Is there such thing as a "STYLE"?

[QUOTE=ginosifu;1136921]Self expression is not what I was looking for. I guess I just should have stated System.

I have studied several styles. Although I may be using only Monkey System / Theory, I express my fighting with my own “Style” because of my experiences.

The thread was supposed to about SYSTEMS. Should there be a universal system? Like a World Martial Art, where everyone one punches the same and kicks the same? Should we Jeet Kune Do all CMA? Or should we keep Shaolin as Shaolin and Wing Chun as Wing Chun etc.

ginosifu[/QUOTE]

universal system exists. It is just conflict and it can happen at low levels or insanely intense levels. I think we just slice ourselves off the loaf and call ourselves a slice instead of a piece of the loaf, we are all still bread!

sorry, that’s a crappy analogy, but at the same time not.

heh heh… :slight_smile:

Should there be a universal system? Like a World Martial Art, where everyone one punches the same and kicks the same? Should we Jeet Kune Do all CMA? Or should we keep Shaolin as Shaolin and Wing Chun as Wing Chun etc.

If such a standardization took place, it would only be a matter of time (most likely a very short period) before someone decided to change some aspect of what is being taught to suit them for whatever reason, and then another change is made and another by various people for various reasons with different emphasis…eventually enough differences are made that someone decides it warrants a different name…and then you have a different “system”.

Regardless of what is needed, any product/project of human endeavor is “alive”, and martial arts is no different. Besides, “needs” change. I think having different “systems” is just a convenient way to categorize and differentiate the inevitable variations that naturally occurred. Whether or not they’re categorized as different systems, the variations would have happened and will continue to.

[QUOTE=ginosifu;1136921]Self expression is not what I was looking for. I guess I just should have stated System.

I have studied several styles. Although I may be using only Monkey System / Theory, I express my fighting with my own “Style” because of my experiences.

The thread was supposed to about SYSTEMS. Should there be a universal system? Like a World Martial Art, where everyone one punches the same and kicks the same? Should we Jeet Kune Do all CMA? Or should we keep Shaolin as Shaolin and Wing Chun as Wing Chun etc.

ginosifu[/QUOTE]

You will never have a universal system in THAT way.
Look at boxing, it is ONE unified system and yet you will find different styles of suing that system.
Judo is another example.
In the end we all do punch ( for example) the same ( physics and biomechanically).
There is only one system of Karate ( in terms of principles and techniques), but look at all the different styles that came from the various interpretations of that system.

[QUOTE=ginosifu;1136888] If you study Shaolin or Wing Chun or Shuai Chiao and you don’t like how they kick… then don’t train in their system anymore! [/QUOTE]
If you don’t train more than 1 system, how will you be able to know the difference?

  • Is XingYi Beng Chuan better than boxing jab?
  • Is mantis Quan Chui better than boxing hook punch?

You have to train both in order to know the PRO and CON.

[QUOTE=ginosifu;1136888]Most all CMA systems are COMPLETE with every situation covered with techniques to fill every need. [/QUOTE]
This is our major disagreement. IMO, there is no complete system that exist on this planet.

  • Judo has no kick.
  • Wrestling ha no punch.
  • Boxing has no lock.
  • TKD has no throw.

They all good in certain area but none of those system is “complete”. The TCMA systmes may have more grey area but to assume that kick, punch, lock, throw exist in all TCMA systems will not be realistic.

[QUOTE=ginosifu;1136921] should we keep Shaolin as Shaolin and Wing Chun as Wing Chun etc.[/QUOTE]

You can learn

  • WC all your life, you still won’t be able to develop your locking skill.
  • Shaolin your life, you still won’t be able to develop your throwing skill.

So what will you do? You learn joint locking from eagle claw, and throwing from SC. After that you have learned at least 4 styles. When you use

  • WC Tang Shou and Pak Sou to set up an eagle claw ebow lock, are you keeping WC as WC and eagle claw as eagle claw?
  • Shaolin Quan Chui to set up your hip throw, are you keeping Shaolin as Shaolin and SC as SC?

If you just want to stay in your comfort zone as a “striker”, you may not have this problem. The moment that you want to cross that boundary between the “striking” and “throwing”, you will not be able to keep thing as simple any more.

Now you have 2 new drills

  • WC Tang Shou, Pak Sou, followed by eagle claw elbow lock.
  • Shaolin Quan Chui followed by SC hip throw.

If you train those drills daily. What system/style are you training?

fortune cookie thought of the day

If you really take the time and make the effort to master 1 style - you’ll have mastered them all.

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1136947]
This is our major disagreement. IMO, there is no complete system that exist on this planet.

  • Judo has no kick.
  • Wrestling ha no punch.
  • Boxing has no lock.
  • TKD has no throw.

They all good in certain area but none of those system is “complete”. The TCMA systmes may have more grey area but to assume that kick, punch, lock, throw exist in all TCMA systems will not be realistic.
[/QUOTE]

I knew a judoka who stop an aggressive dog with a kick to the throat a long time ago. poor doggie…

bare knuckle boxing teaches how to wrench their opponents elbow if the opportunity presented itself in the clinch

TKD do have throws hidden in their forms providing you have a knowledgeable instructor.

a lot has been lost in regards to TCMA but i believed at one time they did have answers to the problems faced by today’s practitioners.

i do agree however that cross training is valuable in helping you to understand your primary system.

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1136947]If you don’t train more than 1 system, how will you be able to know the difference?

  • Is XingYi Beng Chuan better than boxing jab?
  • Is mantis Quan Chui better than boxing hook punch?

You have to train both in order to know the PRO and CON.

This is our major disagreement. IMO, there is no complete system that exist on this planet.

  • Judo has no kick.
  • Wrestling ha no punch.
  • Boxing has no lock.
  • TKD has no throw.

They all good in certain area but none of those system is “complete”. The TCMA systmes may have more grey area but to assume that kick, punch, lock, throw exist in all TCMA systems will not be realistic.

You can learn

  • WC all your life, you still won’t be able to develop your locking skill.
  • Shaolin your life, you still won’t be able to develop your throwing skill.

So what will you do? You learn joint locking from eagle claw, and throwing from SC. After that you have learned at least 4 styles. When you use

  • WC Tang Shou and Pak Sou to set up an eagle claw ebow lock, are you keeping WC as WC and eagle claw as eagle claw?
  • Shaolin Quan Chui to set up your hip throw, are you keeping Shaolin as Shaolin and SC as SC?

If you just want to stay in your comfort zone as a “striker”, you may not have this problem. The moment that you want to cross that boundary between the “striking” and “throwing”, you will not be able to keep thing as simple any more.

Now you have 2 new drills

  • WC Tang Shou, Pak Sou, followed by eagle claw elbow lock.
  • Shaolin Quan Chui followed by SC hip throw.

If you train those drills daily. What system/style are you training?[/QUOTE]

YouKnowWho:

Again I disagree with your analysis that there is no complete systems. Northern Shaolin (Gu Ru Zhang lineage) has everything anyone will ever need in a Martial pursuit.

It has one of the largest repertoire of kicks known to MA.
It has the 108 Techniques (Throws) of Shaolin. Similar to the 108 locks of the Eagle Claw style.
A comprehensive Chin Na and grappling system.
A REALLY in depth Chi Gung system.
Weapons for those wanting an in depth knowledge in that field.

Hung Gar is in a close second. Likewise they everything you will need to fighting: Kick, punch, grab and throw + Iron Wire for Chi Gung and all the weapons training you need..

I don’t know what systems you have encountered, but if they don’t have it all, it’s probably not the system but the teacher. Sometimes people don’t finish the systems and go off on their own with out finishing the system.

The only system I have that was not complete was Yang Tai Chi, but that was not the system, it was the teacher, he only had so much information and that was it. I had to go out and learn from other teachers to complete my Tai chi.

Shuai Chiao is even a complete system. After learning all they could from GM Chang, my teacher hooked up with his Grandson (David Chang), for a more in depth system. David Chang works with head of the Taiwan police organization in his city and noted for teaching police capture and control methods.

ginosifu

I don’t see where you need

ginosifu

[QUOTE=RWilson;1136890]You sound like a character from one of the Final Fantasy games. Were you a member of Soldier like Sephiroth and Cloud?[/QUOTE]

I am not familiar with either. Could you be more explicite?

A comprehensive Chin Na and grappling system.

sorry gino, i’m going to disagree with you repectfully. I’ve yet to meet a TCMA that comes close to any grappling system present in BJJ/wrestling/judo. It might have a very bland mix of stuff but I can almost bet it does not have an in depth look into submission, locks, positioning, body leverages, guard sweeps, bridging, rubber, etc. closest would be Shuai Chiao and it still does not delve into ground basics like those systems presented. Not starting a flame war just my belief, when I meet the man whom can prove me wrong I will be the first to say you are right. :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=ginosifu;1136973]Northern Shaolin (Gu Ru Zhang lineage) has everything anyone will ever need in a Martial pursuit.

It has one of the largest repertoire of kicks known to MA.
It has the 108 Techniques (Throws) of Shaolin. Similar to the 108 locks of the Eagle Claw style.
A comprehensive Chin Na and grappling system.
A REALLY in depth Chi Gung system.
Weapons for those wanting an in depth knowledge in that field.[/QUOTE]

I had a Northern Shaolin school (Bei Shaolin Kung Fu Institute) in Austin, Texas back in 1973.

http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/5153/breaky.jpg (just look at those guy’s hair style.)

The Northern Shaolin (I prefer to call it longfist) has lots of kick, punch, and lock. But as far as the throw, I’m not too sure about that. As I have said that I don’t argue with my style brothers. I have spent all my life in longfist and SC. When we discuss subject such as “throws in the Nothern Shaolin system”, It’s like to use my own hand to slab on my own face. I want to protect the honor of my longfist system. But my SC background wants me to tell the truth.

Many Nothern Shaolin brothers believe that all throws are hidden in the forms. I can only say that my IQ is just too low to recognize it.

I was quite proud with my Nothern Shaolin joint locking skill (One of my longfist brothers even published a Shaolin Chin Na book). Oneday I met an eagle claw master. During the discussion of the small circle wrist lock, he asked me what if my opponent raises his elbow and turn his body. I then realized that the eagle claw system has much more locking detail than the longfist system has.

Yes and my style is the best :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1136984]I had a Northern Shaolin school (Bei Shaolin Kung Fu Institute) in Austin, Texas back in 1973.

http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/5153/breaky.jpg (just look at those guy’s hair style.)

The Northern Shaolin (I prefer to call it longfist) has lots of kick, punch, and lock. But as far as the throw, I’m not too sure about that. As I have said that I don’t argue with my style brothers. I have spent all my life in longfist and SC. When we discuss subject such as “throws in the Nothern Shaolin system”, It’s like to use my own hand to slab on my own face. I want to protect the honor of my longfist system. But my SC background wants me to tell the truth.

Many Nothern Shaolin brothers believe that all throws are hidden in the forms. I can only say that my IQ is just too low to recognize it.

I was quite proud with my Nothern Shaolin joint locking skill (One of my longfist brothers even published a Shaolin Chin Na book). Oneday I met an eagle claw master. During the discussion of the small circle wrist lock, he asked me what if my opponent raises his elbow and turn his body. I then realized that the eagle claw system has much more locking detail than the longfist system has.[/QUOTE]

So now all you have to do is choose what You are. What’s to stop you from sharpening that with the skills you acquired through cross training?

You’re much better at kung fu and throwing than I am (seen the vids) so maybe I’m not qualified to say this but… you did see where there were throws in long fist. The long fist guys weren’t good at them and your teacher misinterpreted the set ups and the rest of the students were terrible at them… yet you saw the throws in there and you knew through your SC training how to execute them properly. I see this in Mantis when I practice Judo, so I know you had to see it. Mantis has a lot of Osoto Gari, they don’t really know how to apply it, but it’s there. Someone knew how to apply it at one time - otherwise it wouldn’t be there. Guess what, I choose to be Mantis, my Osoto is better than the other Mantis guys. Get what I’m saying?

[QUOTE=Dragonzbane76;1136982]sorry gino, i’m going to disagree with you repectfully. I’ve yet to meet a TCMA that comes close to any grappling system present in BJJ/wrestling/judo. It might have a very bland mix of stuff but I can almost bet it does not have an in depth look into submission, locks, positioning, body leverages, guard sweeps, bridging, rubber, etc. closest would be Shuai Chiao and it still does not delve into ground basics like those systems presented. Not starting a flame war just my belief, when I meet the man whom can prove me wrong I will be the first to say you are right. :)[/QUOTE]

I agree with you that most CMA do not dwelve as deeply into chokes, submissions, wrestling etc etc. Yes you are right, not even Shuai Chiao goes as deeply into the submission and wrestling techniques.

However, I am comfortable with what I was given in Northern Shaolin. We have enough Chokes, submissions (some but not a lot of ground work) that I would feel that I could defend myself in most situations.

I have never learned any BJJ or MMA but me and my fighters have gone into the octagon and done well. We don’t focus on MMA but if need be we can handle our own.

[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1136984]I had a Northern Shaolin school (Bei Shaolin Kung Fu Institute) in Austin, Texas back in 1973.

http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/5153/breaky.jpg (just look at those guy’s hair style.)

The Northern Shaolin (I prefer to call it longfist) has lots of kick, punch, and lock. But as far as the throw, I’m not too sure about that. As I have said that I don’t argue with my style brothers. I have spent all my life in longfist and SC. When we discuss subject such as “throws in the Nothern Shaolin system”, It’s like to use my own hand to slab on my own face. I want to protect the honor of my longfist system. But my SC background wants me to tell the truth.

Many Nothern Shaolin brothers believe that all throws are hidden in the forms. I can only say that my IQ is just too low to recognize it.

I was quite proud with my Nothern Shaolin joint locking skill (One of my longfist brothers even published a Shaolin Chin Na book). Oneday I met an eagle claw master. During the discussion of the small circle wrist lock, he asked me what if my opponent raises his elbow and turn his body. I then realized that the eagle claw system has much more locking detail than the longfist system has.[/QUOTE]

YouKnowWho: I don’t know your Northern Shaolin lineage but, mine is thru Joh Ervin and Kwong Wing Lam. Maybe it is because of their backrounds, my teachers have an in depth knowledge of NS and it’s Throws.

We never “Pulled” from forms, I was always taught specific throws similar to SC throws. Some of the names may be a bit different but a chopping throw is the same in SC as in NS. The human body is the same no matter what system you pratcice. You may set up and enter differently but you can only throw people so many ways.

NS has some throws I never learned in SC!

ginosifu

[QUOTE=MightyB;1136994] Mantis has a lot of Osoto Gari, [/QUOTE]

The front cut (ACSCA term), or chop (USSCA term), or Osoto Gari(Judo term) almost exists in all MA systems. It may be the most common throw across all systems. Since the hip throw is the mother of all throws, by using hip throw as the reference point, we may be able to get a “fair” comparsion.

[QUOTE=taai gihk yahn;1136850]Chaung Tzu:
[INDENT]‘Heaven and Earth are the same as a finger; the myriad things are the same as a horse. Affirmation lies in affirming; denial lies in our denying. A way comes into being through our walking upon it; a thing is so because people say it is so. Why are things so? They are so because we declare them to be so. Why are things not so? They are not so because we declare them to be not so’.[/INDENT]

'nuff said…[/QUOTE]

I wonder how that philosophy would be applied if we were discussing different STYLES of cooking and how a man who has a sophisticated palate would read that same philosophy, as compared to a man who was raised on cheap greasy food?

Ie. “Fast food” martial arts (even if effective) as compared to profound TCMAs (even if effective).

I have never learned any BJJ or MMA but me and my fighters have gone into the octagon and done well. We don’t focus on MMA but if need be we can handle our own.

Glad to hear that. Happy at least some people in the traditional communities are pressure testing what they have.

[QUOTE=ginosifu;1136973]YouKnowWho:

Again I disagree with your analysis that there is no complete systems. Northern Shaolin (Gu Ru Zhang lineage) has everything anyone will ever need in a Martial pursuit.

It has one of the largest repertoire of kicks known to MA.
It has the 108 Techniques (Throws) of Shaolin. Similar to the 108 locks of the Eagle Claw style.
A comprehensive Chin Na and grappling system.
A REALLY in depth Chi Gung system.
Weapons for those wanting an in depth knowledge in that field.

Hung Gar is in a close second. Likewise they everything you will need to fighting: Kick, punch, grab and throw + Iron Wire for Chi Gung and all the weapons training you need..

I don’t know what systems you have encountered, but if they don’t have it all, it’s probably not the system but the teacher. Sometimes people don’t finish the systems and go off on their own with out finishing the system.

The only system I have that was not complete was Yang Tai Chi, but that was not the system, it was the teacher, he only had so much information and that was it. I had to go out and learn from other teachers to complete my Tai chi.

Shuai Chiao is even a complete system. After learning all they could from GM Chang, my teacher hooked up with his Grandson (David Chang), for a more in depth system. David Chang works with head of the Taiwan police organization in his city and noted for teaching police capture and control methods.

ginosifu

I don’t see where you need

ginosifu[/QUOTE]

My question is, what constitutes having learned a complete system? IMO, it would mean having a solid understanding and the ability to apply a given system’s principles/skills in one’s own natural and versatile way, including a wide enough range of skills. That would be my take in a nutshell.

Or does it mean having learned all the potential forms, weapons, etc., in a given system? CLF is an extremely versatile system, but if you combine its various lineages, it has over 100 forms. Nobody has time to learn, much less practice 100 forms, and you don’t need that anyway.

In our own lineage, there is an excellent system in applying its principles, but there is SO much information just in skills applications alone. You develop the ability to use a wide range of skills, but you can’t absorb and use it all equally, and you’re not really expected to. You can learn over such a wide range, but because people differ, so will many of the skills they absorb. Although they’re all guided by the same basic principles. Under pressure, only so much from each category of skills can come out, anyway. You’re mostly expected to learn so much if you’re planning to be an instructor, which I was for a time. Now that I no longer teach, I only train those aspects that suit or interest me.

I have heard that Cha Chuan traditionally has ten forms, but that few masters of that art had ever learned all ten. Does that mean they aren’t complete, even if those masters had developed a deep understanding of and ability to fight with the skills they’ve mastered? Or would somebody who maybe has learned/practiced all of a given system’s material, but never developed the ability to use it in an instinctive way?

[QUOTE=Jimbo;1137062]My question is, what constitutes having learned a complete system? IMO, it would mean having a solid understanding and the ability to apply a given system’s principles/skills in one’s own natural and versatile way, including a wide enough range of skills. That would be my take in a nutshell.

Or does it mean having learned all the potential forms, weapons, etc., in a given system? CLF is an extremely versatile system, but combining its various lineages, it has over 100 forms. Nobody has time for 100 forms, and you don’t need that anyway.

In our own lineage, there is an excellent system in applying its principles, but there is SO much information just in skills apps alone. You develop the ability to use a wide range of skills, but you can’t absorb and use it all equally, and you’re not really expected to. You can learn over such a wide range, but because people differ, so will many of the skills they absorb. Although they’re all guided by the same basic principles.

I have heard that Cha Chuan traditionally has ten forms, but that few masters of that art had ever learned all ten. Does that mean they aren’t complete, even if those masters had developed a deep understanding of and ability to fight with the skills they’ve mastered? Or would somebody who maybe has learned/practiced all of a given system’s material, but never developed the ability to use it in an instinctive way?[/QUOTE]

Completion of the system is when you have complete comprehension of all theory and principle. There will always be more drills and skill apps to learn and such. Forms are nice but not needed for the modern Sifu IMO. I use forms for basic skills, demonstrations and tournaments but they are not a requirement for learning the whole system

ginosifu

My question is, what constitutes having learned a complete system? IMO, it would mean having a solid understanding and the ability to apply a given system’s principles/skills in one’s own natural and versatile way, including a wide enough range of skills. That would be my take in a nutshell.

Jimbo has chi blasted the correct!!:stuck_out_tongue:

The thing is this, you can learn and know something but it may take years to master it. What I mean by mastering it is to hone one’s skills to the point that it becomes instinct and natural reaction. The continued development of these skills is what truly makes someone be able to know and master a system.

In regards to forms, the breaking down and application of the form is what truly constitutes one’s willingness to master it. Form collectors are just that, collectors of categories of techniques that may know them but can they show the application for them and even more importantly use them reactivly and during live training. I will take the knowledge of 10 forms and their breakdown and useage over 100 forms for just collecting and “showing off”.

TCMA has four elements of fighting that should be taught: Da (Upper Body Striking-Using fists, open hands, elbows, fingers, forearms). Ti (Lower Body Striking-Kicks, Knees, Sweeps, Stomps). Shuai (Wrestling, Throws, Sweeps). Na (Seizing-Chokes, Joint Locks, Submissions).

Now the key to this is to focus on those subsets of fighting and develop them according to your weakness or your level of interest. And also to cross train and pick up the elements your system does not have or where the training was simply touched upon or was not in depth.

Here is the thing, if you came from a system that has all of these, great, you were lucky. Not all of us did and we made up for the defiecienies by training other systems. This does not “pollute” or take away from what you learned, quite the opposite actually. It improves your “style” or “system” to be more in line with what all areas of unarmed combat should focus on.

[QUOTE=Iron_Eagle_76;1137072]This does not “pollute” or take away from what you learned, quite the opposite actually. It improves your “style” or “system” to be more in line with what all areas of unarmed combat should focus on.[/QUOTE]

This is an important point. Is it a plus or minus if a Taiji guy corss trains “hip throw”? People may say that bending head down is against Taiji principle. But to have a flexiable waist can be good for “health” even if we don’t talk about combat benefit.