I still remember that I jointed in the university students protest in Washington D.C. in front of the white house back in 1971. We had 15 students from the University of Kansas at Lawrence. Our slogan was, “, Remove internal traitor and resist the outside power.” When asked who was the “internal traitor”, we were all treated as anti-Taiwan government left wing bad guys.
I always wonder at the level of intelligence of people who riot, destroy property, always blaming “the other”, etc., for the sake of nationalistic or religious fervor. Such people are very easy to manipulate, like cattle. Would most of them even know or care about these islands if it wasn’t pushed in the news?
If Chinese flags and businesses were being defaced in any country in the world, for any reason, the PRC government would be complaining and threatening over it.
Yes, this is causing a lot of tension in Asia, and could cause a lot more. I wouldn’t rely only on the BBC for news on this one though, since this BBC article appears to have a pro-Japan bias and doesn’t look at the history of the islands at all. Although I’m not a historian, I’d look at multiple news sources around the world to consider this issue.
[QUOTE=Sima Rong;1188035]Yes, this is causing a lot of tension in Asia, and could cause a lot more. I wouldn’t rely only on the BBC for news on this one though, since this BBC article appears to have a pro-Japan bias and doesn’t look at the history of the islands at all. Although I’m not a historian, I’d look at multiple news sources around the world to consider this issue.[/QUOTE]
Do you have any other news agencies you’d recommend? Preferably in English.
I normally go to BBC for my “impartial” world news source.
In my opinion, the Chinese and the Japanese have never really resolved the issues of the Japanese occupation of China from 1931 invasion to 1945 end of WW2.
I think there are still a lot of Chinese who hold a lot of resentment towards the Japanese in general because of this persistence of memory.
The islands just seem to be the valve or the release of all the pent up hatred and distrust of the Japanese. I keep hearing about the occupation years in context to the feelings being vented due to this story.
I want to know, are those the Islands from Enter the Dragon?
[QUOTE=Empty_Cup;1188058]Do you have any other news agencies you’d recommend? Preferably in English.
I normally go to BBC for my “impartial” world news source.[/QUOTE]
for some things a good place to try and find another source is:
here is the al jazeera cover on that story:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/inpictures/2012/09/2012917946448723.html
definately some powerful images
BBC impartial?
nope.
there is no such thing as an impartial news agency. You want impartial? You gotta dig and you gotta decide from alternate viewpoints where the truth sits by your own reckoning.
Recognize that ALL news media outlets are propaganda for the system which they serve.
I would listen to Scandinavian news outlets if I wanted as close to impartial from a news agency, but those were cancelled in Canada. they had one great show called “overnight” and it was broadcast from Holland. Real news stories and different angles.
I guess our government got uncomfortable with our government propaganda station broadcasting contrary viewpoints to the night owls that would stay up to listen.
Anyway, these days, believe nothing, question everything or let your political inclinations go entirely. It’s hard just to keep track of who’s lying these days!
[QUOTE=David Jamieson;1188063]In my opinion, the Chinese and the Japanese have never really resolved the issues of the Japanese occupation of China from 1931 invasion to 1945 end of WW2.[/QUOTE]
The Chinese Japanese conflict started much early than that. It starts from the (Jia Wu) War.
[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1188172]The Chinese Japanese conflict started much early than that. It starts from the (Jia Wu) War.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aptPGHYcldo[/QUOTE]
Not familiar with that. Time period?
That was 1894. China loss Taiwan to Japan. The movie clip that I put up was how the native Taiwanese fought against Japanese occupied soldiers. The Japanese soldiers used chemical weapon to kill Taiwanese.
All my life, I had refused to teach any Japanese students. It almost got me in trouble in my university informal class.
Nisshin sens?First Sino-Japanese War1894
The Sino-Japanese war, war in Japan known as the Nissin (Japanese: the date the price of war/ Nisshin Sens ?), commonly known as the first Sino-Japanese war (First Sino-Japanese War), refers to the great Qing Empire and Japan between Empire, fighting for control over the outbreak of a war on the Korean peninsula. 1894 (Guangxu 20 years) according to the Chinese in Chinese era calendar, year of the Sino-Japanese war years when, it is known as the Sino-Japanese war. Battle of Pung is a sign of the outbreak of the war. Eventually, the Qing Government was defeated, and Japan signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki.
