Chi Sao article

[QUOTE=KPM;860299]I have my answer .

—Then feel free to share it!

I’m writing for everyone to ask themselves , not just you

—None of us are your students.

You post a thread and ask people to discuss, then you get the ‘hump’ when questioned

—I don’t have the “hump.” Whatever IT is! :slight_smile: Its just that few of us appreciate the “oriental master” act. If you have something to say and a point to make, then DO it. That is discussing. Playing the “I know the answer, do you!?” game is not discussing.[/QUOTE]

lastly…We are ALL students of the VT system…:wink:

Lol at you taking your ball and going home. I already know what you want to say. Maybe KPM doesn’t but your method of trying to tell him leaves a lot to be desired

:wink:

:smiley: I cant say it in words , maybe I’ll do a you tube link soon. We all share the same terms but not the same ideas.
Then you can all heckle me :wink:

the hump= british slang for being defensive, upset …“why do you have the hump on ?” or hes got the hump about something …
HUMP.

I told you Kevin that I’m not the only one that doesn’t appreciate the “oriental master” act. If you have a point to make or something to say, then just say it! Now who’s getting in a “hump” and not wanting to play with others?! :slight_smile:

We all share the same terms but not the same ideas.

Nobody wants to heckle the ideas Kevin, it’s just the method of putting them across that is a pain. You also assume nobody knows what you are trying to say..maybe more people are familiar with WSL ideas than you think?

You should do a youtube clip

I said its a common idea ..guy b has been through this with me as well so he’s post hump.
I havent got the hump at all :smiley:

I tried to convey the thinking but I get "the tan cant hold the same space as the punch "
Im trying to say the tan is just [basic] punch itself ‘in training’ for a simple strike in a more advanced state…same with Jum… are you with me ? or do you have the hump still
:smiley:

Does asking a question make one an"oriental master" ? oops there I go again !

[QUOTE=k gledhill;860322]Does asking a question make one an"oriental master" ? oops there I go again ![/QUOTE]No, asking questions is good. But if after reflection people don’t provide the answer you have in mind then it would be more helpful to provide a clearer and more direct explanation of your (or rather WSL -> PB’s) ideas. It is good that you are trying to get people to think for themselves, but it isn’t helpful when you keep saying “nope, try again”.

Based on my level of understanding I can see glimpses of what you’re trying to say. But I do get lost very easily in some of your more detailed posts. A shame (for me).

ok…

SLT is a break down of arm angles for free-fighting from a face off. IOW we arent trying to develop a tan sao for use as that shape alone like a block , its a psotion for training a line specific strike idea later , developed through dan chisao > chi-sao etc…dummy etc…all the same thinking.

Attacking someone , not waiting to do a turning tan sao and other arm hits front and center like chi-sao.

So how do we achieve this ability to sustain an attack that doesn’t stop to think ?

We attempt to overwhelm isolated sides/arms from facing us as chi-sao, so we get an advantage to fight with 2 arms , one leading , one following in a free striking idea , like any fighter hitting with 2 hands jab -x hook -jab -upper cut …flowing at us. And yet we train [ some] to fight with one arm doing a block while we have one left. Why do boxers give us a hard time ? we are fighting with one arm at full capacity , while the other chase , sticks , does all the things to help the guy we are trying to pulverize.

By isolating our arm angles in SLT we aren’t developing a Tan to do a lateral block while hitting with the other …same for Jum sao.

These are the starting points fro the elbow to travel along to the target. Coupled with rear pak sao/vusao, jut sao’ bong sao’s etc…as after thoughts to a punch being stopped or deflected…

he chi-sao is done to create each arms capacity to act as 2 actions per strike along the line before us. Functional at the sides , x ing over or parrying and going under etc…

we develop the arms not to stick and feel entry but to strike and prep for contact force , opposing our strikes and what we need to develop structurally , shoulders , elbows, stances , legs , hips…to deliver full body [ ours] shots with alignment to a point while our arms rotate as senk sao /tut sao to a target…the arms wrsits x our centerline slightly creating a natural ‘pass it to you’ partnership of arms [ours] that don’t open the line for counter entry from someone attacking us …it is a chain punch with more :smiley:

Many do a jumming punch but don’t do a tanning punch , because they are throwing a punch off line to clear a path for the rear hand…that clearing action should be done by both a punch and acute angle of the striking lead arm…attack leads the action, attack follows the action and so on and so forth…

IF ! an attempt is made to defelct stop the lead we use actions to stay facing that attack [ ours] by adopting jut sao [ from blocked tanning punch] to a rear follow up…all done at the speed of light . same with bong sao’s ..they should be trained in chi-sao to natural shift objects left or right to our rear follow up strike , not trained to be followed by a lateral off line lop sao… we use lop to regain the bad use of a lifting up and down bong [ up & down bong is wrong] why you resort to kick boxing in sparring , your trying to use it facing square on, try it from the side to a punch that has been xed at the wrist from the sides, turn the bong so the arm is shifted to clear a shot ON ITS OWN , not using 2 hands to simply throw a 3 beat counter or 2 if your fast ; )

SLT is the basis for the angles to strike…elbows in , shifting the ‘facing’ working attack lines with chum kil, chum kil is like shooting people while they shoot back…dont be in front chasing bullets …maneuver to the opposite sides of the attempted shots. Avoid being in the path of two shots coming in move shift to isolate one side form functioning as we do…Even if it means allowing them to over chase you [ mistake] overturn , wwhy we do small stepping attacks, it allows instant line shift as opposed to adeep lunging lines of force/attack against us, aka trying to use force against you…we simply use the same striking angles /arms to wail at high speed , but using the chi-sao to hold our low lines of defensive counters , WITHOUT THINKING.

We can only achieve this kind of attack if we dont seek to stick /feel/ chase…but to simply attack and allow the lead hand [ man sao] to tell us the next shot if it stopped , xed over under..etc…then the rear hand follow’s it…and the lead recovers the rear .

Doing chi-sao in a constant facing feeling thinking is wrong , redundant . Its teaching you to seek contact to become ‘safe’ functional, controlling bs …your F$#ing attacking someone not being safe ! :smiley:

How good is that attack ? can it be sustained without resorting to sticking redundantly to let the guy your ‘attacking’ breath ? oh oh question !? :wink:

We are like arobots delivering this angling constantly to a given line of force , all the time attacking with 1 hand at a time in the lead , only resorting to a 2 handed 2-3 beat counter if the intial assault is stopped or needs fixing …ie bad bong sao’ or loss of space to hit…ergo po-pais to shove the guy covering up back into strike range/kick range, down stairs , into wall, over chair…

Doing dirty clinch work is a mystery to me ? why would a smaller person engage a larger stronger one front and center to fight each arm delivering flanking blows to YOU ?
you should be training to not be ther from a face off…if sh*t happens open up your bil gee bag of responses to recover the out side lines asap and keep delivering the blitz ..dont stop firing or turn away from the shot line coming at you while holding center.

shift like a boxer use our tactics dont shift back jabbing shift to an offside to a following strike from the guy but staying close enought to counter that stiking attack with your own…and deliver a stop shot to his head ..or 2.

hows that ?

Cheers Kevin, still can’t really say I got that but don’t let that stop you! :smiley:

[QUOTE=k gledhill;860357]Attacking someone , not waiting to do a turning tan sao and other arm hits front and center like chi-sao.[/QUOTE]Yes, I can’t say I’ve ever liked this when I’ve stopped to think about it. Leaves you a bit open even if you can deliver the punch. And I think you’ve (?) already mentioned the “see-sawing” left and right.

Many do a jumming punch but don’t do a tanning punch , because they are throwing a punch off line to clear a path for the rear hand…that clearing action should be done by both a punch and acute angle of the striking lead arm…attack leads the action, attack follows the action and so on and so forth…
Are your tans always from the flank and hence to the outside of your opponent? If so I think I can see how your punch would develop from the tan and still maintain the “covering” elbow. But from the inside?

IF ! an attempt is made to defelct stop the lead we use actions to stay facing that attack [ ours] by adopting jut sao [ from blocked tanning punch] to a rear follow up…all done at the speed of light .
Sorry, I can’t picture jut from tan. Is the jut against their “other” hand/punch?

same with bong sao’s ..they should be trained in chi-sao to natural shift objects left or right to our rear follow up strike , not trained to be followed by a lateral off line lop sao…
I think drills like bong-lap fuel this problem.

we use lop to regain the bad use of a lifting up and down bong [ up & down bong is wrong] why you resort to kick boxing in sparring , your trying to use it facing square on, try it from the side to a punch that has been xed at the wrist from the sides, turn the bong so the arm is shifted to clear a shot ON ITS OWN , not using 2 hands to simply throw a 3 beat counter or 2 if your fast ; )
Again I can’t picture this. Have you got the flank again?

