Wingchun structure

Terence:

I believe that training the static structure in Sil lim Tao is important because the sense of rootedness will indeed come into play often enough when absorbing or redirecting the force of your opponent’s blows - even if only for a brief moment during the course of what otherwise would be much movement.

And of course the stable rooted Sil Lim Tao stance provides a good base from which to develop a strong tan, bong, garn, pak, gum, etc.

The point is, though, only a small amount of one’s training time should be spent on Sil Lim tao (and the rest of the forms for that matter)…and the vast majority of one’s time spent on more spontaneous drills/sparring/fighting, etc.

Wing Chun Structure

The guy was sad because he spent 5 years in Wing Chun, and wasn’t shure about the structure of his Yee Gee Kim Yeung Ma? Don’t be sad because some people spend their life doing what they call Wing Chun, and will never understand that… (structure)

Wing Chun is all about structure. Skeletal structure first.

By the way, Boxing also have structure. Beside other things, that is the purpose of shadow boxing. Understanding structure as a static thing is short sightness.

The best thing to understand Wing Chun concepts, is to seek competent instruction under qualified instructors. And that is a hard task, since the time goes by and we get older and older. And to discover that most what we have learned under unqualified instruction is wrong, and we must start from scratch, is not too easy for big egos.

Anyway. Big luck for everybody.

Hee hee, hey mate. I am not sad. I am interested at the different interpretation of YJKYM and the internal dynamics of WC though.
As you can see, I have learnt a few forms of structure and some of them majorly stress alignment and structure, rooting.
From reading Kenneth Chung and his work, thanks to alan for adding to clarify, it seems like things are taken slower, but with arms, legs, body, mind connected. The yi- intention, rooting are all basics, and if its not done properly, all this footwork and drills mean nothing. This is what I understand from the literature available.
Without proper root and structure, how to fajing? How to generate the power behind chung choi? The choi is not a powerful punch without the use of the twisting of waist, like a karate punch. Changing it to include weight shift and other stuff, changes wingchun. Not that change is bad, but sometimes people change stuff because of a lack of understanding.
We do alot of drills to get the reflex/ speed action. But I am thinking, sensitivity is a higher skill.
How did Yip Man maintain his sensitivity, speed? He didnt have, and didnt want to drill with people. And how did he keep his chi sao partners unbalanced on their toes?
Maybe it was wrong to say I have learnt for 5 years or that I am still a beginner at heart, hence people think I am sad, or that I have learnt nothing. My Sifu has passed on his humility to me. The chinese say, live till old, learn till old. I embrace that thinking.
I am talking about maintaining the right body structure in YJKYM which should apply to movement and fighting. I spent alot of time in the earlier days, sparring, drills, depending on speed, strength, aggressiveness to win, sometimes adding muay thai, boxing etc…Got known for that in class. Not that I was good or anything, but when I look at Yip Man and the tales of him, read stuff on Kenneth Chung, Alan Orr, Robert Chu, Master Chu Shong tin. I realise, I could be on the wrong path, by taking the easier way out, the hard approach.
Any WSL guys out there? Alot of sparring? What do they think of structure and alignment?
Just sharing guys, I could be, and might very well be, totally wrong. Or maybe its the yiquan and internal arts I have been doing for the last year, making me whacky.
Learning it and not knowing how important it is, is what I am going through now. Slowing down my movements, back to basics, stance, and proper angles and movements
Waiting for my pay check to come in, gonna get me some Alan Orr tapes. They kick ass…:slight_smile:
Thanks for all the help.

I agree with all that you guys are saying, in fact its the way imo. The forms are counterproductive if they are the ONLY ‘thinking’ given to the student.
I feel that the guidelines of tactics/movements THINKING are paramount [like knowing the rules/guidelines of baseball, as well as how to throw a ball and swing a bat] .
The forms are the individuals training time to ISOLATE particular concepts in the VT ‘stepping stone’ system. As the students train they should ,imo, be given the whole thing in the form of simple movement exercises like boxers sparring ie I have them shadow my movments utilizing the triangulating flank angles, depending on my direction, while always being able to touch/punch my chest [as a target] .
I show actions at full speed and force in the scenarios we reach to convey the connection of weapons/tactics/thinking.. to the empty hands etc…Then I add my attempts to touch them in the head as they are touching to give guidance to correct elbow lines to intercept my move while still being able to touch/punch me. Like chisao without the static stance , going stright to the ‘what we want to freefight like’ …then going back to describe chisao as yet another stepping stone to the end…the purpose of SLT ‘thinking’ coupled with chum kil 'thinking combining to enhance the whole thing we are currently trying to do now ‘freefight’…
The common errors that become visible when doing these simple exercises are everything most fighting styles strive for only with VT ‘thinking’ added…like no timing of ground to fist,stucture or balance to maintain themselves when they make contact with me, raising arms allowing me to lever them. The list goes on, on an individual basis one can then ask a student to concentrate on a particualr aspects of the system to correct the mistakes…
Once the picture on the box of a jig saw puzzle is presented to the student ‘so to speak’
they can figure out which piece goes where after being given ALL the pieces…maybe a reason so many arent achieving their full potential and standing in a room for X years seeking enlightenment …
attached here is ashort article about the subject from P Bayer [my instructor]

Individual Improvement Strategy

Author: Philipp Bayer

“Understanding the genius of Ving Tsun should not take longer than an afternoon. By then, everything should be clear.”

“Following that, it becomes about deciding how you can achieve these goals most efficiently. This is also a part of the system.”

“Unfortunately, Ving Tsun is too perfect, such that in ones life-span, no more than approx. 70 of it can be mastered * even with great efforts! The Human Factor, as always.”

  • Philipp Bayer -

Ving Tsun can best be looked at in its entirety for an individual improvement strategy, but also as a correction system for mistakes. More modern than the quality management systems of today, the individual behavior during a fight is corrected. This is why optimally, all elements are developed simultaneously from the start and all fit together. As I said before, it is a fatal mistake to learn certain parts too late. Then the other elements would have to be developed without these important elements. In this manner, the result will be totally different and very difficult to correct, according to the motto: What Johnny doesnt learn now, John will never learn again.

The only obstacle always is the soul of Ving Tsun: not learning Chi Sau the right way, directly from master to the student… giving adequate strength with an enormous speed which contrastly generates a particular handling from the student… Ving Tsun will remain a mystery… as it is regularly read about, seen and experienced in public.

Ving Tsun cannot be classified in a such manner that you could say: now learn this or that, or once you have learned this, we can start with sparring. The forms serve to correct the errors, which constantly appear in times of stress: to bring the elbows in the correct position, train the stance, and to generate a certain behavior that is necessary to have in a fighting.

Therefore, it is very important to learn everything as a total package. It is pointless to learn a certain component, for example the ’ dummy training after 15 years, because, by then, the personal development at this stage has probably reached its end. A certain behavior has then already been established. Also, when starting from scratch it is very difficult to incorporate a new element. It is always asking for trouble to change movements which are already frequently trained, even if it only concerns relatively small changes. The total package conversely leads to the development of a feel for fighting, timing, feeling for distance, punching power, spontaneity, and perseverance * fighting skills are attained.

Afterwards the system is tested by means of sparring and the weak points become clearly visible. Common errors are, for example: the elbows point outward, Wu Sau placement is still not good, the position of the legs is worthless, the position of the hips is incorrect and because of this, mobility, balance and power are diminished. All this is corrected by the forms and Chi Sao. As soon as most errors disappeared, the pressure is intensified, as a result of which new errors become visible and can again be eliminated.

The errors are very individual - there are simply people, who can handle less stress, and in despair turn themselves away and as a result have difficulty protecting themselves. Others have the inclination after a strong counter attack to allow their opponent some space to recover and display no perseverance. Others make the situation more complicated than necessary or start an attack from the wrong distance and unnecessarily waste valuable energy.

It is therefore clear that Ving Tsun is very individual, in each area, in methods, training or fighting. Everyone is bound by his own potential, which requires its own treatment. Gradations play no role, everyone knows each others errors and still encouraged to use these to their own advantage.

Everyone who makes errors should want their trainings partner to focus on these errors * this way each one assures the quality of the other. Wong Shun Leung had superior methods to help someone progress… perhaps another time more about this.

Hey Shadow_warrior8

Good to see you are looking for the right path. Structure is the key to Wing Chun. The problem is lot so of people think that they know what real structure is, when in fact they are talking about something very different.

I have been in Wing Chun for 20 years and have never seen a full understanding of what I would now call structure until I learned the Chu Sau Lei Wing Chun System.

Thats just mine feeling on what I have seen, others may feel different and thats cool as well. I can only talk for myself.

Check me article it may help some.

http://www.alanorr.com/htdocs/articles/formarticle.html

My best

Alan

www.alanorr.com

Great article Alan, thanks for sharing. :slight_smile:
I particularly like this quote from your article " I tell all my students if you don’t understand it then if will not work for you. You must know why, when and how. Question everything! Then after questioning ‘testing’ is the most important part of correct development." I believe the same thing. Learning and practicing the forms on your own (after proper instruction in them) teaches you how to understand the system and how it effects you and your own movement. Like you said, if you don’t understand then how can you apply? Understanding it and creating the structure is just the basics though. You cannot be trapped in this phase and think that is the end of the process. Testing like you say, makes it become alive within you and allows it to be your own and teaches you how to relate to another human being applying force to you. A moderation of both is needed instead of just relying on forms solely, or fighting all the time, to improve yourself as a practitioner of WC/VT, to ulitmately become someone that can use it against all comers.

James

“Unfortunately, Ving Tsun is too perfect, such that in one’s life-span, no more than approx. 70% of it can be mastered * even with great efforts! The Human Factor, as always.”

Nice article, but whenever I see the wholesale and cold-blooded abuse of numbers in ths manner I cringe.

That statement has all the validity of “90% of all fights end up on the ground”.

The statement is also unverifiable. If no one has mastered in a lifetime, how TF would they know how much was left?

The Human Factor, as always.:stuck_out_tongue:

Philipp would laugh with you ..its 73.5 attainable not 70.8% :wink: just a way to describe perfection, a
concept …like tansao , nothing to do with the hand, just words to describe something…:smiley: