Repubs in S. Dakota Move To Legalize Killing Abortion Docs

[QUOTE=Lucas;1078740]“i blame the person for the first 10 bullets, I blame the law for the next 21 bullets” he has a good point, no one needs that many bullets in a gun for self protection. war is different.[/QUOTE]

What if they are not a good shot and need alot of bullets to hit the target(s). :wink:

Seriously though, the 2nd Amendment was not written just for self protection. It was also written to protect the people from the government. Remember, no dictatorship in history has allowed the people the right to bear arms. The Founders knew this.

lol then they deserve to lose if they cant hit the mark with 10 rounds. :stuck_out_tongue:

at this point its almost a moot point though, does anyone HONESTLY ever see the american people rising up and fighting the govt. and the military?

ill bet anything that will never happen, ever. so why even bother with the mentality that it will. we all know it wont. imo, its far too late for that, we missed that ship when it sailed many years ago

[QUOTE=Lucas;1078751]lol then they deserve to lose if they cant hit the mark with 10 rounds. :stuck_out_tongue:

at this point its almost a moot point though, does anyone HONESTLY ever see the american people rising up and fighting the govt. and the military?

ill bet anything that will never happen, ever. so why even bother with the mentality that it will. we all know it wont. imo, its far too late for that, we missed that ship when it sailed many years ago[/QUOTE]

Many rebellions include rifts in the military, statistically speaking, that will someday happen.

But, defending yourself here from a modern military with what amounts to toys, probably only if we become third world.

[QUOTE=Lucas;1078740]i saw a quote today that made sense to me, its from that guy ummm..lawrence odonnel or something like that but he said.

“i blame the person for the first 10 bullets, I blame the law for the next 21 bullets” he has a good point, no one needs that many bullets in a gun for self protection. war is different.[/QUOTE]

yeah that was about gabby and the fact that jared had extended clips… he was only taken down when he had to reload…

[QUOTE=BJJ-Blue;1078737]The Bible says it no matter what you call it. .[/QUOTE]

The Bible is the biggest socialist experiment ever. Jesus tells the rich to sell their **** and give it to the poor. Paul tells everyone that you have to work to eat. And at the very center of all this debacle is an all powerful leader who promotes the murder of children, subjagation of women, and genocide whenever his agenda his threatened.

[QUOTE=MasterKiller;1078901]The Bible is the biggest socialist experiment ever. Jesus tells the rich to sell their **** and give it to the poor. Paul tells everyone that you have to work to eat. And at the very center of all this debacle is an all powerful leader who promotes the murder of children, subjagation of women, and genocide whenever his agenda his threatened.[/QUOTE]

You make that sound like its a bad thing :wink:

Just an FYI in regards to Jesus’s views on things they HE deemed "worthy’:
The Sheep and the Goats

31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.

34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

40 “The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’

41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

45 “He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

I just believe in helping those who help themselves. It’s really that simple.

Most people in my family despise those who mooch off others. We don’t give money to bums begging on streetcorners. But we do donate stuff to Goodwill and the Salvation Army (and speaking only for myself we don’t even write it off), and some of us with extra money donate to the Austin Food Bank. But one night my brother was leaving a restaurant with his wife and kid. They had taken some ‘doggy bags’ of food with them. On the way out a homeless guy asked for food, he said he was hungry and just wanted to eat something. My brother gave him all they had. But he is the same guy that tells bums begging for money on streetcorners to ‘*** off’ when they ask him for money. Helping someone to eat is one thing, giving them money to buy alcohol and drugs is another.

But giving any able-bodied person welfare for free rent, food, clothing etc for decades and decades is madness. The way I look at it, if you can fill out all the Gov’t forms it takes to get the welfare, you are capable of writing up a resume and doing office/clerical work.

[QUOTE=BJJ-Blue;1078929]But giving any able-bodied person welfare for free rent, food, clothing etc for decades and decades is madness.[/QUOTE]

how did this thread end up being the same topic is the other thread??? one is enough…

yes its a problem, yes something needs to be done… but what you propose isnt the way to go about it… and the longer you wait to do the right thing, the harder it will be to get it done properly… the fact that the real problem has been ignored for so long and pushed aside is the reason why its so bad right now… you guys are barely holding on as it is… if you just lance the problem all you are doing is creating an environment that didnt learn any lesson and is more than vulnerable to the same problem later on…

if you walk in the snow in bare feet then come back in and get a toe removed from frostbite and then do it again and again until you have no toes you are an idiot… and when the toes are gone you move on to the feet, then the ankles and so on till it kills you… instead after the very first toe got cold you should have put on some footwear and dealt with it properly…

but you dont do that, you put on socks then run back outside then cut off another toe when disaster looms again… you never learn the real lesson and you doom yourself to a very hard life…

and you people who are all cozy way up there near center mass have no idea why your toes are so fukcing cold… all you know is that it hurts and you are willing to just cut the toe to stop feeling pain… yoou dont care about toes anyways, you live in a different world…

thats ignorance beyond ignorance… wake up… you act like every kid born in the ghetto has the same opportunities you have because some peice of paper says they do… they dont… very few do… the fact that you dont get that is just sad… pull your head out…

[QUOTE=Syn7;1078946]thats ignorance beyond ignorance… wake up… you act like every kid born in the ghetto has the same opportunities you have because some peice of paper says they do… they dont… very few do… the fact that you dont get that is just sad… pull your head out…[/QUOTE]

In many ways they do. They get a free K-12 education just like non-poor kids do, and if they bust their butts they can get full ride scholarships just as the non-poor kids can.

And in some ways they get MORE. There are scholarships and grants that only go to minorities. There are scholarships and grants that only go to kids whose parents earn BELOW a certain income. And there are programs that take the higher performing kids from inner cities and put them in better schools (Obama killed a program like that in Washington DC though).

Now I’m not saying it’s easy, I’ll admit it’s easier having money in many ways. But with some hard work for just a few years, you can set yourself up for a very good, free college education and thus a very high paying job for the rest of your life. It just takes some work.

[QUOTE=BJJ-Blue;1078958]
N. But with some hard work for just a few years, you can set yourself up for a very good, free college education and thus a very high paying job for the rest of your life. It just takes some work.[/QUOTE]

now here is the disconnect. show me a child in elementary school that truly understands this concept. your examples, i’ll bet you, will be very few. now take into account many children raised in the ghetto do not recieve the same familial involvment during their formative years to explain these things and impress a strong example through action.

there are many other factors involved beyond the argument of simply working hard. by the time these kids ‘get’ it many are in middle or high school and so much has built up it can be hard to get away from the life that is already developed through years of living it.

not saying it cant be done, examples are there that it certainly can. but its not just so simple. life is complicated

i will say the people who have made a good life for themselves that were raised in the ghetto generally have a better grasp of reality than many other ‘well to do’ people. tends to happen when you have lived on both sides of the tracks and built your life off of hard work.

[QUOTE=Lucas;1078961]i will say the people who have made a good life for themselves that were raised in the ghetto generally have a better grasp of reality than many other ‘well to do’ people. tends to happen when you have lived on both sides of the tracks and built your life off of hard work.[/QUOTE]

yeah doncha just shake your head at middle class people who think they worked harder for what they have than somebody in a lower socio-economic bracket who has less…

sure, all socio-economic classes have their bad seeds, but its not fair to stereotype whole segments of your fellow american brothers based on some examples of lazyness, criminality etc etc…

thats no different than assuming somebody who inherited a fanancial dynasty doesnyt work hard to maintain it, that their money makes money and the actual owners just live it up… sure there is lots of that… but its not fair to stereotype them all based on that…

we cant let paris hilton ruin it for all the trust fund babies! :stuck_out_tongue:

Congresswoman Revealed Abortion Ahead Of Vote To Defund Planned Parenthood

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky2gylhdXRA&feature=player_embedded

Just for the record. Planned Parenthood was created by Margaret Sanger who was a proponent of Eugenics.

Teddy Roosevelt was a huge proponent of Eugenics as well. Look it up, it’s common knowledge. So Eugenics is all about stengthening society through good breeding. Weed out undesirables and stuff like that. Then these guys go and start a womens clinic for the marginalized and call it Planned Parenthood. What do you think their ultimate agenda would be?

[QUOTE=Lucas;1078960]now here is the disconnect. show me a child in elementary school that truly understands this concept. your examples, i’ll bet you, will be very few. now take into account many children raised in the ghetto do not recieve the same familial involvment during their formative years to explain these things and impress a strong example through action. [/QUOTE]

No disconnect at all. Inner city public schools are just as accredited as public schools in well-to-do neighborhoods.

And they can’t be that bad anyway, liberals told us that integrated bussing was a great idea. That was where they shipped kids from the suburbs into ‘the hood’ for the STATED goal of “integration”. It failed horribly. Integrated bussing didn’t last long, even the liberals had to admit it was an epic failure that really only created more problems. FYI, I was bussed and I (and my parents) hated it. That was where I first discovered that liberal ‘feel good’ solutions/programs that sound good on paper usually fail when enacted. And even at that young age I noticed that only middle class kids were bussed in ‘the hood’, the rich kids were not. Of course the rich part of town was where all the liberals on the City Council were from…

And in Texas, we have laws such as the one below, that treats all schools as equal in terms of college admissions:

“The Texas legislature passed House Bill 588 in 1997 in response to the 1996 federal court ruling in Hopwood vs. the State of Texas that struck down an affirmative action admissions program at the University of Texas School of Law. The law requires each public college and university to admit automatically any student who has graduated in either of the two preceding academic years with a grade-point average in the top 10% of the student’s graduating class. After admitting all automatic qualifiers, the schools must admit other applicants based a number of academic and socioeconomic factors. According to a 2005 report by the Texas House Research Organization, the top 10% law has had the greatest impact at the state’s flagship institutions.”

Source:
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/rpt/2008-R-0116.htm

So if you are in the Top 10% of your graduating class you CANNOT BE DENIED in ANY public college or university, no matter if you graduted in the State’s richest district, or the State’s poorest. Sounds like equal opportunity to me.

[QUOTE=Lucas;1078961]i will say the people who have made a good life for themselves that were raised in the ghetto generally have a better grasp of reality than many other ‘well to do’ people. tends to happen when you have lived on both sides of the tracks and built your life off of hard work.[/QUOTE]

SO true. I’ve always said a huge problem the US is facing is the rise of the “political class”. These are people who are either born into politics or raised into it from a young age. They really do not experience ‘real life’ and when they get elected they have no clue of the needs of middle class America, yet they are in charge of enacting new laws. It’s a recipe for disaster.

[QUOTE=Syn7;1078993]yeah doncha just shake your head at middle class people who think they worked harder for what they have than somebody in a lower socio-economic bracket who has less…[/QUOTE]

Because they have worked for it. Middle class means you are not the working poor or the non-working welfare types, nor are you rich. You experience both being a ‘have’ and a ‘have not’. While the poor and the rich only experience one half of those. Middle class people are America, imo. They work for what they have, and they only want their kids to have more than them. They are the hardest working too. They don’t get Gov’t assistance, yet they are not rich so they don’t have personal accountants, tax shelters, new cars every 2 years, etc.

if all these schools are just as good as the next, then why was “bussing” such a failure???

do you really believe an inner city ghetto school, with like one token white student, is as good as the schools in the suburbs??? on average??? please… thats just rediculous…

you say you were shipped in… from where??? you were white middle class shipped into the hood??? and you hated it why??? and you felt all the academic standards were the same at all the public schools you attended???

all liberal/conservative smearing aside… do you feel you would get as good an education at the inner city school that you would have gotten at a school closer to home??? and aside from educational standards, do you feel the conditions in and around everything to do with the inner city school was just as good as its suburban counterpart???

all laws and rules aside… i dont care what its supposed to be, i care what it is… so dont quote the rules… you really feel that each has the same opportunities???

i guess the test results are just cause poor kids are lazy like their welfare food stamp loving parents huh…

BJJBLUE…

SO true. I’ve always said a huge problem the US is facing is the rise of the “political class”. These are people who are either born into politics or raised into it from a young age. They really do not experience ‘real life’ and when they get elected they have no clue of the needs of middle class America, yet they are in charge of enacting new laws. It’s a recipe for disaster.

so, i dunno, people like george bush, his brother and his father??? all raised in private schools by political parents and later went off to other states to pretend like they grew up there??? like florida and texas… george bush isnt texan in any way shape or form… hes a smug lil andover rich boy who was silver spoon fed from day one… by your logic this man should be the biggest disaster… same with his father…

but people you hate are newcommers like obama… im willing to bet you dont like ron paul much either, huh???

blue… if everyone has an equal shot, like you say… that means that somebody poor who has less than somebody middle class has not worked as hard… and thats bullsh1t… it shows you dont understand at all… you can deny that all you want but your statements speak for themselves…

if A and B have equal opportunity and A has more than B that means A worked harder than B… and, on average, thats just not true… and thats not even taking into consideration the people who want to work more but cant for one reason or another… like no jobs available or already working 18 hours a day for 8 bucks an hour…
do you work 18 hours a day blue??? would you work 18 hours a day for 8 bucks an hour blue??? if that was your only opportunity to stay afloat would you feel as if the world is fair and you had a fair shake??? while some brat drives by in mommys suv… or some guy who makes 80 bucks an hour and works 5 hours a day 4 days a week because mommy bought them an education???

are you really gonna sit there and tell me that you believe everyone is on equal footing… and dont spout off laws and ideals… we are talking about what the world is really like, not the american dream world that only exists in principle for too many people…

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]if all these schools are just as good as the next, then why was “bussing” such a failure???[/QUOTE]

Mainly two reasons:

  1. When you forcibly put groups of people together from very different demographics, you will have problems. I saw ALOT of fights over race, it was actually alot like these prison documentary shows, kids separated themselves by race and and location (the kids bussed from North Austin stuck together, the kids bussed from South Austin stick together, and the Eastside kids stuck together. One of the primary issues bussing was supposed to fix, integration, only got WORSE.

  2. Upwardly mobile familes who had worked hard to leave the bad neighborhoods were now having their kids FORCIBLY sent to schools in the very neighborhoods they had worked their butts off to get away from!

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]do you really believe an inner city ghetto school, with like one token white student, is as good as the schools in the suburbs??? on average??? please… thats just rediculous… [/QUOTE]

First off, it wasnt a “token white kid” that was bussed in. At the school I was bussed into the bussed in kids were around 30%-40% of the students IIRC. Second, I’ll admit the suburbs schools are better, but I say it’s due primarily to parent participation. We have an Eastside HS (Johnston) that is always on the verge of being closed by the State over poor performance. Everytime it looks like they are going to close it, they parents of kids who go there always protest, usually it’s all 5 of them. But when Austin considered closing higher performing schools to cut a budget gap, you had hundreds and hundreds of parents protesting. IMO, parents are the biggest factor, and like it or not, parents from the bad parts of town just do not actively participate in school issues like parents from better parts of town.

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]you say you were shipped in… from where??? you were white middle class shipped into the hood??? and you hated it why??? and you felt all the academic standards were the same at all the public schools you attended??? [/QUOTE]

I was shipped from South Austin, the Junior High I was bussed to was on the East Side of town. We also had kids bussed from North Austin as well.

I disliked it for many reasons. First, I had to wake up about an hour earlier because of the long bus ride, and I’m not a morning person. Second, I don’t like seeing the evils of racism on a daily basis, and I did over there. I never encountered near that amount of racial strife in schools that were non-bussing schools. The academic standards were the same as the ‘better’ schools, that part was actually ok. Of course the academic performance was alot worse. We actually had 2 Eastside kids who drove to school! And again, this was JUNIOR HIGH! And yes, those guys were old enough to drive, 16 in Texas. And though they only came to goof off in class, show off their cars, and hit on the 13 year old girls, they were not thrown out of school despite all this.

And as I said before, despite the stated goal of “integration”, the children of the rich, white liberals were not forcibly integrated…

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]all liberal/conservative smearing aside… do you feel you would get as good an education at the inner city school that you would have gotten at a school closer to home??? and aside from educational standards, do you feel the conditions in and around everything to do with the inner city school was just as good as its suburban counterpart???[/QUOTE]

In many ways, I admit no. But you do have to pass the same Statewide test to graduate, and the Top 10% of graduates from ALL schools were guaranteed a slot in college.

