The difference MK, is that cigarette manufacturers knowingly marketed a product that had NO purpose other than addiction and that causes all kinds of health problems, even in ‘moderation’. That is, if you smoke, say, four cigarettes a day, your risk goes up considerably. By contrast, I can occasionally have a McD’s meal -even 4 times a week (not something I would do, personally) and not risk my health.
However, McDonalds is no worse for you than Fetuccini Alfredo, Creme Brulee or Mac and Cheese - all of which are readily available anywhere. Further, the food has a purpose other than addiction- to nourish bodies. Some is more nourishing than others, but do we take action against the eggplant growers because eggplant is nutritionally valueless?
Nah. Eat less, exercise more, and stop making excuses for yourself.
Perhaps both messages are important to the film, that’s what I got from it.
I disagree. I believe the fellow chose to eat and behave as many normal sedentary Americans do. That’s not a commentary on McD’s as much as it is on lifestyle choices.
I won’t deny there were some shots taken at McD’s, but it’s not THEIR responsibility to do something about it, unless they are saying things like “Eat at McDonald’s, it promotes health!” If I sell lard in a bucket and people come back and buy it, I’m not responsible for the effects so much saturated fat has on somebody.
That being said, a great many Americans, probably millions, are suffering from SATURATED FAT ADDICTION.
No they aren’t, they’re suffering from “I keep stuffing my face.” Put the fork DOWN fatty! Yet another way to shift personal blame and turn it into a “condition.”