WC Kickboxing

I believe this is the next step in wc training after you have become a bit proficient in the basics. The basics are: dan chi sao, lap sao, luk soa, basic stepping, drills using wc moves againt various attacks.

After you have spent a few months doing the above it is time to apply it from a distance against non-wing chunners This is not a “wc people need to spar and spar against other people” thread. This thread is about diversifying wc. WC is a specialized system that was meant to be added to regular fighting(kickboxing) or that regular fighting was meant to be added into wing chun training.

One of the major things I learned from sparring was that you can’t survive just using the wc blocks/parrys/ strikes. It’s impossible! The mentality, and I believe it was well intentioned, was to train a few movements to master them. Train fook, lop, bong, etc and be able to blast people away because that’s all you do. The problem is that those only work at a certain distance. At other distances the covering seen in boxing/kick boxing work better. And still at other ranges(grappling) none of them apply as they are done in the form or when trained against strikes. Sure you can say that when you throw someone your hand was in fook so you used fook but in reality it wasn’t fook.

Tneihoff would disagree and say that wing chun is attached fighting. I don’t disagree or agree completely. Enter, strike, grapple is the basic strategy of many Chinese martial arts. WC seems like it has good simple tools to parry and enter. Common wc training needs to include more power training and not just the typical wc jab which could be powerful but often isn’t.

I was sparring the other day and the purpose of this was to work in wc trapping(entering). The other guy would punch me with medium power and I had to try and stop his hands from moving to strike him. What happened was a lot of hilarity. It worked ok sometimes but other times against the craftier strikers I got clocked. Even though the drill was to work on the trapping aspect I learned that it is impossible to trap ALL strikes coming in. Covering with my arms while using angling footwork would have worked well WITH the trapping. I think the trapping mentality comes from the wc way of thinking where when you get it the opponent is finished. But during sparring the opponent gets trapped up and hit…but them moves and it starts all over again.

What I noticed about my training brothers, as well as others on youtube, is that they stand robotically with their hands out to meet. There was no head movement and flat footwork. When the sparring started then the trapping hands would fly into action sometimes missing completely allowing them to get hit. Constant forward pressure worked sometimes and other times it lead to getting hit rather hard as you are walking into a punch coming at you.

This is just a log of sorts for my sparring adventures. Are wc opposed to adding boxing covers and slight head movement into wc? Years of chi sao didn’t prepare me to eat my friends right hook. I think he killed a part of my brain.

[QUOTE=SavvySavage;1094678]I believe this is the next step in wc training after you have become a bit proficient in the basics. The basics are: dan chi sao, lap sao, luk soa, basic stepping, drills using wc moves againt various attacks.

After you have spent a few months doing the above it is time to apply it from a distance against non-wing chunners This is not a “wc people need to spar and spar against other people” thread. This thread is about diversifying wc. WC is a specialized system that was meant to be added to regular fighting(kickboxing) or that regular fighting was meant to be added into wing chun training.

One of the major things I learned from sparring was that you can’t survive just using the wc blocks/parrys/ strikes. It’s impossible! The mentality, and I believe it was well intentioned, was to train a few movements to master them. Train fook, lop, bong, etc and be able to blast people away because that’s all you do. The problem is that those only work at a certain distance. At other distances the covering seen in boxing/kick boxing work better. And still at other ranges(grappling) none of them apply as they are done in the form or when trained against strikes. Sure you can say that when you throw someone your hand was in fook so you used fook but in reality it wasn’t fook.

Tneihoff would disagree and say that wing chun is attached fighting. I don’t disagree or agree completely. Enter, strike, grapple is the basic strategy of many Chinese martial arts. WC seems like it has good simple tools to parry and enter. Common wc training needs to include more power training and not just the typical wc jab which could be powerful but often isn’t.

I was sparring the other day and the purpose of this was to work in wc trapping(entering). The other guy would punch me with medium power and I had to try and stop his hands from moving to strike him. What happened was a lot of hilarity. It worked ok sometimes but other times against the craftier strikers I got clocked. Even though the drill was to work on the trapping aspect I learned that it is impossible to trap ALL strikes coming in. Covering with my arms while using angling footwork would have worked well WITH the trapping. I think the trapping mentality comes from the wc way of thinking where when you get it the opponent is finished. But during sparring the opponent gets trapped up and hit…but them moves and it starts all over again.

What I noticed about my training brothers, as well as others on youtube, is that they stand robotically with their hands out to meet. There was no head movement and flat footwork. When the sparring started then the trapping hands would fly into action sometimes missing completely allowing them to get hit. Constant forward pressure worked sometimes and other times it lead to getting hit rather hard as you are walking into a punch coming at you.

This is just a log of sorts for my sparring adventures. Are wc opposed to adding boxing covers and slight head movement into wc? Years of chi sao didn’t prepare me to eat my friends right hook. I think he killed a part of my brain.[/QUOTE]

So much good stuff in this post.

I only add this:
If you seek to be an “attached fighter” then the vast majority of your fighting will be clinch work ( grappling), throws and ground work ( because that is where you will end up).

Wing chun isn’t about trapping . You don’t fight with trapping hands. Trapping is purely a happy function of contact and energy received. The heart of wing chun fighting is covering,movement and angles. Wing chun body should be springy not robotic. Foot work is alive and floating not flat and plodding.

What you want to add already is part of wing chun. Ground fighting is a different story

[QUOTE=SavvySavage;1094678] One of the major things I learned from sparring was that you can’t survive just using the wc blocks/parrys/ strikes. It’s impossible! [/QUOTE]

If you say you can’t do something it’s always going to be true. Instead of saying that you [one] cannot survive just using WC, maybe you should consider an alternative, namely, that you might not be as good as you think you are. My instructor was a correctional officer in Baltimore for a decade and a half. In that environment he learned to make WC work, in other words, he used the tools, adapted them and changed things that he thought did not work well for him. He says he has no problem dealing situations that you describe.

It has been my experience that trapping lends itself better to grabs and attempted grabs than to strikes.
The typical mentality of someone trying to grab you is to grab you and feel that contact, when they do they feel they “have you”, by trapping you have them but they still perceive that, because of the contact, they have you.
Strikers are different, try to trap them and they will hit and move and hit and move and do pretty much anything NOT to keep contact.
Add to that the typical strike is far faster and comes in combination as opposed to the typical grab that comes as a “onesy” and is slower because the person is attempting to grab and control you instead of trying to knock your head off.

[QUOTE=trubblman;1094688]If you say you can’t do something it’s always going to be true. Instead of saying that you [one] cannot survive just using WC, maybe you should consider an alternative, namely, that you might not be as good as you think you are. My instructor was a correctional officer in Baltimore for a decade and a half. In that environment he learned to make WC work, in other words, he used the tools, adapted them and changed things that he thought did not work well for him. He says he has no problem dealing situations that you describe.[/QUOTE]

I never said I was any good. I was only saying what I can and cannot do. If the Baltimore environment was as bad ad you say I bet he didnt use pure wing chun. Does he have any video of him using his trapping skills sparring against students or his training brothers? I don’t like the video challenge but you are saying he can make WC work 100%. Better to show instead of tell.

I’ve actually known a few corrections officers who were wing chun practitioners. None of them seemed to feel as you do about it not being adequate. I trust their experience.

There’s a lot of other stuff that could be responded to in there, but I don’t know where to start.

Train, train, train, the answers are in there. If these are not the answers for you, look elsewhere. I don’t think you can draw sweeping conclusions on behalf of the rest of us, though. In my experience, kickboxing and wing chun are very different things.

If you say you can’t do something it’s always going to be true. Instead of saying that you [one] cannot survive just using WC, maybe you should consider an alternative, namely, that you might not be as good as you think you are.

Sounds like someone’s buttons got pushed by accident.

The boxing cover/shell is certainly a good “everything else has failed” defense against a striker. It also allows you to get that bit closer if you want to get into grappling range without getting hit.

I agree with the OP that WC defense works very well at some ranges, not well at others, and the “blocks” in the empty hand forms are worse than useless against edged weapons.

My instructor had a lot of kickboxing matches well before MT became popular in the west. and had to work with rules that disallowed kicks below the waist and a mandatory kick count per round. He added roundhouse kicks, hook kicks etc to WC. It worked very well for him. So did working on head movement, boxing footwork and evasion.

In this day and age it doesn’t pay to lock yourself totally into one system. It seems only in TCMA that methods are regarded as one size fits all, unworthy of improvement, or that adaptations shouldn’t be experimented with, because some alleged supergenius supposedly conceived them out of the ether centuries ago.

The opposite happens and is regarded as normal and sensible in nearly every other field of human endeavor.

[QUOTE=SavvySavage;1094771]I never said I was any good. I was only saying what I can and cannot do. If the Baltimore environment was as bad ad you say I bet he didnt use pure wing chun. Does he have any video of him using his trapping skills sparring against students or his training brothers? I don’t like the video challenge but you are saying he can make WC work 100%. Better to show instead of tell.[/QUOTE]

I was not saying that you were not any good either. My intention was analyze the logic that WC does not work just because an individual has not yet found the answer to a problem. Rather than look at WC and say it does not work, the better solution IMO would be to experiment, question, practice and find a solution from the WC kit that works for the individual. My teacher found what worked for him. What he does may or may not work for me.

[QUOTE=trubblman;1094810]I was not saying that you were not any good either. My intention was analyze the logic that WC does not work just because an individual has not yet found the answer to a problem. Rather than look at WC and say it does not work, the better solution IMO would be to experiment, question, practice and find a solution from the WC kit that works for the individual. My teacher found what worked for him. What he does may or may not work for me.[/QUOTE]

I have yet to see one sparring video on YouTube to say that pure wing chun works. Actually what is your definition of pure wing chub? Is WC all trapping or is it attached fighting or is it WC kickboxing? I believe WC to be closer to kickboxing because it is a boxing style. Attached fighting is wrestling and wrestlers do it best so train wrestling and not WC if you believe in attached fighting.

IMO studying a sport style could be very useful in improving one’s tcma.

I’m not saying your teacher can’t do anything. Obviously he can since he was in corrections. How big is he? All I’m asking is to post a video of what your consider pure WC and the video show it working.

He is about 5’ 6" - 5’ 7". I didnt say he uses pure wc at all. What I wrote is that he has no problems eating punches, hooks or jabs or closing the gap using WC. I dont post videos. If you are by chance ever in Maryland let me know and I will be happy to introduce you. Or if he releases a video which he may do I ll let you know.

pure WCK only exist in the classroom.

in a fight take what works for you and use it. leave the pure WCK bs to the pattycakers

I agree with the original poster in a lot of respects. As much as I would like it to be, I don’t think Wing Chun is the end all when it comes to fighting. I would say that it is formidable and definitely can be used as a primary system for self-defense but does have cons.

My Sifu endorses learning some of the fill-in’s for Wing Chun so to speak. A good ground game and some good “Chin Na” will take you a long way! He’s regularly practiced in Brazilian Jujitsu and knows all the “Chin Na” locks like the back of his hand. He incorporates it into his Wing Chun. There’s a lot you can do with WC while on the ground involving the opponents arms but you have to also know how to move your body on the ground too. And while there’s plenty of “Chin Na” already within WC itself, if you practice it outside of the system, you can almost come to understand it even better and it will come more naturally.

WC is an evolution and each individual is unique in that sense. My Sifu finished the system under Augustine Fong, represented both Fong and Ho Kam Ming back when they first started the Chi Sao competitions and won against all the other lineage’s back when the lineage’s founders and students were actually at the competitions, i.e. WSL, Leung Ting, Ip Chun, etc.. (He said WSL was one of the most humble WC guys at the place, makes you wonder about the PB guys, huh?!:)) My point is, he’s been around long enough where he’s allowed to tweak it to what works for him. And that tweaking occurred after years of finding out what worked and didn’t work. He works at a mental health institute and regularly has to use his WC to maintain the peace :slight_smile: and different “Chin Na” locks combined with his WC structure works really well when you’re not trying to kill someone but subdue them.

I don’t want to speak for my Sifu on what kind of WC his system has evolved into but from a personal viewpoint, I would say, at least when him and I are training, it is much more real world fight oriented than vanilla WC. He’ll throw in feints here and there and uses distancing when appropriate against a stronger incoming force. Most of you might have already seen this video, but if you watch closely, you can see him doing both of these within our flow. I’m coming at him with everything I got too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axeKt8Gnjeo

I also forgot to mention that he uses a lot of different angle punches(not so much in the video, but his downward straight punch kills!) too and while it’s already built into the Wing Chun system, you don’t see a lot of guys using them really.

At the end of the day “your” WC needs to work against the “spontaneous” abilities of your opponent and if it doesn’t, well, then I’d recommend going back to the drawing board. Think about it, our main drill, Chi Sao, is meant to figure out where your weaknesses are. Why wouldn’t you apply that mindset to the whole art? As long as you stay true to the basics I don’t think even Ip Man himself would have a problem with what you add to it. After all, IMO, Wing Chun was built upon ‘evolution’ from the very beginning, keep what works, discard what doesn’t. That’s what they did!

never heard of all the chi sao comps in the early days. Who did he chi sao and when.
Anyway, trapping is a slipt second thing to get a shot in. People tend to think that it means being able to strike at will. I was always taught that if you can get another shot in good but don’t count on it. Thats why the videos of people doing one trap and chain punching is normally when someone is heaps better and the other guy gives up. I do traps in sparing when it happens but looking for it would mean that most of the time you shouldnt have trapped just hit or moved etc. Its like trying to hit a ball in the same way at the same spot no matter where he throws it. Good for training but the odds are low that you will get them all.
WSL and Barry used to practice while in fights so they would try to use a certain techniques in as many ways as they could to trail it out. Barry always said that it is not recomended if you want to win or not get hit. But in those days he didn’t know when the next one would be and he was in the country for a certain period of time so he had to learn as much as he could.

[QUOTE=SavvySavage;1094853]I have yet to see one sparring video on YouTube to say that pure wing chun works. Actually what is your definition of pure wing chub? Is WC all trapping or is it attached fighting or is it WC kickboxing? I believe WC to be closer to kickboxing because it is a boxing style. Attached fighting is wrestling and wrestlers do it best so train wrestling and not WC if you believe in attached fighting.
.[/QUOTE]

I myself don’t have any videos but IMO WC can work without addons. If I may make bold as to suggest the video Backyard Chi Sao by Gary Lam. He uses several techniques I like and I think work really well: what he calls ding-ding lap lap, biu-biu lap-lap and open palms from Chum Kiu curving from the center line outward.

The problem as I see being articulated by Savage is how to deal with a fighter with very fast hands, using jabs, hooks and uppercuts in combinations. My thing is once your hands occupy a particular space, try not step back and or with draw your hands. For example lets say I m doing pak sau to wu sau. Even though I m stationary, my thinking is that I dont withdraw the wu sau at all; rather I am stepping forward and my wu sau hand continues to occupy that space. So I am not withdrawing the hand to perform pak sau to wu sau but my body is moving forward.

In addition, one of the teachings that I have heard mentioned by Yip Man’s students is not to be afraid of getting hit.

By the way, my instructor and I dont do per se sparring. What we do is nonprearranged drills at 1/2 speed which dont stop until either he or I ( and it’s usually me ) is put in a really bad position.

That’s my 2 cents. Feel free to disagree with it.

[QUOTE=trubblman;1094932]I myself don’t have any videos but IMO WC can work without addons. If I may make bold as to suggest the video Backyard Chi Sao by Gary Lam. He uses several techniques I like and I think work really well: what he calls ding-ding lap lap, biu-biu lap-lap and open palms from Chum Kiu curving from the center line outward.

The problem as I see being articulated by Savage is how to deal with a fighter with very fast hands, using jabs, hooks and uppercuts in combinations. My thing is once your hands occupy a particular space, try not step back and or with draw your hands. For example lets say I m doing pak sau to wu sau. Even though I m stationary, my thinking is that I dont withdraw the wu sau at all; rather I am stepping forward and my wu sau hand continues to occupy that space. So I am not withdrawing the hand to perform pak sau to wu sau but my body is moving forward.

In addition, one of the teachings that I have heard mentioned by Yip Man’s students is not to be afraid of getting hit.

By the way, my instructor and I dont do per se sparring. What we do is nonprearranged drills at 1/2 speed which dont stop until either he or I ( and it’s usually me ) is put in a really bad position.

That’s my 2 cents. Feel free to disagree with it.[/QUOTE]

Level 1 is the basic drills. You are doing why seems like level 2 where it is more like two man form/luk Sao. It’s time to move to level 3 and put the gear on. You’ll find out first hand that what works from the rolling position doesn’t work from a distance or rather has to be modified to work.

There was a time a few years back when mma was not as big that WC people would say, “You have to adapt WC principles in order to beat the ground fighter or wrestler”. Practitioners of many tcma have stated this but neglected to get specific on how to do it. IMO this was before a lot of them tried to do WC while on the ground or wrestling because it sounds nice on paper. Now some have went to the dark side and come back mature. They learned that to fight a bjj person on the ground you need to learn bjj. To fight against a wrestler you have to learn wrestling otherwise you won’t be able to set up you strikes. The saying “Figure it out for yourself” only applies when both people have the same types of skills. Putting a WC guy in a wrestling class and telling him to use WC form principles to throw, with no prior throw training, is like sending a regular sized 12 year old into a fight with a grown adult. He’ll never be able to do it without a weapon because a weapon would make him equal.

Anyway. Try some sparring. I can do a lot of stuff in chi Sao as well abd have found sparring to be a different animal.

And for others it doesn’t matter what WSL did or could do. Without video we’ll never know how he fought. WC is one of those styles where you get taught the bare minimum white washed material and then told it will work like that. I suspect that if video was available of WC people in real fights we’d see them brawling with maybe a little WC flavor. These videos would also show them doing things they were never taught in the WC curriculum: covering, backing up, moving their heads to avoid attack, grabbing(clinching), wild swings.

I think WC training tries to streamline fighting too much saying it will look like this but will actually not. And that’s the problem. Teaching someone to square dance and then having him enter tap dancing competitions is a recipe for failure.

Wow, I really like that last sentence. No one steal it!

Try using distance and mobility, left right shifting while holding your arms behind your back, then let them make distance to you to hit your jaw. try to stay outside their leading arm so they are always trying to face you squarely to use their strong arm.

use sidestances like chum kil to move and keep your distances…avoid going back in astraightline more than a few steps. It makes it easy for a guy to just ‘momentum’ at you…wailing [throwing water]

many lead with their weak hand.

dont do kicking, get used to hands coming at you and just moving…

keep moving in short shuffles …slipping with with footwork.

use their inability to change directions quickly against them…iow how good is their facing if you simply avoid their strikes.

Being shown ‘blocking’ is your worst input, becasue your waiting like a statue with arms outstretched to catch a bucket of water they are going to throw at you…you might block SOME water…:smiley: but you will get wet.

tactical mobility…as you get better you move less gain more…a skilled bullfighter is measured not by how much he moves but how little when a 1 ton bull comes at him… he could be a little guy 5 ft nothing.:smiley:

momentum and lines of abstract force control…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwCuIvbWYa4&feature=player_embedded

[QUOTE=SavvySavage;1094853]I have yet to see one sparring video on YouTube to say that pure wing chun works. . . [/QUOTE]
With regards to martial arts the word “pure” is subjective.
But here’s our WC being tested by two of our guys in their very first full contact fight outside of the kwoon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzlDFKNoJ2M&lc=X8bMfW2_bT1OLFHOx42OM8AeI3WjoP-MQNIiW7ETK0E&feature=inbox

[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;1095222]With regards to martial arts the word “pure” is subjective.
But here’s our WC being tested by two of our guys in their very first full contact fight outside of the kwoon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzlDFKNoJ2M&lc=X8bMfW2_bT1OLFHOx42OM8AeI3WjoP-MQNIiW7ETK0E&feature=inbox[/QUOTE]

Nice video Phil! I’m looking forward to the day, if ever, when I get to hop in the ring. I’ve used it in a real fight and it worked great but I do want to try it with the rules and gloves to see if I can apply it there too.

I don’t care what anyone says about this but I think this is a great video of two guys doing some sparring
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvUP76MbtJE&feature=related