Saying that your form is “too deadly” is kind of a lame excuse.
However, I don’t think that is really the argument.
The argument is that people feel that what they train for and what is allowed at a tournament are two different things.
In addition to “tae kwon do style” punches and kicks most kung fu styles have joint locking, sweeps, knees, elbows, eye gouges, throat strikes, knee breaks, etc. ad nauseum
Many of the techniques are designed to inflict permanent damage, not simply submission, on your opponent and it is with that intent that they were and are trained.
In tournament fighting most of that traditional arsenal is thrown out the window. You can’t use it because it wasn’t designed for sport, it was designed for street defense. Different intention.
So what are you left with?
Not much.
Front kick, side kick, roundhouse, jab, hook, straight, uppercut, hip throw, sweep, leg takedown…
You lose the original flavor of kung fu and it becomes kickboxing. It also becomes an athletic contest of who can execute the basic moves more quickly with more power.
But what about the moves that aren’t basic? The sublties that are unique to each style? The techs and strategies that lead your opponent to a really nasty outcome.
IMHO, sparring definitely has its place in training, it teaches a lot of good lessons.
However, I think a lot of traditional teachers fear that if they focus too much on sparring as a sport that they’re students will lose the original concept of kung fu…which is disable your opponent quickly and efficiently ie with the least energy expended.
The “deadly” or “injurious” techniques can be trained alongside sparring but they have to be trained in more controlled and often more inventive ways.
That is to say…they can’t be trained with a “live resisting opponent” unless the intention is to permanently injure that opponent.
Peace.
