The risk of the TCMA hammer fist

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY1Hiuz8gDU&feature=related

At 1.38, when you use right “hammer fist” on your opponent’s left arm, your opponent can borrow your force and sping his left arm into a hook punch at your head.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOD_MuvzcwY&NR=1

IMO, this will never work in combat speed. The reason is the hammer fist has to travel much longer path than a jab. If your hammer fist can hit on your opponent’s arm when he applies a straight punch, you must be much faster than him. If you are much faster than your opponent then anything will work.

There is a good reason that “hammer fist” is not commonly used in the western boxing. It’s just too slow to be combat realistic. What’s your opinion on the “hammer fist”?

Hmmm it’s a terrible opening move in my opinion, but as something of a finisher it has the potential to be very strong, I think.

At the same time a normal hook is faster and just as strong most of the time I believe.

So this technique is not the most optimal.

You have to absorb the incomming force and begin to redirect first, then crack them with the hammer fist as part of the set up for the next move.

The hammer fist is not stopping the jab. The other hand is. The hammer fist is neutralizing the next move before it can be started.

In the Yuan Gung Quan - application, the attackers punch is stopped at the :05 second mark by a quick raising of the elbow.

He’s going in slow motion so we can see.

By the :07 mark, the same arm is now both clearing the first attack, and covering for the attackers second blow.

At the :12 second mark, the first arm (using the elbow) is now trapping the attackers original punch (assuming he caught it), and is now pulling it to his body as he uses his other forearm to jack the attacker’s shoulder. The resulting shock has the potential to damage the elbow. If not, it will take a beat from the attacker so the defender can position for his counter attack.

:14 seconds , the defender’s left arm comes in, covers against the likely third attack from the attacker, and sets the position needed for the take down.

:34 defender takes down the attacker using internal force and foot positioning to up root them.

:36 holds gay theatrical Kung Fu posture for the camera.

those techniques in youtube video doesnt work because its standard slow jab, hold it out, i make a bridge with your forearm bullsh1t. not because of hammerfist

It would work either way. infact, at speed it would work better because the attacker would try to fade back as you entered, and thus help you with the take down as you’d have him tripping over your feet on top of everything else.

if u try to make a brdige with the gua chui you get taken down in 2 seconds

You don’t need to make the bridge. Just lift the elbow to shield from the first attack and charge in full bore. As soon as your legs get under them, they are toast. The rest is just gravy.

[QUOTE=RD’S Alias - 1A;1079414]By the :07 mark, [/QUOTE]
At the :07 mark, the guy used right hammer fist as he described in Chinese. I don’t think he would be fast enough to do that against a fast jab.

One of my friends has a lot of confidence in his hammer fist. Oneday I challenged his hammer fist. He liked to use heel kick and hammer fist combo. He delievered a heel kick, I blocked it. Before he could drop his hammer fist on my head, my front toe push kick already hit on his chest. We tested this many times and everytime, my kicks could always be faster than his hammer fist. He is more than 10 years younger than me. He should be able to move faster than me. The reason is my kick did not have to traveled as long path as his hammer fist did.

This is a good example that without proper testing, you may think some moves should work but in reality, it just doesn’t.

This is similar footwork, but going faster. The idea is to use your entry to take thier root and balance. The hand work just covers against thier attack and makes them fall over once you already won.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoERMXVhLlc&feature=related

it’s the foot work that wins it.

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1079422]At the :07 mark, the guy used right hammer fist as he described in Chinese. I don’t think he would be fast enough to do that against a fast jab.

One of my friends has a lot of confidence in his hammer fist. Oneday I challenged his hammer fist. He liked to use heel kick and hammer fist combo. He delievered a heel kick, I blocked it. Before he could drop his hammer fist on my head, my front toe push kick already hit on his chest. We tested this many times and everytime, my kicks could always be faster than his hammer fist. He is more than 10 years younger than me. He should be able to move faster than me. The reason is my kick did not have to traveled as long path as his hammer fist did.

This is a good example that without proper testing, you may think some moves should work but in reality, it just doesn’t.[/QUOTE]

Look again, the jab was already neutralized by the rising elbow by then, at the :05 mark. Go slow, one frame at a time if need be.

The Hammer fist seen from :07-:10 is to clear the second attack if it is coming. It’s not really a hammer fist. he’s just covering that line for anything potentially comming in, like a cross.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoERMXVhLlc&feature=related

Ther are a lot of good moves in this clip, but there is something missing in that clip. It’s like watching a movie without “ending”. Does anybody feel the same way as I do?

