best of blogs - 8 lies republicans want you to believe

[QUOTE=sanjuro_ronin;1062775]I don’t have that many issues with Harper, he’s a conservative and does what conservatives do.
Granted that outside of the GST reduction I don’t recall anything else he has done, but hey, at least he did that after promising to do that, which is far more than the Liberals did when they kept saying they would.
I would enjoy having a liberal worth voting for.[/QUOTE]

I don’t regard Harper as a conservative. He’s not. He’s a reformist or a neo-con at best. He is not fiscally responsible and has a finance minister who just sold us a 50 biullion dollar deficit. That’s hardly what I would deem “conservative”.

Harper’s strength is in policy implementation of law and order.

this is why he gives a billion dollars to police forces so that he can hold a meeting downtown in a major city that never votes for him and he did that in spite for spite and to spite that city in which he was born and in which he cannot get an elected seat in. He’s a petty man in that sense.

His reduction of the GST has been offset by his push to re-implement the more costly hst in provinces that are willing to jump that train. Ontario (the most populated) and BC (the most populated western province.

His record on the afghan war is fairly dismal and he doesn’t seem to have vision or direction there and is content to let NATO and generals run the show and just report to him as opposed to understanding that Canadians do not like participating in such vague and seemingly meaningless military adventures halfway round the world with little justification remaining to actually even be there anymore.

he has a minority gov in parliament and the only reason for that is that he is the devil we know. That’s what it comes down to. People don’t trust Iggy because despite his intelligence and ability, he is regarded as an outsider and in reality, he really is. He was the worst idea the liberals could have forwarded yet! Had he actually been elected party leader, instead of appointed, that would have way more clout with voters and particularly Liberals themselves.

Then there is the BLOC which exists only in Quebec and was created by ex liberal party members actually (who are now once again liberals) in an effort to maintain Canada as a federation by giving Quebec special recognition and powers over it’s own governance so they would stop trying to separate all the time. That’s why the BLOC is there.

Then we have the NDP, hey 1bad, you wanna see real socialists in a western liberal democracy, these are your guys, specifically Jack Layton. When we have Layton up here and we are familiar with him, we all collectively think that people who call Obama a socialist are dumb or something or don’t know wtf they are talking about because Obama ain’t no socialist by any measure if you want to compare what a socialist agenda looks like under the NDP vs Obama’s white house admin and their policies.

Obama is practically a fascist capitalist by comparison. seriously, stop making yourselves look silly on this point.

anyway…</rant> :stuck_out_tongue:

social and political activism is needed for a healthy society in my opinion and we don’t have enough of it. We have too much complacency and fat assedness going on. That’s the real problem. We just let them.

[QUOTE=BJJ-Blue;1062485]So the CBO, Forbes, and the Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees are all just wrong. :rolleyes:

From my link:

"The CBO now projects that Social Security’s costs will exceed tax income in 2010 (next year!) and 2011, with cash surpluses returning over the 2012-2015 period and becoming negative again beginning in 2016 and later.[/QUOTE]

I addressed that in my post, in which I linked to the most recent SSA Trustees report.

[QUOTE=BJJ-Blue;1062485]Last year, outlays for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid combined accounted for about 9 percent of GDP. Outstripping the growth of GDP, spending for those programs is expected to rise rapidly over the next 10 years, totaling nearly 12 percent of GDP by 2019. Under long term projections recently published by CBO, such spending would continue to rise under current laws and policies and could total 17 percent of GDP by 2035.

“If outlays for those programs reached that level, federal spending would be well above its historical percentage of GDP. Unless revenues were increased correspondingly, annual deficits would climb and federal debt would grow significantly, posing a threat to the economy. Alternatively, if taxes were raised to finance the rising spending, tax rates would have to reach levels never seen in the United States. Some combination of significant changes in benefit programs and other spending and tax policies will be necessary in order to attain long-term fiscal balance.”[/QUOTE]

You’ll note my post only addressed Social Security. Meanwhile your post lumps Social Security in with Medicare and Medicaid. The later two problems do have large financial issues. Social Security has amassed a huge surplus in anticipation of the Baby Boomers’ retirement…which was the general idea when Ronald Reagan jacked up the payroll tax. Here’s an idea; look through the report to which I linked and find either the word “broke” or “insolvent.” Better yet, read through it instead of having other peopld tell you what it says.

[QUOTE=David Jamieson;1062762]We can think and muse all we like, but what we as the people on the ground can do is write our MP’s our MPP’s and give them our concerns.

waving signs is retarded as is shouting or egging politicians.

It has to be dealt with using the system mechanisms that are available and those are all about developing a relationship with the elected official in your riding.

That’s how I do it and I would suggest that if you want to affect change on even a small level then you should do same if you are concerned.

words mean nothing when not combined with action. Fwiw, there is no grope fest going on in Canuck airports and we are not into the whole maniacal security and fear that is currently seeming to infest the USA.

The US people’s political culture is much more polarized than Canadians at this point in my opinion.[/QUOTE]

mos def, the US is more polarized… no doubt about that… i wouldnt call it an opinion, its pretty obvious, seem more like a fact to me…

what makes you think i dont know my reps and get involved personally???

i think a big diff between me and you is that i dont believe in our system, i dont believe it does work, and i dont believe it will ever work… i have no faith in candian politics whatsoever… but that does not in any way mean that i dont get involved… its what we have, im stuck with it as are you, so we work with what we have… doesnt mean i have to like it tho…

[QUOTE=David Jamieson;1062783]His reduction of the GST has been offset by his push to re-implement the more costly hst in provinces that are willing to jump that train. Ontario (the most populated) and BC (the most populated western province.
[/QUOTE]

hst is done in BC… you just wait and see… vanderzalm has already started the process of recalling liberals… politics in BC is deep right now…

cambell anounced a 15% tax cut while he had an approval rating of less than 15% then when it was clear he was done for, he stepped down and took back his promiss for the tax break… why is he so unpopular? because during the race he said he wouldnt bring hst to bc then two months after election he announced that they were gonna bring in the hst…

so BC went nutts… very angry… petitions were signed like crazy, recalls have started, a referendum has been called(for next year if you please:rolleyes:) and the people will recall the hst…

personally, i didnt want hst, but we spent so much money making it happen, we took a federal grant which we have to give back if we reverse this… so we are out twice on the cost of hst implementation(and de-implementation if thats a word) and then the cost to put pst and gst back… seems like a waste to me… the damage is done maybe we should just keep the **** thing… im still thinking bout that one…

but make no mistake, hst killed the libs in BC…

[QUOTE=David Jamieson;1062783]Then there is the BLOC which exists only in Quebec and was created by ex liberal party members actually (who are now once again liberals) in an effort to maintain Canada as a federation by giving Quebec special recognition and powers over it’s own governance so they would stop trying to separate all the time. That’s why the BLOC is there.
[/QUOTE]

they should seperate… if they feel they are that special and deserve so much distinction… fine, be a frog, not a canadian… i love that idea… better yet… im a western seperatist to the core… drop everything east of sask… lance the festering boil of the east and end the leaching… my life would be alot better if we did… same with everyone else this side of the country… taking on sask would be like charity… but they grow stuff and would be useful… yall can keep the name canada, its been spoiled anyways…