First, KC Elbows comes out of hiding, risking his witness=protection status, but now Philbert and Sevestar are posting agan?
If Eulerfan and African Tiger show up, I’m 100% certain Uki will implode and form this:
Philbert lives!
We saw him with our own eyes at Twin Peaks.
That’s the anus river in wichita isn’t it?
the most shocking thing? after a 2 year hiatus, I am still #3 in post count, lol.
Greetings,
You know, adult Hollywood never made their own tribute to Apocalypse Now…ApairofLips Now!!
It just never happened.
mickey
cool ****ing picture!!!
my computer must have given the thumbs down sign… this does not reflect the belief of the computers user. 
how about that oil spill eh?? it truly is the end of things as we know it. 
Greetings,
The Apocalypse is the work of Man and no other. Have you been noticing the fake weather?
mickey
after so much water or masses imploding into a tiny space (black hole)
there will be a huge exploding or super nova
talking about death of stars and rebirth of stars
just like a circle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl8fKAYQuPk
[QUOTE=MasterKiller;1022093]I’m 100% certain Uki will implode and form this:
[/QUOTE]
but first he would have to stop being this:
Yeah, lots of changes in life the past couple months and now I am back training again after not training for a long time. Didn’t realize I was so out of shape either 
gotta lose like another 10-15 lbs.
Sept. 23, 2017
There’s some embedded vids if you follow the link.
The world as we know it is about to end — again — if you believe this biblical doomsday claim
By Kristine Phillips September 17
NASA senior scientist David Morrison debunked an apocalyptic claim that a planet called Nibiru is on a collision course with Earth. (NASA)
A few years ago, NASA senior space scientist David Morrison debunked an apocalyptic claim as a hoax.
No, there’s no such thing as a planet called Nibiru, he said. No, it’s not a brown dwarf surrounded by planets, as iterations of the claim suggest. No, it’s not on a collision course toward Earth. And yes, people should “get over it.”
But the claim has been getting renewed attention recently. Added to it is the precise date of the astronomical event leading to Earth’s destruction. And that, according to David Meade, is in six days — Sept. 23, 2017. Unsealed, an evangelical Christian publication, foretells the Rapture in a viral, four-minute YouTube video, complete with special effects and ominous doomsday soundtrack. It’s called “September 23, 2017: You Need to See This.”
Why Sept. 23, 2017?
Meade’s prediction is based largely on verses and numerical codes in the Bible. He has homed in one number: 33.
“Jesus lived for 33 years. The name Elohim, which is the name of God to the Jews, was mentioned 33 times [in the Bible],” Meade told The Washington Post. “It’s a very biblically significant, numerologically significant number. I’m talking astronomy. I’m talking the Bible … and merging the two.”
And Sept. 23 is 33 days since the Aug. 21 total solar eclipse, which Meade believes is an omen.
Capital Weather Gang’s Angela Fritz takes us back in time to show how mankind has reacted to eclipses over thousands of years. (Claritza Jimenez, Daron Taylor, Angela Fritz/The Washington Post)
He points to the Book of Revelation, which he said describes the image that will appear in the sky on that day, when Nibiru is supposed to rear its ugly head, eventually bringing fire, storms and other types of destruction.
[Will the mysterious shadow planet Nibiru obliterate Earth in October? No.]
The book describes a woman “clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head” who gives birth to a boy who will “rule all the nations with an iron scepter” while she is threatened by a red seven-headed dragon. The woman then grows the wings of an eagle and is swallowed up by the earth.
The belief, as previously described by Gary Ray, a writer for Unsealed, is that the constellation Virgo — representing the woman — will be clothed in sunlight, in a position that is over the moon and under nine stars and three planets. The planet Jupiter, which will have been inside Virgo — in her womb, in Ray’s interpretation — will move out of Virgo, as though she is giving birth.
To make clear, Meade said he’s not saying the world will end Saturday. Instead, he claims, the prophesies in the Book of Revelation will manifest that day, leading to a series of catastrophic events that will happen over the course of weeks.
“The world is not ending, but the world as we know it is ending,” he said, adding later: “A major part of the world will not be the same the beginning of October.”
Meade’s prediction has been dismissed as a hoax not only by NASA scientists, but also by people of faith.
Ed Stetzer, a professor and executive director of Wheaton College’s Billy Graham Center for Evangelism, first took issue with how Meade is described in some media articles.
“There’s no such thing as a Christian numerologist,” he told The Post. “You basically got a made-up expert in a made-up field talking about a made-up event.… It sort of justifies that there’s a special secret number codes in the Bible that nobody believes.”
Meade said he never referred to himself as a Christian numerologist. He’s a researcher, he said, and he studied astronomy at a university in Kentucky, though he declined to say which one, citing safety reasons. His website says he worked in forensic investigations and spent 10 years working for Fortune 1000 companies. He’s also written books. The most recent one is called “Planet X — The 2017 Arrival.”
Stetzer said that while numbers do have significance in the Bible, they shouldn’t be used to make sweeping predictions about planetary motions and the end of Earth.
[For some, eclipse day showcases God’s majesty. For others, it means the Rapture is coming.]
“Whenever someone tells you they have found a secret number code in the Bible, end the conversation,” he wrote in an article published Friday in Christianity Today. “Everything else he or she says can be discounted.”
That is not to say that Christians don’t believe in the Bible’s prophesies, Stetzer said, but baseless theories that are repeated and trivialized embarrass people of faith.
“We do believe some odd things,” he said. “That Jesus is coming back, that he will set things right in the world, and no one knows the day or the hour.”
The doomsday date was initially predicted to be in May 2003, according to NASA. Then it was moved to Dec. 21, 2012, the date that the Mayan calendar, as some believed, marked the apocalypse.
Morrison, the NASA scientist, has given simple explanations debunking the claim that a massive planet is on course to destroy Earth. If Nibiru is, indeed, as close as conspiracy theorists believe to striking Earth, astronomers, and anyone really, would’ve already seen it.
“It would be bright. It would be easily visible to the naked eye. If it were up there, you could see it. All of us could see it. … If Nibiru were real and it were a planet with a substantial mass, then it would already be perturbing the orbits of Mars and Earth. We would see changes in those orbits due to this rogue object coming in to the inner solar system,” Morrison said in a video.
Doomsday believers also say that Nibiru is on a 3,600-year orbit. That means it had already come through the solar system in the past, which means we should be looking at an entirely different solar system today, Morrison said.
“Its gravity would’ve messed up the orbits of the inner planets, the Earth, Venus, Mars, probably would’ve stripped the moon away completely,” he said. “Instead, in the inner solar system, we see planets with stable orbits. We see the moon going around the Earth.”
And if Nibiru is not a planet and is, in fact, a brown dwarf, as some claims suggest — again, we would’ve already seen it.
“Everything I’ve said would be worse with a massive object like a brown dwarf,” Morrison said. “That would’ve been tracked by astronomers for a decade or more, and it would already have really affected planetary objects.”
Some call Nibiru “Planet X,” as Meade did in the title of his book. Morrison said that’s a name astronomers give to planets or possible objects that have not been found. For example, when space scientists were searching for a planet beyond Neptune, it was called Planet X. And once it was found, it became Pluto.
Stetzer encouraged Christians to be critical, especially in an information era marred with fake news stories.
“It’s simply fake news that a lot of Christians believe the world will end on September 23,” Stetzer wrote. “Yet, it is still a reminder that we need to think critically about all the news.”
He took issue with a Fox News story with a headline that appears to give credence to the doomsday claim — and was published in the Science section under the label “Planets.”
“Every time end-of-the-world predictions resurface in the media, it is important that we ask ourselves, ‘Is this helpful?’ ” Stetzer wrote. “Is peddling these falsehoods a good way to contribute to meaningful, helpful discussions about the end of times?”
Julie Zauzmer contributed to this story.
I thought the apocalypse already happened on 12/21/12. Or was it 6/6/6?
It should be noted that numerology and divination is actually against bible teachings.
There are explicit condemnations in both the OT and NT against it.
[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;1305038]It should be noted that numerology and divination is actually against bible teachings.
There are explicit condemnations in both the OT and NT against it.[/QUOTE]
Is the reason to prevent humankind becoming the equals of God?
How many times have people said, 'The end is coming! Doomsday is upon us!" When the fact of the matter is that the VAST majority of people proclaiming the end will die at home in bed, or in a hospital/nursing home/hospice, hooked up to machines. Or in accidents. Meanwhile, the world goes on as usual.
There is a kind of “spiritual” narcissism involved with those who constantly predict the end times. Meaning it’s coming because they say so, and they’ll be here to say, “I told you so.” As a bonus, they (the predictors) will be among God’s ‘chosen few’, to be plucked up when it happens in some type of spiritual rapture. Then they’ll gloat from the safety of their seats in Heaven. They believe that being a sniveling, @ss-kissing coward is the way to God’s good graces.