We can only achieve this kind of attack if we dont seek to stick /feel/ chase…but to simply attack and allow the lead hand [ man sao] to tell us the next shot if it stopped , xed over under..etc…then the rear hand follow’s it…and the lead recovers the rear .
I was going to ask how you knew which way to move!

Doing chi-sao in a constant facing feeling thinking is wrong , redundant . Its teaching you to seek contact to become ‘safe’ functional, controlling bs …your F$%#ing attacking someone not being safe ! :smiley:
I do have some reservations about chi sau that I probably haven’t had answered to my satisfication. But, I think there is a difference between chi sau and sparring/free fighting. I do think that in sparring/fighting you should not be trying to stick because that can give your game plan away too. But in any exchange there are going to be “bridged” situations which is where the chi sau responses should fleetingly kick in (IMO). But I don’t think we should then strive to always keep one hand on a detained limb and cycle through control-hit like we see in many demos. Maybe I am wrong about this. I am admittedly not very skilled, just a novice.

I would love to see a video of your arguments in action. Maybe when you hook up with Phil Redmond. Now he really is switched on with Internet video!

I do have some reservations about chi sau that I probably haven’t had answered to my satisfication. But, I think there is a difference between chi sau and sparring/free fighting. I do think that in sparring/fighting you should not be trying to stick because that can give your game plan away too. But in any exchange there are going to be “bridged” situations which is where the chi sau responses should fleetingly kick in (IMO). But I don’t think we should then strive to always keep one hand on a detained limb and cycle through control-hit like we see in many demos. Maybe I am wrong about this. I am admittedly not very skilled, just a novice.

—Did you read my article? That’s pretty much what I said! :slight_smile: Do you have other specific reservations to talk about?

Hey Kevin!

—You expected me to come up with all of this by just asking me what “IT” is?? :eek:

SLT is a break down of arm angles for free-fighting from a face off. IOW we arent trying to develop a tan sao for use as that shape alone like a block , its a psotion for training a line specific strike idea later , developed through dan chisao > chi-sao etc…dummy etc…all the same thinking.

—I agree. We are training lines and angles more than specific techniques.

Why do boxers give us a hard time ? we are fighting with one arm at full capacity , while the other chase , sticks , does all the things to help the guy we are trying to pulverize.

—And that is one of the things that Chi Sao training helps up overcome. Both arms should be active and ready!

These are the starting points fro the elbow to travel along to the target. Coupled with rear pak sao/vusao, jut sao’ bong sao’s etc…as after thoughts to a punch being stopped or deflected…

—Ok. I follow you. The idea is training a line, not a specific technique.

we develop the arms not to stick and feel entry but to strike and prep for contact force ,

—I would say its both…not either/or.

the arms wrsits x our centerline slightly creating a natural ‘pass it to you’ partnership of arms [ours] that don’t open the line for counter entry

—Sure! That’s the whole point of maintaining forward pressure. :slight_smile:

Many do a jumming punch but don’t do a tanning punch , because they are throwing a punch off line to clear a path for the rear hand…that clearing action should be done by both a punch and acute angle of the striking lead arm…attack leads the action, attack follows the action and so on and so forth…

—This is where your ideas get kind of hazzy for me. I can see the point that we are learning lines of movement and not a specific technique. But that line of movement can become a specific technique like a Tan or a punch. But its either one or the other. In the past you seemed to be saying it was both at the same time, which is what was confusing to me. The action may start as a punch and convert to a Tan if interrupted, but even then it is not both at the same time.

IF ! an attempt is made to defelct stop the lead we use actions to stay facing that attack [ ours] by adopting jut sao [ from blocked tanning punch] to a rear follow up…all done at the speed of light .

----I see what you are calling a “tanning punch” as cutting the opponent’s line from the inside outward. To me, that is the line that is being used in the SLT form. So I don’t see how it would then convert to a Jut Sao, since the Jut Sao moves inward…unless you huen around to the outside of his block first?

bong sao’s ..they should be trained in chi-sao to natural shift objects left or right to our rear follow up strike , not trained to be followed by a lateral off line lop sao… we use lop to regain the bad use of a lifting up and down bong [ up & down bong is wrong]

—I agree with the idea that the lifting Bong is not a great application, though sometimes necessary. But I see the Lop Sao as more than just a recovery from a bad Bong. It can be used to move the opponent and break his base when done properly.

why you resort to kick boxing in sparring , your trying to use it facing square on, try it from the side to a punch that has been xed at the wrist from the sides, turn the bong so the arm is shifted to clear a shot ON ITS OWN , not using 2 hands to simply throw a 3 beat counter or 2 if your fast ; )

—That one’s kind of convulated. Not sure I follow you.

