Why do we bash each other?

[QUOTE=KPM;1066574]And I think you’re idea is total rubbish! You are describing WCK as a weapon that is all or nothing. Your only option is destruction of the opponent. How do you deal with drunk uncle Joe on New Year’s day who wants to see what if your “kung fu is strong!”? So he launches a drunken attack at you. Are you going to punch uncle Joe’s lights out? I don’t know about your WCK, but my WCK allows a lot of leeway to gauge the level of response acccording to the situation. How is that possible you may ask?..by achieving CONTROL of the opponent without necessarily having to punch him out![/QUOTE]

Nonsense mate!!! Wake up ffs!!!

[QUOTE=Wayfaring;1066577]My prediction…

Graham hits an adrenaline dump at about 1:30 in to the engagement. And doesn’t make it out of the first round.[/QUOTE]

Obviously read from the two tiny crystal balls that dangle between your legs you ponce!!! LMAO

[QUOTE=LoneTiger108;1066562] . . . . .And here’s where the internet is a great resource… because here it is…
http://www.kwokwingchun.co.uk/2009/3/12/ip-man-code-of-conduct

THIS should be in ALL OF US. THIS should be our common objective and goal.

Forget the faat mun & kuit, THIS is how we unite together.

IMHO of course…[/QUOTE]
It’s also my opinion. I once mentioned this to someone and they said I watched too many Kung Fu movies. My reply was that I learned “Esprit Du Corps” and honor as a Marine before I knew what Kung Fu was. Even street people understand that no one wants to be dissed. Men should talk to each as they would want someone to talk to them.

[QUOTE=Ultimatewingchun;1066591]…I’ve decided to clean up Graham’s post to the following (ie.- without all the hoopla):

“The idea of Ving Tsun is to interrupt your opponent’s attack with your own attack and finish the fight by maintaining striking even if your strikes meet an obstruction. Or you lose the fight. No making a bridge. No achieving control. No attachment.”
…[/QUOTE]

No need to clean it up!!! It was fine. The fact that the major saps on this forum disagree is totally expected :wink:

GH

…I think I missed something…oh yeah…The Kuen Kuit is BS. I personally wouldn’t wipe my bot bot with it and that is coming from a person who used to memorize it and use its words frequently. That is until I found something out about The Kuen Sh1t that you stupids do not know.

You lot are as bad as Christians!

[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;1066611]Vagabond !! :wink:

[/QUOTE]

Ummm, what were we talking about? :confused: :smiley:

I think Christians. And I would hope that those were some nice Catholic girls. You know, the kind you could take home to meet your mom! :smiley:

I think Grace is Christian or Catholic? :slight_smile:

I don’t know but I do know this, when I see a nice example of the female species I do praise the Lord !

Rubbish!!! The idea of Ving Tsun is to interrupt your opponents attack with your own attack and finish the fight by maintaining striking even if your strikes meet an obstruction!!! or…you lose the fight!!!

No making a bridge. No achieving control!!! This idea of WCK is utter nonsense!!! …NO ATTACHMENT!!!

The gross overuse of exclamation marks does nothing to increase the veracity of your incorrect and uninformed statements.

And, jeez, lay off the Red Bull and calm TF down. I predict a heart attack well before you hit the adrenalin dump.

[QUOTE=anerlich;1066688]The gross overuse of exclamation marks does nothing to increase the veracity of your incorrect and uninformed statements.
[/QUOTE]

No, but the gross overuse of exclamation marks does increase the veracity of my statements if I include pictures!!!

See!!!

If you think this is hot, check out the “Ultimate A S S” thread on the UG (mma.tv)

OMG !!! :eek: :smiley: :cool:

[QUOTE=Ultimatewingchun;1066713]If you think this is hot, check out the “Ultimate A S S” thread on the UG (mma.tv)

OMG !!! :eek: :smiley: :cool:[/QUOTE]

Yes, agreed. Proof that Eddie Bravo is useful for something other than smoking pot and making up weird grappling position names.

[QUOTE=Wayfaring;1066708]No, but the gross overuse of exclamation marks does increase the veracity of my statements if I include pictures!!!

See!!!
[/QUOTE]

Sorry, all I get is a red X, albeit one with veracity up the wazoo.

[QUOTE=anerlich;1066720]Sorry, all I get is a red X, albeit one with veracity up the wazoo.[/QUOTE]

not missing much her arse is pretty flat

NOW THIS ON THE OTHER HAND

Finally, we agree on something!

[QUOTE=goju;1066728] NOW THIS ON THE OTHER HAND
[/QUOTE]
you have a point there.

[QUOTE=goju;1066728]not missing much her arse is pretty flat

NOW THIS ON THE OTHER HAND

[/QUOTE]

nope, other girl’s arse is way hotter

its as flat as a pancake!:eek:
she even has to arch her back to make it look like she has one at all:D

Anything can be argued over on this forum. Anything.

Just amazing !!! :smiley: