rare hfy clip

[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;850153]Because of the ongoing discussion about similarities between HFY and TWC.[/QUOTE]

Not sure if I missed something, but I thought that whole similarities discussion had ended quite some time ago. I don’t recall anything like that being talked about here (?) Still not sure how that discussion somehow translates into anyone waiting for a personal invite for anything.

[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;850153]A beginner wouldn’t have the expertise to make a comparison. [/QUOTE]

Why on earth does HFY need to invite a senior guy to come visit to compare systems? I don’t even understand why you still feel this is even necessary. What’s the point? And what does this have to do with the thread here?

[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;850153]Also two men can disagree and still be civil. I don’t say anything online that I won’t say to a man’s face. I don’t resort to name calling, insults, or grade school rants. [/QUOTE]

I agree, two man can disagree and be civil. For the rest, um, thanks for sharing (?)

Plan to visit them..

Hello, I make it to Brazil when I can. I went to school there in college. When i go I will definitely check them out and report back. I just sent an email out to my aunt and she may find out a little more. I used to go to a 5 animal school in Brazil and honestly I haven’t seen them do anything good as far as news coverage down there on martial arts unless its BJJ, luta livre or capoeira-aka Brazilian. Although I think there was a Tien Shan Pai video out there that is good. Shows many of the forms.

Anyone out there in Michigan?

[QUOTE=JPinAZ;850151]Phil,
it seems you want to resort to somwehat of a personal attack and skip the issue.[/QUOTE]

From where im sitting Phils not attacking anyone… besides which,

Mate are you a Martial artist ? harden the phuck up.

Its a real shame these HFY threads go to the dogs.

When i think about the fact were all learning a fighting art it makes one realise that this forum bs is akin to having a cry when someone calls you a name LOL.

Chuck lost badly to Rampage but is he having a cry…

http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=2vqmgJIJM98

:cool:
DREW

[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;850153]Because of the ongoing discussion about similarities between HFY and TWC A beginner wouldn’t have the expertise to make a comparison.[/QUOTE]

hmm.. I thought whatever ‘ongoing’ discussion about any comparisons you think is still going on died the same time that thread did - and that was quite some time ago. The only reason it might be ongoing is because you are bringing it up again.

But, FWIW, I think neither HFY nor TWC needs anyone to come scruitinize and make comparisons. As I see it, this is out of place in kung fu cutlure. Would you think it’s correct to walk into, say, a praying mantis school and expect to compare your system with thiers? They would most likely laugh.
There’s a difference between coming to learn and coming to compare. And I think one approach would be met with a more open attitude over the other. I am sure you know this.

[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;850153]Also two men can disagree and still be civil.[/QUOTE]
Agreed
[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;850153]I don’t say anything online that I won’t say to a man’s face. I don’t resort to name calling, insults, or grade school rants. Now I hope you don’t twist this into a personal attack. [/QUOTE]

Well, that’s good to know. I wouldn’t expect anything less, and feel the same way. Maybe you are trying to imply something here? probably not since you don’t seem like the type that would beat around the bush and are straight up about how you feel. :wink:

“Due to popular demand … we plan to make legitimate HFY videos direct from our HQ in SF under the guidence of our GM. But until then, don’t expect to see any video’s from our members.” (duende - from post#17 on this thread)

***SO when can we expect to see these videos from HQ in SF up for sale?

Hello,
My understanding is that the videos will be clips of HFY. I don’t think we will ever see HFY videos for sale from HQ.
Just my 2 cents,
Matt

So when will the video clips be up?

[QUOTE=osprey3883;850548]Hello,
My understanding is that the videos will be clips of HFY. I don’t think we will ever see HFY videos for sale from HQ.
Just my 2 cents,
Matt[/QUOTE]

And why is that?

[QUOTE=KPM;850685]And why is that?[/QUOTE]

Keith,
Looking at your website it mentions you are a Doctor, so I know you are a smart person. Why is it then that here at KFO you come across more like a gossip or someone trying to stir the pot? Are you really asking why HFY will not be documenting and offering for sale our system after all the previous threads here at KFO? If so I would say from here you come across as having 100% book smarts but 0 street smarts.

Matt

[QUOTE=osprey3883;850879]Keith,
Looking at your website it mentions you are a Doctor, so I know you are a smart person. Why is it then that here at KFO you come across more like a gossip or someone trying to stir the pot? Are you really asking why HFY will not be documenting and offering for sale our system after all the previous threads here at KFO? If so I would say from here you come across as having 100% book smarts but 0 street smarts.

Matt[/QUOTE]

Thanks for checking out my website. :slight_smile: I asked the question because I wanted to hear the justification. You are correct. After all that I have read here I would be very surprised to see HFY instructional videos hit the market. But, then again, there was the book! So who can really say? But really…why should HFY be hesitant to offer videos? Why be afraid to show your stuff? It seems odd that the HFY family seems interested in spreading on an international scale, yet they hesitate to actually show people what their system is like.

The only “pot” I stir here on KFO is the one that tries to get the HFY guys to actually open up and share something substantial…to be willing to actually engage in an open conversation without hiding things behind technical jargon, telling us we haven’t “earned” that information, or shrugging us off with “you need to visit a HFY school.” I mean no ill will towards the HFY family.

If you care to go back and read prior posts of mine you will see that I had the same attitude with Hendrik Santos some time back for the same reasons. He would come here and ask about other people’s Wing Chun, but when questioned about his own Cho family Wing Chun he was not willing to share any real information.

My attitude is this…if you are going to frequent a Wing Chun discussion forum, you darn well better be prepared to discuss your Wing Chun! If you aren’t willing to share on equal footing with the rest of the people here, then you haven’t “earned” the right to talk to us! Maybe I’m in a small minority that sees it that way. But I still have the right to express that opinion.

“My attitude is this…if you are going to frequent a Wing Chun discussion forum, you darn well better be prepared to discuss your Wing Chun! If you aren’t willing to share on equal footing with the rest of the people here, then you haven’t ‘earned’ the right to talk to us! Maybe I’m in a small minority that sees it that way. But I still have the right to express that opinion.” (KPM)

***Actually, Keith…I think you’re in the majority. :smiley:

In my opinion, it comes down to one thing, and that is there is so much in the HFY system that is simply not in many other Wing Chun systems which cannot be discussed in depth without direct experience. Yes, there is a great deal of technical jargon that not too many people are familiar with, but much of the jargon is actually HFY hou kuit. The specific terminologies that are unique to HFY are difficult to communicate without having directly gone through the teachings. This is true for any teachings of Wing Chun. Experience is a requirement. Yet, when trying to discuss things HFY related, we generally get accused of four things:

  1. Your talk is all marketing, and its just repackaged Wing Chun.

  2. Oh, we have that too. Youre just using different words to sound different. More marketing.

  3. Now you are just being secretive, unwilling, and afraid to share.

  4. It is the exact same thing we do. I dont need to believe otherwise. I dont even need to see it. Im sure its the same. What? A video? When can I buy one?

So for most of those HFY members engaged on KFO, it becomes exceedingly difficult to have a deep conversation with non-HFY folk when there is not enough common ground to begin with, simultaneously avoiding comments like the ones above. If we stay true to HFY language, we shut everyone else out. If we water it down to simple English, it sounds like what we do is the same as others (but we dont). Trying to maintain a balance in between is a tough thing to do without getting accused of things.

Let me tell you something. There are generations of HFY members stemming as far back as 1975 here in the US. Do you think that included in those hundreds of people who have learned HFY dont have any alternative Wing Chun backgrounds? Do you think those people say the same four things above? To say otherwise is ultimately, indirectly or directly, a shot at the integrity of the HFY family. HFY is not a modern regurgitation of other Wing Chun. It doesnt matter how you cut it. Common sense: NO ONE appreciates being called anything that is not true.

Ive gone through the Ip Man system. I learned it all the way through the weaponry and to a large degree, my training and teaching involved more than 40 hours a week above my normal 40 hr daytime job. I am confident enough to say that the cumulative knowledge I have in Ip Man Ving Tsun cannot be compared to Hung Fa Yi Wing Chun because they are just too different. Even though, yes, they are both Wing Chun. The deeper you go, the more different it gets. I have learned and trained more than enough of both to know that the truth is contrary to any of the four comments Ive listed above. Ive sat down and watched videos of TWC published on the internet, and I know enough of Hung Fa Yi to say that it is also a different system. I know enough of Ip Man and HFY (through the kung fu, culture, and history), to say what Ip Man taught, and what GM Gee teaches, are very different systems.

So, after years of online conversations, going from the educational to the confrontational, the only option to maintain educational interests is via hands-on teaching and direct experience. Thats not marketing. That is the most practical vehicle of education. The MKF book was a promotional piece to help preserve the existence of HFY, it is not an instructional book. Even with more HFY books on the horizon, and a video in the works, neither will offer instruction on how-to-do HFY. This should illustrate that despite public interaction and publications, we hold to the importance that HFY must be learned hands-on.

