Attacking me does not negate the premise of this thread.
I don’t attend seminar-after-seminar, class-after-class, meeting-after-meeting, read book-after-book, article-after-article…and yes, get involved in thread-after-thread…
devoted to wing chun history.
Which is what many people can’t seem to get enough of.
And the lineage and politics discussions and debates have grown very old - so I try to avoid them as much as possible at this point.
My primary interest has always been either actually doing, (ie.- as in training), or discussing various fighting methods, training methods, strategies, principles, and techniques THAT WORK under pressure.
And the premise of this thread is that if you call yourself a wing chun man and you’re spending a great deal of your time still doing the history and politics thing as we approach 2009…
seminars, classes, books, articles, discussions, meetings, debates, etc…
you’re helping wing chun become antiquated and irrelevant. There’s really no getting around that fact anymore. For anybody. Regardless of what lineage they come from. Or what is the history (or supposed history) of that lineage…or anything else…the politics of who’s-who, or the alleged unbeatable quality of the wing chun method in question, etc.
Because wing chun is being left behind. The martial arts world has taken a giant leap forward within the last 15 years or so - and wing chun, for the most part, is watching from the sidelines.
Why?
Because instead of spending most of their time pressure testing to find out what wing chun works and what doesn’t - people are engaging in history lessons and trying to figure out (and shuffle) the politics of who’s who.