[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1188174]That was 1894. China loss Taiwan to Japan. The movie clip that I put up was how the native Taiwanese fought against Japanese occupied soldiers. The Japanese soldiers used chemical weapon to kill Taiwanese.
All my life, I had refused to teach any Japanese students. It almost got me in trouble in my university informal class.
Nisshin sens?First Sino-Japanese War1894
The Sino-Japanese war, war in Japan known as the Nissin (Japanese: the date the price of war/ Nisshin Sens ?), commonly known as the first Sino-Japanese war (First Sino-Japanese War), refers to the great Qing Empire and Japan between Empire, fighting for control over the outbreak of a war on the Korean peninsula. 1894 (Guangxu 20 years) according to the Chinese in Chinese era calendar, year of the Sino-Japanese war years when, it is known as the Sino-Japanese war. Battle of Pung is a sign of the outbreak of the war. Eventually, the Qing Government was defeated, and Japan signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki.[/QUOTE]
Who you teach is your choice, but NO nation has a “clean” history. If you blame every Japanese person for what Japanese military forces did decades ago, you are blaming someone who had nothing at all to do with it. I’ve met some Tibetan people who hate Chinese for actions that happened in the 1950s.
[QUOTE=David Jamieson;1188166]BBC impartial?
nope.
[/QUOTE]
The BBC has a marked anti-China bias. It’s as obvious as the China Daily’s pro-China bias. Seriously. I used to read both and split the difference to find out what was really happening in China.
Ok, so maybe I’m using some invective… but you get my point.
Anyway, from what I can tell, the Chinese claim is slightly stronger than the Japanese claim but not by much. Basically it boils down to Chinese sources since the 1500s calling it China and Japanese sources since the 1850s calling it Japan. Oh and ONE PRC source from the 1960s which might be a forgery calls it Japan and ONE Japanese map from the 1700s calls it China.
I think in the end everybody needs to CHILL THE **** OUT and LEAVE THE **** ROCKS ALONE.
[QUOTE=David Jamieson;1188166]BBC impartial?
nope.
there is no such thing as an impartial news agency. You want impartial? You gotta dig and you gotta decide from alternate viewpoints where the truth sits by your own reckoning.
Recognize that ALL news media outlets are propaganda for the system which they serve.
Anyway, these days, believe nothing, question everything or let your political inclinations go entirely. It’s hard just to keep track of who’s lying these days![/QUOTE]
Yes, exactly. It’s enough to make you los your faith in humanity, like this baby:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/newborn-loses-faith-in-humanity-after-record-6-day,29588/
[QUOTE=David Jamieson;1188166]BBC impartial?
nope.
there is no such thing as an impartial news agency. You want impartial? You gotta dig and you gotta decide from alternate viewpoints where the truth sits by your own reckoning.
Recognize that ALL news media outlets are propaganda for the system which they serve.
Anyway, these days, believe nothing, question everything or let your political inclinations go entirely. It’s hard just to keep track of who’s lying these days![/QUOTE]
Yes, exactly. It’s enough to make you lose your faith in humanity, like this baby:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/newborn-loses-faith-in-humanity-after-record-6-day,29588/
[QUOTE=Sima Rong;1188212]Yes, exactly. It’s enough to make you lose your faith in humanity, like this baby:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/newborn-loses-faith-in-humanity-after-record-6-day,29588/[/QUOTE]
Ah the onion. Keeping it fresh for quite a while now. lol
The Chinese claim on the islands is incredibly weak.
The only support the Chinese media can find is the fact that Chinese sailors mapped it hundreds of years ago.
Japan claimed it during its annexation of Okinawa. In fact, there were no people living there or using it before the Japanese annexation. Of course, in those days, China claimed “sovereignty” over any tribute nation.
The US actually offered China the chance to retake control of the islands at the conclusion of WW2 but China declined. Of course, China also never repaid its debts or even showed any sort of gratitude to the American volunteers who helped to fight the Japanese in China, so I don’t see any reason to cut China any slack on this issue.
John Wang…that sort of attitude works well when you are back in China, but you are not there anymore.
[QUOTE=pazman;1188299]John Wang…that sort of attitude works well when you are back in China, but you are not there anymore.[/QUOTE]
When Japanese bombs killed your people, where you live won’t change your attitude.