from Fu Ragz neijia forum
Hereās perhaps my favorite Brent Carey post, probably because he puts things more eloquently then I could hope and of course he agreeās with me. I think alot of times we tend to gravitate or agree with posters on here with similiar ideas:
"Brent Carey
Member
Posts: 19
(9/24/02 6:08:33 am)
Reply Re: 5 elements
tcsoldier wrote:
Quote:
Perhaps Im too novice to this subject to understand this question. To me yin/yang theory, 5 element theory are just ways to understand things. The whole world could be dissected with these theories, does it help you understand taiji better? Iām not sure. My guess would be it makes no difference.
This is one of the truest statements regarding traditional Chinese principles, that I have seen in a long time. The same statement could be made of western scientific principles. They are only models used to approximately describe our surroundings.
So, it doesnāt matter which model we use to describe phenomena; it doesnāt change the observable phenomena themselves. What we have to understand is that language is a relatively crude tool, suitable for describing simple principles, but which falls apart when we want to describe something more complex - like quantum mechanics, nirvana, or the taste of cheesecake.
So, to bridge the gap between more complex phenomena and the spoken/written language, we use metaphors, analogies, and logical models. Examples include Newtons laws of motion, 5 element theory, qi/reservoirs/meridians, etc.
None of these models holds up to unlimited scrutiny. Like all analogies, they break down at some point. So, I find it amusing when western physicians dismiss traditional Chinese medicine based on the lack of evidence of physical meridians in the human body, and their lack of coincidence with other known systems. When the western model of physiological understanding is able to diagnose and treat all disorders, and explain all medical phenomena, I will concede bragging rights.
So until someone comes up with a complete explanation that does not fall apart at some point in our scrutiny and practice, then we need to make a clear distinction between the theoretical description and its practical applications.
Do these theories help us understand martial arts any better? I contend that they do. These theories form a logical bridge between fundamental reality and meaningful practice. Let me give an example.
When hitting a golf ball, players are taught to follow through in a full circle. In reality, all motion about an inch past the tee is irrelevant. However, in practice, by focusing on the complete motion, we make subtle adjustments to alignment and power that would fall apart if we stopped immediately after striking the ball. In practice, these subtle principles are too complicated to bother explaining and thinking about.
So, even though we can examine the golf stroke and say that the last half of the stroke appears to be just for show, tradition, or whatever, we can see its practical effects when we take the time to get the complete stroke right.
This may seem like a tangential issue, but it really isnāt. A fundamental principle of the golf stroke is this complete circle. We donāt bother questioning this principle even though it is not strictly necessary. It is possible to hit the ball quite well using a completely unorthodox stroke. The full circle is just a convenient way to describe the golf stroke so that everything the needs to happen is more likely to happen as it should.
This is true of the traditional Chinese principles we are talking about. For example, does qi exists as some mystical force that has no parallel in Western science? I think not. It is just a convenient way of thinking about energy in the human body. If we think about qi in a traditional way and apply it with traditional means, we get the effects promised. You could also describe the same principles in western terms to a student, and get the same effects. It is just that the traditional terminology and metaphors provide a convenient and more direct description, since the effect and its description are often closely related.
-B "