SLT is the basis for the angles to strike…elbows in , shifting the ‘facing’ working attack lines with chum kil, chum kil is like shooting people while they shoot back…dont be in front chasing bullets …maneuver to the opposite sides of the attempted shots. Avoid being in the path of two shots coming in move shift to isolate one side

—Good explanation for Chum Kiu! I like that analogy. :slight_smile:

We can only achieve this kind of attack if we dont seek to stick /feel/ chase…but to simply attack and allow the lead hand [ man sao] to tell us the next shot if it stopped , xed over under..etc…then the rear hand follow’s it…and the lead recovers the rear .

—I see what you’re saying here, but if the lead hand is going to “tell us the next shot” isn’t it because it was sticking and feeling the reaction from the opponent? I agree with not chasing hands. But a big part of the contact reflexes developed in Chi Sao involve sticking and feeling for just that brief moment it takes to get a read on what the opponent is doing.

Doing chi-sao in a constant facing feeling thinking is wrong , redundant . Its teaching you to seek contact to become ‘safe’ functional, controlling bs …your F$#ing attacking someone not being safe ! :smiley:

—I agree. That’s doing Chi Sao without good forward pressure and without the partners challenging each other’s structure and position.

Doing dirty clinch work is a mystery to me ? why would a smaller person engage a larger stronger one front and center to fight each arm delivering flanking blows to YOU ?

—Maybe because he was unable to keep the other guy from moving in on him and coming to the clinch!? Maybe because the other guy didn’t stop HIM from moving in? I see the clinch range as a natural progression from Chi Sao if you haven’t knocked the guy down or out with a blow and he is still there as you move in.

you should be training to not be ther from a face off…if sh*t happens open up your bil gee bag of responses to recover the out side lines asap and keep delivering the blitz ..dont stop firing or turn away from the shot line coming at you while holding center.

—Right! Take his space and smash his face! :smiley:

hows that ?

—Better! Thanks! :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=KPM;860422]Hey Kevin!

—You expected me to come up with all of this by just asking me what “IT” is?? :eek:

SLT is a break down of arm angles for free-fighting from a face off. IOW we arent trying to develop a tan sao for use as that shape alone like a block , its a psotion for training a line specific strike idea later , developed through dan chisao > chi-sao etc…dummy etc…all the same thinking.

—I agree. We are training lines and angles more than specific techniques.

acute ‘cutting lines’ from tight elbow training..

Why do boxers give us a hard time ? we are fighting with one arm at full capacity , while the other chase , sticks , does all the things to help the guy we are trying to pulverize.

—And that is one of the things that Chi Sao training helps up overcome. Both arms should be active and ready!

given

These are the starting points fro the elbow to travel along to the target. Coupled with rear pak sao/vusao, jut sao’ bong sao’s etc…as after thoughts to a punch being stopped or deflected…

—Ok. I follow you. The idea is training a line, not a specific technique.

ok

we develop the arms not to stick and feel entry but to strike and prep for contact force ,

—I would say its both…not either/or.

primarily to strike with alignmnet of a pole strike all force to the tip

the arms wrsits x our centerline slightly creating a natural ‘pass it to you’ partnership of arms [ours] that don’t open the line for counter entry

—Sure! That’s the whole point of maintaining forward pressure. :slight_smile:

[B]sorry me again, but your confusing with my lead hand striking in a freefight passes whatever to the now ‘taking its place AND covering my line attacking in’

NOT with a partner in forward pressure chi-sao thinking…[/B]

Many do a jumming punch but don’t do a tanning punch , because they are throwing a punch off line to clear a path for the rear hand…that clearing action should be done by both a punch and acute angle of the striking lead arm…attack leads the action, attack follows the action and so on and so forth…

—This is where your ideas get kind of hazzy for me. I can see the point that we are learning lines of movement and not a specific technique. But that line of movement can become a specific technique like a Tan or a punch. But its either one or the other. In the past you seemed to be saying it was both at the same time, which is what was confusing to me. The action may start as a punch and convert to a Tan if interrupted, but even then it is not both at the same time.


the tan elbow spreads the guys arm out side our ‘inner triangle of space’ tans go to form ther outside angle [either side depending which flank is attacked] the jum holds thew center as they swap…striking in altarnating along the flank..like mentioned we are talking a few moves to a strike WSL normally didnt use more than 3 .
The tan points like a gun and fire across abridged arm keeping the elbow low as it expands off our centerlines , striking forwards, the elbow acts like a pak…the following jumming force inward keeps the line shut ..

