someone said a while ago in this thread that WC stances are high. he also said WC has no circular punches.
that may be true of some yip man lineages (they are flat footed too), but in the yuen kay san style of wing chun we stay low the ground.
low to the ground, on the toes, with a narrow stance for mobility. hunched over so we are ready to spring forward (imagine a line backer or wrestler being low so that they can shoot forward)
if you ever try to fight someone while standing in a horse stance while they are agile and mobile…circling around you, you will find that your kung fu is useless.
there are also circular punches.
there are other misstatements from CLF fanatics in this thread about WC, but we will leave it to that.
i dont kow much about CLF except that its distinct from other southern chinese styles in that it has wide swinging (haymaker like) punches found in northern styles like hung ga kuen
someone said in this thread that CLF principles are in direct opposition iwth WC principles. what are the principle philosophies of CLF?
[QUOTE=clam61;914124]i dont kow much about CLF except that its distinct from other southern chinese styles in that it has wide swinging (haymaker like) punches found in northern styles like hung ga kuen
someone said in this thread that CLF principles are in direct opposition iwth WC principles. what are the principle philosophies of CLF?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=clam61;914171]i actually just saw it on google. people can still feel free to answer my question.[/QUOTE]
In some parts of the world I believe they still burn people who practice necromancy.
this thread died a long time ago.