clfnole
clf nole:
yes i am a die hard hs clf man. i won’t deny it. but i have done my research, and since i have been to fut san and saw their records i am more sure now that our branch holds all the chips.
yeah i come on strong. yet, i am mostly alone here fighting off an army of people. lets face it, the chan side will go down fighting about their history, but so will the hung sing people.
yes i said that there were said to be 8 original forms. but the more i keep doing my research i am learning more and more new things.
the one thing i am sure of is that the chan family is working hard at trying to convince the world of their story. and that’s all i have a problem with. i have never said anything bad about anyone’s clf. i am just particular to lau bun’s clf, his methods, his mindset, his approach. plus it doesn’t hurt to have a sifu who has been down in the trenches using clf in real life combat on the streets.
come on, first every single chan family man on earth fought the green grass monk idea, but for them to fold and try to shift the green grass monk over to their side by claiming he was actually monk choy fook. that was where they went wrong.
now the hung sing people see that as an opportunity to tell the world that the chan family doesn’t have the true history.
i do agree, that the development of your personal gung fu is paramount. i work on that every day. i am a clf man to the bone.
if anyone told me my clf is wrong they would have to prove it to me first in combat, and i mean not in the ring, either!
clfnole, it is hard to stand my position and believe what i believe while i see hung sing members out here afraid to speak up. if you truly do the research and put aside the chan family records for a second, one may understand what i mean.
there is far more to clf than what was written by chan yiu chi.
if not then why does their story stop at chan heung?
***the history of choy lee fut was never truly recorded as it happened. there are no documents available dating back to the early 1800’s. they claim to have proof because someone in their brnch wrote the history according to the chan clan.
so if that history is true, then why does the hung sing and buk sing branch resist what the chan clan claims? aren’t we all supposed to be part of the same lineage? so why are there 4 families in the choy lee fut family? the 4th being strong winning founded by chan koon pak.
now look at this loong gee choy question. it makes sense when you look at it and understand the time in china back then.
sorry to those i offend with my harshness, but i am a hung sing soldier. i know my history. so if i am wrong, then prove me so beyond the shadow of a doubt. make me believe chan clan history. until then, i’ll keep up the fight to promote the fut san hung sing kwoon history.
frank