If my WCK is good then I won't be taken down...

[QUOTE=t_niehoff;783270]But you’re not going to be able to “do it at the correct angle” and “maintain the outside line.” The other guy will adjust and face you directly - within a split second - as you move in
{snip}
This is a good example of starting with theory and trying to make it work – it never will, at least not consistently and certainly not against anyone good. If you start with the fight and see what works as a starting point, no one would be wasting their time doing this stuff.
[/QUOTE]
Moving to the outside is taught in boxing… I won’t bother with why… Suffice it to say it’s a sound tactic..

Moving to the outside at the last split second as you attack/counter happens all the time in fighting and in boxing as well–in boxing it’s called a slip…

Most standup fighters sooner or later learn to move to the outside when using certain kinds of attacks, like a cross… It’s just duh… Nothing so special or theoretcial or exotic about any of this…

And I and many others have used the lifting knee thing to jam kicks on entry, another common tactic, even MT does the lifing knee thing <takoon?> to block/jam kicks, moving in with it is even better to jam, but you don’t leap with it…

As for Jong Sao it’s neutral position and occupation of the line is useful IMO.. but the hands keep moving…

I used this simple ‘theory’ fighting … it works. I had maybe 30-40 fist fights in bars clubs streets;) usually more than 1 guy at a time. I did Judo when I was 10 and learned arm submissions /chokes I could use against anyone, vt guys or bar fight guys…I went to the ground rarely because I fight more than 1 guy. Do you train to fight out of your weight class terence or multiple attackers to test your theories of grappling them in a big hugfest
then add the common ‘glassing techniques’ or wetting a common knife strike to simply leave scars , lots of them, nicknamed Mars bars =scars across your arms and face… from my part of the world [ my reality :wink: ] see how your fighting evolves…my theory isnt your theory so what.
Sadly my fights arent recorded as they hapened spontaneously without any forwarning just took it as it came first come first served…oh and nobody knew what I was serving …surprise never fails ..I can have police records checked , I gave evidence in court several times …Even the police gave me help when giving written evidence , never to say I ko a guy just threw my arms out to defend myself and they fell over …well i did alot of defending myself :smiley: thats why I know what Im talking about when I say the seung ma toi ma drill will help…it is the point in time relative to aguy moving on you , it works , its mechanics trained in motion [chisao] with a partner over and over …not sticky hands …striking hands .

The Entry technique does work well against kickers.

[QUOTE=Ultimatewingchun;783281]It does work well against kickers.[/QUOTE]

There is no such thing as “kickers.” Decent fighters don’t just kick – the move, they strike with both hands and feet, they clinch, etc.

But if you think this works against fighters that throw kicks, go visit a MT gym and spar 100% with some decent MT “kickers” and see for yourself. You’ll find that if you try to “hop in” their kicks will just knock you down.

I use it too . jam legs …

[QUOTE=YungChun;783278]Moving to the outside is taught in boxing… I won’t bother with why… Suffice it to say it’s a sound tactic..
[/QUOTE]

It is a sound tactic – AS BOXERS DO IT. They don’t try to hop in with a bil sao. :wink: They move to create angles for punches, and as defense. You can’t hop in with your body as quickly as you can throw a punch.

Moving to the outside at the last split second as you attack/counter happens all the time in fighting and in boxing as well–in boxing it’s called a slip…

Most standup fighters sooner or later learn to move to the outside when using certain kinds of attacks, like a cross… It’s just duh… Nothing so special or theoretcial or exotic about any of this…

Dude, it’s not the same thing. Wrestlers use circular movement to set up shots too.

But as I was saying: you won’t be able to sue this angle with the hopping enry and you won’t be able to keep the outside line either (because the oppopnent will adjust). Instead of arguing with me – yes you can! – from a theoretical perspective, show me (video?) anyone that can do it in fighting, consistently (so that it wasn’t a lucky shot), against decently skilled fighters (like a good MMAist or MT fighter). That evidence doesn’t exist because no one can do it.

And I and many others have used the lifting knee thing to jam kicks on entry, another common tactic, even MT does the lifing knee thing <takoon?> to block/jam kicks, moving in with it is even better to jam, but you don’t leap with it…

Sure you and many others use it – lots of people do all kinds of skilly things. Show me someone that does it in 100% fighting, consistently, against people with some skills.

Yes, MT raised the leg, but not while moving forward. You will have no base and if he kicks you with a good thai shot, he’ll take you out.

As for Jong Sao it’s neutral position and occupation of the line is useful IMO.. but the hands keep moving…

A few rounds of sparring with a good boxer will disavow you of that opinion. :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=canglong;783276]And what you’ll argue against some other part of the technique. What good is a video if you can’t understand the principle.
[/QUOTE]

Who cares about the principles? I want to see it work. What good is the principle if you can’t make it work? Do you think fighting takes place on a chalkboard? You see, my theory says . . . .

Post that video of your stuffing the MT fighter’s kicks over and over with your entry technique, of your getting and keeping the outside line, etc. Or, just do what all theoretical people do – tell me how it does work, how the principle is correct, that you’ve used it and it has worked, etc. In other words, do everything but show us that what you say is true.

You want to make this harder than it needs to be the raised leg guards against a kick before moving forward similar to a forward guard hand. If you have seen Tony Jaa raise his knee while practising you have seen the same raised MT knee as TWC so once again Terence you are wrong but nothing new there.

MT does not use this hopping, skipping entry. In MT and MMA, they raise the leg as a cover while in base. It’s like raising your arm/elbow to cover your head agaisnt a hook. It makes sense if you have base – since there will be an impact that you need to be able to absorb. If you don’t ahve the base, you will be knocked off-balance (perhaps down).

originally posted by t_niehoff
Post that video of your stuffing the MT fighter’s kicks over and over with your entry technique, of your getting and keeping the outside line, etc. Or, just do what all theoretical people do – tell me how it does work, how the principle is correct, that you’ve used it and it has worked, etc. In other words, do everything but show us that what you say is true.
Should that be posted next to all your shining works of art. Terence for someone that claims not to talk excessively when I compare your join date to that of mine and then your number of post to mine I think you talk more than you post videos and wine more than some children I know.
originally posted by t_niehoff
It makes sense if you have base – since there will be an impact that you need to be able to absorb. If you don’t ahve the base, you will be knocked off-balance (perhaps down).
Now you are saying leave your horse to create a base on one foot:rolleyes: oh yeah thats right you are the same person that doesn’t believe in principle, "Who cares about the principles? " so a one legged base probably does sound good to you.

[QUOTE=t_niehoff;783291]
Post that video of your stuffing the MT fighter’s kicks over and over with your entry technique, of your getting and keeping the outside line, etc. Or, just do what all theoretical people do – tell me how it does work, how the principle is correct, that you’ve used it and it has worked, etc. In other words, do everything but show us that what you say is true.
[/quote]
You don’t show anyone jack schit.. You just tell every one they’re full of it unless THEY post vids… YOU are a Hypocrite.. All you do is talk about how everyone’s experience is irrelevant except yours… That’s called being pig headed… I think that the folks you fight are probably really good, and you probably can’t make anything work on them, get your butt kicked regularly and as a result spend hours on the puter each day telling everyone else that the only reason they can make anything work is because they are not fighting the folks you are and getting their azz handed to them in each session the way you do…
[QUOTE=t_niehoff;783291]
MT does not use this hopping, skipping entry. In MT and MMA, they raise the leg as a cover while in base.
[/quote]
Actually, as I was shown by a MT trainer they start on the ball of the foot and when absorbing energy allow the foot to land on the heel, becoming flat..

You say entering with the raised knee doesn’t work, BS I and scores of others have used it, use it and will use it… It offers other benefits, taking position and taking space away and closing stuffing the force.. Take it to the extreme and you have a flying knee…

Moving to the outside is not hard, you just move to the outside… It forces them to keep re adjusting, boxing coaches teach this.. What in GOD’s name do you mean folks can’t do that? It’s preposterous… YOU are preposterous..

It’s simply changing the angle in a pre entry phase… BFD!

Slipping can’t be done?

Nothing can be done, only you the magnificent Terence can do it, or maybe not because you are fighting the only skilled fighters in the world and only those fighters with whom you spar are legitimate measuring sticks…

You see no value in starting, using, attacking on the centerline with one or more hands? Then I don’t think you know jack schit about WCK or controlling the centerline…the core of the ‘method’.

[QUOTE=canglong;783302]Should that be posted next to all your shining works of art. Terence for someone that claims not to talk excessively when I compare your join date to that of mine and then your number of post to mine I think you talk more than you post videos and wine more than some children I know.
[/QUOTE]

So now you change the subject from substance to one about how I post too much. Oh, what I surprise. When you can’t respond to substance, the next thing to do is change the subject and talk about me. Thanks for admitting that you can’t respond with substance.

Now you are saying leave your horse to create a base on one foot:rolleyes: oh yeah thats right you are the same person that doesn’t believe in principle, "Who cares about the principles? " so a one legged base probably does sound good to you.

Yes, you can have one legged base (though it isn’t as strong as two legged base). But when your body is moving forward with one leg raise, like in that entry technique, you don’t have base. Don’t beleive me, visit a MT gym, try your entry technique, and see for yourself.

originally posted by t_niehoff
So now you change the subject from substance to one about how I post too much. Oh, what I surprise. When you can’t respond to substance, the next thing to do is change the subject and talk about me. Thanks for admitting that you can’t respond with substance.
The only substance here is in your mind you argue with everybody about anything then in your mind decide you are correct and everyone else is wrong.
originally posted by t_niehoff
Yes, you can have one legged base (though it isn’t as strong as two legged base).
wow did you figure that one out all by yourself T.
originally posted by t_niehoff
But when your body is moving forward with one leg raise, like in that entry technique, you don’t have base. Don’t beleive me, visit a MT gym, try your entry technique, and see for yourself.
The leg raises then you move forward if performed the way you describe it would be a thrusting knee, oh but if you described it correctly there might not be room for you to argue against it.
You don’t show anyone jack schit.. You just tell every one they’re full of it unless THEY post vids… YOU are a Hypocrite.. All you do is talk about how everyone’s experience is irrelevant except yours… That’s called being pig headed… I think that the folks you fight are probably really good, and you probably can’t make anything work on them, get your butt kicked regularly and as a result spend hours on the puter each day telling everyone else that the only reason they can make anything work is because they are not fighting the folks you are and getting their azz handed to them in each session the way you do…
That’s about how I read it.

[QUOTE=YungChun;783303]You don’t show anyone jack schit.. You just tell every one they’re full of it unless THEY post vids… YOU are a Hypocrite.. All you do is talk about how everyone’s experience is irrelevant except yours… That’s called being pig headed…
[/QUOTE]

I don’t post videos because I am not on here telling people this or that will work in fighting. I’m saying it won’t. And I can’t post videos showing it not working because one of you bright fellows will point out that my opponent was (perhaps) bad and didn’t know the real principle (like you do, of course) - so I would be trying to prove a negative. You guys say it works, you’ve made it work, you know the real WCK principles, etc. So show us.

You may calling not believing it unless I see it pig-headed; but that’s the only way to know if it is BS or not.

I think that the folks you fight are probably really good, and you probably can’t make anything work on them, get your butt kicked regularly and as a result spend hours on the puter each day telling everyone else that the only reason they can make anything work is because they are not fighting the folks you are and getting their azz handed to them in each session the way you do…

Yes, the folks I fight with are very good and do kick my ass. And I can see from working with them, what sort of things can work, and what sort of thigns can’t work. If a good, athletic, skilled fighter can’t do it, what makes you think that you can? But if you can, and you know better, please by all means educate us – put it up for all to see. Show us how you make it work against good fighters. I’m all for learning. I’ll take good stuff from anyone. You just need to show me that it is good.

Actually, as I was shown by a MT trainer they start on the ball of the foot and when absorbing energy allow the foot to land on the heel, becoming flat..

So?

You say entering with the raised knee doesn’t work, BS I and scores of others have used it, use it and will use it… It offers other benefits, taking position and taking space away and closing stuffing the force.. Take it to the extreme and you have a flying knee…

A flying knee is an offensive technique, like a kick – where you raise your knee too! LOL! Once again, you miss the point: it’s not the same thing. Neither is raisnig your leg because you beleive a kick is coming, realizing you were mistaken, then stepping down to enter. The mechanics, intent, etc. – what you are actually doing – is very, very different.

Back in the day, Benny Urquidez, the great kickboxer, used a similar looking technique (actually, this is where I believe Cheung took it from and tried to adapt it into his TWC) – from a standard boxing guard position, he’s raise his lead leg (knee) and shoot out his front hand (opened) into the face of his opponent (like a bil sao) while stationary as a defense against the low round kick. He shot out the hand to block the eyesight of his opponent (so they couldn’t see his counter coming).

His technique, btw, was an adaptation of what many 70s point fighters used as an entry: the raised leg entry. It works in that environment because they are not really kicking with realistic power.

Moving to the outside is not hard, you just move to the outside… It forces them to keep re adjusting, boxing coaches teach this.. What in GOD’s name do you mean folks can’t do that? It’s preposterous… YOU are preposterous..

It’s simply changing the angle in a pre entry phase… BFD!

Of course you can move to the outside (circle them), that’s what boxers and wrestlers do. I didn’t say you couldn’t – I said you couldn’t enter with that entry technique off that angle. And you won’t be able to maintain the outside line. They’ll close the angle when (or even before) you move. That step is too slow. And it doesn’t threaten them and force a response from them.

Slipping can’t be done?

Sure it can - but that’s not what we are talking about. Try slipping while raising your lead leg! LOL!

Nothing can be done, only you the magnificent Terence can do it, or maybe not because you are fighting the only skilled fighters in the world and only those fighters with whom you spar are legitimate measuring sticks…

Lots of stuff can be done, and the stuff that can be done we can see in done. Instead of arguing how it will or should work and telling me stories about how you’ve done it, just show me someone who can do it consistently in fighting at 100% with good people (like decent MMA or MT fighters). I can’t argue with that.

You see no value in starting, using, attacking on the centerline with one or more hands? Then I don’t think you know jack schit about WCK or controlling the centerline…the core of the ‘method’.

Just because you repeat some principle “attack or control the centerline” doesn’t mean you can do it, know how to do it, understand what it means, etc. Holding your lead hand out there in “jong sao” isn’t attacking or controlling anything. All it is doing is exposing you, limiting your offense, etc.

[QUOTE=canglong;783311]The only substance here is in your mind you argue with everybody about anything then in your mind decide you are correct and everyone else is wrong.
[/QUOTE]

I don’t think “everybody” is wrong – because not “everybody” does this entry stuff or believes it is any good. I decide what is good from evidence, from seeing it for myself work in fighting (at 100%) against good people. Not from theory or demos. I’ve been in WCK for 25 years and never seen anyone who could do use this entry technique consistently in fighting and against anyone decent. But, if the evidence exists that proves me wrong – please, provide it. I’m more than willing to reassess my views in light of genuine evidence.

wow did you figure that one out all by yourself T. The leg raises then you move forward if performed the way you describe it would be a thrusting knee, oh but if you described it correctly there might not be room for you to argue against it.That’s about how I read it.

Once again, this is the old you-don’t-know-how-to-really-do-it-like-I-do argument. That might carry some weight if you would provide any evidence to back up what you say.

[QUOTE=t_niehoff;783313]I don’t post videos because I am not on here telling people this or that will work in fighting. I’m saying it won’t. And I can’t post videos showing it not working because one of you bright fellows will point out that my opponent was (perhaps) bad and didn’t know the real principle (like you do, of course) - so I would be trying to prove a negative. You guys say it works, you’ve made it work, you know the real WCK principles, etc. So show us.
[/quote]
No you are saying that what everyone else does is BS and won’t work, implying that only what you do, whatever that is, WILL WORK.. So show us!

I know what works and what has worked on the folks I have sparred with.. You say that’s meaningless because you don’t think it will work against the folks you fight… And that we must show you it will work against folks you fight..

So say we show you something that works against the people you fight and then you begin using it and it works on the folks you fight.. Then Chuck Liddel gets on the board and tells you that what you are doing is a load of BS because it would never work against the folks that he fights with… And on and on

I measure my success fighting and sparring against myself.. If I get better then I have achieved something.. Others who work security may have lived a little longer due to their skills and yet again this means nothing and is BS unless they post a video of themselves fighting someone you specify..

So what’s your point?

If you cant use your WCK to whip Tito Ortizs butt then I think you suck and have your head up your butt

The point is that YOU are the one with the audacity and presumption to tell everyone one what they do is BS.. So you know better.. So I say PROVE YOU KNOW BETTER AND SHOW US!!! If you can’t show us then I say you are full of schit..

You think occupying the line, starting on the line is useless… If you don’t start on the line then you must move to the line.. This allows the opponent to take the line first.. Once that happens you are playing catch up in terms of occupying the line… There is no problem starting on the line if you are filling space with structure but I don’t think you use any of these things, from the most basic to the most complex in the method.. You probably look like a half assed kick boxer… And btw many of the ‘proven’ methods taught in boxing are only viable because they have GIANT gloves on… Many of the moves used in boxing become next to useless when you are bare fisted, such as taking hits on gloves, catching punches–go take your fist, put it on your head and let someone hit you…and see how you feel.. The reason the positions in WCK are not like those used in boxing is because absorbing shots on your hands, that are placed next to your face is not functional without those big old pads on…in fact its pretty stupid. Look at the positions used in the old days of bare fisted boxing and whoaaaaa we see guys with and extended guard… But HEY they didn’t fight those bad boys you do so…

Spar with those big old gloves on and you won’t be able to use the small spaces WCK was designed to use, you will loose dexterity in your hands, you will have no structure to speak of using some half assed peek-a-boo guard and rely on your gloves to absorb blows… This kind of stuff completely leaves behind the method of WCK..

Where is the WCK in your WCK?

Moreover you failed to provide the location of your school, if you even have one, so that folks can come check you out.. You did not appear at the sparring event which, once and for all would clear up the question of walking the walk, and you refuse to show us the RIGHT way which only you claim to understand because of your mythical experience..

Only listen to those who can walk the walk yet we have no evidence that you have learned to crawl with WCK let alone walk

orignally posted by t_niehoff
Once again, this is the old you-don’t-know-how-to-really-do-it-like-I-do argument. That might carry some weight if you would provide any evidence to back up what you say.
If I was as impressed with your 25 years in service as you seem to be then that might matter to me but your 25 years hasn’t made your argument more superior more persuasive or less opinion than fact any more than anyone else on this forum. But as long as you believe you know it all then I am sure you’ll continue your crusade to prove Victor correct.
originally posted by Robert Chu
No opinion, just fact.

I noticed you didn’t have anything to say to this statement even though it was just full of holes. Terence you are so transparent it’s pathetic and you are becoming even more so with each and every post.

[QUOTE=canglong;783324]If I was as impressed with your 25 years in service as you seem to be then that might matter to me but your 25 years hasn’t made your argument more superior more persuasive or less opinion than fact any more than anyone else on this forum. But as long as you believe you know it all then I am sure you’ll continue your crusade to prove Victor correct.
[/QUOTE]

I know that I don’t know it all – because I know that if a person can’t do it, they don’t know it. And I can’t do it all! :wink:

But I don’t take things on faith or theory or belief – I base my opinions, judgments, and conclusions on evidence. EVIDENCE. Funny, how all you guys that say you can make it work, say that you have made it work, etc, can’t provide any evidence that we can see for ourselves to prove your assertions. You’d think that would be the easiest thing in the world - if it were true.

I noticed you didn’t have anything to say to this statement even though it was just full of holes. Terence you are so transparent it’s pathetic and you are becoming even more so with each and every post.

Just admit that you can’t provide the evidence and leave it at that. We all know that’s the case.

i plead the 5th :wink:

[QUOTE=YungChun;783323]No you are saying that what everyone else does is BS and won’t work, implying that only what you do, whatever that is, WILL WORK.. So show us!
[/QUOTE]

It is because I don’t believe you. It’s nothing personal, but anyone can say “oh, I can make such and such work” or “I’ve had a zillion street fights” or whatever. These are empty claims. I can say that the elbow escape works. You don’t need to take my word for it or trust my theory, you can find all kinds of videos of people using it in fighting, you can go to a BJJ school and see it done in fighting for yourself – because it works there is all kinds of evidence of it working. When it is true, the evidence will exist, and anyone can see it. When it doesn’t exist, . . .

My opinion on the “jong sao” (which is that it is not a fighting posture, but an action) is based on my experience, from seeing what other WCK people can really do when they fight, and from seeing what really good fighters can do if you give them an opening. And anyone can see it for themselves – just go spar at 100% with some people with proven, good standup skills (like at a boxing or MMA gym). If you leave your arm out there, you will see the results for yourself.

I know what works and what has worked on the folks I have sparred with.. You say that’s meaningless because you don’t think it will work against the folks you fight… And that we must show you it will work against folks you fight..

What do you mean by “it worked”? That you were able to do it? So was the kid in the video. Did it make any difference in the video? No. He would have done better - been less open to the shoot, better able to defend the shoot, etc. for example - by keeping his arm back. His punch would have more power. He’d be better covered with his arm back, and better able to defend himself (which he would see if the other guy had had good punching skills).

As I said, lot of people do things in what they call “sparring”, particularly with others in their same group, doing the same things, with the same poor habits, poor skills, etc. This is the problem. You can’t learn what are and are not good fighting habits by working with poorly skilled people. Go to a really good boxing gym, one that has produced high level boxers, show them your “guard”, and ask them – after all, they are experienced fighters – about what they think of it, about the strenghts and weaknesses of it. Then ask them to show you why it is a bad idea. They’ll be glad to.

So say we show you something that works against the people you fight and then you begin using it and it works on the folks you fight.. Then Chuck Liddel gets on the board and tells you that what you are doing is a load of BS because it would never work against the folks that he fights with… And on and on…

Solid stuff will work at any level. Obviously a person needs to be at that level in their skill/performance ability, but crap can and does work against poorly skilled people (crap works against crap) but it won’t work against good people. For example, the elbow escape – it works from white belt through black belt, works in MMA competition, works on the street, etc. I may not be able to pull it off against a BB, but someone (another BB) can! A good sign of crap is that no one can pull it off against good people.

I measure my success fighting and sparring against myself.. If I get better then I have achieved something.. Others who work security may have lived a little longer due to their skills and yet again this means nothing and is BS unless they post a video of themselves fighting someone you specify..

You can only measure your progress in fighting (developing fighting skills) by fighting with better and better people.

So what’s your point?

If you can’t use your WCK to whip Tito Ortiz’s butt then I think you suck and have your head up your butt…

My point is that if you’ve spent years or decades, training something that you can’t make work against someone with decent fighting skills, then something is wrong, very very, wrong. And if you beleive it is good, then the evidence of it working against good people should be easy to find or produce.

The point is that YOU are the one with the audacity and presumption to tell everyone one what they do is BS.. So you know better.. So I say PROVE YOU KNOW BETTER AND SHOW US!!! If you can’t show us then I say you are full of schit..

I can very easily prove I know better. Go visit a good MMA gym and spar with them at 100% and tape it. There’s your proof. You’ll see that what you train to do, what you talk about doing, you won’t be able to do. See, I can show you. You just don’t want to see.

If I showed what I can do, you’d just say, “OK, maybe he can do that, but it doesn’t mean what I do is wrong.” And that would be exactly right. My doing something else doesn’t prove what you do is wrong. The only way for you to know about what you do is to see for yourself. But sparring (light sparring) with poorly skilled people won’t show it to you.

You think occupying the line, starting on the line is useless… If you don’t start on the line then you must move to the line.. This allows the opponent to take the line first.. Once that happens you are playing catch up in terms of occupying the line… There is no problem starting on the line if you are filling space with structure but I don’t think you use any of these things, from the most basic to the most complex in the method..

This is not how fighting really works. You’d be much better off to stop thinking in terms of lines. You’d be much better off thinking in terms of are my hands in a place to do the things I will need them to do. Holding an extended arm out there will not permit you to do the things you will find that you really need to do in fighting.

You probably look like a half assed kick boxer… And btw many of the ‘proven’ methods taught in boxing are only viable because they have GIANT gloves on… Many of the moves used in boxing become next to useless when you are bare fisted, such as taking hits on gloves, catching punches–go take your fist, put it on your head and let someone hit you…and see how you feel..

I don’t think you know much about boxing either. Boxing skills work on the street, in the gym, where ever. The tactics – how you use those skills – change based on the situation.

The reason the positions in WCK are not like those used in boxing is because absorbing shots on your hands, that are placed next to your face is not functional without those big old pads on…in fact its pretty stupid. Look at the positions used in the old days of bare fisted boxing and whoaaaaa we see guys with and extended guard… But HEY they didn’t fight those bad boys you do so…

The hands are up for protection, yes – and it does work on the street, btw – but also to facilitate body mechanics, close off openings, find angles, etc. People did do lots of thigns in the good old days, not because they were better but becaue they hadn’t learned better yet.

Spar with those big old gloves on and you won’t be able to use the small spaces WCK was designed to use, you will loose dexterity in your hands, you will have no structure to speak of using some half assed peek-a-boo guard and rely on your gloves to absorb blows… This kind of stuff completely leaves behind the method of WCK..

How do you know what “WCK was designed for”? How do you even know it was designed in the first place? More theory.

Go spar some really good boxers without gloves and test your theory. When you wake up, have them tell you what happened. :wink:

Where is the WCK in your WCK?

Even the question reveals you don’t get it. Who would ask “where is the boxing in your boxing”? If you are using the tools/skills of the method (in question) in fighting, you are doing it, either boxing or WCK. Your level, your skill, your understanding, depend upon the level you can do it. Does really bad boxing work? Sure, it can. Against really bad people. How do you know it is good boxing? Because it works against really good people.

Moreover you failed to provide the location of your school, if you even have one, so that folks can come check you out.. You did not appear at the sparring event which, once and for all would clear up the question of walking the walk, and you refuse to show us the RIGHT way which only you claim to ‘understand’ because of your mythical experience..

Only listen to those who can walk the walk yet we have no evidence that you have learned to crawl with WCK let alone walk

I live in St. Louis and I’m in the book. I don’t have a “school”; we have a small group of guys that train WCK together. And some of us crosstrain too. If you want to visit, you’re welcome. I’ve had a few visitors over the years.

[QUOTE=YungChun;783303]You don’t show anyone jack schit.. You just tell every one they’re full of it unless THEY post vids… YOU are a Hypocrite.. [/QUOTE]

Pretty much everything T posts about can be seen performed by athletes against other athletes in competitive settings. You can find just about everything he espouses on You Tube. There is no reason for him to post personal videos of himself when you can find better examples done by professional fighters.

For those of you arguing counterpoints to his arguments, just point out the videos of good fighters doing what you are claiming can be done. You don’t necessarily have to post videos of yourselves.

It’s pointless.. You two will never get it…

It’s too easy to refute here your written statements Terence, no point doing it anymore…

It’s easy to believe I can do it.. Whatever IT is.. Just imagine me doing it on scrubs…

See now it’s real easy to believe…

Even if folks posted said videos they would be labeled exceptions for whatever reasons.. Most TMA folks are hobbyists.. Most TMA are thought to exist for same so you don’t get to see thousands of MMA types training in them at that level.. Maybe if you did you would see changes and new tactics from those arts in MMA but that isn’t the case…yet.

These hobbyists may well spar hard but sadly they are not up to your elite standards because they are not sparring the right people, the folks who are proven…

You label everything to suit your theory Terence, okidoki…

Modern Boxing is what it is based largely on the fact that folks wear these giant gloves, have them take them off and the whole sport would change, no question… Very likely it would again reflect some of the older elements of the sport when it was bare fisted… A block consisting of a hand/fist placed in front of your face/on your head/face is good… Okidoki…

Fists are better than open hands, retracted structure is better than advanced structure…okidoki

Modern combative research says otherwise but… Terence has straightened us out… He is the all knowing all seeing, yet, invisible WCK man from reality with an antigravity YGKYM from no form..

Wing Chun techniques are BS… But he does WCK… Whatever WCK is when you take away all the training, forms, techniques and training/fighting concepts.. Whatever WCK is we can’t define it but Terence does it…and we can’t because we are fighting scrubs.. Okidoki… We fight who we fight, we improve depending one how often and how dedicated we are.. Not good enough though so we all suk… Okidoki…

Centerline is meaningless, don’t think of lines… Forget the most basic tenant of the method… Controlling the center.. The method without the method, but you have the TRUE structure.. To me it’s a load of BS…

Terence is riddled with contradictions, he does WCK but doesn’t follow any of the elements within the method except his magic antigravity biped stance which came from a form he doesn’t do. He invites folks to come check him out but has no address.. I have no doubt that Dale knows that biped thing is a load of BS… Yet we are supposed to take this guy seriously ..okidoki

I have no intention of being the next Bruce Lee.. Or whoever.. When I was younger I would have challenged you to a fight if we were face to face and I would have trained for it..

These days I could give a crap less.. and I am not in the shape I was when I was hell bent for combat.. I know that I have improved and I was happy with what the system/training/method did for me–it allowed me to stop getting my ass kicked by scrubs… Not a great feat but good enough for my meager goals..

There are others who worked in Prisons and in Security that feel the same way.. But our thinking is flawed, we are immersed in the folly of theory…because we don’t fight the right people…okidoki..

It’s cool, you go and do your thing, which seems to mainly involve posting insults here. Meanwhile the rest of us will continue to enjoy our training, and improve to the best of our limited abilities.. No we won’t be fighting in the next UFC but we may just and continue to cultivate a modicum of skill and be happy with it…

Happy training Terence, whatever that means to you…