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1079427]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoERMXVhLlc&feature=related

Ther are a lot of good moves in this clip, but there is something missing in that clip. It’s like watching a movie without “ending”. Does anybody feel the same way as I do?[/QUOTE]

I think he lets his opponent escape too much. Seems like he’s content with just uprooting, but has no follow through. He’s not doing anything to incapacitate his attacker or finish him off.

This is a very old pre Sung Dynasty style known as the Six Stance Fist among other things. If I am not mistaken, the Wensengquan is based on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kJ8unUIlgM

[QUOTE=RD’S Alias - 1A;1079428]I think he lets his opponent escape too much. Seems like he’s content with just uprooting, but has no follow through. He’s not doing anything to incapacitate his attacker or finish him off.[/QUOTE]

Agree 100% there. I prefer this kind of ending instead.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTR5KU3xwls

or something like this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbJfX9Jinik

This is the stuff I have been playing with lately.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv-_MC1oRDg&feature=related

the asshammer technique is very deadly

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1079409]

At 1.38, when you use right “hammer fist” on your opponent’s left arm, your opponent can borrow your force and sping his left arm into a hook punch at your head.
[/QUOTE]

Not if the hammerer sinks in with the elbow, or if it is done with high power, or isolates his elbow… At combat speed the switch your suggesting is indeed possible but much easier said than done…every move is counterable…thats the art.

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1079409]
IMO, this will never work in combat speed. The reason is the hammer fist has to travel much longer path than a jab. If your hammer fist can hit on your opponent’s arm when he applies a straight punch, you must be much faster than him. If you are much faster than your opponent then anything will work. [/QUOTE]

Applied against a Jab for conveniance of demonstration only… there are many situations where your hands form contact without it being that the opponant is jabbing, not to mention prediction. Its the throw i wouldn’t use, the entry is great and very powerful. Power and speed, you can’t always have both.

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1079409]
There is a good reason that “hammer fist” is not commonly used in the western boxing. It’s just too slow to be combat realistic. What’s your opinion on the “hammer fist”?[/QUOTE]

Za Chui in chinese kung fu (Pound/smash/break—hammer/pound/strike) the hammer fist.

THe videos aren’t great demonstrations. The hammer fist is however an essential technique.

  1. Typically there is no distinction in the form between elbow za chui and fist za chui and the elbow version is a great technique.

  2. SLower?? Every joint in the human body is circular, your saying combining them into an awkward approximation of a straight line is faster than arcing straight through? It may appear faster in after it has been set in motion but it is not in reaction and preparation time.

Picture an example of your hand is held high and his face is ducked slightly, low. In this situation your hand is above its target… in order to punch straight you would have to withdraw the hand, prepare it then punch out, forming a parabolic motion. If you simply arc down it will be much faster.

Remember with Za CHui you don’t have to ‘chop’ you can still hit with your knuckles just on a circular path, not as powerful as a straight but much faster (from certain starting positions).

ITs true that the fastest way between two points is a straight line, but there are many positions in which a small arc will form a much straighter line then a straight punch. In terms of body mechanics there can be no truely straight punch as every joint has circular motion. Straights can be done from a much smaller range of prepared hand positions. In combat you don’t always manage to keep your hands within these zones, once outside, they must be returned before the punch can be made, its this bit that is slow.

Western boxing keeps the hands within a smaller zone so is best to use straights, but western boxing only includes punching. When you add the kicks the throws and all the other moves the hands can no longer remain in such a small zone and the hammer becomes more necessary. Its not because its slow, its because it works from different positions.

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1079409]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY1Hiuz8gDU&feature=related

[/QUOTE]

they are used to set up and not really to strike. so they have to be “slow”.

  1. lead hand or yin shou is forward upward in the center

  2. then hammer fist is to attract attention, it is right behind yin shou, there is almost no gap.

your follow up with 3 (axe, zhan to carotid artery/vein) and 4 (drawing bow to shoot the tiger wan gong she hu) almost instantly.

zhao jian guo is showing slowly 1-2-3-4

if you do all of them very fast in an instant —

well at least that is the idea to drill 4 moves in one combo.

:slight_smile:

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1079409]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOD_MuvzcwY&NR=1

[/QUOTE]

no matter how you set up

the finish move is called twin boys carry the mountain or er lang dan shan

it is a common move across many and many styles.

if you do it with only hand/side, it is called iron fan or tie shan----

:slight_smile:

that looks very similar to how we Kwa Sau Biu Jong in hung sing choy lee fut