I think Chi Sao sucks!

[QUOTE=TenTigers;912329]

at “trapping range,” you are not standing side body to your opponent, but facing, where your hands are equal distant.

[/QUOTE]

Over time, bear with me a minute, some people have begun to believe that there is no “trapping range”, there is “clinching” and the LAST THING you want to do in clinching is stand square and facing with your arms extended like that

Chi Sao is to develop a certain attribute. The sturcture that developing this attribute has taken is, like most TMA stuff, based upon certain assumptions. Assumptions about how and why things happen. IE a good idea to re-check your assumptions from time to time

[QUOTE=TenTigers;912329]

The same happens in boxing, where as you get toe to toe, you square yourself to your opponent, to allow both hands to work.
[/QUOTE]

Boxing also has a pile of basic assumptions, ie no leg kicking, no knees, no wrestling, no single legs, no double legs, etc

We’ve found boxing to be the most removed from a real fight of all the contact combat sports

[QUOTE=TenTigers;912329]

As far as doing drills that are not exactly how you’d use them? What about,rope skipping, speed bag training, maize bag and rope ducking and weaving, hitting a truck tire, or any other sport-specific supplementary training?
[/QUOTE]

A number of hard core old school trainers think that the speed bag is garbage

The maize bag is specific to a certain style of boxing, and as we said, boxing is differnt than “fighting”

or are we assuming that wing chin is NOT for fighting? :cool:

Over time, bear with me a minute, some people have begun to believe that there is no “trapping range”, there is “clinching” and the LAST THING you want to do in clinching is stand square and facing with your arms extended like that

Chi Sao is to develop a certain attribute. The sturcture that developing this attribute has taken is, like most TMA stuff, based upon certain assumptions. Assumptions about how and why things happen. IE a good idea to re-check your assumptions from time to time

The issue is one of 2 people trying to strike each other in a “clinch” VS 1 person trying to strike and the other trying to grapple in the “clinch”.

Chi Sao is to develop a certain attribute. The sturcture that developing this attribute has taken is, like most TMA stuff, based upon certain assumptions. Assumptions about how and why things happen. IE a good idea to re-check your assumptions from time to time

The assumption that its two people trying to strike, or two trying to clinch and not, what is the reality, of 1 trying to strike and one trying to clinch.

Boxing also has a pile of basic assumptions, ie no leg kicking, no knees, no wrestling, no single legs, no double legs, etc

We’ve found boxing to be the most removed from a real fight of all the contact combat sports

While boxing develops great attributes for fighting, it is very hampered by a very limited ruelset.

A number of hard core old school trainers think that the speed bag is garbage

The maize bag is specific to a certain style of boxing, and as we said, boxing is differnt than “fighting”

or are we assuming that wing chin is NOT for fighting?

Speed bags suck ass and not in a good way.

good points. Upon re-thinking-you are ight. WCK does not always stand toe-to toe and often moves to angles, as do other Southern styles like SPM. Chi-sao still comes into play, however, as we still control the bridge. Learning ambidexterity, shifting, constantly changing is one of the skills developed through chi-so

[QUOTE=TenTigers;912429]good points. Upon re-thinking-you are ight. WCK does not always stand toe-to toe and often moves to angles, as do other Southern styles like SPM. Chi-sao still comes into play, however, as we still control the bridge. Learning ambidexterity, shifting, constantly changing is one of the skills developed through chi-so[/QUOTE]

Just don’t chase those bridges, that is a big no-no !
:stuck_out_tongue:

[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;912425]

The issue is one of 2 people trying to strike each other in a “clinch” VS 1 person trying to strike and the other trying to grapple in the “clinch”.

[/QUOTE]

I can clinch you with the sole intention of grappling you

I can clinch you with the sole intention of striking you

I can clinch you and “flow with the go”

Over the years, playing with so many things in the clinch (heck even with MANY different kinds of clinches) I can say two things without reservation

  1. Certain Wing Chun skills can indeed be transferred to live fighting

but

  1. Live fighting never takes anything resembling the structure of “chi sao”

[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;912425]

While boxing develops great attributes for fighting, it is very hampered by a very limited ruelset.

