From a non WSL lineage POV.
How would you TEST this
Anyone learning a MA for self defence or competitive combat, tests it by doing just that. By Defending oneself and competing in fighting.
Anything else is just a dance. VT forms included :eek:.
Get someone to throw a punch at either mans head. The results will be easy to see :rolleyes:
I’ve heard this ‘traditional’ vs ‘realistic’ argument before and imo without traditional there is no realistic
Depends what type of Traditional one is refering to -
Traditional in the 50’s when my Sifu was learning Spencer meant realistic full contact training combined with going out and fighting, which he did with WSL often.
Nowadays the word traditional has taken on a different meaning, and IMHO its not for the better…its more about people knowing rather than doing.
Ip Man didn’t just teach people how to fight did he?
Most really old school teachers were kung fu practitioners, chinesse medicine doctors, and caligraphy artists.
So no. But the Kung Fu he taught from what im told was for fighting.
Those that wanted it for such were sent out to do just that by him, my sifu included.
Although not all students wanted it for the same reasons…
Give a bum in the street a couple bucks for food, and well he may just spend it on beer :o
This whole argument is funny cause its based on knee jerk reactions IMO.
Earlier Dave mentioned the differences (big or small) between WSL and WKL VT even though WKL learnt from him. Which others not Dave IMO, took as meaning its not effective or is somehow inferior. Nows its blown out to this LOL…
What is this about anyway ?
Some people do VT to learn to fight, i certainly dont pretend to know why people do it for other reasons
You dont see people leanrnig how to surf to not go out and surf, man the world of martial arts is a weird one 
DREW