What style is this shown on the vid clip? is this Pak mei ? Looks a bit mainlandish the vid…this guy also does Hung gar and Wing Chun instructional VCDs..
any infos on the style and maybe on the guy would be appreciated
It’s likely a branch of Lung Ying in Fut Shan. The form seems to be a version of Ng Ma Kwai Cho (five horses return to the stable). The form should gives a feeling of horses rushing towards stable/home. I don’t know is it me but the Fut Shan MA community seems to favor the exaggerated movements. The circles are rather big for my taste. I prefer more compact structure and explosive dynamics. Considering the age of the exponent, it is a good performance and maintain Lung Ying’s shape.
Once again, I’ll have to agree with Mantis108. It looks like Loong Ying or Pak Mei flavoured Kung fu, but the circles are bigger and there is a bit more flourish that I would want my siDai to play. Being that its longer, and the name, I suspect it is indeed a rendition of a Dragon form, but I don’t have the first hand knowledge to really know for sure.
My feeling is that the player had a knowledge of many martial arts and than learned this set because it shows lots of fundamentals that are not pure Pak Mei or Loong Ying, but there is a high “southern fist” skill level overall.
Shaolin Master, you are correct! Although the form is a bit different from the Lama Version, it is Siu Lo Han Kuyhn. Wonder why it’s mislabeled as Fut Ga??
A few things are fudged in the form but otherwise, he’s pretty accurate.
VCD#879 Wong Fei Hung Buddha Fist
About an hour, See Main VCD page for prices, CHINESE ONLY
Fut Jia LuoHan Quan. Buddha Family Disciple Boxing. Being a Southern style there’s more chance people recognize the Cantonese idiom of “Fut Gar LoHan” Boxing. Within the Wong Fei Hung branch this is the most distinctively Long Arm of all the sets. It almost resembles PiGua with special weight put on Big Opening and Big Closing. A nice looking set and a workout. Very different from some of the more Arrow Punch sets of the system.
Hi Guys,
So, who is this guy, Chen Nianen? Seems to be crossing a lot of styles for his video business…
Gazza, you have way to much time to search the internet these days…hahahah.
On a different topic, while you guys are on the thread, can you and SM help me with a “hypothetical” question concerning Australian law and self defense.
You are attacked by a mugger with a knife, and you injure him seriously, say, breaking a wrist, elbow and jaw, where does the self defense end, and the excessive force begin? Lets say, you already have a police record for using excessive force on a couple of other occasions.
Keep in mind, the “hypothetical” incident started with an armed robbery where you have a justifiable fear for your life.
Since working alot fo door work, clubs, hospitals etc, as long as you can prove that “YOU, used as much force that was nessecary to control the situation” then that is what it is, if you have a record prior to this for man handling heavily that will not help you, although if someone has a knife and you can prove you used the force required it should be ok.
(1) It is a defence to a charge of an offence if -
(a) the defendant genuinely believed the conduct to which the charge relates to be necessary and reasonable for a defensive purpose; and
(b) the conduct was not, in the circumstances as the defendant genuinely believed them to be, reasonably proportionate to the threat that the defendant genuinely believed to exist
However, in addition to ensuring no more force than necessary, there is consideration of all circumstances such as alternative courses of action (such as retreat or flight) open at the time, any disproportion between the harm prevented and the harm caused, history/record, occupation etc…
In terms of when does it stop, well again law is such an open ended affair. Basically it is when the situation is controlled or when there is no further danger from the assailant.
This could go on of course but I presume you get the drift.