IF ! an attempt is made to defelct stop the lead we use actions to stay facing that attack [ ours] by adopting jut sao [ from blocked tanning punch] to a rear follow up…all done at the speed of light .

----I see what you are calling a “tanning punch” as cutting the opponent’s line from the inside outward. To me, that is the line that is being used in the SLT form. So I don’t see how it would then convert to a Jut Sao, since the Jut Sao moves inward…unless you huen around to the outside of his block first?

our lead tan or jum strike doent fight the other arm because it can treach or is unable to develop force, flanking attacking like knives isolates and weakens the guy to one knife against our 2.
if an arm stops a tanpunching arm [left outsde forearm v left punch or left arm position] we simply apply shocking force in the same position to JUT the arm down for the rear vusao to strike in…as chum kil [ only the tan with a jut is done to the wrist area not like an arm break :rolleyes:] in chum kil we jut our own arms and do a tan to get the elbow in to strike again..


remember tan is a punch in training its palm open , fighting you dont see a plam open unless you make it so.

bong sao’s ..they should be trained in chi-sao to natural shift objects left or right to our rear follow up strike , not trained to be followed by a lateral off line lop sao… we use lop to regain the bad use of a lifting up and down bong [ up & down bong is wrong]

—I agree with the idea that the lifting Bong is not a great application, though sometimes necessary. But I see the Lop Sao as more than just a recovery from a bad Bong. It can be used to move the opponent and break his base when done properly.

thats why lop is in bil gee not SLT…agreed. you stop my attack I twist you on your axis point with lop. head to floor I open you like a gate with your arm.

why you resort to kick boxing in sparring , your trying to use it facing square on, try it from the side to a punch that has been xed at the wrist from the sides, turn the bong so the arm is shifted to clear a shot ON ITS OWN , not using 2 hands to simply throw a 3 beat counter or 2 if your fast ; )

—That one’s kind of convulated. Not sure I follow you.

bong is like a boxers raised arm deflecting a punch at his head from under the punch, only we strive to knock it sideways so we can puch with the free hand …not tie ourselves up using 2 for 1 always …sloooow.

SLT is the basis for the angles to strike…elbows in , shifting the ‘facing’ working attack lines with chum kil, chum kil is like shooting people while they shoot back…dont be in front chasing bullets …maneuver to the opposite sides of the attempted shots. Avoid being in the path of two shots coming in move shift to isolate one side

—Good explanation for Chum Kiu! I like that analogy. :slight_smile:

straight from PB firing a rifle in your stance shifting to avoid water in a pending water fight

We can only achieve this kind of attack if we dont seek to stick /feel/ chase…but to simply attack and allow the lead hand [ man sao] to tell us the next shot if it stopped , xed over under..etc…then the rear hand follow’s it…and the lead recovers the rear .

—I see what you’re saying here, but if the lead hand is going to “tell us the next shot” isn’t it because it was sticking and feeling the reaction from the opponent? I agree with not chasing hands. But a big part of the contact reflexes developed in Chi Sao involve sticking and feeling for just that brief moment it takes to get a read on what the opponent is doing.

the only reason we stop to feel is because they made us by interrupting the attack lines [ chi-sao kicks in unthinking to recover the attack not suddenly stop n chill on their arm ]…if I attack anyone longer than they attack me who has a better % ? ah ? again :smiley: they found our arms not us find theirs we should be hrowing punches along a shifting chasing attacking flank available, even if its them just turning their lines wildly to avoid us.

Doing chi-sao in a constant facing feeling thinking is wrong , redundant . Its teaching you to seek contact to become ‘safe’ functional, controlling bs …your F$%#ing attacking someone not being safe ! :smiley:

—I agree. That’s doing Chi Sao without good forward pressure and without the partners challenging each other’s structure and position.

Doing dirty clinch work is a mystery to me ? why would a smaller person engage a larger stronger one front and center to fight each arm delivering flanking blows to YOU ?

