Is Grappling Overrated?

With the introduction of such sports competitions as UFC, Pride and Prancrase many people have jumped unto the grappling bandwagon. In truth, grappling has been a lost art that thankfully has only begun to resurface. However, it’s naive that so many now believe grappling to be the ultimate martial art.

Now, from time to time, I hear people jeering that Tae Kwon Do, karate and kung-fu are weak compared to Muay Thai and Brazilian Jui jitsu… In defense of the these martial arts (TKD, karate, Kung-fu), with so many practitioners you are bound to get a variety of good and mediocre fighters. Some fault lies in the marketing machine of martial arts. Many instructors are out to make a living first and before instructing.

In boxing, you’re likely to get better fighters because the money is much, much more. BIG money encourages better work ethics, more training and better trainers. The average TKD practitioner cannot aspire beyond anything else, other than a few trophies or a low-end kickboxing career.

Consequently, I’ve noticed that Muay Thai is headed down the same road as TKD. Every year Thai instructors flock to the US introducing their brand of Muay Thai. Furthermore, American instructors trained in Thailand are now very accessable. It’s a simple equation that the more people learning one art, the greater the number of mediocre fighters within that art.

I try to emphasize to many students that UFC is a grapplers version of boxing… It isn’t REAL fighting. When I was in grappling, I was told 90% of fights end up on the ground… However, nobody mentions that about 3/4 of that 90% involve people who can’t fight.

Nothing I’ve seen has convinced me that grappling is more effective than striking or that Muay Thai kicks are more powerful than TKD kicks. Muay Thai fighters in general have more conditioned legs, but the concept is like swinging a bat. The idea of swing versus snap is debatable…

Actually, an MT round kick is going to be more powerful than a similarly TKD round kick, all other things equal. The disadvantage is that you can’t change kicks midstream as well. Chambering allows you to change the kick if you need to. Different philosophy, neither right nor wrong.

Is grappling overrated? By some. But some people think you can knock out a wrestler before he gets there or stop a shot by dropping into stance and “redirecting their energy.”:rolleyes:

Real life is obviously more dynamic than such solutions.

The level of guilt on all sides is rather large. If grappling is not a stylistic emphasis, learning some is a remarkably good idea. By the same token, a wrestler that doesn’t know how to defend strikes very well could be in a heap of trouble provided our proverbial striker can stay on his feet.

It’s a necessity for a well rounded MA education. It is not the end all.

For the record when I say “learn some grappling,” that doesn’t mean “Go find the grappling the instructor knows,” I mean, seek out a good wrestling coach, a judoka, SC guy, BJJer, etc and learn what you need.

GS - seeing as this is your second post on this forum I am going to cushion the blow for you.

No real martial artist, sport or otherwise, worth his weight is going to tell you there is one best way, or one art is better then another. Good grapplers will tell you that knowing the ground game is what is important, not being an expert at it, unless that is what you are looking for. Lately grappling has lost some steam, since more and more people are now beginning to address this long lost range of martial combat. No it is not the ultimate art, neither is any other. If it is overrated it is overrated by individuals who know no better. GRound fighting is soemthing that should be addressed by any martial art, and for sport fighters it is a necessity to train.

now let the beating begin…

One clarification. Although I wholeheartedly endorse SC, it wont give you any groundfighting skills.

how can an entire range of of fighting be “overrated?”

grappling is not a martial art.

I try to emphasize to many students that UFC is a grapplers version of boxing..

that would basically be lying. Boxing (Queensbury rules) is limited to punching techniques. UFC is hardly limited compared to boxing or any other event except that colorado and japanese randomness.

However, nobody mentions that about 3/4 of that 90% involve people who can’t fight.

everyone can fight, this is a dangerous attitude.

Nothing I’ve seen has convinced me that grappling is more effective than striking or that Muay Thai kicks are more powerful than TKD kicks. Muay Thai fighters in general have more conditioned legs, but the concept is like swinging a bat. The idea of swing versus snap is debatable…

you should read around and learn something about these random (but common) style generalizations. “It” has nothing to do with thai kicks or TKD kicks, it is entirely based on my particular skills, conditioning, etc vs you. Individuals, trying to hurt each other. I have never seen two styles fight each other, and the human body has no style bias when it comes to pain.

:eek:

Grappling is fake. Please stay away from grappling arts and MMA type styles they will give you a false sense of security. Futhermore you will become an ego driven a**hole and think just because u have more weapons than the person u face in the street it will help you. BANNED GRAPPLING!!!

Brad “Anti-grappler” Souders

Of course grappling is overrated. Have you ever tried a double-leg takedown on a midget? It’s unpossible to pull off. The myth of grappling being effective was disproved the instant The Discovery Channel aired it’s first segment on Dim Mak. No one in their right mind would risk a poison hand strike to the eyes or the neck when trying to take down the good kung-fuer. Plus every “REAL” martial artist knows that grapplers don’t train full contact. They just practice their submissions in a pre-arranged series of movements against an imaginary opponent.

LMAO that you think the UFC is real. GS probably still believes that Pro Wrestling is real.

Hmmm

Originally posted by Brad Souders
[B]Grappling is fake. Please stay away from grappling arts and MMA type styles they will give you a false sense of security. Futhermore you will become an ego driven a**hole and think just because u have more weapons than the person u face in the street it will help you. BANNED GRAPPLING!!!

Brad “Anti-grappler” Souders [/B]

Have you ever sparred with a grappler, ie a Wrestler, judoka, BJJ fighter, a Japanese JJ ka? I think most MAist that don’t spar hard and often are the ones that have a false sense of security. So all of these artists are A holes. I train and teach Bujinkan Budo Taijutsu, which is grappling based art(As are all japanese born arts) with lots of striking and weapons. I also train with some BJJ guys and MMA guys. They are some of the most well-rounded niceist people I have met.
Also BTW MMA are not grapplers , they are different % of boxing + Muay Thai+ Greco+ BJJ, with some subsitutions. (sambo, kickboxing, kyokushi etc)

LOL @ shinbushi thinking Brad was sincere.

For the record, I think that Great Sage is a regular forum member who got tired of all the political threads and wanted to get things back to normal around here. On the Rollsigraph I would score this attempt a 1.2.

Way to go styles!! :wink:
I think some MMA´s would join you with this,when it comes to character.

"When I was in grappling, I was told 90% of fights end up on the ground… "
Is this science?
Without further evidence,may this remain questionable.

It is like a practitioner of alternative medicine promoting his therapeutic herbs by telling you how harmful synthetic medication can be,and how natural his is.
Forgetting that ppl have died of those natural drugs,and synthetic does not equal unnatural,but rather it´s chemical build-up.

Alternatively enough,here´s an argument between a neurologist and a cardiologist-I made this story up by myself.:
Neurologist:My art is more important,without central nervous system that we work on,there would be no beating hearts.
Cardiologist:Ha! But without a working heart,your precious brain would die!
Neurologist:But we operate on the master organ!
Cardiologist:Man,you´ve got a few kilometres of tissue and a lump to work on,but mine is to be associated with the heart and kilometres,and then kilomeeetres of vein…
Neurologist:It only takes the hind brain to control the heart!
The argument goes on…

Both guys are experts on the same field,with certain specialties.
What are they arguing about?

exallace is correct on both points…the midget thing and the GS being a former member…

On the contrary!

Grappling is very underated!..The fact that seals,marines and other elite warriors carry weapons is proof of it!..Why use tanks at all when they could as well (and for a lot lower cost) send legions of grapplers to Irak, armed with only their testoterone and a touch of steriods? We all know that guns,knifes,grenades,shovels,bazookas are useless against a shooting grappler.(as seen on TV in the UFC’’ I II and III.)
The only thing that can beat a grappler is a bigger grappler or two or three smaller grapplers.

Re: Hmmm

Originally posted by shinbushi
[B]

Have you ever sparred with a grappler, ie a Wrestler, judoka, BJJ fighter, a Japanese JJ ka? I think most MAist that don’t spar hard and often are the ones that have a false sense of security. So all of these artists are A holes. I train and teach Bujinkan Budo Taijutsu, which is grappling based art(As are all japanese born arts) with lots of striking and weapons. I also train with some BJJ guys and MMA guys. They are some of the most well-rounded niceist people I have met.
Also BTW MMA are not grapplers , they are different % of boxing + Muay Thai+ Greco+ BJJ, with some subsitutions. (sambo, kickboxing, kyokushi etc) [/B]

lmao@ you getting trolled - he is a grappler…

lol Brad :smiley:

Originally posted by ewallace
For the record, I think that Great Sage is a regular forum member who got tired of all the political threads and wanted to get things back to normal around here. On the Rollsigraph I would score this attempt a 1.2.

Actually, I’ve never been here before… Just found it by accident while looking for Martial Arts news and happenings. I’ve never dwelled in the politics of martial arts, so I wouldn’t know about it in here.

Originally posted by Merryprankster
Actually, an MT round kick is going to be more powerful than a similarly TKD round kick, all other things equal. The disadvantage is that you can’t change kicks midstream as well. Chambering allows you to change the kick if you need to. Different philosophy, neither right nor wrong.

I have to disagree, I’ve seen kung-fu, karate and Many TKD fighters break just about anything with their kicks… I can kick just as hard as any Thai Boxer I’ve sparred with. The point being it’s in the legs. Most people assume Thai Boxers kick harder, but it’s actually the impact of their legs which are hardened through conditioning.

The average Joe that goes to the gym to practice TKD may not have shin breaking legs, but his power can come from speed and snap, much like a rubber band. Just imagine if he were to condition his legs similar to a Muay Thai boxer?

Thai Kicks = Swing
TKD Kicks = Snap

Well conditioned leg = Swing or Snap, it’s gonna hurt somebody.

Re: Is Grappling Overrated?

Originally posted by Great Sage

I think this thread should have sharp teeth and nappy, spiked neon hair, but here goes anyway…

With the introduction of such sports competitions as UFC, Pride and Prancrase many people have jumped unto the grappling bandwagon. In truth, grappling has been a lost art that thankfully has only begun to resurface. However, it’s naive that so many now believe grappling to be the ultimate martial art.

1993 called - it said it wants it’s mullet back. nobody really thinks that grappling is the be-all-end-all anymore. Not anyone with a clue, anyway. However, it’s a necessity, IMO, to have some ground experience.

Now, from time to time, I hear people jeering that Tae Kwon Do, karate and kung-fu are weak compared to Muay Thai and Brazilian Jui jitsu… In defense of the these martial arts (TKD, karate, Kung-fu), with so many practitioners you are bound to get a variety of good and mediocre fighters. Some fault lies in the marketing machine of martial arts. Many instructors are out to make a living first and before instructing.

some aspects are more powerful. A muay thai kick, for example, is designed to act like a baseball bat - it doesn’t snap back - it goes through the target. muay thai by design is a destructive style - hard follow through, relentless conditioning, etc. the methods of training are what lends it most of it’s power, but the mechanics hold alot of it also.

In boxing, you’re likely to get better fighters because the money is much, much more. BIG money encourages better work ethics, more training and better trainers. The average TKD practitioner cannot aspire beyond anything else, other than a few trophies or a low-end kickboxing career.

it’s not just money. not alot of money in bjj, not alot of money in judo, not alot of money in muay thai. Sport styles tend to attract people who like to train hard. And, if they expect to compete and win, they have to train hard. Consequently, they train harder than the run of the mill joe who doesn’t care for competition.

Consequently, I’ve noticed that Muay Thai is headed down the same road as TKD. Every year Thai instructors flock to the US introducing their brand of Muay Thai. Furthermore, American instructors trained in Thailand are now very accessable. It’s a simple equation that the more people learning one art, the greater the number of mediocre fighters within that art.

true - it’s bound to happen. The thing with sport fighting though, is that it proves or disproves itself eventually. If a guy opens a McThai school and his guys compete and regularly get their arse handed to them, the fighters will have to asses where the problem lies… the school will probably not be around long.

I try to emphasize to many students that UFC is a grapplers version of boxing… It isn’t REAL fighting. When I was in grappling, I was told 90% of fights end up on the ground… However, nobody mentions that about 3/4 of that 90% involve people who can’t fight.

don’t forget to tell them that whatever you do in your school isn’t real fighting either. It’s only training. when it comes down to it, that’s all that any of it is. Training for the ring has several advantages that should serve you well in the street though.

As far as people fighting - most likely, you won’t be fighting a trained fighter. If/when he loses his balance, he may take you down with him. he may intentionally want to drag you onto the ground so he can pummel you. You could be fighting multiple opponents and either fall or get knocked to the ground. Regardless of the situation or who you THINK you will be fighting, once you’re on the ground, you need a clue of what to do.

Nothing I’ve seen has convinced me that grappling is more effective than striking or that Muay Thai kicks are more powerful than TKD kicks. Muay Thai fighters in general have more conditioned legs, but the concept is like swinging a bat. The idea of swing versus snap is debatable…

it’s not really all that debatable once you’ve felt the difference. As far as grappling being more effective - it depends on the situation. If I being the Good Grappler™ know how to strike and defend strikes, and you being the person assuming all I can do is grapple and that you can easily beat a grappler, etc. you will be the that’s very surprised in the end. If you have a more realistic view, and train all ranges and feel comfortable there, than you may fair well in a clinch of on the ground, and may be able to defend takedowns if you’ve trained them properly. MMA guys realized along time ago that you need to be well rounded.

Someone stick a stick into that wheel.

I think that’s the first time in months that you’ve used an icon other than the thumbs up! :eek:

What’s with you and this megaman kick lately? just a fan?