[QUOTE=KTS;971023]i am studying in a parallel field basically. check out hunyuan taiji and hunyuan qigong. excellent system IMO.[/QUOTE]
Thanks, I will have a look.. what field are you studying? I googled Hunyuan and found the British Hunyuan Association, they list their syllabus as
- HUNYUAN NEIGONG - Qi-Gong
- Traditional Chen-style Taiji First Routine - 76 Form (LAOJIA)
- Traditional Chen-style Taiji Second Routine (PAOCHUI)
- HUYUAN TAIJI 24 Form
- HUNYUAN TAIJI 36 Broad Sword
- HUNYUAN TAIJI 48 Sword
- Taiji 32 Elbow
- Chen-style Push hands
I was looking for something perhaps a bit more simple, maybe you can tell me more?
[QUOTE=mawali;971061]You will find that you will have to break down the movements into much smaller components to seek your goals. Since the objective is building gong, you will have to simplify more than you realize because too many perceived difficult patterns will cause the individuals to lose interest.[/QUOTE]
Hmm, I dont want people to lose interest, but dont want to simplify too much as it still should be recognisable as Tai Chi..
[QUOTE=Xiao3 Meng4;971074]I agree that too much complexity will limit the number of interested students. Why not offer something like the 8 pieces of brocade first, Simplified Yang 24 next, and then whatever you want your “advanced” training to be after that?[/QUOTE]
8 pieces of brocade is a Qigong set right? I know it is only a few movements.. it is something I should consider I think but I am interested in Tai Chi more than qigong for reasons GLW states below:
[QUOTE=GLW;971099]A lot depends on the type of disorders that are predominant in your target population.
For example, due to the “stillness” and inward looking aspect, I would tend to avoid teaching any form of still Qi Gong to a group of psychotic or schizophrenic patients. Not a good mix - telling a group that often has delusions or may hear voices to quiet the mind…
Moving Qi Gong (not combined still/moving where you assume a posture and hold it) would be the closest I would get to that - and then I would suggest very close monitoring of the patients.
As for Taijiquan - keeping it short and simple would be best - teaching something that can be learned in a short time but that also can be a building block for other things. This points to using the newer standardized routines. There is the 8 Posture and then the 16 Posture routine that then lead to learning the standardized 24 Posture set. Each builds on the previous set and is short enough to teach to a varied group.
I would advise against pursuing the mental aspects of Taijiquan at first unless the assigned therapist (psychiatrist, psychologist, social-work therapist, etc…) is working in that direction.
Now, if your population is more in line with mental retardation, again, the 8, 16, and 24 are good.
For a population of folks in for drug abuse - just about anything is good… they are substance abusers and have a different set of issues totally unlike psychosis and schizophrenia.
For those suffering from things like adolescent or adult adjustment reaction, again, pretty much any practice is good.
For depression, movement - and avoiding the quieting of the mind at first is a better approach. It is also good to know if their depression is chemically based or (physiological) or not. With a person being put on anti-depressants - holding off a little until their chemistry is stable…and then teaching them like a normal student would seem a better approach.[/QUOTE]
I remember hearing warnings about teaching Qigong to people with Psychosis before so I am glad to have had you mention this. This is part of the reason why I wanted to teach something very physical, almost ‘external’ or at least something which has detail in terms of structure and body positioning but doesnt focus on mind states or qi too much.
I have a better idea now about what I might be looking into in more detail.