Those types of people are not really ‘spiritual’ in any sense of the word. Most of those types are no more than self-righteous psychopaths, like that slimeball Harold Camping, who love feeding on the fear of nervous, gullible people.
If the end does happen to come when I’m here, I certainly will not have wasted my life living in constant dread, waiting and worrying about it.
[QUOTE=rett2;1305039]Is the reason to prevent humankind becoming the equals of God?[/QUOTE]
No, to stop people from being stupid.
LOL.
Actually, the reason was that for it to actually work, people would have to expose themselves to demonic influence.
It was to protect people.
[QUOTE=Jimbo;1305040]How many times have people said, 'The end is coming! Doomsday is upon us!" When the fact of the matter is that the VAST majority of people proclaiming the end will die at home in bed, or in a hospital/nursing home/hospice, hooked up to machines. Or in accidents. Meanwhile, the world goes on as usual.
There is a kind of “spiritual” narcissism involved with those who constantly predict the end times. Meaning it’s coming because they say so, and they’ll be here to say, “I told you so.” As a bonus, they (the predictors) will be among God’s ‘chosen few’, to be plucked up when it happens in some type of spiritual rapture. Then they’ll gloat from the safety of their seats in Heaven. They believe that being a sniveling, @ss-kissing coward is the way to God’s good graces.
Those types of people are not really ‘spiritual’ in any sense of the word. Most of those types are no more than self-righteous psychopaths, like that slimeball Harold Camping, who love feeding on the fear of nervous, gullible people.
If the end does happen to come when I’m here, I certainly will not have wasted my life living in constant dread, waiting and worrying about it.[/QUOTE]
Spot on.
Spot on indeed.
Greetings,
It’s all nothing more than a death wish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EdxM72EZ94
mickey
Thanks for clarifying that now, David Meade…
Man who said the world is ending Saturday changed his mind. It isn’t actually ending
USA TODAY NETWORK Ashley May, USA TODAY Published 12:10 p.m. ET Sept. 22, 2017 | Updated 4:51 p.m. ET Sept. 22, 2017
Many ‘doomsday’ predictions have surfaced over the years. Here’s a look at four of the most notable ones. USA TODAY
The Earth, partly illuminated
(Photo: Digital Vision, Getty Images)
David Meade, who claimed the world will end Saturday, said doomsday isn’t this weekend after all.
“The world is not ending, but the world as we know it is ending,” he told The Washington Post. “A major part of the world will not be the same the beginning of October.”
Meade, Christian and self-published author, laid out his “astronomical, scientific, the Book of Revelation and geopolitics” ideology in his book Planet X — The 2017 Arrival. He claims Sept. 23 “Planet Nibiru” will collide with the Earth.
But now Meade is saying this event won’t mark the apocalypse, but rather a series of dire events over the course of weeks, The Washington Post reports.
NASA has said “Nibiru” or “Planet X” doesn’t exist and this is a hoax. Christian leaders have also disputed the claims. Christianity Today calls Meade “a made-up leader in a made-up field.”
Even some translations of Biblical scripture refutes men making claims about knowing the date of the end. Just take a look at Matthew 24:36, which says: “But about that day or hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”
Many like Meade have tried to pinpoint doomsday in the past. But, here we all are. At least for now.
Follow Ashley May on Twitter: @AshleyMayTweets
The Aztecs predicted their own apocalypse in a way. They mistook Cortez as Quetzalcoatl, but from their perspective, that was spot on. They knew the day or hour, but then again, they weren’t Christian.
Then again, there’s this
Niburu, Pluto, when are we getting the Uranus Apocalypse? That’ll be the end.
We may survive the Anthropocene, but need to avoid a radioactive ‘Plutocene’
September 27, 2017 4.01pm EDT
A nuclear blast and runaway climate change could propel us into the Plutocene. mwreck/Shutterstock.com
Andrew Glikson
Earth and paleo-climate scientist, Australian National University
Andrew Glikson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.
Partners
Australian National University
Australian National University provides funding as a member of The Conversation AU.
On January 27, 2017, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the arms of its doomsday clock to 2.5 minutes to midnight – the closest it has been since 1953. Meanwhile, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels now hover above 400 parts per million.
Why are these two facts related? Because they illustrate the two factors that could transport us beyond the Anthropocene – the geological epoch marked by humankind’s fingerprint on the planet – and into yet another new, even more hostile era of our own making.
My new book, titled The Plutocene: Blueprints for a post-Anthropocene Greenhouse Earth, describes the future world we are on course to inhabit, now that it has become clear that we are still busy building nuclear weapons rather than working together to defend our planet.
I have coined the term Plutocene to describe a post-Anthropocene period marked by a plutonium-rich sedimentary layer in the oceans. The Anthropocene is very short, having begun (depending on your definition) either with the Industrial Revolution in about 1750, or with the onset of nuclear weapons and sharply rising greenhouse emissions in the mid-20th century. The future length of the Plutocene would depend on two factors: the half-life of radioactive plutonium-239 of 24,100 years, and how long our CO will stay in the atmosphere – potentially up to 20,000 years.
During the Plutocene, temperatures would be much higher than today. Perhaps they would be similar to those during the Pliocene (2.6 million to 5.3 million years ago), when average temperatures were about 2 above those of pre-industrial times, or the Miocene (roughly 5.3 million to 23 million years ago), when average temperatures were another 2 warmer than that, and sea levels were 20–40m higher than today.
Under these conditions, population and farming centres in low coastal zones and river valleys would be inundated, and humans would be forced to seek higher latitudes and altitudes to survive – as well as potentially having to contend with the fallout of nuclear conflict. The most extreme scenario is that evolution takes a new turn – one that favours animals best equipped to withstand heat and radiation.
Climates past
While we have a range of tools for studying prehistoric climates, including ice cores and tree rings, these methods do not of course tell us what the future holds.
However, the basic laws of physics, the principles of climate science, and the lessons from past and current climate trends, help us work out the factors that will dictate our future climate.
Broadly speaking, the climate is shaped by three broad factors: trends in solar cycles; the concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases; and intermittent events such as volcanic eruptions or asteroid impacts.
Solar cycles are readily predicted, and indeed can be seen in the geological record, whereas intermittent events are harder to account for. The factor over which we have the most control is our own greenhouse emissions.
CO levels have previously climbed as high as 2,000 parts per million (ppm), most recently during the early Eocene, roughly 55-45 million years ago. The subsequent decline of CO levels to just a few hundred parts per million then cooled the planet, creating the conditions that allowed Earth’s current inhabitants (much later including humans) to flourish.
But what of the future? Based on these observations, as reported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), several projections of future climates indicate an extension of the current interglacial period by about 30,000 years, consistent with the longevity of atmospheric CO.
If global warming were to reach 4, as suggested by Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, chief climate advisor to the German government, the resulting amplification effects on the climate would pose an existential threat both to nature and human civilisation.
Barring effective sequestration of carbon gases, and given amplifying feedback effects from the melting of ice sheets, warming of oceans, and drying out of land surfaces, Earth is bound to reach an average of 4 above pre-industrial levels within a time frame to which numerous species, including humans, may hardly be able to adapt. The increase in evaporation from the oceans and thereby water vapour contents of the atmosphere leads to mega-cyclones, mega-floods and super-tropical terrestrial environments. Arid and semi-arid regions would become overheated, severely affecting flora and fauna habitats.
The transition to such conditions is unlikely to be smooth and gradual, but may instead feature sharp transient cool intervals called “stadials”. Increasingly, signs of a possible stadial are being seen south of Greenland.
A close analogy can be drawn between future events and the Eocene-Paleocene Thermal Maximum about 55 million years ago, when release of methane from Earth’s crust resulted in extreme rise in temperature. But as shown below, the current rate of temperature rise is far more rapid – and more akin to the planet-heating effects of an asteroid strike.
Rate of global average temperature rise during (1) the end of the last Ice Age; (2) the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum; (3) the current bout of global warming; and (4) during an asteroid impact. Author provided
Mounting our defence
Defending ourselves from global warming and nuclear disaster requires us to do two things: stop fighting destructive wars, and start fighting to save our planet. There is a range of tactics we can use to help achieve the second goal, including large-scale seagrass cultivation, extensive biochar development, and restoring huge swathes of the world’s forests.
Space exploration is wonderful, but we still only know of one planet that supports life (bacteria possibly excepted). This is our home, and there is currently little prospect of realising science fiction’s visions of an escape from a scorched Earth to some other world.
Yet still we waver. Many media outlets operate in apparent denial of the connection between global warming and extreme weather. Meanwhile, despite diplomatic progress on nuclear weapons, the Sword of Damocles continues to hang over our heads, as 14,900 nuclear warheads sit aimed at one another, waiting for accidental or deliberate release.
If the clock does strike nuclear midnight, and if we don’t take urgent action to defend our planet, life as we know it will not be able to continue. Humans will survive in relatively cold high latitudes and altitudes. A new cycle would begin.