Jim,
While it is true the human body hasn’t changed, that doesn’t mean that our knowledge of fighting hasn’t evolved (based on experiences over time, new insights into how to effectively train, myths being dispelled, etc.). I’ve a friend that does Renassaince “western martial arts” (sword fighting and wrestling) but he recognizes that both wrestling and fencing evolved since the 1600s.
And even if the body hasn’t changed, that doesn’t mean that some fighting method from the past made the best use of it, had the most effective tools or tactics, etc. Nor does it help to say these things worked in the past since that begs the question: against whom (what level of skill)?
RR wrote:
If your purpose is to have fun, enjoy some social activity, and learn an interesting cultural art, then WCK is neither obsolete nor out-moded.
**Quite true, like my friend who does Renaissance WMA. It’s a great hobby.
If your desire self defense, you’re better off buying Strong on Defense for a couple bucks and starting there.
**True.
If your desire is to compete in the UFC and K-1, then that’s combat sports and it requires a modern approach to athletics, mental preperation, coaching, and some degree of natural ability (“vitamins” not-withstanding) or intense dedication to purpose.
**What if you don’t want to compete but just enjoy the fighting aspects?
And in the old days they fist-fought a lot more, which meant they tested their stuff under high resistance, which is a weeding process (both technically and personally) all its own.
**That’s a good point; similar to what happens today in BJJ, boxing, muay thai gyms.
Tom, Ernie,
You guys seem to have the same “answer” – show them you can make it work. If you can do that, that seems to be a great answer.
Kungfufighter,
How do you know that “knowledge was hoarded”?