Oh boy 
(warning, this reply might seem sarcastic or mean, but don’t take it that way… i’m just very apprehensive right now so it’s coming out in my response
)
the reason i dont like weights, is because i have seen, read and heard that they are not good for you.
Hmm, I’ve read that steroids cause cancer, but that doesn’t mean it’s true.
They can seriously mess up the body in later life.
They can seriously mess up the body right now if you drop a heavy one on your head 
Plus our treasured ancestors never used weights to develop their bodies, so why should we?
Do you mean kung fu ancestors? How about iron rings or 108lb kwan daos? How about all the training they do in the movies where they carry big buckets of water long distances? The reason they used buckets of water is because they didn’t have dumbells 
I have a bit of tone already, but i dont want to go above it. I dont want to look anything like a body builder, and i dont want huge biceps.
Don’t worry about getting big. Most people don’t even have the genetic potential to get big in the first place. Your tone is because of low bodyfat.
Bruce lee, was a man i both respected yet disliked. I never liked that he had muscles, it goes against traditional martial arts.
Uh… having [developed] muscles is against traditional martial arts? I’d rather “have muscles” than look like one of these fat ass mcdojo blackbelts.
Listen, it’s like this. If you develop muscles, and your bodyfat is low enough, you will see them. If you develop muscles, and you have a high bodyfat percentage, you will not see them. If you have no muscles AND a low bodyfat percentage, you will look like a twig.
You will never see or hear of proper martial artists having bleeding muscles, yet he did.
Bleeding muscles? Can you clarify? Do you just mean like big, visible muscles? Have a look a sifu Allen. This guy has huge muscles and he’s pretty “traditional” from what I hear.
The reason Bruce Lee’s muscles were so visible is because he had a very low bodyfat percentage. In fact, I would say that his level of bodyfat was unhealthily low… his muscles were not “big” by any stretch of the imagination, they were just very visible because of his low bodyfat.
Kumkuat said It’s probably becaseu Bruce had a low bodyfat %.
That’s absolutely correct 
He also said: Then don’t work biceps
Yeah, but don’t neglect them to the point where they become a weak link. If you’re going to work out one muscle you might as well work out everything. Just don’t do bicep exercises for mass and you’ll be ok.
inic said:
think u’ve watch matrix or anime too much. theres no physical way to get a lot stronger without gaining size… it is true though that strength is the DENSITY of the muscle, NOT SIZE! which explains why a little guy like me uses same weights as someone twice his size.
I think you’re on the right track here… if you are a total beginner any workout you do will put on some mass… however, once you get to a point you will not gain any more size or weight but your strength will continue to improve. Note, however, that this point is far below being considered “big”
they excercised 24/7 and were probably in better shape than most people today… they couldnt get instant dinners or sit and watch the tele. they were all strong, but still had the body to show it!
Yeah, people from then were probably in better physical shape due to their lifestyle, but we have better food and nutrition and medicine. Most of them probably had athletic bodies, except for the people who had fat genes.
Finally, to anyone worried about getting “too big” from lifting weights, I doubt you eat enough to get big anyway, so stop complaining
[ /rant ]
Sorry, I told you I was in a crazy mood. Hope no one took offence.
IronFist