Boxers are petty internal fighters

Sui -
My old friend, so glad to see you again. Say, you wouldn’t have an apple or two for the big guy? I think he might be hungry. Tell me, can you make Chi Balls of fire? I can’t seem to figure out how, without burning my underwear.

Sui, I’m still in the dark about this “internal” power stuff, but if you could do it, could you do it pouring tea? Making love? And therefore, doing just about anything? How deep does it reach into a persons being? Maybe I’m off track…but I’m not talking about “spiritualism”. Or, maybe???

7 Star -
In Sui’s post, I believe he said, “Chi Sau Wing Chun Boxing” not simply “Boxing”.

Tigrentera -
I like your baloon anology - there is certainly a lot of value in the observation. But, I’d like to add that what makes a lot of people think internal strength is “weak” is the lack of brutal intent. The baloon covers physical characteristics well, but not the all important psychological aspect. Maybe people that can do this kind of stuff have a more balanced character, and people just don’t ever get a taste of their “yang” side?

Hey Mate, have you got a trick for making “Chi balls of fire?” Everybody seems to know how to do this but me, and I’m getting really pizzed off!!!

Originally posted by Sui
not bad,not bad at all.see if yum can equate,little point on the coil of the pole.

Ahhhhh! A riddle? Little point on the coil of the pole - small enough for a wee nest where the Phoenix lives?

Goodness Gracious, great Chi balls of FIRE!

LOL!

Originally posted by Tigrentera
Until you have crossed hands with a high level internal practitioner you cannot know the difference between external and internal ways of fighting.

I’ve crossed with internal guys - dunno what caliber they were as compared to other IMA guys though, and I’ve met Dr. Yang jwing ming, so I’ve at least seen it, if nothing else.

You cannot divine the difference simply by observation. You can’t say Muhammed Ali “looks” internal because “internal” means inside where you cannot see it. By their very nature internal arts are “esoteric” meaning only the “initiated” can understand them and apply them.

I’ll give you that, as I’m not an internal guy. There is an accomplished internal practitioner on this forum named shooter, whose taiji guys compete in local mma events. he has stated that judo guys use peng and other energies characteristic of internal arts.

The point of stating this is not to exclude people or make other people feel like there fighting art is not sufficient.

No worries there…

[b]So how are internal arts physically different?

To use an analogy, high level internal makes your body like a huge water balloon (we are something like 90% water after all.) But its not quite that simple. In addition, it is like a water balloon that can alter the tension of its own skin. So in one instant your body can be like a plastic bag filled with water (low pressure) and in the next second it is a raquetball filled with water (high pressure).

When your body is like a plastic bag you absorb any incoming force. Your opponent cannot find your center because as soon as thinks he’s found it, it changes.

When your body is like an inflated raquetball it is hard and if someone pushed on you they would spin the ball to the side and deflect the force.

So in internal arts you are constantly confusing your opponent. You can feel him but he can’t feel you. You suddenly feel solid but as soon as he pushes against that solidness he realizes that it wasn’t solid at all. The harder he pushes on one side of “the ball” the harder the other side comes flying at him.[/b]

Once again, I encourage you to roll with a high ranking bjj guy. This is no different from them…

I hope my analogy is making sense.

It was an excellent analogy.

[b]In so called external arts your body is more like a tether ball. Your spine is the pole and your arms are like ropes, your fists the ball.

But in addition you can change the tension, elasticity and length of the ropes.

You generate power by pushing from the ground.

This twists the “pole” the pole drives the “ropes.”
You can generate more power by suddenly changing the length, elasticity and tension of the ropes.

If you start the rope long and loose and then stiffen and contract it as you twist the pole you can generate huge speed on the “balls.”

Of course, there are over 300 styles of kung fu. I am simply comparing the two that I know.[/b]

Sticking with a boxer, where do you see the internal quality? rooting? coiling? add the internal aspects you see to the external example you just gave.

Oh no, sui is back and the apples are out for the Donkey King. Hi Yum Cha things are well with me thanks! C.Park is all good im doing lots of meditation and internal work there on night shift,

My question is not that boxing is REALLY internal like the Chinese martial arts of taji etc but a good boxer is relaxed and when people are relaxed chi or energy flows well. They can K’O people with a jab and this shows that they have co-ordiation or luk hup as well, in ways.

In internal kung fu is to hit and not make them go backwards but to hurt the inside without much or no external force.

Yum Cha,

Some times the body shape and postures of our choosen style is too external and isnt really internal striking at all. The P/EYE ill hurt anyone so thats a bonus but still not internal enough for my liking! Im on a mission my friend see u all in a few EONS!:wink:

Jon,

Hows Ho sifu hows your bagua and taiji going?

ft

:slight_smile:

Originally posted by fiercest tiger
They can K’O people with a jab and this shows that they have co-ordiation or luk hup as well, in ways.

I’ve done that in the ring before.

In internal kung fu is to hit and not make them go backwards but to hurt the inside without much or no external force.

I’ve seen good strikers who don’t move a bag backward when they hit it - it just folds in half. Is this the same thing?

This is more along the lines of what I’m looking to have answered - what do you think separates an external guy from an internal guy in terms of power generation, movement, etc.?

seven star

Hi,

The difference is meditation and hei gung. Cultivating the chi is what makes u internal!

FT

hi yum yes long time but no time is where we live when contacted has already been established.
well in the dark you will stay(which isn’t a bad place)poetry is where you’ll find light amongst the grey.
internal,external power?lol

1.“When your body is like a plastic bag you absorb any incoming force. Your opponent cannot find your center because as soon as thinks he’s found it, it changes.”

this is the clue about the point to what apple is there for you(coil)

2.“In so called external arts your body is more like a tether ball. Your spine is the pole and your arms are like ropes, your fists the ball.”

so how does this equate yum?yes they’re only theolgy,however to lead to the so called fire balls you must feel the ying/yang balls,but there is something to lighting f@rts(more than you know)lol tigrentera’s anology is that of a so called text theory but he does say "Until you have crossed hands with a high level internal practitioner you cannot know the difference between external and internal ways of fighting. " so the experience has been mentioned.

i would of explained much more simplar to tigrentera’s but never the less not bad.

f.t you wrote boxers are pretty internal fighters,its the title.lol stop grasping at whats not really there.i am simply answering yums question

“Is there anything that is unquestionably NOT internal(fighting)?”

where no-one seemed to want to go there,as i trood carfully.so you and 7* can grasp and explain what you mean when you don’t really need to.
“The difference is meditation and hei gung. Cultivating the chi is what makes u internal!”
is a fine example so how does this fit in to boxers are pretty internal fights?

anybody?jon?anybody?7*?anybody?f.t?anybody?

LOL

Sui -
Coiling is very simple, the un-coiling is what takes too many too much time. And the re-coiling is the most misunderstood.

The other half is the half most forgotten.

7*
Ali’s famous knockout (was it the second fight against Liston?) with the “invisible” jab? Pure perfection in pugilism.

Sorry, but I’m on deadline guys, I can’t really stay and “play” today, see you next week.

I think the following is a succint contrast of Internal and external mechanics. so, if the boxer does it, then he is using internal mechanics. If he is not, then he is not.

http://forum.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=33010

IMA the waist leads the hips for total body connection. Take any basic hand exercise and make the hips initiate movement. Later isolate the hips (don’t move them) and move only with the waist. Then make the waist move the hips to move the body.

Originally posted by WanderingMonk
[B

IMA the waist leads the hips for total body connection. Take any basic hand exercise and make the hips initiate movement. Later isolate the hips (don’t move them) and move only with the waist. Then make the waist move the hips to move the body. [/B]

The waist must move in coordination with the whole body, not separate from it. You see guys swinging there waists around in a see-saw type action, pointing there dan tien around, but that’s not internal. That’s actually the opposite of what you want, you want whole body connection. And then beyond that…connection all the way through to the ground.

You can get “internal” in EMA’s to some degree. But usually you are twisting up the spine (see my tetherball analogy) so that you are violating the 6 harmonies. Instead of twisting you should see smooth unbroken movement. There is twining yes, but not twisting. Twisting is twining that is taken to far as to misalign and therefore create tension.

If you are doing the motion correctly it should feel like you are doing nothing, because there is very little muscular tension. Like you are a big gummy bear…:smiley:

I’m not saying I’m at a high level with this yet…but I am starting to realize what is “internal” and what is “not internal.” In other words, I’m starting to realize what is the path and what is not the path…I still have to walk it.

western boxers are internal in punching.Take any CMA and put 16oz gloves on them and you work the focus mits. No power.Do the same with a 6 month amateur boxer,you’ll feel the difference.You have to hit internally to KO with gloves.

phoenixdog

I disagree. All you need a punch strong enough to snap the persons head back, so that the brain hits the skull hard enough and its lights out. Being hit internally doesn’t even feel like a regular hit and is usually very subtle.

Take care,
Buby

I can hit a persons head with a 2X4 and make the same thing happen..My point was that western boxers learn internal hitting right off the bat. NPI.

phoenixdog

And my point is that they don’t hit internaly. Its an external strike. You used the example that they can knock people out with gloves on and I’m saying that just cause you knock someone out with gloves doesn’t make it an internal hit.

Also, what do you consider as internal hit?

Buby

Re: phoenixdog

Originally posted by Buby
[B]And my point is that they don’t hit internaly. Its an external strike. You used the example that they can knock people out with gloves on and I’m saying that just cause you knock someone out with gloves doesn’t make it an internal hit.

Also, what do you consider as internal hit?

Buby [/B]

IMHO, boxing is pretty **** external. It’s about as external as you can get. That’s why they do so much external conditioning, ie running, lifting, pushups, bagwork, etc.

The technique of some boxers like Muhammed Ali might have ventured into the external side of kung fu because they were more relaxed in there striking. But none of them approached the “internalness” of what we classically think of as Internal Martial Arts.

Re: Re: phoenixdog

Originally posted by Ai Lek Ou Seun

The technique of some boxers like Muhammed Ali might have ventured into the external side of kung fu because they were more relaxed in there striking. But none of them approached the “internalness” of what we classically think of as Internal Martial Arts.

They ventured into the external side of boxing, not kung fu. that relaxation is not unique to cma. you are saying that none of them approach the “internalness” of cma, however other members of these forums on various threads (who do study internal styles) disagree with you. So, what exactly is this “internalness” and why can you all not agree on what it is or isn’t?

Re: Re: Re: phoenixdog

Originally posted by SevenStar
They ventured into the external side of boxing, not kung fu. that relaxation is not unique to cma. you are saying that none of them approach the “internalness” of cma, however other members of these forums on various threads (who do study internal styles) disagree with you. So, what exactly is this “internalness” and why can you all not agree on what it is or isn’t?

I explained it under my other handle Tigrentera.

Internal=making your body like a big “variable outer tension” gummy bear.

In order to strike internally you have to “bounce” your energy off the ground. Other wise it is still external. Structure is part of it but it still doesn’t make it internal.

People can’t agree on what internal is because there are people on this board of varying skill level.

Chen Xiaowang compared learning IMA’s to walking up a spiral staircase. Depending on how far up you are in the spiral you are going to see things slightly differently. I’m not gonna say that those people aren’t partially correct, its just that they don’t see the bigger picture.

I don’t know about other people but my lineage is about as good as you can get. My teacher’s teacher Feng Zhiqiang learned directly from Chen Fake in Chen Taiji. He learned Xing Yi and Tong Bei and Shaolin before that it.

I have touched hands with Master Feng as well as my own teacher and I can tell you that there is a HUGE difference in body use.

If you don’t believe it then seek out someone quaified in my Taiji lineage and feel the difference. It is immediately obvious.

What does an internal punch feel like? I have seen many boxing matches where a boxer dies from a punch to the head. A boxer is still punching like a martial artist and boxing is also classed as a martial art in my books, Just no legs!

People get there ribs broken off a body rip punch also, thats pretty good punching skill to break the ribs using gloves.

Anyway what is an internal punch/strike?

FT

I think what you guys fail to realize is that saying a punch is internal doesn’t necessarily = more powerful.

It simply means that is executed using a different way of moving.

The reason is that if you punch externally is sets your momentum up to be used against you.

If you punch internally then everything remains balanced and your momentum is negligible.

The simple truth is that if you understand internal, then you can make any movement internal.

If you don’t even understand this, then you are not qualified to say anything is internal or external simply based on outward appearance.