[QUOTE=RenDaHai;1278198]…Have you seen the one in the book by LiuZhenHai and WangXiQian? This is the same as the one I practice, I have seen its poem repeated in several places and I think it is the best candidate for a standard 18 Shou. It is not in the Encyclopedia.[/QUOTE]
yea. we talked about it in the Luohan quan thread. it’s said to have been passed down by Li Gensheng, which as you know was a folk master. i still don’t know anything about its origin. but has much in common with xiyuan small Tong Bi quan, and especially the 1st form of the strange 18-form Luohan system that i posted its first 10 forms into the Luohan thread. strange, that 1st form of that 18-form Luohan quan also was exactly of the kind of and somehow identical to xiyuan small Tong Bi quan. the origins go toward xiyuan and its Tong Bi quan, for sure.
it was just a conjecture, but i guessed this one is called Luohan 18 hands because its 18 techniques are exactly those that form that 1st form of that strange 18 Luohan quan. complicated.
[QUOTE=LFJ;1278208]A couple comments;
- I learned that the traditional stick fighting method of Luohan was Yinyanggun, not Fengmogun…[/QUOTE]
strange! because of the many Shaolin staff forms, shao huo gun and feng mo gun overtly have completely Buddhist luohan postures and nature. yin shou gun and yin yang gun both come almost directly from the Ming generals Yu Dayu and others. these don’t show any Buddhist luohan attitude and are not of Luohan quan in origin, but could have been adopted to the system later on.
…Nanyuan Tongbeiquan
this is another case of the “different styles, same/similar names.” Shaolin has no Tong Bei quan. Shaolin tong bi quan origin, as you know, comes from general Han Tong’s Tong Bi quan of the Song dynasty (this Tong Bi quan, now, also as you know, part of xiyuan big Tong Bi quan though it’s a small form, and Taizu Chang quan, and Da Hong quan, and Shaolin small Mei Hua quan, and probably Wu He quan, and some other styles of the early Song dynasty are all based on the methods that the generals of the early Song dynasty taught their armies. all these styles share much technical contents in common.) later, the monks mixed Han Tong’s Tong Bi style (maybe called Tong Bi quan because of Han Tong’s name? both these 'Tong’s are the same exact Chinese word) with small and big Hong quan, etc, to make the 3-form Tong Bi quan, now called small nanyuan Tong Bi quan. Tong Bei quan is a totally different Daoist style. there we see almost no technical similarity between Shaolin Tong Bi quan, and Daoist Tong Bei quan. i think using the totally different name Tong Bei for Shaolin Tong Bi style is probably because of the similarity of the names. despite this much spread confusion, i’m yet to see any reliable source mentioning any logical relation between Shaolin Tong Bi quan and the Daoist Tong Bei quan.
If you ask me, the version shown in the Encyclopedia is very disjointed and hard to follow, as if deliberately scrambled to further obscure what it is, along with making it seem as if it’s part of an 8 or 9 road Luohan system, which clearly it is not. Not sure what exactly Sal was talking about when he suggested a Baguazhang connection to it and how it should be like the Encyclopedia version. That version makes no sense. I’ve never seen anyone do it like that, and everyone in Zhenxu’s sect does it the same way.
this is definitely a wrong impression. i previously talked about it in the Luohan thread, and i thought it was enough to show that the Encyclopedia version is the same. but seems it had not been enough. ok. i make that description pictorial and post it here tonight. maybe that helps.
[QUOTE=taichi4eva;1278223]…the term Kanjia…does it point to something special? “watch over the household”[/QUOTE]
both of these. in Shaolin theres is more than one Kan Jia quan. one means ‘guard/watch over the household,’ another means ‘special.’ and i think there’s more. about the ‘guard the home’ style, it’s is said to have been created under the supervision of abbot FuJu (Song dynasty, 960s AD) or FuYu (Yuan dynasty, 1200s AD). about the ‘special’ style, i’m unsure if it refers to one specific style. many lineages pick up a form and call it ‘special.’