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]all laws and rules aside… i dont care what its supposed to be, i care what it is… so dont quote the rules… you really feel that each has the same opportunities???

i guess the test results are just cause poor kids are lazy like their welfare food stamp loving parents huh…[/QUOTE]

This is America, so yes, they have the exact same opportunity as anyone else. Of course some people may have to work harder to achieve it (life isn’t fair) than others. I actually admire the kids who do come from a poorer family that become very successful more than rich kids who do it. In my industry, we have ALOT of people from poor countries that come here to finish their higher education (if need be) and to work and to become American citizens. They actually start out BEHIND poor American kids because these people aren’t raised speaking English and they have to acclimate to an entirely different country. So kids born in the hood have a mucher better ‘starting position’ than these guys, yet I work with alot more engineers from poorer countries than I do with people who grew up poor in America. That says alot about American entitlement mentality.

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]so, i dunno, people like george bush, his brother and his father??? all raised in private schools by political parents and later went off to other states to pretend like they grew up there??? like florida and texas… george bush isnt texan in any way shape or form… hes a smug lil andover rich boy who was silver spoon fed from day one… by your logic this man should be the biggest disaster… same with his father…

but people you hate are newcommers like obama… im willing to bet you dont like ron paul much either, huh???[/QUOTE]

Notice I didn’t say being born into a political family was the ONLY factor.

Yes, Obama is political class to me because as a child he was interested/raised to be a politician. Look at his education, and the fact he never held a PRODUCTIVE private sector job. Sure, Bush was born to parents who were pretty well off (and remember his father risked his life for this country and almost lost it if not for a submarine rescue). But Bush went out and got business loans, did fail at times, and did succeed very well at times. So he learned lessons from this, which I say is VERY important. Look ,lets be honest here, Obama is clueless about the private sector. Absolutely clueless. He has to bring in CEO and COC types to fill him in on what to do to help businesses! And even then he is too **** arrogant to listen to them.

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]blue… if everyone has an equal shot, like you say… that means that somebody poor who has less than somebody middle class has not worked as hard… and thats bullsh1t… it shows you dont understand at all… you can deny that all you want but your statements speak for themselves… [/QUOTE]

Again, as I said in the post above, we ALL have the same opportunites. Of course I admit some will have to work harder then others because of their situations, but what’s so horrible about hard work? Is it now a bad thing?

[QUOTE=Syn7;1079369]do you work 18 hours a day blue??? would you work 18 hours a day for 8 bucks an hour blue??? if that was your only opportunity to stay afloat would you feel as if the world is fair and you had a fair shake??? while some brat drives by in mommys suv… or some guy who makes 80 bucks an hour and works 5 hours a day 4 days a week because mommy bought them an education???

are you really gonna sit there and tell me that you believe everyone is on equal footing… and dont spout off laws and ideals… we are talking about what the world is really like, not the american dream world that only exists in principle for too many people…[/QUOTE]

It’s against labor laws to work over 16 hours a day, but I have done it when I was younger. People do that to get ahead, this should not surprise you. I now make over THREE TIMES what I made when I started in this industry about 15 years ago. I did that through hard work, furthering my education, and being very flexible when others are not (like working holidays, long hours, cancelling dinner plans, etc, etc). People do this.

And yes, I know rich kids get it easier. Though I was bussed into Junior High, my last two years of High School were at a school where my parents made under the median income of other parents. My parent scraped up money to get me a '73 Bug, while other kids were driving brand new IROCs, Saleen Mustings, stepside pick-ups, and some drove fully restored classic cars. It didn’t make me bitter, it didn’t make me despise rich people. It didn’t make me a socialist. It made me tell myself I would bust my butt to be able to buy those things FOR MYSELF. That’s why I say we all have the same opportunities. My father only wanted me and my brother to have more than he did, it’s part of the American dream. And he did. I have some nice toys at my age my father couldn’t affod to buy when he was my age. So when I see myslef achieve more than my parents, I know others can even if they start out ‘behind’ me. There really is no excuse for a kid who is able-bodied, and with enough intelligence to graduate HS (which isn’t alot btw) to fail in this country.