Lineage
Many have exhibited fair assesments of lineage on this thread so far, and it can be seen that this topic is a pinnicle for some and a sore spot for others. I like to seek the balance point of these kinds of issues.
Lineage IS the source of our learning, it had to come from somewhere, and it dictates the methodology of how we learn. Respect is due, in all branches, for those who laid the groundwork or have traveled the path before us, but where lineage becomes confounded is with where we are placing that reverance.
Some will directly credit their sifu, all good, your sifu is the one who you have the closest contact with, but is he/she the architect of the system?
Some will credit their sigung. It’s less likely that you gain your personal instruction from this person, but he/she taught your sifu, right? The same question arises, are they the architect of the system you are studying?
Some will credit the ancestors. It’s impossible that you have learned anything DIRECTLY from these people, but they taught the people who taught the people who taught your sifu, right? It is possible that they are the archtects of the system, right?
Truth is, information has traveled down certain avenues, through certain people, to you. That is all that lineage is, the course that the info took to reach you.
Along the way, that info has gained insight and has been added to by any of the above mentioned people. This is what forms the differences in lineage, the different perspectives.
When does lineage become a bad thing? When the individuals deny the perspective of others, stating that the branch they are standing on is the ‘Only true branch’ (much like one branch of a tree denying that there are other branches that also bear fruit). When, by identifying themselves with that branch (lineage holder), the individual limits their view and refuses to see the fruit borne by the other branches.