Originally posted by Ford Prefect
[B]Gotta say I disagree as to conditioning being king. I’m a huge fitness buff and keep in great shape compared to most people. I’ve trained Div 1 athletes succussfully and am very well-read and practiced in most aspects of strength and conditioning. I’m obviously a huge believer in conditioning. It’s a hobby and some-what a part-time career for me.
With that in mind, time in your chosen sport/activity is the most important thing bar none. Strength and even endurance work, be it aerobic or anaerobic, are extremely activity specific. One of the big buzz words in the business is “carry-over” because everybody is concerned with how their strength/conditioning training will carry-over to their skills in their activity. This term was coined because lots of people assessed themselves honestly and realized that their gym numbers might be going up, but their performance isn’t doing a **** thing. The body is a smart thing that has learned how to meet challenges placed in front of it. The problem is a rule called SAID (Specific Adaption to Imposed Demands) meaning that the body’s adaptions in strength and endurance are very activity specific.
Obviously this isn’t the case 100% of the time. This is where GPP (general physical preparedness) comes in. Basically you get yourself into generally good shape by doing exercises that have broad carry-over. Now there are dimishing returns here. Getting your squat up to a respectable amount may help in fighting, but once you’ve been training it a while, then eeking out another 5-10 lbs isn’t going to do anything for your performance. This is where SPP (specific/special physical preparedness) comes into play. It’s built off your GPP training. Think speed bag, heavy bag rounds, drills drills drills.
Sparring round after round with fresh partners, doing rounds on the heavy bag, and other sport-specific training will do more for your endurance than the latest scientifically proven high intensity interval training or the latest fitness gadjetry to hit the market. Actually fighting will do more for your strength and conditioning in a fight than lifting weights, doing calesthenics, running hill sprints, pulling sleds, doing cone drills, etc etc etc etc.
I think that is overlooked too often especially in the martial arts. Maybe it’s just because I visit MA forums a lot, but I see a lot of people who just started training wondering what the best program is for more strength on the mat or more wind while sparring. I’ll tell ya what it is. Train your friggin arse off at what you are doing. Go to class/training as much as possible. After training your arse off for a good year or two, then come back, and you’ll be ready to reach a new level. Training and training often sets the foundation for your physical skills and attributes in your sport. You need a strong foundation to build on otherwise the rest of structure will be shaky (mediocre results) and likely to collapse (injury).
Training is king for most things.
Adding conditioning on top of training is the key to excelling.
It’s not the other way around. [/B]
Good post Ford Perfect. My Sifu advocates the same thing, Train, Train and Train some more to get the most out of it. That’s all I used to do in the beginning years of my Wing Chun experience. Since we only had 7/8hrs a week of class time I would practice at work(I was in the security field and had lots of time alone on site), drilling the things I had worked on in class alone. It was around the time I got my instructor’s certificate that I started to weight train, but this was not to improve my WC abilities at all, I wanted to get more muscular and hated being skinny, but I’m sure that over the last 8yrs or so it has improved some of what I do in the Wing Chun I train in.
The skill was already there and the increased strength I got from the weights has only added to my individual physical attributes. I have found that as I have matured in the art, and am wiser with it my skill level has increased even though I don’t train in it as much as I used to. I also found through the years that teaching the art is also a good way to increase skill level. When your teaching all levels from beginner to advanced students you have to understand all aspects of the system, this therefore translates to a better understanding of it and more overall knowledge of the art, which produces more skill.
James