I’ll have to find the video. I’m pretty sure it was Burton Richardson that was demonstrating knife defense and sparring with his students. From what I remember, he gradually made it more dangerous and they gradually were more and more careful. Then he gave them those shock knives and they didn’t do much after that. The threat was imminent.
edit: found it.
[quote=jimbo;1235750]very true.
A lot of maists seriously underestimate knives. Even someone who is untrained but fully committed to using one is extremely dangerous, and generally not so easily disarmed as so many people seem to think.[/quote]
$5!!!
[QUOTE=Kymus;1235752]I’ll have to find the video. I’m pretty sure it was Burton Richardson that was demonstrating knife defense and sparring with his students. From what I remember, he gradually made it more dangerous and they gradually were more and more careful. Then he gave them those shock knives and they didn’t do much after that. The threat was imminent.[/QUOTE]
You too - $5, this shiite ain’t free:mad:
[QUOTE=MightyB;1235755]You too - $5, this shiite ain’t free:mad:[/QUOTE]
Do I get a belt and a certificate of authenticity?
[QUOTE=Kymus;1235757]Do I get a belt and a certificate of authenticity?[/QUOTE]
No certificate but…
All graduates are required to grow a mustache, sport a mullet and wear cut off jean shorts. That is the dress code of a true warrior.
Dan Inosanto with a knife will pretty much kill anyone any way he wants, and there is nothing anyone can do about it, period
That being said, most people with knives are not Dan Inosanto
“grappling” is still the best defense against a knife (STAB, “red zone”, die less often, etc etc etc)
People selling “anit BJJ” are your worst enemy, RUN AWAY, NOW
In TCMA, you have to learn the offense before you can learn the defense. The interest thing is, if you spend the 1st hour to teach offense, and spend the 2nd hour to teach defense, your students may ask you what will happen if they use what you taught them in the 2nd hour to against what you taught them in the 1st hour? What your answer will be?
Everything have counters. Only ability and experience can decide one way or another. Both require a lot of partner training time and partner testing.
[QUOTE=MightyB;1235735]I also did just give a $5 dollar one image seminar on effective anti grappling. [/QUOTE]
I’ll give this “image seminar” for only $4.95.
http://imageshack.us/a/img21/1913/spikesring.jpg
No wrestling style can deal with this either.
http://imageshack.us/a/img88/1787/guandao.jpg
I truly don’t know whether it’s fair to discuss MA this “general”.
[QUOTE=YouKnowWho;1235812]In TCMA, you have to learn the offense before you can learn the defense. The interest thing is, if you spend the 1st hour to teach offense, and spend the 2nd hour to teach defense, your students may ask you what will happen if they use what you taught them in the 2nd hour to against what you taught them in the 1st hour? What your answer will be?[/QUOTE]
3rd hour: offense vs defense
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-CelP5XVtg
Mmmmmmmmmm yes…
[QUOTE=Blacktiger;1235951]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-CelP5XVtg
Mmmmmmmmmm yes…[/QUOTE]
This is the general problem. The strikers think they have all the answer to against grapplers. The grapplers also think they have all the answer to against strikers. Only until you have cross trained both. You start to look at everything from both directions.
We sing from the same hymn book…
[QUOTE=Blacktiger;1235951]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-CelP5XVtg
Mmmmmmmmmm yes…[/QUOTE]
Teach wrestling to counter wrestling. Nothing wrong with that (guy in white gi pants was smooth and definitely is a grappler)- This would be a good seminar for non-grapplers to attend.
On a side note, somebody needs to pay up their $5 to me so I can pay YKW the moniez I owe him!
[QUOTE=MightyB;1235982]Teach wrestling to counter wrestling. Nothing wrong with that (guy in white gi pants was smooth and definitely is a grappler)- This would be a good seminar for non-grapplers to attend.
[/QUOTE]
I am guessing you never wrestled, because that stuff was wack
[QUOTE=lkfmdc;1235983]I am guessing you never wrestled, because that stuff was wack[/QUOTE]
What’s wrong with 1:07 or 1:16 - I doubt anyone posting here can shoot for a double that smoothly.
Duck walk, sprawl, pummeling etc. All from the guy with the white gi pants.
I didn’t like the guy in the red shirt though.
Things wrong with that video
1, sprawl with no forward pressure
sprawl while trying to keep hand on back of neck and grab wrist! :rolleyes:
pummeling with elbows up
posture in pummeling
guy you love so much does a double, doesn’t use momentum, tries to PICK UP THE LEGS… meaning he doesn’t understand how the takedown really works
Showing leg takedowns with wrong hand placement, wrong head position etc
I could go on
This is the problem, people can go on youtbue and “fake it” to most people, but once you have studied real wrestling you learn how aweful most of the stuff on youtube really is
[QUOTE=lkfmdc;1235988]
5. guy you love so much does a double, doesn’t use momentum, tries to PICK UP THE LEGS… meaning he doesn’t understand how the takedown really works
[/QUOTE]
We may see things differently. For example, old school BJJ - Baiana. IS a pick up.
What kind of hipster douche trains in a beanie?
[QUOTE=MightyB;1235994]We may see things differently. For example, old school BJJ - Baiana. IS a pick up.[/QUOTE]
and
have you ever wrestled? or studied it with a wrestler?
and in the second example, his posture is totally wrong, if the other guy had any defense he’d be fucked, and the “pass” is wrong
smh
[QUOTE=MasterKiller;1235996]What kind of hipster douche trains in a beanie?[/QUOTE]
the same sort of douche that learns wrestling off youtube and then teaches a seminar