Five Ancestor Chi Sao/Interesting for Wing Chuners!

[QUOTE=Hardwork108;921613]Well if there is not shape then you will still have the wing chun principles as as a guide. After all in higher levels of practise one is not even suppose to use blocks.

You know, I would say that everyone here will know that not all kung fu styles are equal. That means that there are kung fu styles that are better than others and the little I know about 5a fist would in my opinion put it ahead of Wing Chun.

So I am not going to say that because I do WC then it is the best. I got over that kind stuff when I was around 8 years old.

Wu Zhu Quan seems to have “deeper” internals and of course uses more in your face techniques, that is, force is discipated not by turning your stance but by the use of soft force through the upper limbs, while facing the opponent squarely, am I correct?

Of course, anyone reading this can correct me with more info in such aspects within WC. Or perhaps we can even start a new thread and compare these arts which at some level share similarities but are very different.

Tell us more about Sifu Yap Leong as well.[/QUOTE]

you are right in stating that a majority of 5a principles are conducted squarely.
and the enrgy in certain branches of the system are soft and internal, i too am not of the school of what i do is the best, only in my experience of wc and 5a that i have to say 5a is superior. I think it would be a good idea to be constructive and exchange views and comments rather than tit for tat nonsense that we should of exorcised in the playground. easier said than done people in the martial arts are proud !.

true the higher the level the less need for the earlier structures, although what is advanced ?someone could have all the knowledge and still not be able to play, therefore still needing structure. perhaps we will all attain wu - chi ? but probably not in this lifetime.

go to shaolinway.com see more about Sifu Leong.

[QUOTE=Shaolin Fist;921636]Its a fact that there are good teachers and bad ones. The kung fu world is not regulated nor is it based on performance or results. A teacher could be crap yet still open up a school, these days it seems more like a type of leisure business.

Forget the fact that the teacher might be unskilled in the first place we also have so many schools being opened and run by inexperienced teachers (less 5 years of experience)

I could say i have played a Wing Chun guy in the past who have did the same to me and made me feel inferior what’s your point ? so i dare say you are talking from limited experience, not from the number of years of experience but rather from a limited exposure to the number of good Wing Chun teachers.

To make such a big sweeping statement based on what experience ?..If you had traded hands with at least 5 Wing Chun teachers of different lineages (with over 25 years experience) and then maybe your comments wouldn’t come across (in your own word’s) … ‘Hollow’

The forums are a place to share our experiences and all styles are welcomed but all you have done is to sow the seeds in creating bad blood. Hardly in the spirit of Shaolin.[/QUOTE]

whether you take my statement as sweeping or not is up to you, in my experience which you keep saying is limited, i have found that 5a is for me superior, also what bad blood all i have done is asked someone to explain themselves, it stilll confounds me that rather than credit the good points of another style you discredit them saying thats not proper wing chun etc.. if you have played with sifu leong you will know this !

forums are also for debate and difference. I have traded hands with several wing chun practitioners some better than others. also one shouldnt blindly follow without questioning, the spirit of shaolin ill leave up to shaw brothers.

Saying that i agree that there are alot of bad so called sifu who run schools
as well as some very skilled practioners who teach. The catalyst for this debate
the 5ancestors chi sau shows that there are some very advanced sifu who are thankfully still around.

[QUOTE=Shadow_warrior8;921631]Tao? pride? You talk like you know me. Profoundness? You say statements that say nothing- so I ask you to present your evidence of your training and your knowledge. Its not a surprise you get personal and go off track.

Yes I said my sifu taught a Wuzu master who converted to wingchun. Did I say wingchun was better or Wuzu? It was a personal choice, just like what I said in my last email.

What has my words got to do with your claim that wingchun is hallow?
What has it got to do with your claim you studied wingchun? Hence I asked you how long you studied. How long have your spend practicing? Who was your Sifu?
You use your experience with a Wuzu master to describe wingchun being hallow?
Its like saying I am having a pear and talking about how ALL apples taste weird.
How many apples did you taste? How many internal wingchun masters did you seek out?(and point, there really arent that many)
Framework? Please describe your previous wingchun framework/body structure, methods to generate striking force.

Internal wingchun schools structure are flawed. Please share, what is flawed.

Why you talking like you know me? Or know what I am going to say- " bong sau is for beginners" advanced wing chun has no shapes"? What have your been smoking? Your MA training trains ESP too? This is not kuen kuit yeah? I have never heard these claims on bong sao or advance wingchun. What does that mean- advanced?

If there are not comparisons, then you have just slapped yourself on the face. You signed up on KF forums just to retort a comparison for Wuzu and Wingchun. Your pride to defend Wuzu is what is happening here. If you like your training with Sifu Yap, share. Dont talk down about other arts. They aint got nothing to do with your training with him right?
Note- I am not defending wingchun(wingchun doesnt need defending) I am merely relating experiences of what a Wuzu Master said to me, when he trained with us. You however are claiming to know all about wingchun and belittle it, and put Wuzu higher.

However when someone belittles another art, I want to know, what is your basis? What kind of training with references, names, description, instead of vague words of nothing.

Please share your training for unifed body structure, spine, kua, shoulder nest. How to open and close these gates?
How do you train coiling of tendons and muscles. How do you train kung lik?
Do you do big heavenly circulation or small heavenly circulation?
Do you breath through the yongquan? How do you train rooting?

Nothing to get personal, what all this tao, pride talk. Talk mechanics, details, leave the my daddy is better than yours for the playground.
My respect for TCMA says all styles are good, and we honour the style, the ancestors and the way. The only reason why someone says another is better is because the other person trained harder, or the person who is making a observation isnt qualified to do so- Not knowing where or what to look for.

I still love training with my Wuzu/Wingchun mates when they come to visit because they can switch on Wuzu and we can have a party. We always walk away with new found respect for each other, and learning something new.

The fact that you are willing to put down your own lineage of other practitioners of Wuzu to play up the name of Sifu Yap speaks volumes
As if wingchun doesnt have enough internal family problems with claims of who is more authentic, which master was better, who taught who, who beat up who etc…We need to have other lineages claiming wingchun is hallow.[/QUOTE]

wing chun internal family problems thats an understatement, like you my experience is subjective, we live in a world of relativity, my experience of wing chun is just that my experience, so your ranting on, makes no difference. you can say whatever you like it doesnt take away my perspective. you can have the best lineage and still get walloped. Like you said its the skill of the individual, your understanding is clear from your loaded remarks.

I have never said sifu yap leong is my sifu, just that his work is inspiring.

the more on the outside the less inside. why dont you put a video up and reveal all your secrets ! youll have to pay for mine.

[QUOTE=shaolinfist;921737]whether you take my statement as sweeping or not is up to you, in my experience which you keep saying is limited, i have found that 5a is for me superior, also what bad blood all i have done is asked someone to explain themselves, it stilll confounds me that rather than credit the good points of another style you discredit them saying thats not proper wing chun etc.. if you have played with sifu leong you will know this !
[/QUOTE]

Ok i’ll speak in your language so we cross wires…

I think 5 Ancestors is definately ‘Inferior’ to Wing Chun because 10 years ago i got truly done over by a 30 plus years experienced Wing Chun master who i thought was going to be a pushover. As i was armed with some of what i thought was Superior 5 Ancestor chi sau bullets i went in with all guns blazing.
But alas as the stories went, i lost my chi sau chalengne :frowning:

Based on that i can only conclude that Wing Chun is a Superior System to 5 Ancestors.

Oh dont get me wrong, let me give ‘credit’ to 5-Ancestors as they do have a ‘few good points’ :rolleyes:

Ok after i have finish my popcorn i gonna train my Superior Wing Chun moves…

[QUOTE=shaolinfist;921723]you are right in stating that a majority of 5a principles are conducted squarely.
and the enrgy in certain branches of the system are soft and internal, i too am not of the school of what i do is the best, only in my experience of wc and 5a that i have to say 5a is superior. I think it would be a good idea to be constructive and exchange views and comments rather than tit for tat nonsense that we should of exorcised in the playground. easier said than done people in the martial arts are proud !. [/quote]

I agree with you there. We can only base our opinions on our own experiences. Again I would say that I have not even reached a high level in Wing Chun let alone compare it to higher levels in 5 ancestor fist.

You are right about wuji it is at least a lifetime’s work and search, but what a great way to spend a lifetime, eh?:slight_smile:

For those who are unfamiliar with this concept then I will only say that I doubt that you will get this through heavy weight training programs nor by excessively concentrating on ring sports.

For wuji read higher level kung fu.:slight_smile:

[QUOTE=shaolinfist;921802]wing chun internal family problems thats an understatement, like you my experience is subjective, we live in a world of relativity, my experience of wing chun is just that my experience, so your ranting on, makes no difference. you can say whatever you like it doesnt take away my perspective. you can have the best lineage and still get walloped. Like you said its the skill of the individual, your understanding is clear from your loaded remarks.

I have never said sifu yap leong is my sifu, just that his work is inspiring.

the more on the outside the less inside. why dont you put a video up and reveal all your secrets ! youll have to pay for mine.[/QUOTE]

So you havent even trained with Sifu Yap? And you say pound for pound he’s the best? You can tell this from the video? So he’s not your sifu?

I am merely asking you to explain what you mean, and I am using your terms
Internal wingchun schools structure are flawed
wingchun is hallow?
bong sau is for beginners" advanced wing chun has no shapes"?

Your secrets? Its okay, not interested. You actually believe your “secrets” are worth money? Hahahahah…Traditional TCMA masters dont sell out for money.
Use Wuzu terminology, or chinese TCMA terms, see if I can carry a conversation on internal training.

You belittle the name of wingchun and I would like to know what basis you make such statements on an art that has been a reputation since the 70/80s for being a formidable fighting style. Thousands of people have spent their lives, time, effort to spread wingchun all around the world, we cant have someone come around and claim its HOLLOW.
You come to a WINGCHUN forum and made demeaning statements on wingchun that you cant back up. Its like going to Chinatown and saying chinese are sick men of asia- I am chinese, I will back my culture up

[QUOTE=Shaolin Fist;921817]Ok i’ll speak in your language so we cross wires…

I think 5 Ancestors is definately ‘Inferior’ to Wing Chun because 10 years ago i got truly done over by a 30 plus years experienced Wing Chun master who i thought was going to be a pushover. As i was armed with some of what i thought was Superior 5 Ancestor chi sau bullets i went in with all guns blazing.
But alas as the stories went, i lost my chi sau chalengne :frowning:

Based on that i can only conclude that Wing Chun is a Superior System to 5 Ancestors.

Oh dont get me wrong, let me give ‘credit’ to 5-Ancestors as they do have a ‘few good points’ :rolleyes:

Ok after i have finish my popcorn i gonna train my Superior Wing Chun moves…[/QUOTE]

My exchange with Wuzu guys are interesting
Firstly, their hands are really hard and strong and they hit like a Mule, a definate force to be reckoned with
Feels alot like Choy lay Fut or Hung Kuen kinda hands, except they tend to be close range and compact like wingchun.
Larp sao and pak sao on them, feels like hitting a brick wall.
So if we chi sao and think use more strength-lik, you will be defeated.
So what do we do?
Here, in the words of the Wuzu Master/brother, these videos show why he switched to wingchun.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsgRXduHjYY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5uTr5fA1Lw

[QUOTE=Phil Redmond;921616]And here’s his method of dealing with WC chi sao.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJIthqEqGk0&feature=related[/QUOTE]

Very interesting and thank you. Lets discuss.

[QUOTE=Hardwork108;921917]Very interesting and thank you. Lets discuss.[/QUOTE]

What do you think of the demo?
Heavy hands, strong striking very good representation of Wuzu
Check out this awesome demo
http://www.56.com/u30/v_MjQ0MjUwMzU.html

Personally I like and respect Wuzu, its practical and direct and very traditional.
http://www.56.com/u79/v_NDE0NTkyNDQ.html
It reminds of some hard wingchun stylist, like Hard Bridge Wingchun and some masters who mix Choy Lay Fut/Hung Kuen into wingchun
And I believe they took part in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiping_Rebellion

And how does wingchun handle Hard force?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsgRXduHjYY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5uTr5fA1Lw

But wingchun has a internal style, taught by Yik Kam, Leung Bik, others being a more feminine style. Thats where the jewels of wingchun are.
Years ago, a senior said to me Wingchun is a internal style and his lineage is not Iron Fist of Chu Chong Man, or Swallow Weight kung lik kind of energy.
After so many years, I have just a little insight into what he meant.

[QUOTE=Shadow_warrior8;921908]My exchange with Wuzu guys are interesting
Firstly, their hands are really hard and strong and they hit like a Mule, a definate force to be reckoned with
Feels alot like Choy lay Fut or Hung Kuen kinda hands, except they tend to be close range and compact like wingchun.
Larp sao and pak sao on them, feels like hitting a brick wall.
So if we chi sao and think use more strength-lik, you will be defeated.
So what do we do? [/QUOTE]

Shadow_warrior8- Sorry that last post was just meant to be sarcastic. Was just making the point that shaolinfist must either trolling or extremly very immature.

Can you imagine us joining a 5 Ancestor chat forum…informing them their system is inferior to Wing Chun…and then saying ’ Hi lets have a nice sensible chat about it’ ???

S_W8 you have shared some similar experiences to myself but i’ll discuss those points a little later.

Just curious though have you ever tried encorporating any of their energetics into your Wing Chun ?

[QUOTE=Shadow_warrior8;921904]So you havent even trained with Sifu Yap? And you say pound for pound he’s the best? You can tell this from the video? So he’s not your sifu?

I am merely asking you to explain what you mean, and I am using your terms
Internal wingchun schools structure are flawed
wingchun is hallow?
bong sau is for beginners" advanced wing chun has no shapes"?

Your secrets? Its okay, not interested. You actually believe your “secrets” are worth money? Hahahahah…Traditional TCMA masters dont sell out for money.
Use Wuzu terminology, or chinese TCMA terms, see if I can carry a conversation on internal training.

You belittle the name of wingchun and I would like to know what basis you make such statements on an art that has been a reputation since the 70/80s for being a formidable fighting style. Thousands of people have spent their lives, time, effort to spread wingchun all around the world, we cant have someone come around and claim its HOLLOW.
You come to a WINGCHUN forum and made demeaning statements on wingchun that you cant back up. Its like going to Chinatown and saying chinese are sick men of asia- I am chinese, I will back my culture up[/QUOTE]

i was drawn to this friutless dialogue, because of the Sifu Yap Leong Video as i have an interest in 5a, All of the above statements were originally made by wing chun practioners, who were defending there point of view when challenged

I said pound for pound 5a is superior, Sifu Leongs reputation is formidable
all who have played with him know that especially the countless wing chun sifu
who were too shamed to acknowledge there defeats. Now if you are what you say you are then you wont asked me to get the list, out of respect for the tcma
you will want to give face. Everyone knows that the lure of a big red packet can make any tom **** harry a closed door disciple !

by hollow i mean the wing chun in my experience from playing and observing, has been one dimensional not “live” the blocking was dead, no absorbing or listening.
i came onto the forum to challenge perceptions of the video on u tube. In which you will find innane comments by wing chun practioners saying bong sau is for novices, advanced wing chun has no shapes.
In principle advanced kung fu doesnt have any shapes because the masters have gone beyong being readable.
but how many masters are that good, not yip man not bruce lee he actually left wing chun to create his own style ? if wing chun practitioners cant face a bit of critcism, then i feel the insecurity of there skill and style reveals itself. You can tell me to my face that 5 a is crap, thats ok, but if we touch hands and you loose would you say your wing chun is inferior? the proof is in the pudding. it may be true that yip man clan faced many challenges in there time and spread the wing chun gospel, but like every religion questions need to be asked, why is it that alot of wing chun fighters cross train ? whats wrong with
their kung fu ? the main reason wing chun became popular was because of the bruce lee films in the 70s/80s more inclined to thank golden harvest, for the boom in the 70s.

[QUOTE=Shadow_warrior8;921941]What do you think of the demo?
Heavy hands, strong striking very good representation of Wuzu
Check out this awesome demo
http://www.56.com/u30/v_MjQ0MjUwMzU.html

Personally I like and respect Wuzu, its practical and direct and very traditional.
http://www.56.com/u79/v_NDE0NTkyNDQ.html
It reminds of some hard wingchun stylist, like Hard Bridge Wingchun and some masters who mix Choy Lay Fut/Hung Kuen into wingchun
And I believe they took part in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiping_Rebellion

And how does wingchun handle Hard force?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsgRXduHjYY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5uTr5fA1Lw

But wingchun has a internal style, taught by Yik Kam, Leung Bik, others being a more feminine style. Thats where the jewels of wingchun are.
Years ago, a senior said to me Wingchun is a internal style and his lineage is not Iron Fist of Chu Chong Man, or Swallow Weight kung lik kind of energy.
After so many years, I have just a little insight into what he meant.[/QUOTE]

Thank you, very interesting videos and I have seen some of them. I believe that the fact is that no one here has practiced all the different Wing Chun lineages nor have they practiced all of the Five Ancestor Fist lineages. So it would be difficult ot generalise.

The lineage of Wing Chun that I practise acknowledges many internal principles that include, softness, listening, floating, accepting force etc. Honestly speaking many WC practioners that I have met are not even aware of the internal side of Wing Chun. They practice this art exteranally and as a result they miss out on its main advantage, which are the internal elements.

It is good that there are people such as yourself and Hendrik that are making references to this aspect of not just Wing Chun but kung fu in general. When I fist joinned this forum and talked about the internals I was kind of ridiculed by some of the modern “kung fu gods” (read, glorified kickboxers) and even some who didn’t even practice kung fu. So no matter how the subject of internals is discussed it will be benefitial to those who are not aware of its existance in kung fu.

I like to add that perhaps shaolinfist’s experience was limited to externally practised Wing Chun (just like 95% of people out there) and as a result he can see the obvious weaknesses when he compares it to internally practiced 5 Ancestor Fist specially when demonstrated by someone with Sifu Yap Leong’s unquestionable caliber.

It should be becoming obvious for those people who were not aware the reason why many old masters regarded the internals as the higher levels of kung fu which some of them would keep under their hats and not teach it to everyone.:slight_smile:

[QUOTE=shaolinfist;922225]i was drawn to this friutless dialogue, because of the Sifu Yap Leong Video as i have an interest in 5a, All of the above statements were originally made by wing chun practioners, who were defending there point of view when challenged[/quote]

I will say this. People who practise wing chun purely as an external martial art have no grounds to complain about what you have said. Wing Chun practiced externally is not really kung fu. That is my honest opinion. The practice of any kung fu style should incorporate the internals otherwise there is no balance nor essence.

You are right when comparing it with 95% percent of Wing Chun out there. Lets just say classify the other 5% as unknown, for the sake of science.:wink:

I have heard about those.:wink: I heard he really embarassed some karate dan grades as well, is that true?

If you were referring to my comment, then that is exactly what I meant as that fact holds true for high level Wing Chun as well.

You know, one of the main points that I have made about people crosstraining needlessly has been to find their answers in their kung fu and if their school does not provide it then they should look elsewhere in an kung fu school with an authentic kung fu sifu, instead of running to the local BJJ or Thai Boxing gym.

You should see the kind of treatment I am getting for that elsewhere in this forum and for a long time I might add. So don’t you dare go against the MMA and “Cross training is king” as you are going to offend a lot of people who make their bread and butter from the “modern” training concept of mixing MA, LOL,lol,lol.

It is ironic that wing chun became popular because of someone who walked away from it.:confused:

That would make a good thread subject.:smiley:

I am glad that you are posting. You are one of the minority here who train kung fu under a proper sifu. Of course that doesn’t mean that others who interact with you will not sometimes disagree but then that is what we are here for and that is to discuss and hopefully get enlightened about this great art, no matter what style we practice.:slight_smile:

Its silly to post so much on a Sifu that reputation you only heard. Yes I agree it is fruitless for you to continue this thread. What are you defending? Sifu Yap reputation? You are not his student, he doesnt need your defending, and one can see he is a skilled master. Wuzu reputation? Wuzu doesnt need defending, it stands as a formidable MA. So what? Your point that wingchun is inferior to , Wuzu Quan, Ngor Chor Kun, Ngo Chor Kun or Five Ancestors Fist?

HW108, Shaolin Fist
My belief is Wingchun learnt just for self defence is formidable already, as master wong, bruce lee, leung ting, has proven all over the world.
My experience- My Wuzu brother who switched over later, had multiple nice exchanges, we agreed it was a draw. I would honestly say, it wasnt easy, because it was my first encounter with “Hard” hands, strong “Hard” structure. You can see what I mean from the Wuzu video. I was faster, but he was hard to larp, pak. And his close range punching could really floor you. My cultivation back then was not internal per se. Even if I lost, it was no big deal, he had 30 years of experience, but he graciously said it was a draw. I did get alot of ***** slaps in due to speed but without internal understanding it would have been hard to hurt him because of Wuzu Iron body conditioning Tiet Bo San. Later, I was taught the internal aspects of wingchun power, and I learnt chain punching isnt just flicking your hands rapidly into the air, connection of the whole body, rooting, power from ground up. Wingchun looks soft, but its subtle and penetrating and at times projecting, not like hard lik or hard jing.
I might have done some damage if I did a straight blast with my body behind the strikes attacking his face, but I wasnt there to do him in, as he wasnt as well, we are kungfu brothers.

What is the difference between white crane and Wuzu, San Chien? Why does Wingchun not have San Chien(if it descended from White Crane)? Or Santi from Hsing I? Now I know, Wingchun is not taiji, not Wuzu 5 parts power, not Choy Lay Fut, no Hung Kuen. Why dont we take silk reeling from taiji or add Pakua stepping to Chum Kil? It has its only internal mechanics and described in details by some Seniors on this forum for years.

I have never heard any of your claims on advanced wingchun or bong sao.

You can tell me to my face that 5 a is crap, thats ok, but if we touch hands and you loose would you say your wing chun is inferior? the proof is in the pudding.
If I lose when we touch hands, I AM INFERIOR, not Wingchun. I just have to train harder, then I will visit you again for another exchange. And if I beat you then, is Wingchun now proven superior? TCMA is about , self cultivation, making friends through the martial way, not stylist, styles and who is better. You dont have a clue about TCMA culture and have shallow views.

What security or criticism? Of course wingchun can take it, it is not invincible bullet blocking stuff. But it must be said by one who can qualify his answer with experience. You havent done that. You still havent said how long you trained in wingchun or which Sifu. I dont think its wingchun that has security issues. When you "challenge perceptions of the video on u tube", you must show why? show experience? Posting a master you idol, doesnt count as experience. You can tell us your real upfront experience or talk about Wuzu Internal Mechanics versus Wingchun Internal mechancis, thats good enough.

you wont asked me to get the list, out of respect for the tcma you will want to give face
You are talking nonsense here. What reference do you have of countless Sifus who have lost to Sifu Yap? From Youtube as well? You berate wingchun to boost Wuzu. You put down Wuzu other lineages to boost your admiration for Sifu Yap, whom you saw on youtube. And you talk about respect for TCMA?

Why many masters cross train? Who? Please state these masters names. How many are Yip Man? Or Bruce Lee? Or Wong Shun Leung? And here’s my answer, most are not original students of Yip Man or didnt spend enough time in Wingchun. Did you hear any students of Yip Man go learn Shui Chiao? Or Muay Thai? Or Boxing? Why did Wong Shun Leung turn to Wingchun over boxing? Why did Leung Sheung give up Dragon Boxing?

As you can see in Master Samuel Kwok videos, wingchun is very alive. Its very attentive in listening.

the main reason wing chun became popular was because of the bruce lee films in the 70s/80s more inclined to thank golden harvest, for the boom in the 70s.
The challenges of Yip man, and his students were hongkong entertainment tonight even before Bruce Lee learnt wingchun or the movies. He was even famous in guangzhou known as the 3 hero with Master Yuen and Master Yiu.
Bruce Lee died in 1973, his films were becoming famous in the late 60s/70s and before that he was becoming famous in Hollywood. In hongkong, Master Wong, Master Cheung etc…went about challenge matches all those years. Wingchun didnt stop in hongkong just because Bruce Lee went to the states
Seriously, you dont show you know much about wingchun, wingchun history or the physical mechanics- Then again I could be wrong, and I would stand corrected(please feel free to do so). Thats why and I “Speculate” you gave up. And that you can use things like bong sao as a reference point, advance wingchun etc…shows you dont understand the subject

You cant go to a boxing site, muay thai site or taiji site and say their art is crap, and expect not to be challenged on your points. You were not sharing an actual experience, you were putting down other arts to boost your view. My Wuzu brother still does wingchun and wuzu. He doesnt talk down about either art- It was his personal choice and I will ask him which lineage in Malaysia he comes from. And if its Chee Kim Thong, it doesnt mean anything about Wuzu and its reputation as a fighting art.
You were once part of the wingchun family too, just because you found another art you like doesnt mean you can be nasty about your previous. Its just common sense, grace and respect to your previous Sifu.

If you like Wuzu, all the power to you, but dont put down Wingchun. It has stood for years and many heros have spend decades spreading the art, thats why it is what it is today, one of the most popular TCMA in the world.

In fairness the reason why so many kung fu practioners lack internal training is in part because their teachers are unwilling to share such information. Its what sets them apart and for most the rice bowl is more important.

In turn those who have loyally and patiently waited (or paid ) for such imformation, themselves most probably would repeat the same cycle.

From what i have seen there are some such as Chu Shong Tin who has decided to break with old kung fu tradition and has shown and explained to a fair degree some of the internals on his You Tube clips.

[QUOTE=Shaolin Fist;922316]In fairness the reason why so many kung fu practioners lack internal training is in part because their teachers are unwilling to share such information. Its what sets them apart and for most the rice bowl is more important.

In turn those who have loyally and patiently waited (or paid ) for such imformation, themselves most probably would repeat the same cycle.

From what i have seen there are some such as Chu Shong Tin who has decided to break with old kung fu tradition and has shown and explained to a fair degree some of the internals on his You Tube clips.[/QUOTE]

Personally I dont think it was the Sifu all the time
Alot of people wanted to earn money quickly, learn, get a black belt, open a school, franchise- its western culture(and its good for the business minded)
TCMA, cant be seen through those eyes. Its not secret per se, but it requires faith, sincerity, humility and respect for the sifu, culture, the ancestors and the way.

[QUOTE=Shadow_warrior8;921908]
Larp sao and pak sao on them, feels like hitting a brick wall.
So if we chi sao and think use more strength-lik, you will be defeated.
So what do we do?
Here, in the words of the Wuzu Master/brother, these videos show why he switched to wingchun.
[/QUOTE]

The feeling of ‘hitting a brick wall’ is due to the method of energetics 5 A uses. Whereas VT might choose to absorb and flow around or deflect they instead prefer to re-direct (empty) the force or pressure full on. As a result the intent through the arms have to be non linear to create that ‘brick wall feeling’.

5 A prefers to ‘turn on’ forward intent i.e forward energy to a high intensity (which IMO if overdone or balanced incorrectly has the effect of slowing your reflex speed) and the rest downward and side intent. Hence the feeling of ‘Heavy hands’ in the 5 A system. This type of bridge energy in turn dictates the arm bridging postures i.e palms facing forward or down with heavy relience on elbow rooting (sinking).

Before any 5 A practitioners jumps on this thread to say that i’m inaccurate, i would like to say that i have intentionally only glossed over the internal mechanics to make it easily understood by everyone.

[QUOTE=Shaolin Fist;922319]The feeling of ‘hitting a brick wall’ is due to the method of energetics 5 A uses. Whereas VT might choose to absorb and flow around or deflect they instead prefer to re-direct (empty) the force or pressure full on. As a result the intent through the arms have to be non linear to create that ‘brick wall feeling’.

5 A prefers to ‘turn on’ forward intent i.e forward energy to a high intensity (which IMO if overdone or balanced incorrectly has the effect of slowing your reflex speed) and the rest downward and side intent. Hence the feeling of ‘Heavy hands’ in the 5 A system. This type of bridge energy in turn dictates the arm bridging postures i.e palms facing forward or down with heavy relience on elbow rooting (sinking).

Before any 5 A practitioners jumps on this thread to say that i’m inaccurate, i would like to say that i have intentionally only glossed over the internal mechanics to make it easily understood by everyone.[/QUOTE]

Thats interesting, from my research and exchange this sinking force is a key, together with 5 parts power is the essense of Wuzu.

I tried to larp sao the hard arms, but he was very rooted, I tried to cut with my elbows in interception chong choi, his bridge took out alot of my power.
I had to use lau sao, huen sao, to go around counter alot of the close range fighting. Lat Sao also had good results.
What other ways do you think are good for handling a fair exchange with Wuzu?

Very similar to what Samuel Kwok showed in his demo with the world Strongest Man.

[QUOTE=Shadow_warrior8;922321]Thats interesting, from my research and exchange this sinking force is a key, together with 5 parts power is the essense of Wuzu.

I tried to larp sao the hard arms, but he was very rooted, I tried to cut with my elbows in interception chong choi, his bridge took out alot of my power.
I had to use lau sao, huen sao, to go around counter alot of the close range fighting. Lat Sao also had good results.
What other ways do you think are good for handling a fair exchange with Wuzu?

Very similar to what Samuel Kwok showed in his demo with the world Strongest Man.[/QUOTE]

The reason why you would struggle to larp is because 5a have their bridge energy rooted around the elbows, so it would be like trying to lift a broom stick with a weight attached to the end of it .

As you suggested and i totally agree huen sau and lut sau would be more effective than trying to overcome their power, afterall why play the same game ! If they go full out with their heavy power then they will have to forsake a certain amount of reaction speed on their bridge, but off course this is down to skill levels and the individual.

From my experience its better to play them very tight as their main listening points is their hands and not their wrists so to avoid the Chin Na its better to be engaged as far down their bridge as they will allow. This in turn will take away some of that control and by moving closer into their centre should make life a little more difficult for them.

But ultumately its the speed at which you can change bridge positions without any static footwork (root) as 5 A are experts in the uprooting (floating) department.

Though both styles can exchange hands with each either it should be remembered that chi sau is only a part of the overall training and isolating and comparing them like this is not necessarily conclusive on the overall effectiveness of either system.

[QUOTE=Shaolin Fist;922351]The reason why you would struggle to larp is because 5a have their bridge energy rooted around the elbows, so it would be like trying to lift a broom stick with a weight attached to the end of it.[/QUOTE]I know some Wing Chun practitioners are a bit “wrist-y” but doesn’t Wing Chun have focus at the elbow also (jaang daai lik)?