[/QUOTE]

echo in here :wink:

I can clinch you with the sole intention of grappling you

I can clinch you with the sole intention of striking you

I can clinch you and “flow with the go”

Over the years, playing with so many things in the clinch (heck even with MANY different kinds of clinches) I can say two things without reservation

  1. Certain Wing Chun skills can indeed be transferred to live fighting

but

  1. Live fighting never takes anything resembling the structure of “chi sao”

The problem is when you focus on only ONE part of the clinch work and Chi Sao tends to do that, the goal being to, typically, strike someone and avoid their strikes.
Now, some do Chi Sao in a free style format where striking, locking, grappling and takedowns are all valid and that makes it all the better, BUT the issue is still how one arrives at “chi sao” and the A-Typical start position that doesn’t exist in the “real world”.
Of course, no one is saying that you HAVE TO start or even pass by the “typical start” position, just that the huge majority do that.

echo in here

Well, not really, but kind, you see, this part:

We’ve found boxing to be the most removed from a real fight of all the contact combat sports

I disagree with.

[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;912444]

The problem is when you focus on only ONE part of the clinch work

[/QUOTE]

Greco Roman only focusses on the takedown with the holds above the waits

Muay Thai only focusses on the knee strike and unbalance to knee strike

Free Style today does not stress the throw

San Shou stresses only the quick throw, no knees

This is what I like about MMA, you must learn it all

Muay Thai only focusses on the knee strike and unbalance to knee strike

Free Style today does not stress the throw

Uh…I recall learning to do and doing a lot more than just kneeing in the clinch in MT, elbows, hooks, uppercuts, trips even and certainly “throws”.

As for freestyle wrestling, not sure what you mean by not stressing the throw…

you are right chi sao is limited by rules and presumptions, its also overemphasized in most wing chun schools but it still has value. Most people just don’t know when to stop clinging to the drills and move on to other ideas.

no, live fighting will not be that same as a structured exercise. But, without the structure, there is no method to teach the neccesary skills. Once they are learned, the structured format is abandoned.

The “typical start position” is only a beginning. You should be working up to a freestyle attack, where, once contact is made, it should then flow into your trapping/striking.

Very Important-this whole idea of trapping is misconstrued. NOBODY goes in to trap.
You go in to HIT. period.
If something comes in the way, then you deal with it.
You either trap it, jam it, go around it, etc.
THIS is where your chi-sao comes into play.

[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;912331]I am of 2 minds about Chi Sao.
On one hand it is a vital tool to develop that “touch/strike” feeling that allows a person to apply that " if I can touch you I can hurt you" concept, on the other hand it can be a very impractical traning tool and can/does make many people fall into that " the training is the system" mentality and give CS more importance than it deserves.[/QUOTE]

I’m not sure if you subscribe to that concept or not, but that is just another thing wrong with TCMA IMHO.

Touching does not = hurting. Period. Hurting = Hurting. You need certain elements in place in order to hurt someone.

People who think this, need to fight more.

[QUOTE=TenTigers;912329]at “trapping range,” you are not standing side body to your opponent, but facing, where your hands are equal distant. The same happens in boxing, where as you get toe to toe, you square yourself to your opponent, to allow both hands to work.
As far as doing drills that are not exactly how you’d use them? What about,rope skipping, speed bag training, maize bag and rope ducking and weaving, hitting a truck tire, or any other sport-specific supplementary training?
It is all about developing attributes.
But, yes, I do agree that there is such an emphasis placed upon chi-sao that one would think that that is the entire training. For some misguided people, I suppose it is. But chi-sao is to develop a skillset that occurs for one split-second in time during a fight-if at all. But that one split-second can sometimes make the difference between winning and losing, and in a close in fighting method, sensitivity, touch-reflexes is crucial.[/QUOTE]

Jumping rope promises to build your cardio strength. It does not promise to make you a better fighter.

Chi Sao is used by most people under the guise that it will make you a better fighter.

Hitting a truck tire with a sledgehammer builds strength. It does not promise to make you a better fighter.

I fail to recognize your comparisions. I think you have missed my point.

***And you don’t need to square yourself to your opponent to get both hands to work.

Interesting topic.

I understand what you are saying. I think the misconception is too many people think chi-sao is fighting.
Basically, it comes from the fact that there are far too many people talking on this subject that have far too little experience and understanding.
Don’t take the words of internet jockeys, posting on a MA forum about WCK.
Instead, speak to people who are in fact, authorities on the subject.
People like ChuSauLi, Phil Redmond and others, who are accomplished Sifus, with decades of experience, can give you a more informed view of WCK, rather than the teens and youtube masters who frequent the forums.

“teen youtube master” sounds dirty. I like it. Will make a great screen name one day!

Chi Sao is a close-range standup fighting exercise. The point is to learn how to read your opponents movements when you’ve already bridged with them, and ultimately to become more proficient in the trapping range.

Just as many BJJ guys will practice grappling without strikes or takedowns, learning boxing requires first understanding boxing without kicks or such.

I do not like the idea of teaching/training where you say “oh, you don’t actually fight like this, but this will help you to do (BLANK).”

I’m sure you don’t actually mean that in the broadest sense. (as in, weight training or running, you don’t fight like that, but it helps you)
The problem with people saying that is, in general, they use it as an excuse to why they practice certain ridiculousness.

Chi Sao isn’t one of these things. Its very useful. It won’t make you a superhero with trapping or close-range fighting, but it develops it. Its not all-powerful, but if you understand chi sao and apply it the correct way, it has its value and place.

Do things like you’d actually use them. Other arts and sports do. Kung-Fu people should as well.

Absolutely. You should apply chi sao as you would apply your hands in a real fight. The difference is, in chi sao there is a focus on bridging, so in that time, bridging is your focus.

‘Trapping’ is a range, a means to an end, so to speak. (in between Punching Range, right before Clinching/Grappling, etc.) It’s not a fighting style. Some people use this solely as a barometer to measure actual fighting ability. One of the things that ruins Kung-Fu in my opinion.

I agree.

Chi Sao is used by most people under the guise that it will make you a better fighter.

This is because its designed to get you more comfortable in the trapping range.
Just as simply knowing how to slip and weave won’t make you a better fighter, on its own. Learning how to jab won’t make you a better fighter. Its the entire thing as a whole. Learning how to move, jab, slip, weave, strategize, outfight, infight, trap, etc.

Hitting a truck tire with a sledgehammer builds strength. It does not promise to make you a better fighter.

Just for arguments sake, more strength would give you an advantage in fighting, no matter how small.

Chi Sao is a close-range standup fighting exercise. The point is to learn how to read your opponents movements when you’ve already bridged with them.

Just as many BJJ guys will practice grappling without strikes or takedowns, learning boxing requires first understanding boxing without kicks or such.

I do not like the idea of teaching/training where you say “oh, you don’t actually fight like this, but this will help you to do (BLANK).”

The problem with people saying that is, in general, they use it as an excuse to why they practice certain ridiculousness.

Chi Sao isn’t one of these things. Its very useful. It won’t make you a superhero with trapping or close-range fighting, but it develops it. Its not all-powerful, but if you understand chi sao and apply it the correct way, it has its value and place.

Do things like you’d actually use them. Other arts and sports do. Kung-Fu people should as well.

Absolutely. You should apply chi sao as you would apply your hands in a real fight. The difference is, in chi sao there is a focus on bridging, so in that time, bridging is your focus.

‘Trapping’ is a range, a means to an end, so to speak. (in between Punching Range, right before Clinching/Grappling, etc.) It’s not a fighting style. Some people use this solely as a barometer to measure actual fighting ability. One of the things that ruins Kung-Fu in my opinion.

I agree.

Chi Sao is used by most people under the guise that it will make you a better fighter.

