Well, letās see, my video would ācontractā (how you could mistake a ācā for an āsā dumb@ss) your
See now your the dumb@ss because I didnāt mistake a ācā for an āsā because I meant to write ācontradictā. You canāt even correct me correctly. 
your video because the fact that humans are causing the deforestation makes it anthropogenic, doesnāt it George?
Well yes deforestation is anthropogenic, are you trying to draw a connection between āglobal warming and deforestationā? If so, how so? Otherwise I donāt see how your point is relevant to this discussion. Did you even watch the videos?
And more forest is cut down for cattle ranches than sugar cane.
Again how is your point relevant. Are you trying to argue that emissions from cows are responsible for āglobal warmingā?
You are off on some tangent and need to make your self more clear. It makes it easier for me to tear you down that way.
synack I like how people attack the messenger by calling them āHippiesā instead of discussing the issues.
I am discussing the issues, but I have to draw people in to the discussion. I posted videos contradicting the popular claim of anthropogenic āglobal warmingā, once people try to argue a point against the film and itās ideas, weāll have a discussion.
Care to take a shot? ⦠Hippie ⦠
Oh and in this case I am the messenger.
I guess all those scientists are hippies all smoking pot and getting their free love on.
Which scientist? The ones in the video? Do you even know whose side you on? Do you need to take remedial reading comprehension? 
The hippies are the Bah Bah sheep, and the IPCC is the shepard.