B & B sez- responses in brackets-
Joy,
I know from you past posts that you feel your Chi Sau offers what sparring offers.
((Actually much more. Done lots of both- ergo not speaking abstractly. Having done both- if needed… I havea sense of using wing chun with gloves. If I were starting a boxing club- could teach youngsters some things from wing chun.
I actually a year ago investigated buying a spot to train boxers as well as wing chun folks. Capital and prospective overhead costs were massive and prohibitive. Plus in real boxing development programs there is an eventual dirty and repulsive side of human use of human beings.Politics even in amateur boxing- Olympics selection, coaching and training.
Apart from sparring I have watched lots of first class world class sparring.BTW aweek from tomorrow I have a ticket for the Kostya Tszyu- Sharmba Mitchell fight right here in river city( metro Phoenix).Kostya is training here now. Many boxers are superb human beings- but serious boxing or striking arts reacha point of no return relatively early as far as loss of some brain cells are concerned- as Old Jong pointed out ina different post. In a few years Kostya will be history just as Chavez was before him.Of course some skills remain into later years but the cutting edge against younger top flight people erodes fast— Joe Louis/Marciano, Ali/Holmes. Robinson/Pender.
But chi sao skills can do everything that what is commonly called sparring can and much more. Chi sao teaches so many more lines and angles of attack and combinations and reactions under pressure and use of the other persons pressure.)))
I have seen on Augustine Fong’s tapes some kinda light sparring etc and perhaps that’s what you’re talking about. It was nice, and very controlled, but not like full out sparring.
((Master Fong speaks for himself. We all respect him…but.. His students including me are on their own- no cookie cutter production here partly because of the importance of top flight chi sao development. The good ones develop unique skills via chi sao. None of us verbally put down other wing chun lineages. Most are not on the web.If you saw Danny Chan, Nancy Macdonald, Brian Tufts, Daum, and others in various kinds of testing venues you would know. People do test themselves without jabbering on KFO. Everyone is encouraged to see what other styles have to offer. Brian has done bjj -has a machado belt. Nancy has done major Chinese sword work. Danny is in a class by himself on knowledge, ability and experience.There is no franchise or chain store system. I did not learn from tapes. The tapes give you just some ideas about Master Fong’s approach.
To understanf full scale chi sao-the best way is to come a week long annual seminar in Tucson- towards the end of every April and the beginning of every May. That is the best way to understand what I am saying. Films dont do justice. Wing chun is more tactile, hands on rather than visual.
Chi sao skills can be adapted for many kinds of functions- for some you can try it with gloves. First rate pak sao can improve your spiking in volleyball- Danny’s spiking is something to behold.
Manny is suberb with nunchucks. My nephew went on to become a high school wrestling champion in Oklahoma with his early hand skills devloped from early exposure to wing chun. Held the fastest HS pinning time for a long time.
A student of mine became a combat shooting champion with wing chun structure and positioning, I an NOT into guns btw.They scare me.,because of the culture they breed. Nuff rambling- cheers- Joy PS- You are not doing wing chun- good luck with what you are doing. I am puzzled and amused at some of your criticisms of wing chun- given you dont do wing chun, you had limited exposre to the art and limited survey research. KFO’s chi chat forum is hardly the wing chun world.))))