remember something,
where did the chinese government the information to compile such a history?
when they wanted to know about the chan heung family line did they go to? the chan family right?
when they wanted to know about the history of the hung sing kwoon who did they get their information from?
in 2005, the chinese government just now is putting together a history of their martial arts.??? almost 200 years later?
of course there’s no mention of the green grass monk.
but ej, how do you explain the official website of the chan family and on one of the front pages it strictly says that choy fook was the green grass monk? Are you telling me you will believe the government who was the one who put the ban on gung gu in those days somehow kept all of the history books when they were supposed to be destroyed because of the gung fu ban?
fu pow, you’re are a joke, and so is joseph, because if he was so secure in his history he wouldn’t even be trying to prove me wrong?
if you people don’t realize that much of gung fu history was lost due to that gung fu ban and instant death for anyone caught disobeying government law its not my fault you’re lost.
this new government document thing is a current thing and has nothing to do with actual history. it is all part of the current government trying to resurge their lost national treasure, and in doing so they are as equally lost as we are and can do no better than you or me. the information had to come from somewhere. information about the clf style isn’t just floating around like dust particles waiting to land on someones shoulders.
this new information is a mock up of what once was. now, ej says that jeong yim opened up the fut san hsk in 1851, but how about it saying that it only “Organized” it in 1851 since their were so many hung sing schools in fut san. if most of you non hsk people didn’t know, the fut san hsk wasn’t just one school teaching the hung sing clf. there were multiple schools in fut san. so they only organized it in 1851. still doesn’t prove me wrong yet.
see, i have never engaged anyone on how much i’ve researched our history. but check this out, the only way for the government to know that there is a historical rift between the chan and hung sing branches is because it came from the chan family. the reason why i know, if you ever go to the fut san hsk, there are “NO” pictures or likenesses of chan heung in this or any hung sing kwoon. how would you explain that dear brother ej?
i can’t stop laughing at you guys who are so desparate to keep chan heung the only founder. look at ej, because of me “he” keeps up his research as well. EJ, and the rest i would like to say, “you owe it to me!”
the government is trying to rekindle what they lost. in the process they are trying to get together as much information as possible to present it for posterity.
I truly wish most of you would just take some time and research what china was like from the early 1800’s into almost the 1990’s. whaty about fa lun gong, the chinese government because they are afraid of it because it has such a great great following.
if you guys are going to believe joseph, without knowing the whole picture in the first place, you are only getting a glimpse of it all. and if you guys are satisified with what you currently believe, thats fine you can believe a government who is desparate to rekindle their national treasure, something they helped to destroy long ago. they had to get their info from somewhere, right? i just wonder who they got it from?
