[QUOTE=Pork Chop;1131736]I’ve always wondered how close Chinese qi is with Japanese ki ().
I believe they’re the same character, but I imagine that the usage is a bit different.
In Japanese, is a bit esoteric, but not so abstract as to require that much discussion (at least for people who speak the language).
The term/kanji/rootword implies atmosphere, mood, air, nature/disposition, intention/motivation, appearance of/feeling of, spirit, mind, or heart.
You say (ki wo ireru) to mean “put some effort into it” - or “apply a little elbow grease”.
(yaruki); is like your motivation to do something.
It’s basically the meeting point of mood, attitude, focus, intention, spirit, disposition, and atmosphere.
Outside of kiai masters, you don’t really hear it being used to describe invisible lightning bolts or magic death rays.
I’ve always thought of “internal” as just good body mechanics, maybe coupled with coordinating your movements with your breath.
I’m amused when “internal” masters make fun of western styles like boxing, calling it “external” and lacking skill, and then proceed to mimic boxers with mechanics that would get them laughed out of most gyms.
Sure, maybe I’ve only got 4 basic punches in my “sport”, or 8 “limbs” used in about 20 different ways; but i can break down the mechanics of what every applicable joint is doing at every microsecond during each of those movements.[/QUOTE]
In the Chinese approach, it’s not that different. It is energy, and it is considered inseparable from pattern. Thus, there is a physical pattern to any expression of energy. It is not separate from it in such a definition. To believe that muscles play zero role is contrary to the definition of qi.
In most of the internals, like many styles, an premium is placed on micromanagement of forces. Ability to do this, in practice, is almost always interpreted by most good internal martial artists I’ve met, as good chi. This is body mechanics, but also it is entrainment in response to outside body mechanics.
Mixing responses here, but I’ve seen one internal set that does a round kick. The key difference between it and some round kicks I’ve seen is that the practitioner starts middle or back weighted, sinks and digs in(while arching slightly their lower back as they drop) and rise slightly and tuck as their torso shifts forward and they do the kick. The idea is to let gravity pull you down as you sink, and try to redirect that into the kick, while involving a spinal whip.
The problem with defining internal as good body mechanics is that “good body mechanics” is a more meaningless term than “chi”. What is deemed good body mechanics changes constantly, and is only useful in the narrowest of uses. It’s as psuedoscientific a term as ergonomics, or how to make people able to do something that isn’t good for them repetitively more times before they aren’t happy at work.
I’d also say there is not an internal hip throw in internal kung fu that I’ve seen, but I would also say there’s room for one.
There is one subset of hip motion in the better internals I’ve seen that I haven’t seen as comprehensively applied in other styles, but perhaps I’m just not aware of it in those styles. The round kick I describe has it.