This is because its designed to get you more comfortable in the trapping range.
Just as simply knowing how to slip and weave won’t make you a better fighter, on its own. Learning how to jab won’t make you a better fighter. Its the entire thing as a whole. Learning how to move, jab, slip, weave, strategize, outfight, infight, trap, etc.

Hitting a truck tire with a sledgehammer builds strength. It does not promise to make you a better fighter.

Just for arguments sake, more strength would give you an advantage in fighting, no matter how small.

[QUOTE=TenTigers;912479]I understand what you are saying. I think the misconception is too many people think chi-sao is fighting.
Basically, it comes from the fact that there are far too many people talking on this subject that have far too little experience and understanding.
Don’t take the words of internet jockeys, posting on a MA forum about WCK.
Instead, speak to people who are in fact, authorities on the subject.
People like ChuSauLi, Phil Redmond and others, who are accomplished Sifus, with decades of experience, can give you a more informed view of WCK, rather than the teens and youtube masters who frequent the forums.[/QUOTE]

I think TenTigers has hit the nail on the head. There are a ton of misconceptions and differences of opinions regarding what chi sau is, and how it is trained. As one that has spent the last two decades dedicated to Wing Chun and it’s methods, I’ve tried my best to be open minded in the sense when I was training in one specific method, I would be open to researching (books, articles, videos, and eventually personal one on one training) how others did things. Suffice it too say there are too many interpretations of what chi sau is. Some look at it as a sensitivity excersise, some as a trapping drill, while others look at is as a Wing Chun form of fighting or testing hands. For me it is all those things, but primarily a excersise that brings alive what the forms and intention of the system is teaching us. Wing Chun IMO is all about training a particular ability for a particular moment in a fight, the moment contact is made with another’s bridge. Chi sau teaches us what to do in the moment, but isolates it and allows that moment to be played over and over again. It’s like freezing a moment in time. Chi sau also brings the shapes of Wing Chun into a more alive environment as compared to the forms. Dan Chi (single arm chi sau), allows one that has learned and absorb the benifits of the Siu Nim Tau form, to bring the form alive by practicing and perfecting the shapes from that form. It also introduces the idea of centerline awareness, aim of ones energy, relaxation and firmness in the arms, facing, etc etc…Dan chi is also done with stepping motions with different variations happining from there. I didn’t see this portion of the training until I started learning the Wong Shun Leung method. From there we can move onto the more common drills of Poon sau and Dbl arm rolling and the drills that are included there. Lat sau jik Chung training starts here as well, with the ability to spring forward with or without footwork when contact is lost, two arm coordination, some basics trapping drills, and structure/body mechanics development. One would never begin a fight from any of the chi sau starting positions, but what one learns from these excersises, can translate directly to what can happen in a fight. It is much better to intercept an attack coming towards you with some sort of bridge, rather than with your face, it is at this moment that chi sau attributes come into play.

In the method I train in now, we chi sau pretty close to one another, allowing each of us to effect the others COM, rather than chi sau’g further away and playing wrist games. Development of the elbow position and how to utilize it as the initiator of all upper body movements, is an important idea developed here. Soon the whole body plays a part within each movement done, and since the excersise adhere’s to the idea of constant contact with the other’s bridge arms, one can learn to sense when their own COM is under attack, and when his partner’s COM is open for attack. It’s an isolated, exaggerated excersise, so that when the sh!T hits the fan, some basic ideas and reflexes will be able to be executed to help one succeed in a fight.

Chi sau guarantee’s nothing, as is the case when training in any MA method, but it does allow one to learn what WC is teaching us. Application of what is learned is not WC, but is what the individual that has trained in it’s method decides to do with it at that moment.

Just my loonies worth…not a complete picture but just some further info:)

James

[QUOTE=TenTigers;912469]no, live fighting will not be that same as a structured exercise. But, without the structure, there is no method to teach the neccesary skills. Once they are learned, the structured format is abandoned.

[/QUOTE]

Why is the structure so radically removed from the reality?

When I teach a neck tie up/double neck tie up/“Thai clinch” the structure we learn the techniques in and drill in is the SAME as the fight

Same for “over/under” clinching, etc