—Maybe because he was unable to keep the other guy from moving in on him and coming to the clinch!? Maybe because the other guy didn’t stop HIM from moving in? I see the clinch range as a natural progression from Chi Sao if you haven’t knocked the guy down or out with a blow and he is still there as you move in.

You can use anything if it works for you, I have used it fighting guys who are ina standing scrum in bars fighting each other, I use the ‘force’ to shift them like a huge beach balloon out the exit. :smiley:

you should be training to not be ther from a face off…if sh*t happens open up your bil gee bag of responses to recover the out side lines asap and keep delivering the blitz ..dont stop firing or turn away from the shot line coming at you while holding center.

—Right! Take his space and smash his face! :smiley:

hows that ?

—Better! Thanks! :)[/QUOTE]

usually it takes one good timed smash to change a guys intent.

[QUOTE=KPM;860294]—I don’t see Chi Sao as happening “after bridging.” I see it as establishing and crossing the bridge. [/QUOTE]

If you feel that way then what bridge-establishing techniques do you practice in chi sao?

[QUOTE=Edmund;860532]If you feel that way then what bridge-establishing techniques do you practice in chi sao?[/QUOTE]

Uh…touching forearms! :rolleyes:

We are developing striking USING a partner to achieve this simple ability.
A fight starts from space and time to react to movement along certain paths towards you.
We develop a shape before us that our arms travel along in rotation, that intersect naturally , anything coming into them, like a spider web. The web doesn’t go after the fly . It stays put , the vibrations tell the spider it’s dinner time.
Our arms are a web , each one takes the lead and rear in a constant swap, we train for in SLT, we add striking to the deflecting ‘web’ angles. Then we maneuver the angles to the incoming fly …the fly may just fly into the spiders mouth without touching the web…we just hit the head , over…or the fly attempts to avoid the spider and strikes the web at odd angles..the spider doesn’t care because it just goes for the fly ..it doesn’t worry about the web the web is by design just there alternating as it goes for lunch. It is trained to be a strong web that doesnt tear easily from a simple wind passing [ that didnt sound right :D]

The web doesn’t chase after the flies.

ergo the arms are being developed to strike along our lines , relative to us , as we angle ourselves to make them the most efficient. dealing with one fly at a time . not turning one way for one fly and another for the other..if we adopt one side and go in we can devour both in one fell swoop…either left to right or right to left…it only matters how the flies fly that we know were to start.

silly analogy but sometimes they work

Hey Kevin!

We develop a shape before us that our arms travel along in rotation, that intersect naturally , anything coming into them, like a spider web. The web doesn’t go after the fly . It stays put , the vibrations tell the spider it’s dinner time.
Our arms are a web , each one takes the lead and rear in a constant swap, we train for in SLT, we add striking to the deflecting ‘web’ angles. Then we maneuver the angles to the incoming fly …the fly may just fly into the spiders mouth without touching the web…we just hit the head , over…or the fly attempts to avoid the spider and strikes the web at odd angles..the spider doesn’t care because it just goes for the fly ..it doesn’t worry about the web the web is by design just there alternating as it goes for lunch.

—Good analogy! :slight_smile: “Bridge-establishing techniques” aren’t really necessary. You go after the guy! The spider after the fly! If he throws up a defense so that his arm contacts yours he gets caught in the “web” of your Chi Sao reactions. Then you “cross the bridge” in order to continue your forward assault.

Give this man a cigar…the chi-sao is so we dont think about our angles relative to contact, they do their thing without thinking …we just attack, the chi-sao trains the whole to function , structure to back up the idea of attacking, the chi-sao to back up the arms intent to hold low lines of strike/deflection without hinging at the shoulder and offering ‘levers’. Same for swapping along the line ..the lead simply shoots in , if a block is performed up down sideways it doesnt matter because the rear takes the next shot with what was just presented…before it, still striking in at angles to the other guy so he cant use his other arm as well as he would like to…we fight with 2arms like anyone fast striking not one blocks chasing if it never had to …by flanking a lot of the 2 handed arm applications are a waste of time any way becasue the other arm isnt able to strike us anyway…so why touch it or care about it, unless it happens to face us , then we shift or perimeter fight to the tactical position again and again …not fighting like heavy bags with simultaneous block & hit g.

Ergo bilgee to recover guys lifting our lead arms..we simply do the same tut sao senk sao but under and out again…or recover a lead arm grabbed at the wrist, a common thing I faced in real fights.

the space we attack on is all we care about . thats why so much time is spent along the line but shifting to fire in a fire fight with ck. BJ to recover the ‘bubble’ of SLT/CK.

the tactics of knives and pole techniques of ballistic displacemnt while holding our own line not over extending across our own ‘ideas’.

its genius use of spatial awareness.

why its critical not to fight like a chi-sao drill facing equally…

we need to angle across or fight at a perimeter to the attacker , like a protractor before them…we should avoid attacking at 90deg. but go 45 or 125 [ no real exact degree ] .

The seung ma toi ma drills of chi-sao need to be understood to function this idea, or many simply move back and forth in a constant facing arm game of slap n tickle trap 234. waste of time , wont develop the bigger picture of how to take the idea to a fight , that also , but for slightly longer distances, mimics the knives… no stopping to think about tactics , same for each just the arms are used or the knives are used…the knives have ‘knuckle dusters aka brass knuckles’ ..ie loss of knife cutting I still control and strike in on ‘arm cutting across your arm’ fist strike…I lose the fist strike, I cut you…

: )

Give this man a cigar…

—How about a lollie? I don’t smoke. :slight_smile:

the chi-sao is so we dont think about our angles relative to contact, they do their thing without thinking …we just attack, the chi-sao trains the whole to function , structure to back up the idea of attacking, the chi-sao to back up the arms intent to hold low lines of strike/deflection without hinging at the shoulder and offering ‘levers’.

—Exactly. That is what I was getting at in my article when I pointed out that the rolling platform is not realistic and is not really meant to be realistic. Its meant to provide the circumstance where your partner is giving you energy and pressure at the contact points on the forearm. And it really doesn’t matter what the technique is that he uses, what matters is training your sensitivity and reactions. That’s why the Chi Sao itself shouldn’t be allowed to become too complicated and a game in and of itself. That’s why people look at Chi Sao and think it doesn’t apply to a real fight. They just have the wrong attitude or understanding about what is really accomplished by training Chi Sao.

why its critical not to fight like a chi-sao drill facing equally…

—Exactly. You don’t want him to be in a position where he can use both of his arms at will. You want to keep the advantage of your two arms to his one. Hence learning to use good body structure in Chi Sao and learning to turn and control the opponent’s base.

[QUOTE=KPM;860753]Give this man a cigar…

—How about a lollie? I don’t smoke. :slight_smile:

the chi-sao is so we dont think about our angles relative to contact, they do their thing without thinking …we just attack, the chi-sao trains the whole to function , structure to back up the idea of attacking, the chi-sao to back up the arms intent to hold low lines of strike/deflection without hinging at the shoulder and offering ‘levers’.

—Exactly. That is what I was getting at in my article when I pointed out that the rolling platform is not realistic and is not really meant to be realistic. Its meant to provide the circumstance where your partner is giving you energy and pressure at the contact points on the forearm. And it really doesn’t matter what the technique is that he uses, what matters is training your sensitivity and reactions. That’s why the Chi Sao itself shouldn’t be allowed to become too complicated and a game in and of itself. That’s why people look at Chi Sao and think it doesn’t apply to a real fight. They just have the wrong attitude or understanding about what is really accomplished by training Chi Sao.

we are being the attacker & the counter attacker in role play…certain redundancy has to be understood when doing the drill…each partner is training to develop themselves not develop touchy feely ..thats a byproduct not the goal.

why its critical not to fight like a chi-sao drill facing equally…

—Exactly. You don’t want him to be in a position where he can use both of his arms at will. You want to keep the advantage of your two arms to his one. Hence learning to use good body structure in Chi Sao and learning to turn and control the opponent’s base.[/QUOTE]

the partners adopt a random position so each can counter the entry and side attempted and not accidentally turn to the wrong side of the other arm etc… add space and time and you have more ‘space & time’ to maneuver to your angles of attack & counter attack…

ie tan step is a line of force entry we angle and strike across as it comes..to get set and balanced to deliver enough stopping force by using the partner entry…we do the same for them :smiley: add random entry from both sides and presto it becomes alive way of reacting to lines and appropriate angles.

[QUOTE=KPM;860606]Uh…touching forearms! :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

You’re already touching. That isn’t establishing a bridge.
From a non-contact position, you and your opponent are not bridged. That is not Chi sao.

Chi sao is not training those non-contact situations.