“The story I heard is the CMC diluted the YCF form a lot more so it is a lot more health oriented. The reason was that people were concentrating the fighting aspects of it too much, that they didn’t focus on developing internal jin. So he said to screw with fighting applications now, lets focus on getting our jin developed with his form. That’s the story I heard”
I don’t know about more health oriented since I feel that most TC styles practiced will tend to improve ones heath if not done to the extreme.
My own back ground is was with the TC style taught by the Tung family ( yang 108) also some short fast sets developed by them. This is before coming into the CMC style many yrs ago.
I prefer the CMC style and ideas.. works makes sense to me.
My belief at this time runs a little counter to the popular belief that things where made easier. Actually I think he made it harder by really insisting on focusing on what he perceived to be the essences of TC.
The confusion and I think this happens with many TC styles is what people see is not always how it is done.
Every one talks of the founding Chen style, and how every thing seems to be a dilution of the idea from there, what if it was the other way around and all the other styles are improvements or maybe a more direct reflection of what some have found.
What looks simple is not so simple.
sorry if this is off the main topic just found it intersting ![]()