But then Keith asked, Why engage online at all? Because Hung Fa Yi is still Wing Chun, and despite the many uniquenesss of it, there are still similarities to other Wing Chun that can be discussed. Not to mention, someone like me is still interested in sharing. The HFY family has independent thinkers, despite common belief. Are conversations limited? I would say only under the circumstances presented on this forum, very little can actually be discussed.

Does HFY have some very passionate members? Of course it does. We also have our own internal struggles, just as any other family would. Then again, the HFY family comes from all walks of life. The interest of the other HFY members who wanted to discuss HFY here are long gone, in my opinion. The circumstances today still arent conducive to educational talks, so unfortunately you are left with a small few. And we still have to deal with those four points listed above, if not more. What else can I tell you? This forum is just another website. Its not life. Were all free to come and go. It has nothing to do with earning the right to talk here. I talk about Wing Chun, but Keith, your opinion ignores the history of discussions here. For me, its the other way around. If you (generally speaking) want to inquire about HFY, youd better have some respect for HFY first, if you want to get far. Am I complaining? Hell no. Do I care? No. But dont come up to me and tell me I have to open up to you, everything I know.

Regards,
Savi.

[QUOTE=KPM;850885]Thanks for checking out my website. :slight_smile:

My attitude is this…if you are going to frequent a Wing Chun discussion forum, you darn well better be prepared to discuss your Wing Chun! If you aren’t willing to share on equal footing with the rest of the people here, then you haven’t “earned” the right to talk to us! Maybe I’m in a small minority that sees it that way. But I still have the right to express that opinion.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ultimatewingchun;850885]***Actually, Keith…I think you’re in the majority. :D[/QUOTE]

Woah! Am I in the majority here too!?? :eek:

Just really popping in here as times are busy. It seems to me that everyone argues over the past, but what about the present?

While we’re on the subject of sharing, how about checking out my site!?? :slight_smile: My gardens a bl**dy mess!!

http://www.theyumyeurngacademy.co.uk/Projects/present/present.html

Well said, Savi.

Hey, BrazilUSA:

I’m Marcelo Santos, from Rio de Janeiro, the first HFY student in Brasil (2003). I have nothing to do with that video, produced by practitioners from the Northeast of my Country, and I really do not want to comment on them.

Anyways, since you come to Brasil from time to time, I want to invite you to know our Kwoon (www.sanchijin.com.br) and spend some time with us. Beyond Hung Fa Yi Wing Chun, we have classes of (Military) Sambo, Submission Grappling, San Da and Tai Chi Chuan. I myself also cross-train with the team of the Luta-Livre legend, Alexandre Pequeno (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmcZ4mQHqyE).

Drop me a line whenever you come to Brasil and let’s have some fun by training hard and friendly.

Sincerely,

Marcelo
Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
tenebras@uol.com.nr
marcelo.alexandrino@trtrio.gov.br

“In my opinion, it comes down to one thing, and that is there is so much in the HFY system that is simply not in many other Wing Chun systems which cannot be discussed in depth without direct experience.” (Savi)

***AND IN MY OPINION, Savi…this is pure spin and hype. Of course it could be discussed. But enough about all this. I’m really not all that interested anymore - thanks to all the secrecy and spin. Much ado about nothing.

Very well said Sihing Savi. What you write here also expresses many of the things I feel and think (regarding HFY, as well as online discussions of WC in general); while maybe not being able to express with such clarity myself at times :slight_smile:
Obviously, I can only speak for myself, but I feel what you write here might be echoed by others, and not just from the HFY family alone. Hopefully your well intentioned post gives everyone a little something to think about and a better understanding of where some of us are coming from when posting here and trying to share.

Jonathan

Hi Savi!

—Thanks for the reasoned and sensible reply. Some comments below:

In my opinion, it comes down to one thing, and that is there is so much in the HFY system that is simply not in many other Wing Chun systems which cannot be discussed in depth without direct experience.

—Ok. I am willing to accept that idea. But it seems you are one of the few that are even willing to try.

Yes, there is a great deal of technical jargon that not too many people are familiar with, but much of the jargon is actually HFY hou kuit.

—But I get the distinct impression that a lot of it is simply “dazzle them with brilliance” terminology and unnecessary.

when trying to discuss things HFY related, we generally get accused of four things:

  1. Your talk is all marketing, and its just repackaged Wing Chun.

—I think that this stims from the fact that a lot of the technical jargon turns out to be just a different name for something everyone is familiar with. This goes along with my point just above.

  1. Oh, we have that too. Youre just using different words to sound different. More marketing.

—See above. Same applies. I believe you when you say there is a lot in HFY that is not in other WCK systems. But there is also a lot that is! Otherwise it wouldn’t be WCK! When we keep hearing dazzling technical jargon for things that everyone is doing, then you are going to naturally get points 1 & 2 of your list. But when you say that something is NOT the same as we think it is, but then are either unwilling or unable to explain why…

  1. Now you are just being secretive, unwilling, and afraid to share.

…you get point 3 on your list.

So for most of those HFY members engaged on KFO, it becomes exceedingly difficult to have a deep conversation with non-HFY folk when there is not enough common ground to begin with,

—Is HFY Wing Chun, or isn’t it?

If we stay true to HFY language, we shut everyone else out. If we water it down to simple English, it sounds like what we do is the same as others (but we dont). Trying to maintain a balance in between is a tough thing to do without getting accused of things.

—Now that I find hard to swallow. If the differences are that large, they should be easy enough to explain. If they aren’t…

HFY is not a modern regurgitation of other Wing Chun. It doesnt matter how you cut it. Common sense: NO ONE appreciates being called anything that is not true.

—They why the hesitation to prove everyone wrong! Why not CLEARLY explain the huge differences? Why not put out videos showing just how different HFY is from the rest?

I am confident enough to say that the cumulative knowledge I have in Ip Man Ving Tsun cannot be compared to Hung Fa Yi Wing Chun because they are just too different. Even though, yes, they are both Wing Chun.

—With your background in both, and the huge differences that exist…why is it so hard to describe and explain those differences? An apple is very different from an orange, which makes it easy to describe. A Johnny Smith apple isn’t so different from a red delicious apple, which makes it harder to describe.

The MKF book was a promotional piece to help preserve the existence of HFY, it is not an instructional book. Even with more HFY books on the horizon, and a video in the works,

—So…is there going to be HFY videos or not? You’ve said one thing, Matt said something different.

The circumstances today still arent conducive to educational talks, so unfortunately you are left with a small few.

—But ask yourself…what created those circumstances?

And we still have to deal with those four points listed above, if not more. What It has nothing to do with earning the right to talk here. I talk about Wing Chun, but Keith, your opinion ignores the history of discussions here. For me, its the other way around. If you (generally speaking) want to inquire about HFY, youd better have some respect for HFY first, if you want to get far.

----I will repeat what I said before. If you are coming here to discuss Wing Chun, then you better be prepared to talk on equal footing with the rest of us. If someone wants to know if I have a specific motion or technique in my Biu Gee form, I’ll tell them!!! :eek: Did that question ever get answered on that other thread? It ended up so long and belabored that I lost track!

But dont come up to me and tell me I have to open up to you, everything I know.

—No offense intended Savi, and I do appreciate you being willing to share more than most, but what have you got to hide?

Keith,

From reading your comments in your last post, it seems to me, that while you may have ‘read’ what savi wrote, you’re still be ‘hearing’ what he is saying.

As far as all the secrecy talk, and more-so, saying that there is no real sharing of HFY here, I think Savi also addressed this quite well a few pages ago when he said:

[I]"…For that matter, it’s no one’s call what I choose to share about it to the public. It’s not about being secretive. It’s about not being any of your business. It’s called boundaries. If you want to learn more, you gotta put the hands on it.

I don’t take stock in learning martial arts online, and certain (if not the majority of) questions are best answered in person. Quite obviously, Kung fu is learned in person. Everything else is just words…" [/I]

Sure we can all talk here and have dialog and share what we know, but if it’s something that you have never seen, you will never really ‘see’ it online. At some point, hands on is the only real way to know what one is talking about.
Kinda like an apple - One can describe what it tastes like, how it’s different than another apple, or even how it tastes different than another piece of fruit, but isn’t it best to just take a bite to see for yourself if you’ve never tasted that apple?

[QUOTE=Ultimatewingchun;851030]“In my opinion, it comes down to one thing, and that is there is so much in the HFY system that is simply not in many other Wing Chun systems which cannot be discussed in depth without direct experience.” (Savi)

***AND IN MY OPINION, Savi…this is pure spin and hype. Of course it could be discussed. But enough about all this. I’m really not all that interested anymore - thanks to all the secrecy and spin. Much ado about nothing.[/QUOTE]

Cool, then we shouldn’t expect your comments in regards to HFY any more in the future. Saves me the hassle of having to tell you to shut up :wink: