Not purposefully stepping on anyone’s foots, i can see there are some serious differences based on appearance between the three lineages. good to see. or CLF would really be boring.
[QUOTE=CLFNole;1127094]XJ:
Out of curiousity what do you focus on in your training these days. I am not sure your age but I was curious your approach to CLF as we age (I know you are not that old but can guess you don’t train now the way you did in your 20s or 30s).[/QUOTE]
Hi CLFNole,
I am in my mid-60s now so I don’t focus on fighting any more, I train mainly for health, vigor and longevity these days, with my wife being 18 years younger I have to keep it up! 
All the external forms can be done in an internal way and all the internal forms can be done in a lian-kung way and not lian-kuen way like when we are young. The focus for me now is on chi-circulation and not chi-utilization - saving my chi instead of spending it like there is no tomorrow.
I also pay more attentions to my diet instead of just exercising thinks it will burn the fat away. I was quite happy the other day when someone I met for the first time thought I was in my early 50s.
[QUOTE=CLFNole;1127092]The way that sifu moves reminds me of how our lineage looks different from the Chan Family/King Mui line. We come from the Chan Koon Pak tree as does Peng Sifu but both have different flavor from the source.
I have a feeling there was some change when CLF moved to Guangdong.[/QUOTE]
I think you mean Guangzhou the city, King Mui is in Guangdong the province as well.
[QUOTE=extrajoseph;1127153]Hi CLFNole,
I am in my mid-60s now so I don’t focus on fighting any more, I train mainly for health, vigor and longevity these days, with my wife being 18 years younger I have to keep it up! :D[/QUOTE]
You go man!!!
I am in my mid-60s now so I don’t focus on fighting any more, I train mainly for health, vigor and longevity these days, with my wife being 18 years younger I have to keep it up
with that lifetime supply of the blue superman pill im sure he will.
[QUOTE=extrajoseph;1127154]I think you mean Guangzhou the city, King Mui is in Guangdong the province as well.[/QUOTE]
Yes I realized that last night after I put that in. I always confuse the whole city and county concept. Maybe I am wrong but I think Poon Dik’s schools in China were in Guangzhou but not sure. Was Pang Sifu’s other sifu from Guangzhou?
Yes, Ou Han-Quan is very famous in Guangzhou
1936“”“”“”1979
Ex-Head Coach of the Guangdong Wushu team, Chan Cheung-Mian is also his student, and so is Dong Dek-Quong, secretary of the Guangdong Wushu Association. He produced many champions as well.
[QUOTE=hskwarrior;1127262]with that lifetime supply of the blue superman pill im sure he will.[/QUOTE]
Frank, Don’t need any blue pills to be a superman when I can practice the CLF Chao Taik Kung. Now I bet you don’t know this set either.
Frank, Don’t need any blue pills to be a superman when I can practice the CLF Chao Taik Kung. Now I bet you don’t know this set either.
ya need to wake up from fantasy land. I’ve told you already, name any chan family form and i’ll tell you again fut san hung sing does not practice one single form of the chan family. at all.
I bet you don’t know any Fut San Hung Sing forms as passed down within our lineage.
secretary of the Guangdong Wushu Association. He produced many champions as well.
Forms Champs…yeah that does good for the face of gung fu.
They have San Da now and Guangzhou CLF is not doing too badly. Puen Tong CLF in Guangzhou has all the hot heads, you should check them out.
They have San Da now and Guangzhou CLF is not doing too badly. Puen Tong CLF in Guangzhou has all the hot heads, you should check them out.
thanks but no thanks. I’ll stick to my Fut San Hung Sing CLF. thanks.
[QUOTE=hskwarrior;1127275]ya need to wake up from fantasy land. I’ve told you already, name any chan family form and i’ll tell you again fut san hung sing does not practice one single form of the chan family. at all.
[/QUOTE]
That is because you lot don’t do CLF, you lot do Fut Gar Hung Sing, nothing to do with CLF at all, so stop using the name CLF, you wannabe.
That is because you lot don’t do CLF, you lot do Fut Gar Hung Sing, nothing to do with CLF at all, so stop using the name CLF, you wannabe.
Exactly. people from the chan family branches have indeed said that what the fut san hung sing kwoon practices is not CLF. So, i agree with you, we do Hung Sing Kuen.
You also have Fut San Hung Sing Kuen within your Chan Clan stuff as Jeung Yim and Chan Heung spent time together in HK in the 1860’s. So maybe you are wannabe Hung Sing. you DID try to steal Jeung Yim’s teacher Ching Cho. :rolleyes:
[QUOTE=hskwarrior;1127289] So maybe you are wannabe Hung Sing. you DID try to steal Jeung Yim’s teacher Ching Cho. :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
How can one steal something that does not exist?:eek:
How can one steal something that does not exist?
See who you flip flop. first Ching Cho didn’t exist. then he did but only as Choy Fook, and now that there is SOOOO much info on monk Ching Cho out there to prove he wasn’t Choy Fook at all we’re back to he didn’t exist again. i truly have a blast at reading things once denied by non hung sing people only to see certain things suddenly blended into their accounts and promoted as truth. LMAO. i really do.
So what did your Ching Cho passed down that is not CLF?
So what did your Ching Cho passed down that is not CLF
Why do you ask? you wouldn’t have it in your material. I know what he passed down and what sets you can find them in. I know what i practice section by section can be found in Fut Gar Kuen- not chan family. you can live in your own fantasy world and pass down what ever you think you know in regards to my lineages history. OUR lineage knows you’re full of it.
also, if i mentioned it, you’re only gonna lie and say it was created by chan heung. why you wanna lie…IDK. i think thats pretty shady if you ask me. but keep telling everyone that chan heung created every single form…even the ones that are adding onto the 200+ mark.
And you know whats funny? i’ve taught a few Chan Fam people our stuff. they too thought there were no differences until they practiced it for a few months. then they came to me and say “you know, you’re right, this is not the same. it doesn’t even feel the same”.
So the bottom line is there is no Ching Cho difference you can speak of. Just as I thought.
So the bottom line is there is no Ching Cho difference you can speak of. Just as I thought.
I’ll let you tell it. you are the one in doubt. LOL
So, let me ask you a question. are you saying the monk ching cho is purely a made up character of the Fut San Hung Sing Kwoon? be honest.
[QUOTE=hskwarrior;1127331]
So, let me ask you a question. are you saying the monk ching cho is purely a made up character of the Fut San Hung Sing Kwoon? be honest.[/QUOTE]
Frank,
I’ll be honest with you, it is NOT made up by the Futsan Hung Sing Kwoon, it is made up by Chan Kam-Fa and his Sifu, if you look at the titles of contributers/organisations at the end this article claiming Jeung Yim taught Chan Heung stuff he learned from Ching Cho. Futsan Hung Sing Kwoon deliberately did not put their name there, they know it is not true:
http://www.hongshengguan.com/Item/25.aspx
: