Without regards to lineage and such… I prefer to play my CLF long range. It usually surprises my opponent and bridges the gap in a way that most would not expect, it is very deceptive that way. In fact this is what began my CLF study, I was already seasoned in Kajukenbo and was interested in sparring a friend who was a CLF player. Shorter than I, I was getting hit with shots out of nowhere when he seemed to be 10 feet away just a second ago. I was dumbfounded and was planning to just supplementing my art and ended up making CLF a core style with Kajukenbo getting pushed to the background (kept my kicks and defensive stances).
I have and will continue to study Western and Thai boxing, and frankly I find that the basics (and most important) aspects of these stand up arts have very low training overhead. Even the Wing Tsun my sifu had taught seemed a bit more practical then playing CLF short range, and we even supplemented our CLF with some variation of Wing Tsun trapping, albeit with charp chuis.
I value CLF the most in melee situations where I can just swing away and have a high percentage of hitting someone from a distance (and I have used this thank God without hitting anyone in my party in the process). It just seems to me that kinesthetically, in the short range I am more effective with boxing type strikes in that they are easier to throw instinctively, have a bit more power, and lead into a proper clinch transition to a grapple defense if necessary. I have found much value in drilling CLF short range sow chuis with backpedal footwork used when necessary, but in combat I feel that playing your CLF short just limits your power, and more importantly, your distance advantage.
Agree or Disagree, and why? Let’s hear it.