Choy Lee Fut Misprint in Wikipedia?

Wai Jia: The Kung Fu Forum Southern Chinese Kung Fu
101

no you are ridiculous.

I am not going to re-do this with someone who came late into the picture.

what you don’t know about the fut san hung sing kwoon stanmore, is not my problem.

check out fut san hung sing kwoon’s website for your self.

do you read chinese. i got a whole lot in chinse for you to read.

however, you cannot disprove the governments account of Jeong Yim when he was in fut san. all you can do is b1tch and complain.

seach the site, gain some knowledge on hsk, and then try again later.

102

Anyway, lets get to the point, instead of going around in circles. The quote only mentions Chan Heung is founder of clf. No other founder. No jeong yim. OK?

103

Now when it comes to the process of how and why Jeong Yim is recorded in 1851 is not my problem. all that matters is that he is officially recorded as teaching in fut san in 1851.

That info did not start with me. so unless you have some alterior motive in trying to prove ME wrong, you need to do some research on the Fut San Hung Sing Kwoon before you can debate me on my own lineage.

I hate having to retell all this bs for some dude who wants to battle the legendary Hung SingKwoon Warrior.

104

the release of liability of the person who posted that site clearly states that although they feel this way, we are saying “we” don’t.

Still i don’t see the embarrassement brother joseph was referring to.

trust me those who originally told the story are not embarrassed. you can go to the bank on that one.
I know as well as joseph, that the sifu of the person who posted that site strongly believes in the Fut San Hung Sing kwoon history.

all they were doing was stepping away from the drama.

If they didn’t truly believe it, then they never would have posted it.

that is a buk sing site, not a chan family site.

105

I like it a lot more when we share info rather then shout at each other.

I can see why from the site you believe what you believe. I think the truth will ultimately be something in between and never be truly discovered.

Also I don’t believe the Chinese government one bit. Not one bit. They do what they do for themselves and have to answer to no one. This isn’t just about CLF it’s about the way they are in general.

106

Hi Frank,

but then we have government officials who confirm that Jeong Yim was already teaching in Fut San before 1851. He was registered in 1851 when he organized all the Hung SIng Kwoon’s in Fut San to join in on the revolution.

Sun Yat-San was all over China when he aske people to join in the revolution, he must have been a school teacher all over the place. He may have even been in Futsan at the time, may be we can say he founded the Futsan Hung Sing Kwoon. What do you say?

:smiley:

107

EJ,
Nice one!
Ha ha ha …anyone want sun clf with the in and out kau da?:smiley: :smiley:

108

here is one of the HSK written histories…

the other is a Kuen Po from FUT San HSK.

I am without a doubt SURE joseph will try to claim CHan Heung on this one.

109

haha…that IS a good one.

Anyone want to kill a tiger with a coat hanger?

or hear…why don’t you stand there and let me throw some rocks at you. now don’t move around or i might not hit you, okay?

how about a quick show of super Human Strength?

Or even want to kick up some rocks in the air and break them with our incredible Chan kicks!!!

YEAH!!! That sounds GRRRRREeeaaattt.

It sure does!

110

Hi Frank,

Here is a good example of your misinformation due to lack of knowledge on Chinese history and language.

This is a hand wtitten manuscript for a story written by a guy called Chan on the Futsan Hung Sing Kwoon. It was serialised in the local newspaper as a martial arts novel and not as a history of CLF.

It is definitely not a kuen po.

You have to do better than that Frank to show us that Jeong Yim was the founder and Futsan was the birthplace of CLF.

EJ

111

EJ,
So the guy is using a martial arts novel as history of clf?:smiley:

It goes to show the reliability of his research?

112

Hi Frank,

The second picture you have posted is also not a kuen po, at least not a proper one, more like a short hand.

Do you knoiw what a proper CLF kuen po looks like? It has a definite structue and not just a short description of what the body and limbs are doing.

That shows Futsan don’t have the goods to make their claim if that is the best you can throw at us.

EJ

113

i never said CLF was founded by Jeong Yim.

I said Co-founded. and that Jeong Yim is the founder of His Hung SIng Kwoon. not Chan Family CLF.

Now, i told you all that Joseph will have some answer against what i posted.

joseph has a counter to everything. right?

114

And Joseph, what makes you an authority on what a kuen po is?

IF you have a problem with FUT San HUNG SIng CLF then take it to the elders there.

You are a fool to think you can ever convert me. Fut San is where we started and you can’t change that.

you can’t prove anything joseph. and this stanmore guy reminds me of KENNYPOOP.

115

Hi Frank,

The bit that showed on the novel is about Chan Ou-Sheng and not about your beloved Jeong Yim! Isn’t it ironic?

:smiley:

116

see, now joseph is telling us how and where and what structure some one should record their information.

if the chan family does it that way, then that’s fine. we are not CHAN FAMILY CLF.

you will never get rid of HUNG SING CHOY LEE FUT joseph. deal with it.

117

Hi Frank,

Have you seen a proper Kuen Po? Get a look at one before you talk about the subject. The proof is on you.

Regards,

EJ

118

i know it was about Chan Ngau Sing and how he dealt with someone at the temple.

and my translation to you is as loose as your own information on Jeong Yim.

119

i know it was about Chan Ngau Sing and how he dealt with someone at the temple.

and my translation to you is as loose as your own information on Jeong Yim.

see, all you’ve done joseph is say, no you’re wrong. then back it up.

you have never schooled me on Jeong Yim. why don’t you let us, the Hung Sing People hear what you know about jeong yim. you won’t will you? becauseyou know you are wrong when it comes to Jeong Yim.

stick to Chan Heung.

120

and you still haven’t answered what makes you an authority on Kuen Po’s.

i know you say your’re hella old, come on.

answere me old man.