[QUOTE=lunghushan;704480]
Sifu: “Taiji applications are all push-hands.”[/QUOTE]
of course, that’s not true: push hands is just one type of training exercise to develop hands on sensitivity at a certain range (trapping or pre-grappling); unfortunately, when it’s all you know, it “becomes” the actual appliations, rather than a training tool…it’s also a relatively safe training method to teach, so it’s one that you can show to people who aren’t serious fighters that they can do without killing themselves…
[QUOTE=lunghushan;704480]Me; “Then why does your form have a fist in it? There must be striking if there if fist, right?”
Sifu: “The form is just an exercise. There are no striking techniques in taiji.”[/QUOTE]
that’s also a load of BS - tai ji has plenty of striking - most of it is open hand / palm, but it has a few fist techs, as the form demonstrates (although they can also be interpreted as joint manips as well); also, the form is not “just” on exercise - it’s another type of training method that is designed to get people to be aware of their own movement patterns, habiits and inefficicencies; it is not intended to be done slow for 100 years either if you want to fight with it - but again, if it’s all you know or want to teach, then it becomes an end unto itself;
a lot of tai chi fighting stuff got “lost” because a) the teacher’s didn’t want to teach it as fighting, for whatever reason (for example, much easier to make a living teaching it as health pracice to lots of rich Mandarin nobles than it is to teach it as fighting to poor serfs; that is, the kind of people who might need you to SLOW THINGS DOWN so that they can get what you are doing and practice it in a way befitting their genteel status…); b) the teacher didn’t know it, which, given a situation like in a) above, kinda makes sense;
my teacher has shown me some of the methods his teacher taught him to train fighting in tai chi - although it’s unlike what you see in most tai chi schools, it isn’t anything particularly esoteric and mystical, it’s basically their version of the types of single and two-person training / conditioning stuff you see in a lot of different TCMA styles;
usually, the reason that things are the way they are, are for very simple, straighforward reasons that just get “forgotten” after a while…all you are left with are the BS justifications that fly in the face of common sense…