[QUOTE=HardWork8;874742]MMA is a a training approach that uses a mish mash of(hopefully relevant) martial arts to improve one’s personal fighting ability by training one in a variety of techniques, ranges,ETC.
The MMA’s essence varies depending on the arts that are mixed and its essence can also be described as a mish mash unless you MIX a few relatively simple/external MAs such as Kickboxing and Wrestling! In such a case you may create distinct “essence” within what you practice.
Well, I presume that is what all MA’s try to do but in their own ways and within their own concepts and principles.
The name of the style might provide a hint. Or should I say or Wang Lang’s kung fu interpretation of the Praying Mantis with a Lohan Kung fu base. Of course the foot work is from the Monkey style. Other influences listed by Wong Kiew Kit, in his book,“The art of Shaolin Kung fu”, include Grasping techniques;Felling techniques and Wrestling!
I wonder how many Mantis teachers teach this style with all its aspects and how many of their students cross train(sometimes in the wrong manner) to fill in the gaps?
While we are on the subject of “essence” then it is worth mentioning that kung fu styles generally follow some set principles one of which is the importance of ROOTING! Without rooting your kung fu will have no essence, whatever the style. The same goes for those who ignore the internals even if they happen to be practicing a so called “external” style.
Then that is good for them. They can call what they do MMA or the ever in fashion Jeet Kune Do. They can even invent new names for what they do such as “American Kung Fu” or “Australian Kung fu” and even add sub headings such as “New and Improved”; “Better Than Before”;“Street Effective” and so on, but calling some mish mash Kung Fu is WRONG!
So now you are implyig that the hundreds of kung fu masters who created and evolved these styles, sometimes during turbulent periods of Chinese history, did not engage in consistant combat and therefore are not as qualified as YOU, ANERLICH, ULTIMATE WING CHUN AND GRAND MASTER SAJURO_RONIN???
LOL!LOL!LOL!
I don’t know about you but when I see a fighter chain punch while hopping around like a boxer, then I don’t see Wing Chun nor any other style of Kung Fu. I see a MMA-ist!
But it is!
A “buzz word” that is based on a REAL AND VALID phenomenom. I have no problem with MMA as it works in its own right and has its merrit. My problem is with people who mish mash their martial arts and then call what they do kung fu, just because there a kung fu style somewhere within their mish mash!
Putting aside the weapons’ MA. Yes, karate and Jujutsu together are MMA, however, they are complimentary MMA.
Grappling techniques were also present in traditional karate styles and were “lost” in many(not all) schools.
The Wado ryu style is a relatively new style of Karate and has incorporated Japanese Jujutsu techniques within the principles of karate.
Not if they are trained like in some Mc dojos nowadays…
Kung fu fighters have been “tapping” into other kung fu skill sets for centuries.
That is fine and fair, but I did not invent my “perspective” as it is the traditional perspective. It is a school of thought.
Well I know 3 traditional kung fu sifus personally, with whom I share the same perspective.
The ever present question would be wether you fight in a kung fu context or an MMA context? That is have you assimilated your other skills into your Wing Chun or have you kept them separate and “pick and choose” during the fight. If your case is the second then you are more of an MMA-ist than kung fu-ist. But then if it works for you in a fight then fair enough![/QUOTE]
I appreciate the lack of nonsense this time around in your response! Fair enough viewpoint as well. Take care.