none of the posters who actually bothered to discuss the matter with me agreed with me on every point,
However, these people had an actual TCMA point of reference and relevant knowledge to have discussed that given methodology, even if they were themselves not to familiar with it. See the difference?
That is why I was able to discuss it with certain members here while others with “decades of experience” were running around mis-reading my posts and making clueless assumptions and misrepresentations of what I had written.
HW108
[QUOTE=bawang;972902]…dragging a giant millstone with your testicles[/QUOTE]
Is that how you initially got your brain damage? :rolleyes:
Bawang, I tried to create some decent dialogue with you before but you insist on entering threads and making unprovoked attacks about people you know nothing about who happen to “disagree” with you about methodologies you are clueless about (and I don’t care what your uncle teaches you [and it is not good manners, for sure]as it is not what was being discussed here!!!). so, I did my best with you now you can continue to act like an @ss and lets face it, acting like a jack@ss will keep you in good company here, LO,Lolololol.
HW108
PS, And again (more repetitions for the brain damaged), no one says that there are no weight training practices in TCMAs!!!
i dont see why u guys argued so much with hardwork about internal kung fu when he doesnt actually train internal kung fu
sure it makes ur ego feel good talking down to a retard but u can spend time doing better things like training the iron fist or dragging a giant millstone with your testicles
Think i will step outta this conversation with the above statement. It does make sense.
have at it HW8.. eventually you’ll be talking with yourself. 
[QUOTE=Dragonzbane76;972979]Think i will step outta this conversation with the above statement. It does make sense. [/quote]
IMHO, you should not have stepped into this conversation to start with.
You mean I haven’t been talking to myself enough (for the most part) already? LOL!
You mean I haven’t been talking to myself enough (for the most part) already? LOL!
can’t resist that last word can you?
your right every other single person is wrong good enough for you?
[QUOTE=Dragonzbane76;973071]can’t resist that last word can you? [/quote]
Why blame me for all the laughter this forum is providing? LOL
IMHO, Read:
(Mcdojo phenomenom) + (Secretive sifus) + (“Irrelevant” cross training) + (not so intelligent MA-ists) = 97%plus Cluelessness regarding the TCMA subject discussed in this thread.
See, I have even created a formula for you Modern Scientific types! LOL
HW1O8
preach on preacherman preach on:rolleyes:
[QUOTE=Dragonzbane76;973092]preach on preacherman preach on:rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
You misunderstand. I am not preaching. I merely showed an unusual and valid internal TCMA approach and most of you turned it into a crapfest out of your own disillusions of knowledge and later on, out of your own insecurties.
As always, all I say is, this is it, take it or leave it, I just presented a new “door” for you. How far you take it is up to you.
Furthermore, “Preaching” about any subject to people who have no intellectual point of reference on that very subject, is inutile. 
HW108
PS. I hope that you appreciate my efforts to hold back my laughter when answering your latest gem of a post!
You misunderstand. I am not preaching. I merely showed an unusual and valid internal TCMA approach and most of you turned it into a crapfest out of your own disillusions of knowledge and later on, out of your own insecurties.
As always, all I say is, this is it, take it or leave it, I just presented a new “door” for you. How far you take it is up to you.
Furthermore, “Preaching” about any subject to people who have no intellectual point of reference on that very subject, is inutile.
HW108
PS. I hope that you appreciate my efforts to hold back my laughter when answering your latest gem of a post!
wow lol…
you really need a new approach to life it that’s the limit of your day.
[QUOTE=Dragonzbane76;973117]wow lol…
you really need a new approach to life it that’s the limit of your day.[/QUOTE]
LOL!
[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;972767]Thanks for proving my point, David was NOT ridiculed, his views were ( if that).
That saved me some searching time, very sweet of you.
:D[/QUOTE]
Good lord I have only just read this thread, anytime I see his name on a thread I tend to skip it, but personally I disagreed with what David was saying and used humour when I thought he was being plain silly, but ridiculed… this coming from someone who like to call everyone clueless…..!
[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;972775]Sure, which ST protocol and which of Chow gars “aims” are you referring to?[/QUOTE]
Did he every come back to you on this?
Oh and since this was originally about chimps….. one reson they are said to be stronger according to the latest findings is because their muscular architecture is different from ours, certain studies have shown our muscle fibers are smaller and weaker than there’s. up to an 8th of the size. In addition it has also been argued that apes have less grey matter in their spinal cords than humans have. More grey matter in humans means more motor neurons, and more muscle control. This means humans have more fine motor control allowing us to perform delicate tasks such as manipulate small objects, make complex tools or throw accurately but also prevents us from performing great feats of strength
On the other hand, since chimps have fewer motor neurons, each neuron triggers a higher number of muscle fibers, its more of an all or nothing approach
Or it could be because I have been giving them Olympic lifting lessons :o)
Or it could be because I have been giving them Olympic lifting lessons )
could be that or the cross training drills i’m putting them through might have something to do with it as well.
[QUOTE=Frost;974741]Did he every come back to you on this?[/QUOTE]
Sanjuro’s question was an escape tactic.
I did come back at him by telling him to talk about any weight training methodology or as I put it, “go crazy”.
http://forum.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showpost.php?p=972781&postcount=37
and here:
http://forum.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showpost.php?p=972796&postcount=44
Of course, he then used another escape tactic by pretending that I was “coming on to him”. LOL.
It would be so much less humiliating for him just to say that he was not familiar with that particular Chow Gar methodology, but no, he keeps on pretending that not only he is a jack of all trades but also master of all trades too…LOL. Very sad!
You guys should defeat your own d@mn egos before worrying about defeating other MA-ists!
Anyway I am still waiting for him to come back to me but he won’t because he is not familiar with that particular Chow Gar methodology, just like you aren’t, but none of you have the honesty nor the self confidence to say so. So you criticize and even give advice about a way of practice that you know nothing about.
Of course, I am not discounting the possiblility that Sanjuro will come back with a general, but clueless, statement (just like he so often does to look credible, LOL) after a bout of Googling!
HW108